TheRESISTER GREEN CROSS lier iceeresees geste |p mera creoment zu ‘which exstedin Switeerland. The Swiss Gorbachev and Global | group had been formed four months Enviro-Communism to the merger, This raises the question as to whether the creation of WC and its merger with GCI were ty | moves tofacilitate the establishment of Natalié Grant | GCI headquarters in Geneva. ‘The early description of Green | Cross International as American was | fale. Even while GCT now has a chap Moscow Stage Manager tains a prominent item on thelist of | terin the United States, GClisnot and major Moscow directed hoax | deceitful operations of Soviet leaders, | was never an American movement. of the 1950s was the *Peace | protection of the environment has be- | Movement.” The Moscow re. | tome the principal tool for attack | Global Forum time, expert in political deception, fol- | against the West and al it stands or. seen Cross Internationa races ows attentively western opinion, which | Protection ofthe environment may be | ies origin to a group that it then woes ts'a foundation co spread | weed as a pretent to adope « series of started out under the some- disinformation. Concern by some | measures designed to undermine the | what clumsy appellation of “Global Fo- people in the free world over any par- | indusitial base of developed nations. 1¢ j rum of Spiritual and Parliamentary Rreutar development which might | mayalso serve to introduce malaise by | Leadesson Human Survival” which t threaten their well-being — for ex- | lowering ther standard of ving and | abbreviated to Global Forum, using the ‘ample, nuclear weapons — is seized | implanting commu- fll mameoniy inc upon by Moscow disinformation strat- | nist“values” eee Serra esac pe |e pcs ae tp nae eee cect or A terme tt ae Sard dun | chap be We StiIL Femains @ promi- Maccamae, oe, der considerable stress the victims of | viatheenvironmentis i fist nese activist and now ‘hu Moncow game can ths beta | star in many re, neREHEM on the List ee ae inne Sean ee eiicvsnd ai. | gpesetometiodeen. OF deceitful opera- tor of wre veganiza. Ingstegehurnfultsneirowninieen | ployed by the tions of Soviet lead= 6", — Tike “disarmament.” organization of the i Global Forum's ‘The Soviet tok advantage ofan | "Peace Movement.” EFS, protection of the pee war sentiments that had developed in | Truefactsareexagger- pay lish dialogue with C. IN aveee They were interested, of | ated co the exteeme eBVironment has be- Vob4 founder ofthe courses in promoting peace fr their | withthe inenion of come the principal Eanh Ai Soci ‘vn protection tomake Soviet policies | terrifying rank-an nse. titicult to determine hordrecepive tothe puble-Themain | file citizens, while TOOL for attack against ether the iden of 2 purpore of the "Peace Movernen,” | doubtful evidence js the West and all it dslogue came 19 Ms, ftage managed from Moscow since its | presented as scentifi- jatsumura from inception, Mowever,wastospread com: cally proven Tat stands for. Moscow, which favors tnunistinfluence hroughout theworld. | ~The set up of the dialogues as a tool for “The urge of the Sovietleadership to | environmental operation, however, ix | infiltration. Mr. Nobel reeeuited the expand in the west was confirmed by | more complex. Instead of one world ; Rev: James Pack Morton, Dean ofthe D. Volkogoniov.a prominent Soviet of- | council representing the entire “Peace | Cathedyal of St. John the Divine in ficial aschivistand historian, Inaspeech | Movement,” the enviconinental ex- | New York, who arranged to have the at The National Archives in Washing- | cremiscs (also known as professional | first meeting of the group in June 1985 ton, D-C., shortly before his death, | environmentalist) fallineo wo groups. | in the Cathedeal. Among other things, Volkogonov admitted thatthe objective | One,anon-governmentalorganization, | they discussed a solution to “erica is- afthemeninpowerintheSoviet Union | isthe so-called Earth Council chaired sue," such as degradation ofthe envi had always been to gain greater influ- | by Maurice F. Strong, a top-level off- | ronmentand the depletion ofthe earths cencein the world atlarge. Expansionof | cial ofthe United Nations, The other | resources. There were only about a Jnfluence is, therefore, one of the prin- } group, also an NGO, is linked with | dozen participants. They included, ipal purposes of every major Moscow | Moscow through the Green Cross In- | however, prominent figures Angier disinformation hoax, Moscow's meth- | ternational, or GCI. Mikhail 8. ) Biddle Duke, the former chief of pro- ‘ods have not changed. | Gotbachevisitschairman and founder. | tocol inthe Kennedy and Johnson ad- The environment has replaced | An early definition of Green Cross | minisrations, and Congressman James pace, 25 an astute journalist recently | Internationa depicts GClasan Amei- | H. Scheuer of New York: Femarked. Although “peace” still re- | cannon-governinental organization, | ‘The meeting at the Cathedral was 58 Vol. IV, No.3soon followed by @ conference in ‘Tarrytown, New York. The Tarrytown meeting had a more numerous audi- ence. In Tarrytown, the question was raised and the motion was approved of holding an international conference in Oxford, England. Sometime later Congressman Scheuer visited Moscow. He tookalong. invitations to the conference and handed afew to the office of the Presi | presented Soviet suggestions on how i dent ofthe Supreme Soviet for trans | mission to parliamentarians. Several Soviet officials accepted the invitation and attended the conference. The So- et delegation was led by Yevgeny Velikhov, Vice Chairman of the Soviet ‘Academy of Sciences. The Oxford Conference was well a= tended, mostly by leaders of non-Chris- The RESISTER, ibe oficial publication ofthe Global ois were the main age Senator Forum.’ ‘Al Gore may serve as an example. key event was the speech by [MikhailS. Gorbachev, Presidentofthe | The First Earth Summit Soviet Union. As it was summarized eanwhile, the United Na- in Shared Vision Gorbachev's speech | ions was embarking on its own program to protect the to respond to an “ecological impera- | environment. Leading among the en tive.” The Soviet recommendations | vironmentalistsarthe UN was Maurice comprised the demand fora nuclear test | F. Strong, a multimillionaire with top- ban, the establishment Jevel business contacts. ofaninternationalen- aban J 1972, Maurice ronmental monitor- Strongacted as Secre= entemthecigning You should remem- ?.0"6 ing system, thesigning tary General at the ofa covenant to pro- ber that at the time of Stockholm Confer- tect unique ecological hi a ence,! which was con- zones, the support of is speech, vened to put the United Nations envi Gorbachev was still environment on she ind of the interna, the President of the "fg 1587, the UN tian faiths and indigenous personalities. | tional conference on Soviet Union and he World Commission Inaddition, there were representatives from Britain (including the Arch of Canterbury) and the 5 ‘Among the delegates were Chief Oren R. Lyons and Mother Teresa. There were elections tothe Councilof Global | Forum. Nominated to the Council were antumber of religious leaders from non-Christian faiths, as well as Yevgeniy Velikhov. During leadership announced that their nextin- ternational conference would take place in Moscow, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Underthe circumstances one wonders whether the Global Forum re- ceived assistance from some powerful ally. The international conference in Oxford was a clever move on the part of racially unknown and question: able group. ence of 1987, the Global Forum entered the international arena. ‘The Big Event—The Moscow ‘onference Ihe Moscove Conference metin- January 1990. Co-sponsored by the Supreme Soviet of the | | \ | (then) USSR, theconference had the ac~ | tivesupportofthe Academy of Sciences. the environment and on Environment and op | development, which Was expressing the — Development cailed therlands. | vasscheduledtomest “yiews” and “sugges fo the establishment Injane 1992 in Bree ofa code which would Si Govbacher novel tions” of the Commu prescribe. principal [oo | jet nore for behavior of trgely coud ‘be _ Bist Party Soviet sen arideal gvented only through Union, of which he international effort. You should re- the Earth. Andin June was leader. 1992, the UN held an the proceedings, the GF | member that at the —————-— intersiational confer- time ofhis speech, Gorbachev was stil | ence in Rio de Janciro, Brazil, which the President of the Soviet Union and | discussed toalarge extent matters con- hhewas expressing the views” and "sug~ | nected with ‘protection’ of the environ- gestions” of the Communist Party So- | ment. Maurice Strong was one of the viet Union, of which he was leader. | organizers. In environmental circles, These “suggestions” did not fall on | this conference was known as The Earth deaf ears, Before long, the activities of | Summit. Global Forum began orefleetthecom- | Allwasnotsmooth sailing athe first munist “recommendations.” Indeed, | Earth Summit, Heads of stae refused ite Oxord Cone | haere een any dubs tthe po" | to acet some popes and arg litical stand by certain leaders of Glo- | ments were often bitter. Insults were bal Form or Moscow's attitude toward | exchanged, and President Bush, who at- this barely known group, they weredis- | tended the meeting, got his share of pelled by events at the Moscow Con- | comment, Timothy Wirth, a formes ference. Intense Soviet interest in the | senator from Colorado, accused him of proceedings was obvious. | engaging in “adolescene politics” and By 1990, certain leaders of the Glo- | looking “silly” for not signing a treaty bal Forum had transformed theirgroup | on biodiversity.* Global Forum, for intoa communist front and were ready | some reason, held a simultaneous con- to act upon Soviet “suggestions.” The | ference ofenvironmental pasliamentar- All Soviet religious communities were | services they began rendering to inter- | ians in another section of the city. The called upon to ensure the cooperation of various religious communities. The speakers included the Secretary Gen= eral of the United Nations and the President of the USSR. Senator Al Gore was also among the speakers. He hhad by then become a member of the Global Forum Council and had even contributed an article to Shared Vision, ‘national communism were important. | presence of two similar meetingsin Rio In its appeal, Global Forum played on | de Janeiro led to confusion. ‘Resolu- hostility toward certain aspects of West- | tions passed by Global Forum were at cern civilization, Global Forum recruited | tributed at times by observers to the ‘non-communist environmentalists and_ | United Nations Earth Summit, laced them under the direct, control- | The conference of parliamentarians influence of communists. Naive | served Global Forum as an opportu- indigenous peoples, aon-Christian re- | nity to put into effect Soviet president eg en een, | Geta eee oon Vol. IV, No.3 59aninternational monitoringiinsticution to protect the envionment. This was accomplished by having the parliamen- tarians pass unanimously a resolution creating an organization, named Incer- national Green Cross later changed to Green Cross International. According to a GCI press release, Mikhail Gorbachev's Moscow speech wasat the root of Green Cross International's foundation. He was, therefore, invited to accept the position of founder and chairman of GCI. The formal aunch~ ing of GCT could not take place at Rio and had co be postponed to a future international conference. That took place in 1993 in Kyoto, Japan. Gorbachev attended the Kyoto confer- ence and accepted the nomination. ‘Although environmentalist circles ‘were disappointed by the results ofthe 1992 Earth Summit, it actually proved to be a step forward in their campaign for global “protection” of the environ= ment. The UN conference, thus, adopted a program for the coming cen tury. The course of action bared off “sustainable development” was set down in 2 document known as Agenda 21, which was further amplified by meetings in Copenhagen, Cairo, and Beijing Agenda 21s viewed by environmen- talextremistsasa blueprint in “sustain- able development.” It was circulated among world leaders who are expected | by environmental extremists to imple- rent its provisions. The document is divided into forty chapters, some of which contain, on their face, what af pear to be reasonable demands, until those demands are juxtaposed with other chapters (ie. the chapter on *s0- cial justice”) that reflect adherence to blatantly communist doctrines. "he Earth Council he Earth Council, an interna nal non-governmental orga ization, alco arose asa direct, result of the Earth Summit. The prob- able creator of the Earth Council is its chairman Maurice F. Strong, Iestates its mission to be the support and “emn- ppoweement” of “people” in building more “‘secure,”“equitable” and “susta able” future. The Council, therefore, aims at strengthening the participation of “equal rights” groups, particularly women, indigenous peoples and “youth,” in its work.*The special focus | of the Earth Council is to ensure the The RESISTER “operationalization” of indigenous people, women and “youth.” Canadian born, in his sixties, Mr. | Strong isa self-made man and has ‘numerable contacts in highly placed and | | eakthy business circleswhere he seems to enjoy a good reputation. He admits twholding “socialist ideology” and has been described by a former UN Deputy ‘Ambassador asa"very dangerous ideo- Togue, way over the eft.” Mr. Strong’s immediate assistant is the Executive Director ofthe Earth Council, Maximo ‘T. Kalave He is said to be an “activist” from the Philippines. Mr. Kalaw, who also heads the Earth Council fnsticute and isthe Chairman of the Green Forum of the Philippines, holds some rather bizarre | views. For instance, according to Mr. Kalaw: economic soci- stantly d held publ inerest™ ssa pieery concern tnd, therefore, its tmerber should not be allowed tobe art of peblic governance, Moscow i Fepresened os the bourd ofthe Earth Council by Yevgeniy Velikhov, Vice | Chairman of the Soviet Academy of Sciences. Since its establishment, the Earth Countithasbeenin clove collaboration with Green Cross International. In 1994, Maurice Strong and and launched an “initi charter. They proposed the signing of the charter which would, according to its promoters, provide a "new mode of Tif based upon radical “principles for the whole of humanity.” Both Maurice Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev viewed “The Earth Charter asa priority In this respect they seemed tobe following the precepts of the UN World Commis- sion on Environment and Develop- ment (UNCED). Indeed, in 1987 UNCED had called for the formation of a charter which would “norms” for states and indi ‘maintain life on earth. In order to produce an “ethical and moral” set of “imperatives,” environ- rental extremists supported the idea of an earth charter plan to precede its | acceptance by worldwide consultation Gorbachev con- “change of values” but never specifies should replace them. | inorngallostorsoftoiey: Torch consensus in a world inhabited by people of totally opposite views is an impossible undertaking. Therefore “consensus” will be achieved by limit: ing consultation to individuals and NGOsatreadyfavoringthe Earth Char reen Cross International he political line adopted by Green Cross International is that of Mikhail Gorbachev, founder and chaiman of GCI, who, appropriately, is its mouthpiece. OF nist, Gorbachev and the Green Cross will ‘wantto install commu nist "values." Inits pro nouncement, Green Cross usualy calls for actionbutleavesuncold the action it plans to jlemands a ety, although themain the values he wants take. Generalities per engine for economic meate che statements Sekdopmentedosrnoe Changed, or what oP") and Gorbachev as well — relating to doctrine and activities. In dis- cussing the aims of his enterprise, Gorbachev calls fr anew civilization,” sserting that neither democracy nor prayers to God can solve the alleged world crisis.” What isa “new civiliza- He does not explain. Because civilization is usually understood to be cultural and echinologial development, the qualifying "new" requizesinterpre~ tation chat is (conveniently) not sup- plied. Gorbachev constantly demands 2 “change of values” but never specifies the values he wants changed, or what should eplace them. Inits analysis of the Earch Charter, GCI also follows Gorbachev's lead. GCH laments chat despite repeated ef- forts, the “international community hnas not yet been able co agree on an effectveinternaional treaty thar would guarantee the “rights” of the earch.” With the creation of international law a‘slow and tedious process,” GCI sug- gests greaterfocusing on soitlaw.™ Soft law refers co non-binding documents drawn up by special interest groups, suchas Clr Phe EacthConnel that establish “norms,” hoping they wil take ‘on the force of “lave” through custom ry practice. Majority rule and dissent ye thereby circumvented." Green | Cross International hopes, however, to 60 Vol. IV, No.3‘persuade the government ofeach coun- try to ratify the Farth Charter in time for its proclamation on 01 January 2000. ‘The administrative director of Green Cross International is Andreas Eggenberg. He advocates integration of all sectors of society at every level in order to achieve “constructive” overall prevention of and response to disas- fers. In his opinion, this approach will bilize the ecological and political uation” of humanii The top figure in Green Cross In- ternational "remains. Mikhail Gorbachey, admitted communist by ‘raining and conviction. The Vice Pre dent if GCI i Daniel Goeudevers 4 Frenchman, self-made businessman, who occupies prominent positions in the automotive world. He is a member of the Club of Rome and an advisor to the Director General of UNESCO. He also presides over the Economic Coun «il of the Gorbachev Foundation, The United States chapter of Green Cross International was officially ‘opened by Mikhail Gorbachev during his visitin October 1994. Named “Glo- bal Green USA,” it maintains offices in several cities, including New York and Cleveland, Ohio. Ialso has an of- fice in Washington, D.C., where itis represented by one Paul Walker. The president of the American chapter is ‘one Diane Meyer Simons, whose slo- ganis “oneworld, one people.” Sheap- parently intends to use this motto to rally public and political leaders for ac tion and support of Global Green USA. Global Green USA is directed by Hugh Locke, who in his frst year of activity concentrated on a campaign against “toxic military waste.” Hugh Locke aso seems interested in the production of documentary films devoted to leaders ofthe environmental movement. Asare most of his colleagues, Hugh Locke is vague in his comments Its, therefore, difficult to understand what he means when he too calls for the creation of a “new civilization.” ansion een Cross and Crescent In- ternational is now nits fourth year. (Sometimes “Crescent” is added to the GCI name.) At first ance, it does not seem to have per- ied any spectacular feat. les name ever been mentioned during vol- canic eruptions, nor does GCI seem to Vol. IV, No.3 The RESISTER have intervened in saving the victims ‘of extensive floods, nor has it received publicity at che time of oil spills. GCI has been silent on the ‘Three Gorges Dam Project in China, scheduled for completion in 2009, although the project is expected to have a profound ecological, environmental, cultural, ar- cheological and historical impact. Yet, rescuing the victims of disasters and protecting ecological zones are in the GCI program. In fact, skeptics argue that so far GCI has been fong on rhetoric and short on action.” Green Cross Inter national, however, has notbeenidle. Ithasac- ely collaborated with UN environmen- tal extremists at nu- merous meetings and conferences and has taken a leading role in launching che Earth Charter. Gorbachev The meeting par- ties stressed the need to strengthen the par- ticipation of “equal rights” groups, i.e., women, indigenous peoples and “youth” in councils for sus- ond Earth Summit. Rioe | issued a set of recommenda- ig with the necessity to fo- | usatenton on The Earth Chartrand | to reach a consensus on “values.” The | meeting parties stressed the need to strengthen the participation of “equal rights” groups, i., women, indigenous peoplesand “youth” in councils fors tainable development. The emphai placed by environmental extremists Uupon “sustainability” raises questions. Supporters of “sustainability” often disregard the face that nature is their most dangerous opponent. With one sweep, na- ture can destroy the most carefully laid plans. The voleano at Montserrat, which transformed a flour- into s desert of aah, may serve as an ex: and his staffhave fur- ample, therbeenseekingandtainable develop- "Ti. UN second finding support in ment. Earth Summit opened government circles, its doorsin June 1997. particularly in Hol- land, and have been engaged in expand- | ing GCI into a truly international organization. Barely one year after its cstblishmene, Green Croosand Cres, cent International had already formed five national chapters. The GCI oper ates two centers. One is in che Hague, where GCI maintains its programs on “values” education, as well as matters related to the media and communica tions. The other center is in Geneva, ‘Switzerland, where GCI handlesemer- ‘gency operations. Inaddition, the group has chapters in a number of countries, including Estonia, France, Japan, Ko- rea, the Netherlands (where govern ment circles have donated at least $75,000 0 GCI), Sweden, Switzerland, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Second Earth Summit ‘1 March 1997, five years after the Earth Summit, conference on en- ironment met in Rio de Janeiro with an attendance of some five hun- dred people. Ithas been named Rios’. ‘The participants metin order to review the progress in “sustainable develop: ment” made since the Earth Summit and apparently to prepare for the Sec Dignitaries from over 160 countries locked to the meeting i | New York City Presidene Bill Cinton and Vice-president Al Gore also at- tended. The summit reportedly began with “recriminations between Europe and the United States and by Third World countries condemning devel- oped countries for broken promises." ‘The main pointsin the discussion con- cemed aid to developing countries by } the West — or rather, by the United States. Another point dealt with the signing ofa pact reducing “greenhouse {gases” and their emission; a pact spe- ‘ifically designed to cripple whats left | of American industry. This was pre sented to the conference in Kyoto, Ja- jpan, in December 1997, ‘avironmental extremists proclaimed their disappointment with the results of The Second Earth Summit. They failed to note, however, as did herbalist | Charles K. Hanley" that the environ- | mental movement made progress by “slow bits” over the last four decades. Conclusion formation available a the present rime seems to show thar the envi- ronmental extremists maintain | contact with and are supported by Mos- 61The RESISTER cow. The“movement™ has al the traits of a Soviet disinformation operation. Faetsare exaggerated into a“nightmar~ ish” picture of floods, seorched earth, disease and death. The target, the in- ddustrialized West —~ scared and con- fused by Moscow's sympathizers in “science,” academe, and the slavishly obedient Establishment media — is influenced to accept measures and regu lations harmful to the Western world These are not the only consequences of the action of the environmental ex- ‘remist movement. Its promotingcon- flict, domestically and internationally. We can only marvel at che skill with which the two top leaders have proved | able to introduce dissent and contlict into usually pacific circles. These ewo leaders, Maurice Strong | and Mikhail Gorbachev, are men of considerable experience. They und stand economic and politics. They are therefore fully aware of what they are doing. Strong has the power of the United Nations at his disposal. Gorbachey, and able public relations man, gained considerable influence in the period following his retirement from president of the USSR. They are consciously harming the United Staes. ‘Who profits from the activities of ‘these two men? NOTES: Sbared Vision, No.6, Global Fo- rum (no publishersadress giver ‘Sbared Vision, No 7, Global Fo~ ur, (vo pubishersaddrss given) p11 ‘Editor's Note. Mme. Grant, in | ‘ny estimation, gives eredit to (now) Vice President Al Gore as an apparent dupe, whereno such creditis due. Albert Gore e's father, Albert Gore St. hada distinguished” career as political shield bearer for“business- maa” Armand Hammer, who was imate of Lenin, Stalin, and Krushchev (yes, Hammer was Jewish and a Communist), Hammer's FBI"dossicr” had tobe trundled around ona dolly: Hammerfest bribed Rep. Gore Sein 1950 witha“proftabe partner- ship inact busines (an yo4 say “money laundering?) payoff for “pull” that coninaed well tate ate 60s: Ip return, Gore St. provided politcal access,” and “protection” from FBI interference in Hammer 'sillegal technology transfers tothe Soviet Union, (Another of Hammer's Con= aressionalstoogeswas Rep. James Roosevel, ellest — and eminently bribe worthy — sonof FDR.) After GoreSe became asena~ torhehecamea tireless champion for Ham- | mer, and grease of skids fr yet greater | politial “access.” Senator Albert Gore St. | wasavehement champion of *woed peace™ | (Ga the Communist sense of the phrase), | the Arne Convol and Disarsament | ‘Agency, the creation of the Peace Corps praised the United Nations brutal te- munis ia Katanga 1962. Albert Gore was Front Coun cil fora Livable World, advocate of tans- ferrng state-of-the-art technology to the Soviet Union for “peacefal purposes” (a Hammer project), and beginning “ex: changes” 1 Eastern Fs to promote “understanding” (another Ham mer projet). Albert Gore wa an enthi asic tupporterof President Johns’ "Great Society” programs; his only complaint was that Johmons scilisprogeane dnt go | final payotf was a neyin-Armand Hammers Oc- ‘dental coal division. Sen. Al Gove J was alkoan intimate of Hammer, who sat at Gore Je'stableat Reagatsinauguation ball. VP |AlGoreis every inch his fathers son, hav~ ing learned the “trade” at daddys fet; he | was “groomed” to be where be is now la line for the presidency. Treason may not conrup Blood legally butit does scent ran fribe Goren Guardian, September 17,1991. 5 Thetachington ins, November 85,1997, pA. 1 Preis an ineresting ‘coincidence’ ‘hatin her extensive travel among indig- ‘enous peoples Hillary Clinton wavally Santeria tod ou “Alston Chase, The Washington Time, October 41997, AL3. “Earth Charter Programme,” Green Cross Tnternationaly (htepi// wong ch greencrosproearth hem). It is doubeful this document is curently ac= ceosble Tid "Gordon LBrady.“Greenthreats? ‘The 1992 UN Conference in Environment and Development." Inernational Freedom Review. Spring, 1991, p47. " I New Serie November 5 1994, 8 udaton, Now Dee, 1994, p56. The Washington Tine, June 24, 1997 "The Mashington Times, June 29, 1997. 62 Vol. IV, No. 3