Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This paper is to report the finding outcomes of 3-ply surgical mask sterilization. The discussion in this
paper was made solely based on the research studies from recent article journals, trusted reputable
websites and the intelligence of a 23-years old microbiologist. The conclusion on this paper came
from the opinion of the author who wants the best for the company progress in term of science and
health safety of both staff and employers.
PURPOSES
1. To discuss the possibility of reusing surgical face mask.
2. To discuss the capability of sterilising face mask in workplace.
2. Quantity and time – In biosafety cabinet (BSC), in which it is much bigger than
laminar flow, only nine (9) N95 masks can be placed in the BSC for a period of 40
minutes sterilization cycle according to the study. In case of laminar flow, which is
relatively smaller than BSC and with surgical mask which has larger surface area than
N95 mask, laminar flow can accommodate maximum of only six (6) face masks at a
time. Besides, due to long time exposure for a cycle to complete, it will delay the
daily work testing in the laboratory.
3. Distance of penetration and surface area – The study shows only 23% - 50% of UV
light penetration into the N95 respirator material. As surgical mask has three layers,
the penetration efficiency of UV light may also result as the same as N95 respirator.
Other than that, given that there is a far distance between UV light source and the
target, the efficiency of sterilization is uncertain.
From these limitations, it can be concluded that sterilizing masks in F&B laboratory setting is
not efficient to achieve the purpose of sterilizing viruses in mask. For other solution that can
be presented is to use commercial portable sterilizer as it provides less distance from light
source to target, easy to handle, shorter time (approximate of 3 minutes) and well established
as it has been sold worldwide.