Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gandhi
Antara Gandhi
Ms. Malinowska
ENG4UV-02
16 July 2021
Should new houses and buildings meet certain energy efficiency standards?
With the planet being impacted by human decisions every single day, all citizens need to
be more cautious of the actions they are taking and the consequences that those actions entail.
These same decisions are not only affecting the individuals, and the people around them, but also
the other living beings of this planet. One way to ensure a safer future for everyone is to only
approve new buildings and houses that meet specific energy efficiency standards. The United
States Environmental Protection Agency – also known as the EPA -- says that “increased
efficiency can lower greenhouse gas […] emissions and other pollutants, as well as decrease
water use” (“Local Energy Efficiency Benefits and Opportunities | US EPA”). Considering how
long humans have occupied this planet, they have created many incredible innovations, but that
does not detract from the issues that they have caused. Problems like pollution, ocean
acidification, the greenhouse gas effect, and global warming can be slowed down if new
developments must abide by energy efficiency standards. Many species have been here for much
longer than people. These creatures do not deserve for their planet to be destroyed and taken
away from them by humans who selfishly only care about themselves. Some people may argue
that these buildings will not impact the environment enough for them to worry about it now, but
every small change cumulates into a greater impact. There are also other benefits for this
proposal like boosts in the economy and general health. Economic enhancements include the fact
2
Gandhi
that “13 jobs are created for every $1 million invested in energy efficiency”, individual utility
bills can be lowered by more than 50%, and it can aid in developing steady electricity prices
(Heerema et al.; “Local Energy Efficiency Benefits and Opportunities | US EPA”). By sticking to
these guidelines not only are costs being saved, and long-term energy being invested in, but the
users’ comfort and health is also being improved. This is done by the constant flow of ventilation
throughout the building which results in a better overall well-being (“What Are the Benefits of
Energy Efficient Buildings? - Better Buildings”). These standards are in no way unattainable for
society to meet, and with all of these advantages that are present with energy efficient buildings,
it would be a beneficial advance for the environment, economy, and citizens of the planet.
- Pathos was used when talking about the environment and the consequences that ensue
due to our actions. I used pathos to add emotion and appeal to sympathy by including
current issues that our world is suffering from so that the reader can put everything into
perspective.
- Logos was used when including statistics and specific prices of investments. It was also
used when quoting other sources that spoke of the proven benefits of energy efficiency
standards. My main method of persuasion in this paragraph was logos because the topic
- Ethos was used when quoting the United States Environmental Protection Agency as they
are a certified source with valid information. They are an established and credible source
Heerema, Dylan, et al. “The Many Benefits of Energy Efficient Homes and Buildings |
https://www.pembina.org/pub/efficient-buildings-infographic.
https://www.epa.gov/statelocalenergy/local-energy-efficiency-benefits-and-opportunities.
“What Are the Benefits of Energy Efficient Buildings? - Better Buildings.” Clean BC,
https://betterbuildingsbc.ca/faqs/what-are-the-benefits-of-energy-efficient-buildings/.
Dogs are animals. That is a fact. They have been domesticated and ‘perfected’ over the
years by careful breeding and training to extract certain qualities and eradicate others. This
manipulation of genetics has created hundreds of breeds all with various characteristics that are
unique to their own. However, it is crucial to keep in mind that dogs were once wild animals, and
even those who have been categorized as ‘pets’ still have instincts similar to their ancestors. A
dog may make the decision to bite someone based on various circumstances, many of which can
be very logical. If they do proceed to place their mouth on a human in an aggressive manner,
then the consequences should never fall on the animal itself, but rather the owner or person
responsible for its upbringing. According to DOLA, the Dog Owner’s Liability Act that manages
liability for dog bite cases in Ontario, “when a dog bites or attacks a person or another pet, the
dog’s owner is liable for any resulting damages” (Gaynor and Keele). It also states in Section
3(2) of DOLA that if a person is trying to commit a crime while they are bitten, then the dog’s
owner is not at fault. However, this fails to stand if “the keeping of the dog on the premises was
unreasonable for the purpose of the protection of persons or property” (Gaynor and Keele). It is
already established that a dog that has not been well trained is not expected to be the best
behaved as it has not been taught otherwise. The owner of the dog must be willing to put in the
time, effort, and sometimes money, to ensure that no one, including strangers, themselves and
other dogs have to deal with the penalties of their negligence. Dogs are natural born protectors
who don’t know better if they have not been instructed on a consistent schedule to react in an
altering manner. Dogs have been labelled as “man’s best friend’ and rightfully so, but not when
someone has threatened their safety, comfortability or loved ones. The Center for Disease
Control – or the CDC – “there are around 4.5 million dog bite accidents each year” and 800,000
5
Gandhi
of them require medical care. As a general statistic, one out of every 73 people are faced with a
dog bite at some point (“Who’s to Blame for Dog Bites? | Zinda Law Group”). As common, and
unfortunate, as this is, it should never be the dog that has to deal with the outcome of the
situation. The commonality of this happening proves that people need to spend more time
training and creating a strong base for their pet’s behaviour, and if they are not able to do so then
they should not be allowed to own a dog. It is a lot of effort, time, and commitment to have a
well-behaved dog. When committing to dog ownership, one is also committing to the results of
their labour. Therefore, when a dog is provoked to bite, it is not their fault but the fault of the one
- My main method of persuasion in this essay was pathos. Since dogs hold such a special
place in so many people’s hearts, it was easy to focus in on points of emotion. I used it
when describing their label as “man’s best friend” and their reputation as
wild/domesticated animals.
- I used logos when stating facts about dog bites as it is a serious topic that would only be
seen as such if there was proper statistics and information to back it up. It proves my
point from an external source rather just having to believe the writing.
- Ethos was used when including DOLA as it is a source used by our province. Since it is
Works Cited
Gaynor, Joe, and William Keele. “Dog Bites: Owners Held to a Strict Liability Standard –
standard/.
“Who’s to Blame for Dog Bites? | Zinda Law Group.” Zinda Law Group,