Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/286879364
CITATIONS READS
0 1,678
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Sustainable Lifestyles 2.0: End User Integration, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (EU-InnovatE) View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Ben Capell on 08 August 2018.
Contributors: Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park
Editors: Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park
Book Title: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Quality and the Service Economy
Chapter Title: "Training, Education, and Development of Staff"
Pub. Date: 2015
Access Date: September 14, 2015
Publishing Company: SAGE Publications, Inc
City: Thousand Oaks
Print ISBN: 9781452256726
Online ISBN: 9781483346366
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346366.n225
Print pages: 815-820
©2015 SAGE Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This PDF has been generated from SAGE knowledge. Please note that the pagination
of the online version will vary from the pagination of the print book.
SK Reviewers
©2015 SAGE Publications, Inc. All Rights Reserved. SAGE knowledge
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346366.n225
[p. 815 ↓ ]
Although staff development and training are not new to organizations, such initiatives
have become much more prominent since the 1980s with the expansion of the
Japanese total quality management approach to many firms worldwide. Key elements
of the (then) innovative total quality management approach for improving organizational
performance include continuous learning, at the individual and organizational levels,
and fostering high employee involvement. With these goals in mind, companies such
as Motorola, Honda, and Toyota created learning centers and processes, such as
“improvement groups,” that took staff training and development to a new strategic level
and helped prepare the organization to succeed in an evolving business reality.
Organizations can have many different reasons for implementing training, education,
and development programs. Among the most common purposes are the following:
The benefits of education, training, and development are well documented and show
that such investments tend to have an important positive impact on organizations’
bottom-line results, competitiveness, staff performance, job satisfaction, and
commitment.
Training refers more to the learning of new on-the-job skills that are needed for a
specific job. Effective training programs usually include a combination of instructor-
based intervention and hands-on experience that helps practice the newly acquired
skills or knowledge. In contrast to the practically oriented training, education refers
to more theoretical knowledge that is meant to improve employees’ reasoning and
judgment. Finally, development is typically related to the acquisition of knowledge and
skills that are wider in their scope and that are seen as contributing in a broader sense
to employees’ overall personal and professional growth. These types of interventions
usually include elements such as coaching, formal education, and developmental
experiences. In a sense, they focus more on the employee’s future needs, when
compared with trainings that are more concerned with achieving an immediate result.
To make the discussion more fluid, from this point on the entry refers to the three
activities as learning programs.
Needs assessment can take place at the individual or collective level (team, unit,
etc.). At the individual level, such programs tend to focus on improving an employee’s
inadequate performance or preparing them for their next career step. As such, the
assessment will focus on the employee’s specific needs and on what the best way
will be for them, as individuals, to acquire the required skills or knowledge. In contrast
to such an individualized approach, needs assessment can take place at the team,
business unit, or organizational level—for example, when there is a need to prepare a
group of employees to respond effectively to upcoming organizational challenges, to
develop a new product line, or to address ethical issues or a high accident rate.
The needs assessment can be based on many different sources of data depending on
the issues that need to be addressed.
Needs assessment can at times result in a decision not to offer any learning
intervention. For example, a manager might decide that the employee is not the right
person for the specific job and that training will not help much. Similarly, when [p. 817
↓ ] considering a costly and long program to prepare a team to work on a new product
line, management can decide instead to hire new employees who already have the
skills or knowledge required for the assignment.
Finally, every learning program will need to obtain the right level of support in order for it
to take place. In organizational terms, the manager providing the support and approval
of the resources for the activity is typically referred to as the sponsor.
Instructional objectives refer to the definition of success and answers to questions such
as what the employee/s will be able to do better/differently after the intervention.
The program design addresses more practical concerns such as who should participate,
who should deliver the intervention, what will be the learning methodology/ies, where
and when will the program take place, and so forth.
For instance, let’s think of a simple example. Following a surge in customer complaints
concerning an existing product replacement process, the management decided to train
its service representatives on a new process. The human resources department defined
the instructional objective as follows: “After completing the training, the service reps will
know how to execute the new process independently.”
Once the objective has been defined, the person responsible for the training will need to
clarify the design elements so that they can guarantee that they provide an effective and
efficient solution:
1. Should the training be provided only to the company staff or also to external service
providers who are involved in the process? Should supervisors also attend the training?
Who else should become familiar with the new process?
3. Who will deliver the training or prepare its content? Will it be the human resources,
the management, or maybe an external consultant?
4. Should the program take place on a specific day for all employees? Will it be done
in case the company has offices in different locations, or when the employees work in
shifts? Should the content get translated into multiple languages? And so on.
On-the-job training: On-the-job training (OJT) is one of the most common and
traditional ways to learn new skills and gain knowledge. It takes place when an
experienced employee explains the way to perform a certain task to a trainee. Some of
the benefits of OJT are the socialization that happens between the two employees and
the independent manner in which the activity takes place.
Shadowing: When shadowing, one staff member follows and observes, over a
determined period of time, the way another employee is performing his or her job. This
allows the “shadow” to gain insights into the role of the person he or she follows and
into different organizational contexts.
Stretch assignments: These are projects that extend beyond the scope of the
employees’ past experience and role. Stretch assignments are expected to be
challenging and to provide in vivo opportunity to develop and practice new skills and
knowledge.
Other possible learning interventions include role plays, case studies, simulations,
business games, job swaps, and discussion groups.
The evaluating of a learning program is not a simple task, as many times, it is difficult
to quantify its contribution, especially when there is no control group to compare it with.
Furthermore, as some of the programs address soft skills and attitudes, assessing the
results ends up being based on the personal judgment of management.
These difficulties, however, should not deter from striving to achieve feedback that is as
accurate as possible.
One of the most popular evaluation approaches is Kirkpatrick’s 4 Levels, which assess
the contribution of the program at four different levels.
Further Readings
Accel-Team. (n.d.). Human resource management: Function 7: Employee
education, training and development. Retrieved from http://www.accel-team.com/
human_resources/hrm_07.html
American Society for Training & Development. (2012). State of the industry report:
ASTD’s annual review of workplace learning and development data. Retrieved from
https://www.td.org/Publications/Research-Reports/2012/2012-State-of-the-Industry
Baldwin, T. T., Danielson, C., & Wiggenhorn, W. (1997). The evolution of learning
strategies in organizations: From employee development to business redefinition.
Academy of Management Executive, 11(4), 47–58.
Birdi, K., Allan, C., & Warr, P. (1997). Correlates and perceived outcomes of four types
of employee development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 845–857.
[p. 819 ↓ ] Collins, D. B., & Holton, E. F. (2004). The effectiveness of managerial
leadership development programs: A meta-analysis of studies from 1982 to 2001.
Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(2), 217–248.
Jensen, J. (2001, June). Improving training in order to upgrade skills in the tourism
industry (Tourism and Employment, Final Report of Working Group B, European
Commission). http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/tourism/files/working_groups/
finalreportb_june2001_en.pdf
O’Connell, B. (2013). Why CEOs want faster training–no matter the cost. Forbes.
Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/bmoharrisbank/2013/01/08/why-ceos-want-
faster-training-no-matter-what-the-cost/
Rahman, S.-U. (2004). The future of TQM is past: Can TQM be resurrected? Total
Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(4), 411–422.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483346366.n225