Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Transparent glasses 20ZnF2–40Bi2O3–(40 x)GeO2:xCoO; 0 6 x 6 1 wt% are prepared by melt quenching
Received 4 November 2011 technique. The amorphous nature of the samples is characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and differ-
Received in revised form 24 January 2012 ential thermal analysis (DTA). Spectroscopic studies like optical absorption, FTIR, Raman and dielectric
Accepted 24 January 2012
parameters (e0 , loss tan d, conductivity rac over a wide range of frequency and temperature as well as
Available online 1 February 2012
dielectric breakdown strength at room temperature) of these samples have been carried out. Optical
absorption data has revealed that the bismuth radicals, observed in pure sample C0, are combined with
Keywords:
cobalt ions with increase in concentration of CoO. Further, Co2+ and Co3+ ions occupy octahedral positions
Optical absorption
Raman spectra
at larger dopant concentrations of CoO. From FTIR and Raman studies the coordination of germanium is
FTIR changed from GeO4 to GeO6 with increase in the concentration of CoO. Dielectric parameters such as
XRD dielectric constant e0 , loss tan d, a.c. conductivity rac are increased and activation energy for a.c. conduc-
Dielectric properties tion is decreased and hence opens the glass network with the increase of divalent cobalt ion concentra-
tion; which is also confirmed by decrease in glass transition temperature (Tg) and band gap energy (Eg).
Density of defect energy states (EF) is explained with quantum mechanical tunneling (QMT) model.
Ó 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction Co2+ ions create color centers (blue and pink) with absorption band
in the visible and NIR region [15], the intensity of such color cen-
Germanate glasses mixed with heavy metal oxides are known tres increases with an increase in the Co2+ ion concentration.
to be promising materials for IR technological applications such Photo luminescence studies such as infrared to visible up con-
as non-linear optical fibers and laser devices as reported by Marcel version of Er3+ with glass compositions GeO2–PbO–Nb2O5; GeO2–
[1]. In view of its properties like high refractive index, high disper- PbO–CaCO3; GeO2–PbO–BaO–ZnO–K2O; GeO2–PbO–CaO–TeO2;
sion and transmission in the IR region, such glass matrices are used GeO2–Bi2O3 and GeO2–PbO–Bi2O3 [16–19]. NIR properties of
as specialty glasses, in particular as light guiding core of an optical GeO2–PbO–Bi2O3 glasses doped with Yb3+ ions are reported by Kas-
fiber glasses transmitting IR radiation [2,3]. They are stable against sab et al. [20]. Salem and Mohamed reported the electrical studies
devitrification and moisture resistance [4]. GeO2 is a typical glass such as d.c., a.c. conductivities and other dielectric properties of
former [5] and germanate glasses are being used as IR transmitting Bi2O3–GeO2–MoO3 glasses, in which the molybdenum ions hin-
windows [6]. dered the electron motion in the glass matrices [21]. Durga et al.
Bi2O3 participate in the glass structure with two coordinations [22] studied dielectric dispersion in ZnF2–Bi2O3–TeO2 glass system.
as network former in the form of BiO3 (pyramidal) and as network Recently Srinivasa Rao et al. [23] have reported structural proper-
modifier such as BiO6 (octahedral) units [7,8]. Bismuth ion was re- ties of ZnF2–Bi2O3–P2O5 glass system by means of spectroscopic
ported as an efficient luminescent activator [9]. Fluoride glasses and dielectric studies from our laboratory.
typically have infrared absorption edge wavelengths in the range In view of the above potential applications besides moderate
6–8 lm. With the addition of ZnF2 (metal fluoride) to heavy metal work such as structural properties via dielectric and spectroscopic
germanate glasses widen their transmitting range into the infrared studies reported only on bismuth–germinate glass system. Further
[10]. The glasses containing cobalt ions are useful for nonlinear the addition of zinc fluoride and cobalt oxide doping to the bis-
optical absorbers, needed for passive modulations of laser beams. muth–germanate glass improves the mechanical strength, chemi-
These materials are also considered as useful materials for Q- cal durability and conductivity of the glass matrix. Therefore the
switching devices [11–14]. More over CoO influence the electrical authors have chosen the present glass composition 20ZnF2–
properties of the host glass to the considerable level. In the glass 40Bi2O3–(40 x)GeO2:xCoO; 0 6 x 6 1.0 in order to investigate
matrix cobalt ions exist in two stable states Co2+ and/or Co3+. the spectroscopic properties (viz., FTIR, Raman, optical absorption)
along with dielectric studies (dielectric constant e0 , loss (tan d), a.c.
⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 863 6458142 (R), +91 863 2346380 (O), mobile: conductivity rac) over a wide range of frequency and moderate
+91 9440712142; fax: +91 863 2293378. temperature region.
E-mail address: krdhanekula@yahoo.co.in (D. Krishna Rao).
0022-2860/$ - see front matter Ó 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.01.040
120 P.M. Vinaya Teja et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1014 (2012) 119–125
Table 1
Some physical parameters of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO.
Sample Conc. of Average molecular weight Density q (g/ Molar volume Vm (cm3/ Co2+ ion concentration Co2+ ion Polaron
name dopant x (wt%) M (gram/mole) cm3) (±0.001) mol) (±0.001) Ni 1021 ions/cm3 separation Ri radius Rp (Å)
(Å)
C0 0 248.91 6.177 40.29 – – –
C1 0.2 248.85 6.132 40.58 2.96 6.95 2.80
C2 0.4 248.79 6.095 40.81 5.90 5.53 2.23
C3 0.6 248.73 6.047 41.13 8.78 4.84 1.95
C4 0.8 248.68 6.018 41.31 11.66 4.30 1.77
C5 1 248.62 5.972 41.62 14.46 4.10 1.65
(a)
0.6
Absorption (a.u.)
2.0 4 2
685
T1g(F) T1g(H) C0
(Od) 827
0.5
4 4 4 4
A2( F) T1( P)
(Td)
C5 1.5 500 600 700 800 900
Wavelength (nm)
Absorption (a.u.)
Counts
C5 5
T2 5 (Td) 4 4
C4 E 0.4
4 4
A2( F) T1( F)
Absorption (a.u.)
C4
C3 0.3
1.0
C2 C3
0.2
(b)
C2
C1
0.1
0.5 C1 800 1200 1600
Wavelength
g (nm)
C0
C0
10 20 30 40 50
0.0
2θ 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Fig. 1. XRD patterns of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO. Wavelength (nm)
Fig. 3. Optical absorption spectra of ZBiG glass sample doped with CoO. Inset (a)
shows the absorption spectrum of pure sample Co and Inset (b) shows the peak
positions in the NIR region.
-10
Tg
Tc
-15 8
C0
exo
Tm
Heat flow
-20 C1
1/2
6
(αhν) (cm eV)
C2
-25 C5
-1
C3
endo
C4
4
C3
1/2
C4
-30 C2
C5 C1
2 C0
-35
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
o
Temparature ( C)
0
Fig. 2. DTA traces of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO. 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2
hν (eV)
Table 2 Fig. 4. Urbach plots for optical band gap of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO.
DTA parameters of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO.
Sample Tg Tc Tm Tg/Tm (Tc Tg)/Tg (Tc Tg)/Tm Kgl ima is found to be shifted towards lower temperature region with
C0 560 732 930 0.6021 0.3071 0.1849 0.8686 increase in the concentration of CoO. Such maxima in the dielectric
C1 545 710 923 0.5904 0.3027 0.1787 0.7746 loss(tan d), is the characteristic of relaxation of the dipoles present
C2 542 706 921 0.5884 0.3025 0.1780 0.7627
in the sample. Further, the variation of dielectric loss with temper-
C3 540 703 919 0.5875 0.3018 0.1773 0.7546
C4 538 699 918 0.5860 0.2992 0.1753 0.7351 ature for different concentrations of CoO indicates a gradual in-
C5 535 694 916 0.5840 0.2971 0.1735 0.7162 crease in the broadening of relaxation curves. At the same time
(tan d)max of relaxation curves is found to be increased with in-
crease in the concentration of CoO. The effective activation energy,
CoO is shown in Fig. 9 and its inset shows the temperature depen- wd for all glass samples is calculated for all the samples [26] using
dence of loss(tan d) at different frequencies of C3 sample. The the following equation
curves of both pure and CoO doped glasses show distinct maxima f ¼ f0 expðW d =KTÞ ð3Þ
in the dielectric loss(tan d) verses temperature plot and such max-
122 P.M. Vinaya Teja et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1014 (2012) 119–125
Table 3
Values of cutoff wavelength (kc), band position, energy band gap (Eg) and Urbach energy (DE) of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO.
0.195
C0 945 745 452 428
4.0 2.72
2.70
Eg (eV)
Δ E (eV)
3.5 0.180
2.68
3.0 2.66
C1
%Transmittance
0.165
0.3 0.6 0.9
2.5 Conc. of CoO
ln ( α)
C5 C2
2.0 C4
C3
C3
1.5 C2 C4
C1 C5
1.0
C0
0.5
2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2
hν (eV) 1100 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400
-1
Fig. 5. Urbach energy (DE) of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO. Inset shows the ν (cm )
variation of Urbach energy (DE) and optical band gap (Eg) with concentration of
CoO. Fig. 6. FTIR spectra of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO.
Table 4 Table 5
Some parameters evaluated from optical absorption spectra of ZBiG glasses doped Assignment of absorption bands in the infrared spectra (with a probable error of
with CoO. ±0.1 cm1) of the ZBiG glasses doped with CoO.
Sample Peak position Area (arb. FWHM Peak height (arb. C0 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Assignment
name (nm) units) (nm) units)
428 410 427 419 421 424 Bi–O bonds in BiO6 units
C1 523.0 15.61 63.60 0.2511 452 465 481 484 459 488 Bi–O bonds in distorted BiO6
596.0 7.15 34.58 0.2057 octahedra and ZnO4 units
663.5 4.71 42.75 0.1120 745 749 745 748 743 741 Bi–O symmetrical stretching of BiO3
and Ge–O asymmetric stretching of
C2 527.5 21.52 61.72 0.3755
GeO6 units
596.0 12.55 34.63 0.3609
945 940 935 932 931 931 Bi–O stretching vibrations in BiO6
663.0 8.29 42.44 0.1977
units andGeO4 units
C3 530.0 29.16 58.48 0.5504
597.0 20.48 34.63 0.5887
664.0 14.12 42.77 0.3345 The a.c. conductivity values for all glasses at different tempera-
C4 531.0 34.19 54.77 0.6987
tures and frequencies are evaluated [26] using the equation
597.0 29.11 35.05 0.8222
664.0 19.25 42.64 0.4567
rac ¼ xe0 e0 tand ð4Þ
C5 531.0 37.33 52.10 0.7869 where x is the angular frequency, e0 is the dielectric constant of
596.5 33.48 35.02 0.9474 vacuum. The variation of conductivity with 1/T of all investigated
663.0 21.01 42.56 0.5038
glasses at 10 kHz is shown in Fig. 10 and its inset shows the varia-
tion of conductivity with 1/T at different spot frequencies of C2 sam-
ple. The activation energy (A.E.) for conduction in the linear region
where f is the frequency and f0 is a constant. The summary of of log rac with 1/T plots, observed at higher temperature, has been
data pertinent to loss(tan d), activation energy for dipoles (A.E.) evaluated. Such rac values at 70 °C, density of defect energy states
and breakdown strength for different concentrations of CoO are N(EF) and A.E. values for conduction of all the glass matrices are
presented in Table 7. From Table 7, it is found that wd is maximum incorporated in Table 8.
for C0 sample and is decreased with CoO doping. Since insulating
strength of the glass sample depends upon the electric field applied 4. Discussion
on it, the dielectric breakdown strength of the samples is deter-
mined. The value of the breakdown strength 12.92 kV/cm is ob- In general, the density of a glass is sensitive to the ionic size,
tained for C0 sample and its value is found to be decreased with atomic weight and amount of different elements present in the
increase in the CoO concentration. glass network [10,27]. The observed decrease in the density and
P.M. Vinaya Teja et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1014 (2012) 119–125 123
0.12
396 1 KHz C5
306 0.14 10 KHz
C4
100 KHz
tan δ
564 0.08 C3
0.12
766 500 KHz
1 MHz C2
964 891
Raman Intensity (a.u.)
0.10 C1
0.04
tan δ
0 100 200 300
C0 Temparature C
o
0.08
C1
C2
0.06
C3
C0
0.04
C4
Table 7
Table 6 Summary of data on dielectric loss of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO at 1KHz.
Assignment of Raman features (with a probable error of ±0.1 cm1) of ZBiG glasses
doped with CoO. Sample (Tan d)max.ave (101) Temp. region AE for Breakdown
of relaxation dipoles strength (kV/
C0 C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Assignment (eV) cm)
306 306 307 304 307 307 Bi–O–Bi stretching vibrations in C0 0.322 70–107 2.91 12.92
distorted BiO6 units C1 0.488 60–100 2.68 12.50
396 396 395 397 397 396 Doubly degenerate bending C2 0.522 55–98 2.54 11.94
vibrations of Bi–O–Bi and C3 0.548 45–90 2.40 11.86
symmetrical stretching vibrations of C4 0.587 35–82 2.26 11.30
oxygen in Bi–O–Ge and Ge–O–Ge in C5 0.628 30–80 2.13 11.16
GeO6 along with ZnO4 units
564 562 562 559 564 559 Bi–O vibrations in distorted BiO6
units 1.6x10
-7
766 768 768 768 768 768 Symmetric stretching vibrations of (b) (a)
C5 1.2x10
-7
C4 500 KHz
891 881 891 889 888 902 Ge–O bonds associated with Q2 GeO4 C3 8x10
-8
1E-5
100 KHz
units and Ge–O–Ge asymmetrical C2 -8
4x10
stretching 1E-6
C1 10 KHz
σ ac
3 -1
10 /T (K )
50 36 C0
C5
C4 1 KHz
C3
45 30
C2
C1
ε'
10 KHz
24
40
C0
18 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2
35
ε'
100 KHz 3 -1
0 100 200
o
300 10 /T (K )
Temparature C
30 Fig. 10. Variation of rac with 1000/T at 10 kHz for different concentrations of CoO in
500 KHz ZBiG glasses. Inset of (a) shows the variation of rac with 1000/T for different
1 MHz frequencies of C2 sample and (b) shows the variation of rac with activation
25 energy.
Table 8 result, the density of localized states N(EF) of these defects in-
Summary of data on a.c. conductivity of ZBiG glasses doped with CoO at 10KHz. creases and leads to tailing of the states into the gap at the band
Sample rac at 70 °C (106) N(EF) (1020 (eV1/cm3) AE for edges. This tailing also gives the evidence for decrease in Eg.
(X cm)1
Austin Butcher Pollak
conduction Vitreous GeO2 exhibits IR transmission at 915 cm1,
(eV) 750 cm1 and 584 cm1 and are ascribed to asymmetric
C0 1.40 2.05 0.85 2.09 0.47 stretching vibrations of GeO4 units, asymmetric vibrations of
C1 2.29 2.62 1.09 2.66 0.39 Ge–O bonds of GeO6 and bending vibrations of Ge4–O–Ge4 as re-
C2 2.38 2.67 1.11 2.72 0.37
C3 2.51 2.75 1.14 2.79 0.34
ported previously [37–40]. In the IR spectrum of pure sample, the
C4 2.60 2.80 1.16 2.84 0.30 observed band at 945 cm1 is assigned to the stretching vibrations
C5 3.18 3.09 1.28 3.13 0.25 of GeO4 units. The band at 745 cm1 is due to degeneration of Bi–O
symmetrical stretching of BiO3 units [38] as well as Ge–O asym-
metric stretching of GeO6 units [40]. Another band at 452 cm1 is
increase of CoO concentration. In other words doping of CoO opens due to ZnO4 structural units overlapped by Bi–O bonds in distorted
the glass structure to some extent [28]. The other parameters such BiO6 units [41] and six-coordinated germanium ions [40]. A feeble
as mean Co2+ ion concentration Ni, ion separation Ri and polaron band at 428 cm1 is due to Bi–O bonds of different length in dis-
radius Rp are helpful to understand the conducting nature of the torted BiO6 polyhedra [42].
glass network. From Fig. 6 we can observe that there is a slight decrease in area
From Table 2, the values of the glass transition temperature Tg of band at 945 cm1 and increase in area at 745 cm1 as well as at
and glass forming ability parameters viz., the ratios (Tc Tg)/Tg, 452 cm1. From this it is concluded that with increase in concen-
Tg/Tm, (Tc Tg)/Tm and Kgl, are observed to be decreased with in- tration of CoO some of tetrahedral structural GeO4 units are found
crease in the concentration of CoO. Such values indicate higher to be decreased and at the same time the octahedral structural
thermal stability of the glasses. Normally, the decrease in bond GeO6 units are observed to be increased which results to the in-
length, cross-link density and closeness of packing of various struc- crease in the cross linking bonds such as Ge–O–Bi; Ge–O–Co;
tural groups in the glass matrix are responsible for such a decrease Co–O–Bi; Ge–O–Zn and Bi–O–Zn. Such changes are due to the in-
in these parameters with increase in the dopant concentration. The crease of NBO’s. The red shift of band at 945 cm1 is ascribed to
analysis of DTA data indicates with the increasing presence of CoO the change in bond length when Ge–O is replaced by Co–O. Such
in the glass network, cobalt ions seem to exist in Co2+ structural structural change increases the conductivity of glass net work.
units, occupying glass modifier positions increase the cross-link The Raman spectra of the glass samples show an intense peak
density and weaken the mean bond strength, resulting a decrease around 396 cm1 is assigned to the combination of ZnO4 structural
in the rigidity of the glass network [29]. units, Bi–O–Bi bending vibrations and symmetric stretching of
The observed two small peaks in C0 sample at 685 and 827 nm bridging oxygens in Ge–O–Ge [42,43]. The small shoulder at
[inset (a) of Fig. 3] are attributed to 3P0 ? 1D2 and 3P0 ? 3P2 tran- 564 cm1 is due to Bi–O vibrations in BiO6 units [44]. Another ob-
sitions of Bi+ ions. Generally, such ions exist in the glass matrix due served intense peak at 766 cm1 is assigned to symmetric stretch-
to thermal reduction of Bi3+ ions, into Bi2+ ? Bi+ ? Bi0 bismuth ing vibrations of Ge–O bonds in GeO4 units [45]. Further, two
radicals, which takes place during melting temperature at small peaks at 891 cm1 and 964 cm1 are ascribed to Ge–O–Ge
1050 °C [30,31]. The other absorption peaks observed at around asymmetrical stretching in GeO4 structural units [46,47]. From
523 nm and 596 nm are attributed to 4T1g ? 2T1g(H), octahedral Fig. 6 it is observed that the area of RF around 964 cm1 is de-
transition and 4A2(4F) ? 4T1(4P) tetrahedral (Td) transition of Co2+ creased and RF at 396 cm1 is broadened and increased in area,
ions respectively. Besides the band in NIR region at 1434 nm is as- which indicates the increase in octahedral units.
signed to 4A2(4F) ? 4T1(4F) tetrahedral transition [32,33] and a The inferences drawn from the analysis of FTIR spectra of the
small shoulder at 663 nm is identified due to 5T2 ? 5E transition present glasses are also supporting that obtained from Raman
of octahedral Co3+ [34]. As the concentration of CoO ion is in- spectra; such inferences indicate clearly the decrease in GeO4
creased in the glass matrices, the area of tetrahedral band appears structural units and increase in GeO6 structural units with increase
and is found to be decreased and at the same time area of octahe- in concentration of CoO. Hence, cobalt ions occupy octahedral posi-
dral band is observed to be increased. From this observation it is tions in the glass structure, such ions act as a network modifier in
clear that majority of Co2+ ions occupy octahedral positions with decreasing the rigidity of glass matrix.
distortion due to John–Teller effect [35] which in turn decreases Among various polarizations (electronic, ionic, dipolar and
the rigidity of glass structure. space charge polarization) space charge polarization gives signifi-
The absorption edge kc observed at 386 nm for C0 sample and cant contribution to the dielectric constant and it depends on pur-
increases with CoO doping suggests that the number of non-bridg- ity and perfection of the glass. The observed increase in the value of
ing oxygens (NBO’s) increases with increase in CoO concentration. e0 , loss (tan d) and rac at any frequency are found to be increased
This increase leads to degree of localization of electrons and hence with temperature. The activation energy decreases with increase
the donor centers in the glass matrix. The study of variation of in concentration of CoO, which is an indication of space charge
short wave length absorption edge (SWAE) and optical band gap polarization. The gradual increase in octahedrally positioned Co2+
in oxide glasses give information to understand the electron band ions in the glass network leads to its modification. These ions
structure. The observed red shift of SWAE with increase in the con- weaken the glass network by creating bonding defects and create
centration of CoO results in decreasing of optical band gap. The de- path ways for migration of ions that build up space charge polari-
crease in density, glass transition temperature and optical band zation and leads to an increase in the dielectric parameters. This is
gap emphasize the same. Since Co–O bond length is greater than also supported by the decrease in Tg as well as decrease in the opti-
Ge–O bond length, the doping of CoO effectively opens the glass cal band gap energy, Eg. At higher concentration, cobalt ions in
network. The addition of CoO increases the average bond length octahedral positions lead to more space charge polarization and
which narrows the optical band gap [36]. Among the doped sam- hence increase the disorder in the glass network [48].
ples C1 sample has the minimum tail energy and it is found to be The dielectric relaxation effects may be attributed to association
increased with the increase of CoO concentration. The increase in of Co2+ ions with a pair of Ge–O groups and Bi2+ ions with a pair of
Urbach energy is due to the inducement of defects like fluctuations F ions in analogy, such that the association of the divalent ion
in bond angle distortions, wrong bonds and color centers. As a with a pair of cationic vacancies occurs in conventional glasses
P.M. Vinaya Teja et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1014 (2012) 119–125 125
[49]. From Table 6 the increase in (tan d)max.ave and decrease in acti- to thank the Management of Andhra Christian College, Guntur,
vation energy for dipoles with CoO content suggests that an in- for kindly granting the study leave.
crease in degree of freedom for dipoles to orient into the field
direction leads to a decrease in rigidity of the glass network. The References
graph drawn between conductivity and activation energy (Inset
of Fig. 10) shows near linearity at higher temperature region sug- [1] P. Marcel, Ann. Chim. Sci. Mater. 28 (2) (2003) 87.
[2] V.N. Polukin, Fiz. Khim. Stekla 8 (3) (1982) 338.
gests a random site model for conduction of the glasses [50]. This [3] K.A. Kostanyan, A.D. Akopyan, V.G. Dzhavadyan, Khim. Zh. 38 (1) (1983) 25.
enhancement is directly related to the mobility of charge carriers. [4] R. Balda, J. Fernandez, M. Sang, A. de Pablos, J.M. Fdez-Navarro, J. Mugnier,
By correlating activation energy with mean separation (Ri), and po- Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 3384.
[5] Y. Dimitrov, Y. Dimmiyev, A. Montenero, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 180 (1994) 51.
laron radius (Rp) such that, with increase in Co2+ ion concentration, [6] F.I. Kamitsos, Y.D. Yiannopoulos, M.A. Karakassides, G.D. Chryssikos, H. Jain, J.
the mean site-to-site separation between cobalt ions decreases and Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 11755.
polaron radius increases, which causes decrease in activation en- [7] J. Fu, H. Yatsuda, Phys. Chem. Glasses 36 (1995) 211.
[8] L. Montagne, G. Palavit, G. Mairesse, M. Draoui, K. Aomari, M. Saidi Idrissi, Phys.
ergy and increase of rac as reported previously [51]. Chem. Glasses 38 (1997) 15.
The low temperature part of the conductivity can be explained [9] Werner. Vogel, Glass Chemistry, second ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.
on the basis of quantum mechanical tunneling model as reported [10] J.E. Shelby, Introduction to Glass Science and Technology, second ed., Royal
Society of Chemistry, Cambridge CB4 0WF, UK, 2005.
by researchers [52]. The density of states N(EF) near Fermi level
[11] M.G. Brik, I.V. Kityk, Solid State Commun. 143 (2007) 326.
evaluated using the following equation [53] [12] M. Luo, Y. Jiang, Ch. Xu, X. Yang, A. Burger, N.G. Giles, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 67
(2006) 2596.
h m i4 [13] T. Abritta, F.H. Black, J. Lumin. 48 (1991) 558.
ph
rðxÞ ¼ g2e KT½NðEF Þ2 a5 x ln ð5Þ [14] M.B. Camargo, R.D. Stultz, M. Birnbaum, M. Kokta, Opt. Lett. 20 (1995) 339.
x [15] A. Uniyal, S.P. Singh, Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys. 63 (2004) 109.
where for Austin g = p/3 [52], Butcher g = 3.66 p2/6 [54] and Pollack [16] R. Balda, A.J. Garcia A deva, J. Fernandez, J.M. Fdez Navarro, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 21
(2004) 744.
g = p4/96 [55] with the usual meaning of remaining symbols re- [17] Z. Pan, S.H. Morgan, A. Loper, V. King, B.H. Long, W.E. Collins, J. Appl. Phys. 77
ported and presented in Table 7. The increase in the number of (9) (1995) 4688.
localized states, N(EF) near Fermi level with Co2+ concentration indi- [18] Z. Pan, S.H. Morgan, K. Dyer, A. Veda, J. Appl. Phys. 79 (12) (1996) 8906–8913.
[19] L.R.P. Kassab, A. de Oliveira Preto, W. Lozano, F.X. de Sa, G.S. Maciel, J. Non-
cates the increasing disorder in the glass network. Cryst. Solids 351 (2005) 3468.
The breakdown strength of all the samples is determined at [20] L.R.P. Kassab, L.C. Courrol, V.D.D. Cacho, S.H. Tatumi, N.V. Watter, L. Gomes, N.I.
room temperature. Since the breakdown strength is inversely pro- Morimoto, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 348 (2004) 103.
[21] S.M. Salem, E.A. Mohamed, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357 (2011) 1153.
portional to the value e0 (tan d) the results suggests that the rate of [22] D.K. Durga, P. Yadagiri Reddy, N. Veeraiah, J. Lumin. 99 (2002) 53.
increase of e0 (tan d) with temperature is lowest for C0 sample. [23] P.Srinivasa Rao, Ch. Rajyasree, A. Ramesh Babu, P.M. Vinaya Teja, D. Krishna
Therefore, the experiments on dielectric breakdown strength of Rao, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357 (2011) 3585.
[24] S. Bala Murali Krishna, P.M. Vinaya Teja, D. Krishna Rao, Mater. Res. Bull. 45
ZnF2–Bi2O3–GeO2:CoO glasses reveal that the modifying nature of (2010) 1783.
the glasses increases with CoO concentration. [25] Ch. Rajyasree, D. Krishna Rao, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357 (2011) 836.
[26] P. Nageswara Rao, B.V. Raghavaiah, D. Krishna Rao, N. Veeraiah, Mater. Chem.
Phys. 9 (2005) 381.
5. Conclusions [27] A. Al-Hajry, N.M. Tashtosh, M.M. El-Desoky, Physica B 368 (2005) 51.
[28] S. Rani, S. Sanghi, A. Agarwal, N. Ahlawat, J. Alloys Compd. 477 (2009) 504.
[29] T. Watanabe, K. Muratsubaki, Y. Benino, H. Saitoh, T. Komatsu, J. Mater. Sci. 36
In conclusion, we have studied the effect of CoO concentration (2001) 2427.
on spectroscopic and dielectric properties of ZBiG glasses. From [30] L.B. Su, P. Zhou, J. Yu, H. Li, L.H. Zheng, F. Wu, Y. Yang, Q.H. Yang, J. Xu, Opt.
the analysis of the results the following conclusions were obtained: Express. 17 (16) (2009) 13554.
[31] X. Meng, J. Qiu, M. Peng, D. Chen, Q. Zhao, X. Jiang, C. Zhu, Opt. Express. 13
(2005) 1635.
1. The absence of sharp Bragg peaks in XRD patterns of the glasses [32] D.L. Wood, J.P. Remeika, J. Chem. Phys. 46 (1967) 3595.
confirmed the amorphous nature of the prepared samples. [33] X. Duan, D. Yuan, X. Cheng, Z. Sun, H. Sun, D. Xu, M. Lv, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 64
(2003) 1021.
2. The decrease in density and Hurby’s parameter evaluated from [34] W. Ryba-Romanowski, S. Golab, G. Dominiak-Dzik, M. Berkowski, J. Alloys
DTA data indicated that the glass forming ability is high with Compd. 288 (1999) 262.
low concentration of CoO. [35] G. Nagarjuna, T. Satyanarayana, Y. Ghandhi, P.V.V. Satyanarayana, N. Veeraiah,
J. Solid State Commun. 150 (2010) 9.
3. The spectroscopic studies such as optical absorption, FTIR, [36] K. Kotkova, H. Tichal, L. Tichy, J. Raman Spectrosc. 39 (2008) 1219.
Raman spectra revealed the increase in the number of octahe- [37] I. Ardelean, D. Rusu, J. Opt. Adv. Mater. 10 (2008) 66.
drally positioned cobalt ions with increase in concentration of [38] I. Ardelean, C. Simona, V. Ioncu, J. Opt. Adv. Mater. 8 (2006) 1843.
[39] G.E. Rachkovskaya, G.B. Zakharevich, J. Appl. Spectrosc. 74 (2007) 86.
CoO, due to which some GeO4 structural units are transferred
[40] V. Dimitrov, y. Dimitriev, A. Montenero, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 180 (1994) 51.
to GeO6. Such octahedrally positioned and GeO6 structural units [41] S.B.M. Krishna, A.R. Babu, Ch. Rajyasree, D.K. Rao, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 356
are responsible for the decrease in the rigidity of the glass (2010) 1754.
network. [42] S.B.M. Krishna, P.M. Vinaya Teja, D. Krishna Rao, Mater. Res. Bull. 45 (2010)
1783.
4. The observed large values in the dielectric constant e0 and other [43] G.S. Henderson, D.R. Neuville, Benjamin Cochain, L. Cormier, J. Non-Cryst.
related parameters confirmed the ferromagnetic behavior of Solids 355 (2009) 468.
CoO doped host glass. The a.c. conductivity studies suggested [44] A. A Kharlamov, R. M Almedia, J. Heo, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 202 (1996) 233.
[45] E.I. Kamitsos, Y.D. Yiannopoulos, M.A. Karakassides, G.D. Chryssikos, H. Jain, J.
that the increase in cobalt ion concentration effectively modi- Phys. Chem. 100 (1996) 11755.
fied the glass network with higher dipole–dipole interactions. [46] H. Verweij, J.H.J.M. Buster, G.F. Remmers, J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) 931.
[47] F.L. Galeener, A.J. Leadbetter, M.W. Strongfellow, Phys. Rev. B 27 (1983) 1052.
[48] V. Ravikumar, N. Veeraiah, S. Buddhudu, J. Phys. III France 7 (1997) 951.
[49] S. Radha Krishnan, R.S. Srinivasa Setty, Phys. Rev. B 14 (1976) 6967.
Acknowledgements [50] G.Ei. Damrawi, J. Phys. Status Solidi A 177 (2000) 385.
[51] A. Al-Hajry, A.A. Soliman, M.M. El-Desoky, Thermochem. Acta 427 (2005) 181.
[52] I.G. Austin, N.F. Mott, Adv. Phys. 18 (1969) 657.
One of the authors, P.M. Vinaya Teja, is grateful to the [53] S.R. Elliott, Physics of Amorphous Materials, Longman, Essex, 1990.
University Grants Commission of India for granting fellowship [54] P. Butcher, K.J. Hyden, Philos. Mag. 36 (1997) 657.
[55] M. Pollak, Philos. Mag. 23 (1971) 579.
under Faculty Development Programme scheme. He also wishes