Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15 14 17
Priya
14 15 17
Vighnesh Hari
13 13 18
Divyank Shekhar
Gajji Mohan Kumar 14 14 16
12 14 16
Anmol Jain
12 13 17
Isha Baheti
Shweta Iyer 13 13 16
Ashutosh Singh 13 12 16
Aadarsh Basotia 13 12 16
Ayushman Trivedi 13 12 15
11 13 16
Shabeeb
11 13 16
Rushali Shome
Mansi Mittal 12 12 16
Satyapriya Khanna 13 12 15
Abhinav Pokhriyal 15 10 14
12 13 14
Navya Sodhani
Yash Jha 12 13 14
B Atheeth 13 10 15
Ayush Chaubey 13 10 15
Yukta Mishra 13 12 13
Akhil B Anil 12 11 15
Yash Pimpalkar 12 10 16
Aparna Singhal 12 10 16
Prashant Saxena 12 12 14
Sounak Deb 12 10 15
Vikas Poman 12 11 14
13 14 10
Nihar Dighe
Luv Kapruwan 10 12 15
Gautam Vishnu M. 12 11 14
Sonal Singh 13 9 15
Utsav Daga 12 11 14
11 11 14
Durga Bagri
10 12 14
Sucheta Rout
Mohit Manwani 10 11 15
Nitin Chaudhary 12 10 14
12 11 13
Krushal Patel
11 12 12
Dhruv Goyal
9 12 14
D. Vamsi Krishna
10 12 13
Pratishtha Banerjee
11 14 10
Amritanshu Swaroop
Sarthak Ranasaria 12 11 12
Sankalp Tandon 10 10 14
Adarsh Srivastava 11 10 13
Tanika Yetre 10 10 14
Surabhi Bajaj 11 10 13
Rithwik Nediyedath 11 10 13
ROHIL HAZRA 12 7 15
Kapil Arora 12 10 12
10 5 18
Ashok Jangir
11 9 13
Bharat Maniam
Kodela Nikhil 12 10 11
11 9 13
Harshad Mohod
Vaibhav Mehta 10 9 14
Riya Choudhary 11 10 12
Tanishq Kansal 11 10 12
Shreya Bansal 11 11 11
Afreen Fatima 10 10 12
Yash Jha 10 10 12
9 13 10
ANSHUL AGRAWAL
10 11 11
Souvik Roy
Prerna Bansal 11 9 12
Krishna Priya Gandikota 10 9 12
Suneethi Venkat 10 11 10
11 9 11
G Vijitha Rani
9 10 12
Mayur Gupta
10 11 10
Kanika Sharma
Yukta Mishra 10 10 11
Yogesh Yadav 11 9 11
Nikhil Bansal 10 9 12
Apurv Shekhar Jha 11 7 13
Kunal Mahajan 10 6 15
Monika Singh 12 8 11
Unnati Tanwar 11 9 11
Kuldeep Singh 11 10 10
10 10 11
Nikita Kishan Kumar Das
Apoorva Patni 10 10 10
Mahima Das 10 10 10
12 10 8
Rashika Raina
10 11 9
Vedika Agrawal
Harsh Bafna 10 10 10
10 9 11
Ajitesh
DEBJEET BASAK 8 9 12
9 10 10
Chayanika Das
11 10 8
Azhar Hassan
10 10 9
Sushmita Chitranshi
10 10 9
Pritika Arora
Nehal Patankar 9 10 10
Shubhankar Tomar 11 9 9
Ananya Aggarwal 8 8 12
Muskan Garg 8 8 12
9 9 10
Chetan Sharma
HIMANSHU MITTAL 9 9 10
10 10 8
Muskan Garg
10 10 8
Sanyam Garg
9 9 10
Subhapriya N
Shashwat Singhai 10 9 9
Vishal Vinayak 8 10 10
Ashwini Palan 9 8 10
Ayan Chakravarty 9 9 9
Shalini Pathak 9 9 9
8 9 10
Amrita Mandal
10 8 9
Dhruba Bora
9 10 8
Rahul Nain
9 10 8
9 7 11
Varnika Goel
Rahul Sajja 10 7 10
Gokul Balakrishnan 8 8 10
Abhinav Jain 8 8 10
KARTIKEY JAIN 8 8 10
10 7 9
8 7 11
Rohit Yadav
8 10 8
9 9 8
9 6 11
Akanksha Kudalkar
9 8 9
Aravindh Prabhakaran
8 9 9
Aditya Anandkar
Lokesh Roongta 8 8 10
Himanshi Dua 8 8 10
9 8 9
Asmi Khandelwal
Shivangi Tiwari 9 8 9
Lokesh Roongta 8 8 9
Shubham Mahajan 10 7 8
9 7 9
Sheena Mattu
9 8 8
POULAMI DWIBEDI
9 8 8
Kritika Bhatnagar
8 9 8
Saumya Chaturvedi
8 8 9
Nannaparaju Naishadh
8 9 8
8 9 8
Nikhil Raj
9 8 8
SWARANJALI AGRAWAL
8 7 10
Mrinal Mukherjee
Ayan Sachdeva 9 8 8
Apurva Jain 9 7 9
Pranshu Sinha 8 7 10
Shivang Dahake 7 8 10
Enakshi Mondal 9 7 9
Gaurav Jindal 9 8 8
8 5 11
Aditi Bhatt
Surbhit Rungta 7 7 10
Tanya Mittal 8 7 9
Tanmay Gera 8 7 9
Tanay Madhukar Borkar 8 7 9
Rajashree Mahanty 8 8 8
8 6 10
RAMM BAHETI
9 6 9
Sindhu Vanaparthi
9 6 9
Bhavya Nagpal
8 8 8
Spandan Chaturvedi
8 8 8
7 8 9
Rohit Joshi
9 7 8
vikhyath v
Eeshan Malhotra 7 8 9
Yatin Kumar Singh 6 8 10
SOUVIK SINGHA 9 6 9
Abhishek Kumar 8 8 8
Parth Chawla 8 8 8
Panchal Akshay R 8 7 9
Vibhav Sharma 8 8 8
Akanksha Jhandai 7 7 9
Rishabh Saxena 8 6 9
CHANDAN KUMAR JHA 10 6 7
8 7 8
Akanksha
8 7 8
Meghna Choudhary
8 8 7
Nakul Suresh
7 8 8
Prateek Batham
8 7 8
Ashutosh Raj
Pankaj Kumar 7 9 7
Shreyash Sinha 7 7 8
7 6 9
Sakshi
7 8 7
Akshay Bhardwaj
7 7 8
Ashwini Singh
8 8 6
Himanshu Parihar
8 7 7
Abhishek Acharjee
8 8 6
Shubham Kumar
7 8 7
Diya Dhanik
7 8 7
Rupali Chandra
8 6 8
Aayush Seth
8 7 7
Laboni Dutta
8 7 7
Avirag Verma
4 7 11
Siddhi Kansal
sumeet chaurasia 8 6 8
DHRUMIL 8 6 8
Gursimran Singh 7 6 8
Rithvik Saxena 7 7 7
7 7 7
SPARSH JUNEJA
7 7 7
Ashi Agarwal
7 7 7
Mitul Mehrotra
7 7 7
7 7 7
Aditya Karmakar
7 7 7
Heena Sethi
7 7 7
Mandge Abhishek
7 7 7
Aishwarya Badgujar
7 7 7
Rashika Khandelwal
7 7 7
om prakash
8 7 6
Ashish Kumar Gouda
7 7 7
Aakriti Ubriani
7 7 7
7 7 7
Ishan Mohan
9 5 7
Lokesh Jat
7 7 7
8 5 8
Avinash Somisetty
7 7 7
Pochampally Vinod Rahul
5 7 8
Parth Parswal
7 7 6
Bhalamurali D
7 7 6
Chirag Batra
7 7 6
KANUPRIYA CHOWDHARY
9 6 5
Suyash Gupta
7 6 7
Indu Yadav
7 6 7
7 6 7
Abhishek Yadav
6 7 7
Smrithi Viswanathan
6 7 7
6 6 8
Krishna Prasad N
6 6 8
Sanaatan Misra
5 7 8
Steify Mann
5 7 8
Ankita Sethi
8 6 6
Raghav
Sandeep Singh 7 6 7
6 5 8
Puneet Maheshwari
6 6 7
Bijay Das
6 6 7
Ashwin Kuruvilla
6 7 6
7 6 6
Manan Sharma
Mayank Agarwal 6 6 6
Sounak Chakrabarty 5 5 8
6 6 6
Vineeth N Kowshik
6 6 6
Ankita Patil
6 6 6
Venkatesh Kariappa
5 6 7
Shubham Patidar
ameya bapat 5 5 7
5 5 7
Navneet Gupta
6 5 5
Asmita Das
Nishant Soni 7 4 5
Vimesh Prajapati 5 5 6
6 5 4
Ila Shyantani das
Prerna Pandey 5 5 5
5 4 5
Ashish Pandey
5 4 5
Omkar Kumbhar
4 4 5
Faozia Quraishi
Faozia Quraishi 3 3 4
Namit Gadge 0 0 0
Vibhuti 0 0 0
Total
46
46
44
44
42
42
42
41
41
40
40
40
40
40
39
39
39
38
38
38
38
38
38
38
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
36
36
36
36
36
35
35
35
35
35
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
33
32
32
32
32
32
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
31
30
30
30
30
30
30
29
29
29
29
29
29
29
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
28
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
19
19
19
19
19
19
18
18
18
18
18
18
17
17
16
16
16
15
15
14
14
13
10
0
0
Excellent work on deal analysis including points like haircur on debt and reduction in delivery times for Jiomart. Barriers were
1. Brilliant aesthetics and presentation of information. The research is evident and hence appreciated
2. Could have used breadcrumbs to show a flow
3. Special appreciation for slide 4 (Synergy: Value creation and complimentary capabilities)
4. Good use of financial information
1. Good presentation, it's aesthetically pleasant. Kudos!
2. Well researched, you could have added the IB banks involved in the deal. Also, usage of breadcrumbs would have been app
Very professional PPT. Kudos on touching upon margin and eps accretion. Great job!
1. Appreciate the use of breadcrumbs
2. Your ppt is text heavy, however the content is good.
3. Some parts are copied but good effort, aesthetic ppt
An ideal presentation
Just one thing - you could mention the name of the investment banks handling the deal
Great job! Few formatting errors (27513 CR what? INR USD) that’s all. Also don’t increase the font size of the text you want to
1. Very good work 2. The structure is good, do keep in mind the colours you choose, they are too flashy and impacts the reada
Good job on the PPT. Catchy color scheme and good in depth content.
Submission was to be made in ppt and not pdf. Yur submission could have been rejected if it were a corporate competition.Go
1. It was clearly mentioned that the submission should be a ppt. Follow the instructions
2. Appreciate the use of breadcrumbs
3. Your ppt is text heavy however the content is good.
4. Good effort
1. The presentation looks really good aesthetically, good job with the infographics and breadcrums are appreciated
2. Should always write the full name of the club on the first page
3. Appreciate the "Effect" slide
4. The font is uneven throughout the presentation - shouldn't happen. The style should be the same and the size same atleast
5. The charts on slide 6 and 7 have overlapping objects
6. Should write FY21E and not FY21e (industry standards)
7. Should have included your own opinion of the deal
Good effort! Aesthetics are very pleasing. Can improve content on first slide: Deal overview. Can go into more in depth analys
Good work on deal analysis part. The timeline could have been extended further till July abd what are the supreme court orde
Submission was to be made in ppt and not pdf. Yur submission could have been rejected if it were a corporate competition. G
Good work on the deal analysis part and synergies. Didn’t understood the significance of ARPU of Jio in relation with Rel-Netm
1. Good work 2. Work on formatting graphs, use smartart to convery text heavy information 3. Barriers can be potential barrie
1. Decent effort, good structure and content 2. Improve on aesthetics and formatting, some slides are text heavy
Good attempt, You have touched upon a lot of good points, strategic divestment, GMV, deep discounting, etc. aesthetics can b
Good attempt at the exercise. A few pointers: some slides look extremely haywire like the synergies and the barriers, try to str
Could have discussed a bit about ubereats failure in indian markets which might have led to that cheap valuations. Good point
Didn't understand the chart on page 1 very well with the data labels.Apart from that good work. Make sure that logos don't cu
1. Good use of infographics, the ppt is aesthetic
2. Avoid typos, in slide 5 instead of 'data', date was mentioned.
3. Good effort, try to give your opinion on the deal analysis
1. Good work on the analysis and visual representations 2. Submission format was clearly mentioned to be PPT
Multiple Submissions (-1) 1. Good effort, content was well covered 2. Synergies should show how the combined entity is bette
Good attempt. Could improve aestheics. Charts are snipped, a little text heavy in some slides
Decent job. Could use more inforgaphics, and more detailed slides in the end. Slides 4,5 are very bland.
1. Its Capital - The Finance and Investment Club, not the other way round
2. Could have used breadcrubms and better alignment for the infographics
3. Looks good aesthetically otherwise, and appreciate making the charts and not using a snip
4. The text has uneven spacing - should not happen
1. It was clearly mentioned that the submission should be a ppt. Follow the instructions
2. Avoid typos, there should be space between investment and club in the first slide
3. When you talk about deal analysis, you should talk about the valuation and how much premium was paid as well and justify
4. Try covering all the mentioned pointers, for instance, I couldn't find future roadmap
5. Presentation skills were decent, try using more graphs and charts instead of text
6. When you mention debt, try to find out the source, for instance Wipro raised bonds and see how that will impact the existin
1. Appreciate the aesthetics and the colour scheme difference for both the companies
2. Should use breadcrumbs
3. Good focus on the current status of the deal, but no absolute financial data in the presentation. Could have looked into EPS
4. Should include your own opinion on the deal
Good effort. Text heavy slides, can be improved. In the last slide, you could have avoided including data after 2023 because it’
Good work on zomato's overview. Funding from investors is not earnings for a company. It is something the companies use fo
Good work on compay overview and describing each business segment. Good work on deal analysis. Need to work on present
1. Decent work 2. Need to work on PPT skills
1. Good work 2. Barriers weren't mentioned 3.Could have analysed the deal better and talked about numbers
1. Decent work 2. Text heavy, try putting in graphs and infographics 3. Font needs to be consistent throughout
Good structure, dark color choice use ligher colors, logos and images have been stretched. Charts have been snipped
Good effort. Use png logos to remove white bg, aesthetics could be improved. Weird chart drops in the first slide (it is because
Good work on deal analysis especially why did Ubereats fail in India. If you are copy pasting from source like financial express,
for historical use FY20A rather than 2020
Very Good structure. Could improve on Aesthetics. Don’t just blindly copy from the sources. Zomato is focussed on fine dining
Who is 'he' in here?
Good work on deal analysis. Presentation could have been better
1. It was clearly mentioned that the submission should be a ppt. Follow the instructions
2 Your ppt is aesthetically pleasant. However, when you use images off the internet make sure they are of good quality; some
3. Complete the sentences, on slide 4 you have a sentence ending as "SEBI banned....(FCRL) from accessing the".
4. Future roadmap should incorporate your take on what Reliance should do next with the synergies to establish itself as a ma
5. Good effort
1. Need to work on PPT skills and aesthetics 2. Content was decent but limited 3. Barriers were missing
1. Need to work on PPT skills 2. Deal anaysis and synergies research are surface-level
Structure is a bit messed up and not clear, you have mentioned gains in the second slide then again you have mentioned syne
1st slide: can do away with ceo commentary and could have included more important data there like financials or some chart
Could have discussed a bit about Ubereats failure in Indian market. The idea of evolution of foodtech was not that clear.
Could have discuused about Amazons case in depth with the most recent happenings as well
1. The overview slide is aesthetically pleasing, however all the other slides aren't
2. Please spell check your ppt, avoid typos, spelling of Mukesh Ambani is wrong. Please use 1st letter capital for proper nouns
3. While making charts, ensure that your text fits in the chart
4. Your content was good, however it would be better if you added a bit more on the financials
1. Appreciate the financials and use of icons
2. Deal overview slide could have been less text heavy
3. Lack of infographics; the references slide is poorly formatted
Good try. Improve on aesthetics and presentation skills. Shareholder data can be better presented in a pie.Could use more inf
Good work on deal analysis especially regarding EPS dilution and accretion and EBIT margin. Could have done better in future
Good work with the company overview slide. The increase in revenue might not be 100% attritubutable to the deal as there m
1. Try using infographics, the ppt shouldn't be so text heavy, be brief and concise
2. Structure of the ppt was good
3. Avoid typos for instance FYY19, also try to get the latest values of revenue and cost
4. When you mention forecast period in the suggestions, what is the forecast period? 2 years 3 years? Mention the duration
5. When you copy deal overview, try to make sense, the last line witnesses $3-4 per order, what do we make out of this, is it in
6. Try not to repeat information, you mentioned the valuation of Zomato twice in consecutive points, try to combine those an
7. Try using breadcrumbs in your ppt.
8. In the future roadmap slide, there's nothing mentioned wrt future, so try adding in some points related to that
9. What was the rationale behind giving away x.xx% stake? Try looking at the valuation of the companies.
1. When you are trying to put in ratios, try mentioning a one liner on why you are mentioning it
2. Your ppt is well structured
3. Be consistent with where you are trying to put the header for the slide, and try using breadcrumbs
4. Work a bit on financials, read broker reports regarding the deal
5. You don't speak on behalf of the company, you can say 'RRVL can invest' not 'RRVL shall invest'
6. Future roadmap would be your inputs on the deal not something copied.
Good that you touched on "Comparison Worldwide and Road ahead" and "Impact on shareholders". Why have you given so m
Could have discussed a bit more about ubereats failure in India. Could have improved on Aesthetics.
Good use of breadcrumbs- appreciated; Slide is text heavy - cut that down to using numbers instead of words;
Use third person format for writing instead of 1st and 2nd person unless you are wuoting someone;
Aesthetically soothing presentation; the PPT looks like a copy paste of data from the internet - you are required to be more o
Distrubute synergies in multiple types with brief points
Lack of financials throughout
What is the purpose of the deal anlaysis if you dont mention fundamentals or basic valuations of the deal
1. The submission was supposed to be in ppt format and not pdf
2. Appreciate the use of breadcrumbs
3. The font isn't consistent throughout the presentation
4. Lack of financials
Decent attempt. CEO comments on half slide was unnecessary, Can do: infographics, financials, add sources
Decent structure, but 3 slides are just walls of text, no one will read it. Also you have used snippets for charts and logos, please
Didn't understand the need of impact on swiggy in the synergy slide? Better representation would have been possible. Could h
Could have discuused in depth regarding why reliance would want to enter the e-pharmacy market? Good work to show the im
Submission was to be made in ppt and not pdf. Yur submission could have been rejected if it were a corporate competition.Th
swiggy's revenue and losses in the synergy for zomato & ubereats deal? Barriers slide could have been presented in a better
Good work on barriers by classifying it inot social and legal vbut presentation could have been better rather just putting text b
1. Use of breadcrumbs is appreciated. You could have used it from the first slide itself, you can one set of breadcrumbs for the
2. Your ppt is aesthetically pleasing.
3. When you mention that the graph shows the CAGR, kindly mention the source there itself
4. Please don't ever use all caps in the ppt text, it's a big no no!
5. You haven't spoken about synergy at all
6. Concentrate on financials a bit more, ppt lacks research
1. Keep consistent headers, the position and size of font for the header should be same
2. PPT isn't text heavy and you have used infographics but try to keep infographics associated which would look good with the
3. In the roadmap ahead, one point was good which was copied, when you mention revamp and reimagine their model, menti
4. Avoid spelling mistakes in ppt, this is basic hygiene
5. What was the rationale behind giving away x.xx% stake? Try looking at the valuation of the companies. That is the purpose
1. Your first slide could have looked better, otherwise the ppt is decent aesthetically
2. Your deal overview should contain valuation and analysis
3. Please make 1st letter capital for names of companies at multiple places you written "amazon" and "future retail"
4. When you mention "The retail market in India is supposed to grow to US $1300 by the year 2024 from US $883." as per wha
5. Please avoid typos, your ppt should be grammatically correct!
1. It was clearly mentioned that the submission should be a ppt. Follow the instructions
2. In your future roadmap, you mention, "This deal will help Zomato achieve its long term goals and act as the biggest player in
we need your opinion!
3. What was the rationale behind giving away x.xx% stake? Try looking at the valuation of the companies. That is the purpose
4. Your barrier slide is simply copy pasted
5. Your future roadmap slide has a lot of blank spaces.
1. As a management graduate, you should have your opinion on things. The assignment is not given so that you copy paste fro
2. There are broker coverage reports available for this deal, please try to go through them to understand the valuation and syn
3. Working with templates isn't an issue but when you submit the ppt, ensure you remove any extra pages and you can add re
4. The issue between Reliance and Amazon is one of the barriers in this deal, you can give a summary for that, you don't have
5. In the future roadmap, we need your take on what the outlook is for the deal and how will RIL proceed
6. PPT is text heavy, use charts and infographics
1. Please work on your ppt skills, know what color goes with what and try to make the ppt aesthetic
2. Be consistent in where you position the references throughout the ppt
3. When you mention the revenue, EBITDA etc please give an inference along with it. What should the readers interpret from
4. The issue between Reliance and Amazon is one of the barriers in this deal, you can give a summary for that. You don't have
5. There are broker coverage reports available for this deal, please try to go through them to understand the valuation and syn
1. It was clearly mentioned that the submission should be a ppt. Follow the instructions
2. Your ppt is aesthetically appealing
3. Zomato is coming up with an IPO, do you think this deal would impact that?
4. What was the rationale behind giving away x.xx% stake? Try looking at the valuation of the companies. That is the purpose
5. Try to use more charts when you are making a finance related ppt
1. Be consistent with where you are trying to put the header for the slide, and try using breadcrumbs
2. Please work on the financials, you could have added the swap ratios, etc in the financials
3. When you mention India retail sales growth projection, mention as per which report
4. Your future roadmap, has no insights from your side, as a management graduate we expect your opinion not something wh
5. Please make 1st letter capital for names of companies; you written "amazon". Maintain basic hygiene
6. Try to read on broker reports on this deal and also read on synergy
1. More research needed especially in the synergies section; breadcrumbs; have better aesthetics, ppt structured nicely but ha
2. Weak financial data - merely mentioning figures wont help, you need to put in the sources as to where they are being finan
3. In the future road map, include the current status as of now as well,
4. You are also expected to form an opinion of your own about the deal
1. PPT looks like a copy of a brokerage report, you are expected to mention your opinions and keep it brief with only importan
2. Timeline looks good but back it with better aesthetcs, use breadcrumbs in the PPT
3.'Time taken to complete the deal' section does not include any time line
4. The PPT looks very blank in certain spots and over filled in certain spots - please improve aesthetics
1. Appreciate the use of breadcrumbs, though they are going out of the slide in slide no. 4. Always do a hygiene check before s
2. No financial data used and no own point of view stated
3. The chart on slide 2- the title says "Chart title". Poor hygiene
4. Slide 4 and 5 - the infographics used are much larger than the amount of text you have put, and hence this feels like you jus
1. Not much research done 2. Strcuture-wise, the flow seems to be missing in the submission 3. Presentation skills need work
1. Incorrect naming convention 2. Structure is haphazard, you should start directly discussing the synergies of the deal 3. Need
first slide has no content, blank spaces. Half slide CEO comment is not needed. In the last slide you have written few gassy poi
increasing shift towards foodtech
You have written "Deal will close in June 30, 2021" whereaas that date has already passed. take care of such things when you
Avoid writing big paragraphs and try using infographics and charts to depict the information. Company overview slides at the s
Very Text Heavy PPT. Good point regarding JIO mart. Can improvis eon presentation skills using infographics and charts
1. If you are mentioning data in tabular form, why would you mention the same data in a chart?
2. When you are copying the data regarding turnover and P/L, what is your take on it? What should a person looking at the pp
3. Be consistent, if you are mentioning figures in infographics in the first three boxes, the last two shouldn't be empty
4. Assignment doesn't mean you copy paste everything, we need your take on the deal not something copied from the news a
5. Use of infographics was decent
6. Should have mentioned all the references
1. Please mention the figures accurately. What is "With the acquisition, Combined entity may corner more than 50-50% marke
2. There should be consistency in your headers, this is basic hygiene
3. What was the rationale behind giving away x.xx% stake? Try looking at the valuation of the companies. That is the purpose
4. Using too many colors in a ppt as an analyst for an M&A deal doesn't look good. Try to understand what is the essence of th
5. Your ppt should be grammatically correct
6. Please try to be specific with synergy, this deal had several other benefits than just giving a competitive edge
7. If you are mentioning that the players have started working towards sustainability, mention how. Don't vaguely mention a p
8. Lack of research; read about the CCI probe on this deal
1. Be consistent with where you are trying to put the header for the slide, and try using breadcrumbs
2. What does this b mean? "RIL would take 13.1% stakes in Future Enterprise Ltd. after the slump sale by paying Rs. 28b in two
3. Too many blank spaces on your slides!
4. Your ppt should be grammatically correct!
5. Your ppt lacks research
6. Please go through some broker reports for this deal
1. The assignment isn't given so that you simply copy paste the data, as a management graduate you are expected to have you
2. What was the rationale behind giving away x.xx% stake? Try looking at the valuation of the companies. That is the purpose
3. Don't repeat points in the ppt
4. When you talk about Zomato seeking funding, it's also going for an IPO, you should be precise regarding what funding.
5. Overall the ppt was decent aesthetically, work on the content though
1. Your 3rd slide has a lot of blank space, please use infographics and make the ppt decent aesthetically
2. When you've already mentioned data in the form of text why put the same data as chart?
3. Why are two charts showing the same data on two different slides? You just had to put a chart for the sake of it?
4. There is a CCI probe on this deal. Your ppt lacks research!
5. Your future roadmap contains nothing about any measures the company can take in the near futur, no timeline nothing!
1. Your ppt consistently has empty spaces, no financials, barely any charts
2. A very laid back apporoach
3. Please go through broker reports for this deal
4. The headers should be consistent in their position; that's basic hygiene
5. In your future roadmap, you've mentioned; "Post deal completion, RIL must ensure these assets are utilized properly, lest it
6. As a management graduate you are expected to have your own opinion about things
1. What are we supposed to make out of the 2nd slide? What is the purpose behind it? Just snippets of news?
2. Your slides have a lot of blank spaces
3. "Zomato eats Uber", do you know the valuation of Uber and that of Zomato? Please don't make mistakes in the names of th
4. Your pie chart in the barriers slide isn't explanatory! At least add the numbers!
5. Please use uniform font size, its basic hygiene!
6. Please use 1st letter capital for names of companies
7. Your future roadmap, has no insights from your side, as a management graduate we expect your opinion not something wh
1. You haven't mentioned the club's name on the first slide but have somehow written "IB Analyst". There is no need for you t
2. The deal overview slide looks clumsy due to misalignment
3. The slides are really text heavy and you have not used numbers at all
4. No own opinion mentioned
Extremely simple, low effort ppt. just text walls, no infograpgics no charts, no financials, no in depth deal analysis. Neat ppt th
Slides Lacked content. In the barriers slide you could have also discussed the social barriers where Ubereats employees were n
1. Font size is very small, use around 10-14 for the entire PPT, 2. PPT looks like a formality from your end and a mere copy pas
1. Introduction slide has to be less text heavy with brief points of the companies, use breadcrumbs,
2. Pros and cons table is copied - atleast edit it after copying. You are making an IB Presentation- its not a joke
3. Covid Impact of food delivery is a thoughtful point but is too detailed. Keep it brief and more aesthetically soothing
4. Lack of any financials has absolutely failed the purpose of the assignment- you are expected to be more professional and th
5. Very casual and laid back effort
6. Road map has to be supported with numbers. Point 3 has to be supported with data of what nutraceutical efforts. Merely m
1. It was clearly mentioned that the submission should be a ppt. Follow the instructions
2. 1st two slides are decent with effort put, post which its simple copy paste
3. You are expected to put your opinions and frame a decent enough analysis of your research and not this photo cutting crap
4. Atleast copy paste with some effort.
5. add figures, charts, fianancials to support your answer. they are available in brokerage reports, reserach reports. You will no
1. Aesthetics to be improved
2.Images of promoters not required
3.Great effort in copy pasting - instead read and create own sentences in every point
4.Alignment issues in financial synergy
5.COlour coding needs to be improved, use eye dropper
6.Keep barriers crisp and to the point
1. The slide looks really dry and textual. Could have used infographics, breadcrumbs, icons etc
2. You cannot have different fonts on different slides. There should be one consistent font style and size throughout the ppt
3. Should have used IIFT and Capital's icons. You haven't even mentioned the name of the club the assignment is for
4. The fourth slide has two points and then a misaligned snip, rendering the slide essentially empty and haphazard looking
5. Appreciate how you have written the barriers both in the case of deal going through as well as if the deal doen't get approv
6. You should always put your own point of view in such presentations, and use more numbers and financials from equity rese
1. No mention of your name, enrollment number, IIFT or Capital on the title slide
2. Extremely text heavy slide with no financial data whatsoever. Should have used infographics and breadcrumbs
3. In SWOT analysis, just using icons to show different components of the analysis isn't enough. Be clearer with your presentati
4. No own point of view stated anywhere
1. Use the full name of the club and its logo as well
2. You write the slide titles in the breadcrumbs and not Slide 1 Slide 2. Defeats the whole purpose of using breadcrumbs
3. The alignment and font is severely disturbed in your slide 1
4. Deal synergy not backed by financial data at all
5. No mention of own point of view
1. No mention of the club as well as IIFT throughout, not even logos
2. Should have used infographics instead of bullets everywhere
3. Appreciate the use of financial data in slide 5
4. Roadblocks and future roadmap for the deal - these aspects of the assignment were completely ignored. Unprofessional.
5. Should have used breadcrumbs
Just walls of text, extremely poor. No one will read it ever. You need to work on your presentation skills greatly
Just walls of text, extremely poor. No one will read it ever. You need to work on your presentation skills greatly. Zero effort pp
need to work on presentation skills. Avoid putting paragraphs and try to depict information using infographics and charts
need to work on presentation skills. Avoid putting paragraphs and try to depict information using infographics and charts
No mention of swap ratios for shares of diff future group entities or creation of future enterprise limited whose retail assets w
1. Entire PPT is blank - You are not expected to be sending us presentations in such fashion. Unprofessional in nature.
2. As an IB analyst, Adding images of promoters is unnecessary at this stage of time, adjectives such as ' jealous relatives, love
3. Keep uniformity in mentioning sources, use breadcrumbs in presentation
4. Very laggardish work overall, please improve on the content first and then the presentation
5. Score given is overvalued in nature, please use some kind of charts and graphs in a finance PPT
1. It was clearly mentioned that the submission should be a ppt. Follow the instructions
2. Slides are aestethic but misaligned at multiple places - deal overview, competition landscape have different fonts
3. NO financials included in an IB presentation - the assignment is given for you to understand teh deal on a more professiona
Clear lack of research indicated in the synergies section
4. Mention sources of funds, where theyve been used, a tentative timeline of how the deal went through
1. Not aestheitcally pleasing, PPT with a sincere effort to cut copy paste
2.The purpose of you doing the assignment is to help you understand the deal and what goes on in the finance industry. Simp
3. You are expected to put your opinions and frame a decent enough analysis of your research and not this photo cutting crap
4.. Atleast copy paste with some effort.
5. add figures, charts, fianancials to support your answer. they are available in brokerage reports, reserach reports. You will no
1. PPT is a formality supported by lack of research, helpful copy pasting of data that too in uppercase
2. Reckless effort to fill slides
3. Appreciate your use of breadcrumbs but quality of the presentation is not befitting an IB analyst.
4. Please support the PPT's with charts and graphs - a must for a finance IB ppt
5. Mention references in the end
6. Font size is very small and alignment issues throughout
7. The name of our body is Capital - you have not mentioned it anywhere
1. Aestheticallu pleasing, breadcrumbs not properly aligned with the slides - work done in hurry
2.Most of the data is copy pastes- avoid that
3. Frame personal opinion
4.Use brokerage and research reports instead of googling
5.Valuations? CHarts - just one irrelevant chart is there
6. You are expected to add financials in a finance ppt
7. Job poorly done with immense scope of improvement
1. Must use breadcrumbs and focus on keeping the font style and size consistent. There was a lot of extra spaces as well
2. Labelling of the graph was all over the place - the text was overlapping
3. Lack of financials and own opinion.
1. Appreciate the use of breadcrumbs, but they are out of infographic in a few slides
2. Very text heavy, could have summarised the timeline and overview slide a bit
3. The infographics are going out of the slides, should not happen
4. Complete lack of financials as well as own opinion
1. The assignment isn't given so that you simply copy paste the data, as a management graduate you are expected to have you
2. 'Large acquirers acquire a smaller company so as to provide speedy and efficient services at a lower cost.' - We know why M
3. When you copy paste, at least do that smartly. How can you write a proper noun without capitalizing the 1st letter?
4. How can you make a finance ppt without any charts?
5. All the slides are text heavy
1. PPT is left blank in multiple places, entire ppt looks like a formality to an extent,
2. Source for the valuation chart is not given, no of shares refer to what?, gain in shares refer to? - appreciated the incentive fo
3. Synergies needs to be divided into mulitple genres of synergies
4. Give briefer timelines, where is the valuation analysis for the deal?
5. Poor effort overall and lack of understanding of the deal. As an IB analyst, you could look at brokerage reports
1. PPT is a formality supported by lack of research, helpful copy pasting of data that too in uppercase
2. Reckless effort to fill slides
3. Appreciate your use of breadcrumbs but quality of the presentation is not befitting an IB analyst.
4. Please support the PPT's with charts and graphs - a must for a finance IB ppt
5. No references mentioned
6. 'how will customer lose?' - how does it come up?
7. Font size is very small and alignment issues throughout
1. As an IB analyst you are required to mention your own opinioins instead of snip-paste approach you have used
2. Weak Structure without the deal analysis- the purpose of the assignment was to make you comfortable with numbers and d
3. Use financials and valuation data to enhance the quality of the ppt
4. Such a huge timline is unneccesary, keep it short and sweet
5. Mention sources of funds, use of the funds whihc have been used to acquire
6. The PPT should not look like a note or document. Keep it simple.
7. Very text heavy and wihtout numbers - how can you justify this to be a finance PPT
8. Appreciated your use of breadcrumbs, but keep the ppt more aesthetically pleasing using good colour options
1. PPT is a formality supported by lack of research, helpful copy pasting of data that too in uppercase
2. Reckless effort to fill slides
3. No breadcrumbs and quality of the presentation is not befitting an IB analyst.
4. Please support the PPT's with charts and graphs - a must for a finance IB ppt
5. Mention references in the end
6. Font size is very small and alignment issues throughout the PPT
7. Where is the deal analysis? Valuations? Numbers to support afinance ppt?
1. Why have you not mentioned the club's name on the first slide
2. There is a lot of misalignmnet with respect to the infographics throughout the ppt
3. Lack of financial data supporting the synergies and text heavy slides
4. No own opinion mentioned
1. You have not mentioned IIFT or Capital's name/logo anywhere in the assignment
2. There is a lot of misalignment especially in Deal Overview slide
3. You haven't used financial data at all and not put your own opinion of the deal as well
1. PPT is a formality supported by lack of research, helpful copy pasting of data that too in uppercase
2. Reckless effort to fill slides
3. No breadcrumbs and quality of the presentation is not befitting an IB analyst.
4. Please support the PPT's with charts and graphs - a must for a finance IB ppt
5. Mention references in the end
6. Font size is very small and alignment issues throughout the PPT
7. Where is the deal analysis? Valuations? Numbers to support afinance ppt?
1. No breadcrumbs or infographics, hence poor presentation of data
2. Lack of financials, charts and graphs. Its not supposed to be this textual for a finance presentation, especially one about a de
1. Should always write the full name of the club and use its logo as well
2. Should have used breadcrumbs and infographics
3. The lines used on slide 5 aren't even straight
4. Lack of originality and own point of view
5. No financial data used at all
Do not paste snippets. Create charts in ppt only. No need for for showing value from synergies flow chart. Do not paste news a
Not enough content to fill the slides. Analysis was not at all comprehensive
1. PPT is a formality supported by lack of research, helpful copy pasting of data that too in uppercase
2. Reckless effort to fill slides
3. Appreciate your use of breadcrumbs but quality of the presentation is not befitting an IB analyst.
4. Please support the PPT's with charts and graphs - a must for a finance IB ppt
5. No references mentioned
6. Font size is very small and alignment issues throughout
1. Should write the full club name and use its logo as well
2. Should use club and IIFT logos
3. No breadcrumbs and no slide titles as well. How will the reader know what the slide indicates
4. Text heavy and no infographics used. Poor presentation of information
5. You have written "Thanks You". Poor hygiene
6. Lack of financial data, originality and own point of view
For subsidiaries rather than writing names you can use logos for the same and represent it pictorally. The title of second slide
1. You failed to mention "Capital" and just wrote Finance and Investment Club somehow. No use of any logos anywhere
2. Extremely text heavy presentation, even in a single bullet there is so much text.
3. No proper financials and pov. Have capitalised random words in between sentences for no reason
1. You have directly copy pasted and haven't even changed the font. Extremely unprofessional
2. Completely skipped the deal synergy component of the assignment
3. No financial data used at all and no own point of view mentioned
4. No breadcrumbs and references
1. No mention of the name or logo of the club
2. Wrong naming convention
3. No use of infographics, haphazard positioning of data on the slide
4. Complete lack of financial data and no own point of view mentioned
5. No originality at all, very poor efforts for this assignment
6. You have put "thank you" as a bullet along with the references. Very unprofessional