Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/224725534
CITATIONS READS
39 2,068
3 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Jang Seok Myeong on 24 July 2014.
I. INTRODUCTION
levitation applications and in high-speed vehicles in order to Fig. 1. Eddy-current braking system using linear Halbach array. (a) Schematic
of eddy current braking system. (b) Magnetostatic field distribution in the
avoid the abrasion of mechanical disc brake [1]. The eddy-cur- transverse direction. (c) Magnetostatic field distribution in the longitudinal
rent braking system with dc-excited magnet inherently needs direction.
the power supply and has the consequent power losses. If the
dc-excited magnetic poles are replaced with permanent magnet, 1) The flux density distribution in the air gap is symmetric
a braking system has a high efficiency due to no power losses to the center of the secondary in the transverse direction
and a high power/weight ratio. In particular, the braking system ( direction), as shown in Fig. 1(b), and sinusoidal in the
with a linear Halbach magnetized mover develops a higher longitudinal direction ( direction), as shown in Fig. 1(c).
braking force because of the strong flux density [2]. 2) The induced currents in the secondary vary sinusoidally
For high-speed linear braking system, dynamic end effects along the transverse direction.
are caused by the relative motion between the mover of a fi- Using the Fourier series method, the air-gap flux density fun-
nite length and an infinitely long secondary. As a result, the at- damental distribution in the longitudinal direction is
traction force decreases notably with speed and, furthermore, a
magnetic drag force occurs [3]. In the characteristic analysis of
linear braking system with magnet for high speed, the end effect
should be necessarily accounted for. (1)
In this paper, linear Halbach magnetized mover is applied to
where the magnetization is related to the remanence by
eddy current braking system for high speed. For such a breaker,
, is the spatial wavenumber, is the magnet
we give analytical formulas considering end effects for its mag-
height, and is the air gap. The air-gap flux density transverse
netic field, eddy current distribution, forces according to the sec-
distribution is
ondary relative permeability, and conductivity. The analytical
results are also compared to the experimental data.
(a)
(4)
(b)
where , , and Fig. 3. (a) Distributions of the eddy current density in the transverse direction
. The integration constants are ob- and (b) flux density in the longitudinal direction.
tained from the boundary conditions, field and current density
continuity at and [3].
C. Forces Calculation
Using the coenergy method, the attraction force on the
magnet is given by
(5)
where is the equivalent magnetizing current density in in the longitudinal direction and the transverse direction. The
magnet source, and is the eddy-current density in the analysis model has the following parameters: magnet height
secondary plate. The drag force may be determined from mm, width mm, and length mm.
the secondary power loss The magnet array consists of NdFeB material with remanence
1.1 tesla. For a fixed value of the secondary conduc-
(7) tivity and permeability, Fig. 3(a) and (b) shows how the trans-
verse eddy-current density and absolute value of air-gap flux
where density longitudinal distributions vary for two different
speeds, respectively. It can be seen that, for the speed is high,
the eddy current density increases and the air-gap flux density
has a nonuniform distribution. These phenomena are called “end
effect.” For a fixed low value of the secondary conductivity, the
drag and attraction force variation with speed is calculated and
III. SIMULATION RESULTS ACCORDING TO THE SECONDARY
plotted in Fig. 4 for three different values of the secondary rel-
PERMEABILITY AND CONDUCTIVITY
ative permeability. Fig. 5 shows the drag and lift force variation
Using three-dimensional (3-D) finite-element analysis, Fig. 2 with speed for three different values of the secondary conduc-
shows the magnetostatic field distribution due to magnet source tivity. In this case, the secondary relative permeability is 1.
2996 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. 38, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2002
Fig. 5. Drag and lift forces versus speed for three different values of the
secondary conductivity. Fig. 7. Comparison of the drag forces between the analytical and experimental
results.
V. CONCLUSION
A Halbach magnetized mover was applied to a high-speed
eddy current braking system. Based on analytical 2-D field so-
lutions considering dynamic end effect, the magnetic field, eddy
current distribution, and forces according to the secondary rel-
ative permeability and conductivity were presented. It was ob-
served that the air-gap flux density has a nonuniform distribu-
tion for the high speed. Comparisons between numerical simu-
lations and experimental data were also presented.
(b)
Fig. 6. (a) Schematic and (b) photograph of testing apparatus. REFERENCES
[1] P. J. Wang, “Analysis of eddy-current brakes for high speed railway,”
TABLE I
SPECIFICATIONS OF THE EDDY-CURRENT BRAKING SYSTEM IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 34, pp. 1237–1239, July 1998.
[2] S. M. Jang, S. S. Jeong, and S. D. Cha, “The application of linear Hal-
bach array to eddy current rail brake system,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol.
37, pp. 2627–2629, July 2001.
[3] I. Boldea and S. A. Nasar, Linear Motion Electromagnetic Sys-
tems. New York: Wiley, 1985.
[4] M. Fujita, “3-dimensional electromagnetic analysis and design of
an eddy-current rail brake system,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 34, pp.
3548–3551, Sept. 1998.
[5] D. L. Trumper, “Magnet arrays for synchronous machines,” in Proc.
IEEE IAS 28th Annu. Meeting, 1993, pp. 9–18.
[6] K. Halbach, “Physical and optical properties of rare earth cobalt mag-
nets,” Nucl. Inst. Methods, pp. 109–117, 1981.