Date: February 25%, A.D. 2020 Via: U.S.P.S. Registered Mail® Ne RR821654987US To: Re: Alleged Complaint ticket no, S654321-0, person: MERCATORIA, LEX Any later forced court appearance or order is under threat, duress, coercion, and is repugnant to The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America of July 4, A.D. 1776 as the first Organic Law of The United States of America. I, a living, breathing, flesh-and-blood {MaH, hereinafter “I,” “me,” “my,” making my habitation on the soil of the Sovereign, Free and Independent State of The United States of America, hereinafter “ ,” state that on alleged police officer badge #666, of stopped me as I was traveling in my own private automobile, allegedly charging the person with the alleged offense o or similar. All written law must identify the territory to which it applies. This is known as Territorial Jurisdiction, which is necessary and must be proven if challenged when interacting with any alleged governmental or quasi-governmental entity or employee when demanded. United States acknowledges that its territorial jurisdiction is limited by virtue of the Organic Laws, located in the United States Statutes at Large. These laws clearly define that United States’ territorial jurisdiction is confined to the property which is owned by or ceded to The United States of America, “State of ” is the land the Confederacy, The United States of America, owns within the exterior borders of , and the U.S. Constitution and the Constitution of State of Gonneeticut are the written laws of State of Gonmecticut, NOT Thereby challenge State of Gonnecticut’s territorial jurisdiction where alleged police i DorRight stopped me while traveling in my private automobile on ada et located without the exterior boundaries of State of Gonnecticul and United States ling alleged voice ote MAMMMMIMRDMRRIRE sce cvtaoncing proot inet she tection os MRM vee He stopped me is located within the territorial jurisdiction of State of Gomneeticul or United States, a “in this state” or “in the state,” would deprive me of my rights under color of law and subject me to involuntary servitude. If State of cannot provide evidence of territorial jurisdiction for alleged police officer to stop me on any roads within the exterior boundaries of State of and United States, then alleged police officer thority to stop me, and thus did so in his priv: ersonal capacity. Consequently, Infractions Bureau or any court within State of ‘Gonboctigut or United States lacks the territorial jurisdiction to proceed. \ "The United States of America alla the Confederacy and perpetual Union means the collective of the Sovereign, Free and Independent States united by and under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, A.D. 1777 [hereinafter Articles], and thereafter, numbering fifty at present, in conformance with the popular and ordinary meaning of the word “States,” ie., the plural form of the word “State,” as “States” and “State” are used in the current Organie Law, the Articles, 1 Stat. 4A moving party has the burden of proof, It is a sequential burden from first party encountered to last—each has the burden of proof and it cannot simply be “kicked-up” to the next party in line to “answer on behalf.” In this instance the moving party is first as the alleged Charging Officer, who assumes the initial burden via his alleged When the issue of territorial jurisdiction is raised, it must be proven before a court may proceed. Any attempt to proceed before territorial jurisdiction is proven will be considered a trespass upon me. For illustration purposes only, some territorial courts appear to agree: “Territorial jurisdiction ‘may never be waived’ and must be established beyond a reasonable doubt.” People v. Thomas, 997 N.Y.8.2d 53, 55, 124 A.D.3d 56, 59 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014) (quoting People v. McLaughlin, 80 N.Y.2d 466, 470-71, 591 N.Y.S.2d 966, 606 N.E.2d 1357 (1992). “The parties cannot, even by stipulation, confer jurisdiction upon a court where no jurisdiction exists. . . . ‘[JJurisdiction is established solely by general law.” Evans v. State, 647 So.2d 180, 180 (Fla. Ist DCA 1994) (per curiam) (quoting White v. State, 404 So.2d 804, 805 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1981)) (citing Sclafani v. County of Dade, 323 So.2d 675 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). “No Court or officer can acquire jurisdiction by the mere assertion of it or by falsely alleging the existence of facts on which jurisdiction depends. . .. No officer can acquire jurisdiction by deciding that he has it. In all such cases, every officer, whether judicial or ministerial, decides at his peril.” Middleton v. Low, 30 Cal. 596, 607 (1866) (quoting People v. Cassels, 5 Hill (N-Y.) 164, 168 (1843); Prosser v. Secor, 5 Barb. (N.Y.) 607, 608 (1849)) (internal quotation marks omitted). “When it clearly appears that the court lacl no authority to reach the merits. In such a situation the action should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.” Melo v. United States, 505 F.2d 1026, 1030 (8th Cir. 1974). “A court lacking jurisdiction cannot render judgment but must dismiss the cause at any stage of the proceedings in which it becomes apparent that jurisdiction is lacking.” Basso Utah Power and Light Company, 495 F.2d 906, 909 (10th Cir. 1974) (first emphasis added) (citing Bradbury v. Dennis, 310 F.2d 73 (10th Cir. 1962)). “No judicial process, whatever form it may assume, can have any lawful authority outside of the limits of the jurisdiction of the court or judge by whom it is issued; and an attempt to enforce it beyond these boundaries is nothing less than lawless violence.” Ableman v. Booth, 62 U.S. (21 How.) 506, 524 (1858). Whereas, without first acquiring territorial jurisdiction, alleged police officer Dudley DO-Right lacks authority to invoke or any court's power. Any action taken against me without a court first acquiring territorial jurisdiction leaves (a) Sut of Cimnei liable for damages, and (b) both the Statoal Attorney and alleged police officer liable for damages in their private, personal capacities. Respectfully,