Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Simulation and Experiment Study On Temperature of A Forced
A Simulation and Experiment Study On Temperature of A Forced
Ventilated Greenhouse
Yun ZHAO*a, Quanfeng HUANGa,b, Jieqiang ZHAOa,b, Defa SONGa
a
Faculty of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
b
College of Mechanical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science & Technology, Ganzhou 341000,
China
ABSTRACT
Keywords: temperature simulation; forced ventilation; greenhouse temperature; computational flow dynamics (CFD)
1. INTRODUCTION
Natural and forced ventilation are two basic ventilation in cooling technology of agriculture greenhouses. Natural
ventilation has many advantages like low cost, less energy consuming but has other disadvantage such as uncertain
ventilation rate depending on ambient condition (wind). On the contrary, forced ventilation has ability to maintain certain
ventilation rate so as to keep a stable temperature inside greenhouse which is necessity for some plant productions, even it
has a disadvantage of energy consuming, so there are some trend to use forced ventilation for flower production in
Zhejiang province of China. For a purpose of energy saving and optimal control of climate inside the greenhouse to make
a comfortable condition for plant, it is necessary to know more about behaviour of temperature responding to forced
ventilation in greenhouse.
In recent decades computational flow dynamics (CFD) is successfully applied in analysis of climate condition of
1~4
agricultural greenhouse[ ]. More recently some methodology approach were studied in order to simulate numerically
(CFD) a greenhouse equipped with fan and pad evaporative cooling system in order to identify the critical parameters that
affect the efficiency of fan and pad evaporative cooling systems in greenhouses[5,6]. The aim of this work is to do the
experimental verification of the proposed numerical model and the comparison of the numerical results with the
experiment results.
PIAGENG 2013: Intelligent Information, Control, and Communication Technology for Agricultural Engineering,
edited by Honghua Tan, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8762, 87620P · © 2013 SPIE
CCC code: 0277-786X/13/$18 · doi: 10.1117/12.2019745
SS SS
ter
gutter
R Out monitoring point
é Inside shade net SS st
Inside shade net
n T31 Thermal couple 3 m T3 I 1
5m 5m
2.3 m
T41 0.4 m
C 7 Wet curtain
fan 1T1 T21 T4 T6 LC. T7 1
1.6 W ground
V T5 Ve y 0.6 m T5 I s5
,/ground 0.5 m
-< A [1 W
7 40 m
Fig.1 Experimental greenhouse structure and temperature measurement point
(a)
W
5439i!
.á..dtV202M' -
nq
9aex 6SSimkA-
Sl6 UA
Z:í4a
t
4TiiiSi
d
w
wt
Li
Ora°ae.sMi
(b) (c)
Fig.2 Model meshed by Gambit
(a. general model; b. mesh refinement in pad; c. mesh refinement in fans)
3 07+702
3 039702
3 05,02
m.m
3.02
'
Coiitoin of Sosto ¡o.opooswo (lo) Contours of Static Temperature (k) (TIme= t3410e03) Oct 19, 2012
FLUE,11 3(3d, pMS, eke, unsteady)
Fig.3 Horizontal profile of temperature contours Fig.4 Vertical profile of temperature contours
In order to verify the accuracy of simulation model of CFD, the simulated temperature at positions where a thermal
couple was set up is got from the results of steady-state simulation of CFD and compared with the temperature value of the
test. As shown in Fig.1, T1 is the thermal couple near fan, T7 near pad; T3, T4 and T5 are in the same vertical line but T3
is the top with T4 in the middle and with T5 in the bottom; T6 is at a distance 5m from pad and T2 at a distance 5m from fan.
From the temperature value of the experimental, we can see that the temperature has horizontally such relation as T2> T4>
T6> T7, and vertically T3> T4> T5, which are in accordance with experimental data.
Tab.3 gives us the absolute errors and relative errors between the measured and the simulated temperature for T1 to T7.
It indicates the CFD model has a perfect prediction accuracy compared with that mentioned in other literatures. We
contribute this high accuracy to more boundary conditions being measured from experimental real time value in our work.
NO. T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7
Average temperature
of the experiment(oC) 27.78 28.60 28.40 28.22 25.96 26.72 25.18
Steady-state temperature
of the simulation(oC) 26.64 26.74 28.24 26.73 25.13 26.36 25.22
Absolute error (oC) 1.14 1.86 0.16 1.49 0.83 0.36 0.04
4. Conclusion
The comparison between the simulated temperature and experimental temperature shows that CFD simulation can
effectively reflect the actual temperature distribution in greenhouse. More accuracy of CFD model can be got if more real
time parameters being measured from experiment are applied to define the boundary conditions.
5. Acknowledgments
This work paper was funded by the research project (No. 2010C34004) of Science & Technology Department of
Zhejiang Province, P.R. China.
References
[1] Arbel, A., Yekutieli, O. and Barak, M., “Performance of a Fog System for Cooling Greenhouses,” J. of Agricultural
Engineering Research. Papers 72, 129–136 (1999).