Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: G. Valavarasu, M. Bhaskar, B. Sairam, K. S. Balaraman & K. Balu (2005): A Four Lump Kinetic Model for
the Simulation of the Hydrocracking Process, Petroleum Science and Technology, 23:11-12, 1323-1332
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to
anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should
be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims,
proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in
connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Petroleum Science and Technology, 23:1323–1332, 2005
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Inc.
ISSN: 1091-6466 print/1532-2459 online
DOI: 10.1081/LFT-200038172
K. S. Balaraman
Centre for High Technology, New Delhi, India
K. Balu
Chemical Engineering Department, A. C. College of Technology,
Anna University, Chennai, India
1323
1324 G. Valavarasu et al.
INTRODUCTION
velocity, etc., on product yields and qualities. The models can also be used
for process optimization and control, design of new units, and selection of
suitable hydrocracking catalysts. Because the hydrocracking process involves
various reactions and components, it is not possible to keep track of all
the possible reactions and reaction mechanisms occurring simultaneously in
the reactor.
To simplify the hydrocracking process and to develop simple models,
researchers have studied the hydrocracking process with different modeling
approaches. Some researchers viewed hydrocracking chemistry of petroleum
fractions with respect to the hydrocracking of a set of model compounds or
pseudo compounds. Various experimental yield distribution data on hydro-
cracking of several model compounds have been generated and used as guid-
Downloaded by [University of Guelph] at 07:39 09 August 2012
MODEL FORMULATION
In the present work, a four lump mathematical model was formulated with six
significant reactions among them. The proposed model takes the following
kinetic lumps into consideration:
1. Gas (0–32◦ C)
2. Naphtha (32–150◦ C)
3. Middle Distillates (150–343◦ C)
4. VGO Feed (343◦ C+)
Downloaded by [University of Guelph] at 07:39 09 August 2012
The kerosene and diesel fractions were lumped together as middle dis-
tillates. These four lumps are considered to undergo six reactions to yield
different product yield patterns. The proposed reaction scheme for the hydro-
cracker model is represented as follows:
dCF
= −(k1 + k2 + k3 )CF (1)
dt
dCMD
= k1 CF − k4 CMD − k5 CMD (2)
dt
dCN
= k2 CF + k4 CMD − k6 CN (3)
dt
dCG
= k3 CF + k5 CMD + k6 CN (4)
dt
Four Lump Kinetic Model for the Hydrocracking Process 1327
MODEL ANALYSIS
Downloaded by [University of Guelph] at 07:39 09 August 2012
In recent years, Ali et al. (2002) have generated extensive data on the hydro-
cracking of heavy vacuum gas oil using amorphous silica-alumina and zeo-
lites as catalyst supports. The experimental data reported by Ali et al. (2002)
for the USY-ASA/NiMo catalyst at three different temperatures was used
to validate the proposed model in the present work. The vacuum gas oil
(VGO) feedstock used in the work of Ali et al. (2002) has 91.1 wt% of VGO
(343◦ C+) and 8.9 wt% of middle distillates (150–343◦ C).
The kinetic constants for the model were estimated by minimizing the
error between experimental data and predicted values of product yields. The
error function defined to estimate these parameters, (Y exp −Y pred)2 , was
minimized using a standard optimization procedure. The estimated kinetic
constants are presented in Table 1. Then the model differential equations
were solved to obtain product yield distributions at various residence times
in the reactor using the estimated kinetic parameters. The model equations
were solved to generate data on the effect of reaction time (inverse of liquid
hourly space velocity) and temperature on product yields. The data generated
for the effect of operating temperature on the product yields at a constant
space velocity of 1.0 h−1 are presented in Table 2 and Figure 2. The effect of
reaction time on the product yields for various temperatures (380◦ C, 395◦ C,
and 410◦ C) are shown in Figures 3, 4, and 5.
Kinetic
parameter
(h−1 ) Kinetic expression k at 410◦ C
The effect of reaction time on the product yield pattern was predicted based
on the model output at three different temperatures of 380◦ C, 395◦ C, and
410◦ C. The yield of VGO feedstock decreased with increasing residence
time, while the yields of other products, such as middle distillates, naphtha,
and gas, increased gradually. Similar trends were observed for 380◦ C and
395◦ C. At 410◦ C, the yield of VGO decreased, while the yield of middle
distillates increased sharply initially and then showed a steady value at higher
reaction times. The yields of naphtha and gas were found to increase steadily
with residence time. This also follows the general trend of hydrocracking
reactions.
The model predictions were compared with the experimental data used
in the present work and shown in Table 3. The parity data of the model
predictions vs. experimental data is presented in Figure 6. The proposed
Table 3. Experimental vs. predicted yields for the data of Ali et al. (2002)
Product yields (wt%) Exp. Pred. Exp. Pred. Exp. Pred. Exp. Pred.
model was found to represent experimental data satisfactorily with the specific
catalyst and feed system in the range of operating conditions studied. The
model can also be used for any catalyst and feed system, provided kinetic
parameters are estimated from pilot plant experiments.
CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
NOMENCLATURE
F Feedstock VGO
MD Middle distillates
N Naphtha
G Gas
CF , CMD , CN , CG Concentrations of feedstock, middle distillates,
naphtha, gas, respectively, at time t, wt%
LHSV Liquid hourly space velocity, h−1
k1 , k2 , k3 , k4 , k 5 , k6 First order reaction rate constants for the proposed
reactions, h−1
t
Downloaded by [University of Guelph] at 07:39 09 August 2012
Reaction time, h
REFERENCES
Ali, M. A., Tatsumi, T., and Masuda, T. (2002). Development of heavy oil
hydrocracking catalysts using amorphous silica-alumina and zeolites as
catalyst supports. Applied Catalysis A: General 233:77–90.
Krishna, R., and Saxena, A. K. (1989). Use of axial dispersion model for
kinetic description of hydrocracking. Chem. Eng. Sci. 44:703.
Lakshminarasimhan, C. S., Verma, R. P., and Ramachandran, P. A. (1996).
Continuous lumping model for simulation of hydrocracking. AIChE Jour-
nal 42(9):2645–2653.
Strangeland, B. E., and Kittrell, J. R. (1972). Jet fuel selectivity in hydro-
cracking. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 11(1):15–20.
Strangeland, B. E. (1974). Kinetic model for prediction of hydrocracker
yields. Ind. Eng. Chem. Proc. Des. Dev. 13(1):72.
Sullivan, R. F., Egan, C. J., and Langlois, G. E. (1964). Hydrocracking of
alkyl benzenes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on acidic catalysts.
Evidence for cyclization of the side chains. J. Catalysis 3:183–195.