6 Unbalanced
Development, 1958-62
ALBERTO PETRECOLLA
(with the collabo:
ion of Gracicla Simén}
1
Frequent and sudden shifts have been an important part of Argentine
So erie Pelity since the mid-1950s. The discontinuities have bea
soacident that many people have conclude that over the pac thirty
Fears there have only been short-term policies. Nevertheless, are
fave been several attempts to develop fong-term programmes wince
have been subsequently interrupted due to their on, an teomings
OF een more frequently, as a result of institutional breakdewne,
YS Policy carried out inthe period from the beginning of Lees to
{he beginning of 1962 had the explicit and clear aim 9f producing a
lasting change in the Argentine economy. ‘The vari
have analysed the period have at times stressed the dew opment plan
anaat other times the stabilisation programme, but itis eer ther
datter was simply an ingredient of the former, The tac plans were
indeed considered as an inseparable whole by ther protagonists
dn this study we shail consider whether President Frondial cen:
omic policy brought about lasting changes in the Argentine economy,
‘shall consider the impzct
poteies on the relationship between Argentina's ability to
IMPOR and the distribution of income. In section It we shall devecihe
ibe objectives of the plan and the principal instcumonts thor neve
pind nay: I section Hit we shall deal withthe policy's effects on the
Principal macroeconomic variables. In
pounder the exchange, fiscal and monetary policies among offen e,
Re exogenous variables used as instruments, while the press Product,
TenamPesition, the growth rate, the balance of payments‘eml ie
‘istribution of income are part of the endogenous character of wast
and monetary policies. In section IV we make some vaine judge.
‘ments concerning the results and sum up our conclusions.
108,
Ditadl, Auccte y Devil, Dasiger, the prlibiat
}
Eerromg of Argerting, M946 - 1933,
o Unbalanced Development, 1958-62
1
The economic programme executed between 1958 and 1962 was an
aktempt to bring the Axgentiiec economy up to date anal to aceele
growth through a substantial increase in investment, cone
a few capital-intensive and import-substituting sectors, 7
clements making up the plan were subordinatad to these fades
dims. This was especially true of the short-term poliey worked oat
‘owarcs the end of 1958 with the International Monetary Fund whic
se gg Sabllisation plan, The success of the development pion
demanded a favourable atmosphere for investment. ‘The ‘ener
spitlls’ of loval and foreign investors had to be set free. For inet
[eon & Mominflationary economy was sought which would keep
capital mobility restrictions to a minima and
sectors which could enjoy oligopolistie quasi-res
{ihe formulation of the development plan was based on convictions
hich must be explained. To begin with, the country was losine
ground in relative terms. During the postwar period. in spite ef
soa inultig industialisation, it had not participated in the updating
and development of the European ‘economies with which it wee
nevertheless compared. Nor had it been able to keep up with Brasil
growth rate. The aztemprs at industralisation had not been eufciers
‘o transforin the so-called “estructura agroexportadora” That mack
that the growth rate was limited by the capacity to import, which re
urn depended almost exclusively on agricultural exports. Thereiore
in order to deal with this supposed barrier, attempts were made te
SEP up the import substitution process which had been under way
32 the 19305. National industry had followed the classic path ct
Gevelopment, starting with light industry — basically textile ard stecl
‘ustcies ~ and subsequently durable consumer goods. According to
the authors of the programme, the economy was then on che
threshold of a definitive leap forward that would concentrate tavern
‘ment Ou the so-called basic industries (supposedly those thar woul
maximise forward linkages). Since neither local private sources nor
the “Argentine state could supply the necessary capital and tech:
nology, incentives were granted t0 foreign investors. In this way the
Sountty’s internal savings capacity would cease to limit development
And at the same time the gap with the developed world would be
bridged. On the basis of statements made by the main protagonists,
"st of investment priorities was drawn up, including
tiny on
he different
al
veate important10 The Political Economy of Argentina, 1946-83
Petroleum and natural ges; development of chemistry and petso-
chemistry; stee! production; the extraction of coal and iron, ane the
automobile industry. It is not easy to find a common denominator for
this list, although all the items involve import substitution activities
The concentration Of investment on these sectors. would create
interdependenties and externalities which would stimulate develop.
ment. Moder forms of production would be brought into the
Gounty in order to free it from its century-old dependency on
imported inputs and capital goods. The idea was to give the economy
& push which would produce reactions and adjustments that would i,
turn demand additional ereative efforts,
The specific instruments to be used in order to achieve the steted
Priorities were not fully clarified until after several months of
government. A first stage, in accordance with other political men
Areocets aimed at bringing about a significant increase in real wages
through generalised increases in nominal wages. At the seme tare
Public utility rates Were maintained at low levels, price controls were
1aguiar, Fressoli y Thomas - Estilos Socio-Técnicos de Producción de Tecnologías Conocimiento-Intensivas. La Conformación de Una Empresa de Biotecnología