Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4 April 1959
INTRODUCTION
* The major part of this work was carried out by the authors at the Institute for SOil
Fertility, Groningen.
** Institute for Soil Fertility, C-roningen.
- - 3 3 5 - -
336 E. G. MULDER, R. BOXMA AND W. L. VAN VEEN
EXPERIMENTAL
N i t r a t e was e s t i m a t e d a c c o r d i n g to t h e x y l e n o l m e t h o d 1.
RESULTS
TABLE I
A 0 (continued)
Cauliflower 0Mo, 1 dayMo Stem 4.0
0 Mo, control Leaf 0.3 Seed leaf 2.3
Stem 0.4 0 Mo, 3 days Mo Leaf 3.4
0 Mo, 4-} h Mo Leaf 6.3 Stem 5.2
Stem 2.0 Seed leaf 3.0
0 Mo, 9} h Mo Leaf 7.0 0 Mo, 6 days No Leaf 0.9
Stem 2.7 Stem 2.8
OMo, 2 4 } h M o Leaf 4.7 Seed leaf 1.1
Stem 2.7 + Mo, control Leaf 0.5
+ Mo, control Leaf 3.1 Stem 1.2
Stem 2.0 Seed leaf 0.7
B D
Cauliflower Tomato
0 Mo, } h H~O Leaf 1.C 0 Mo, control Leaf 0.2
0 Mo, 2 h Mo Leaf 2.9 Stem 1.3
0 IV[o, 2 h H20 Leaf 1.1 0Mo, 1 d a y M o Leaf 2. l
0 Mo, 4~} h No Leaf 6.3 Stem 2.4
0 Mo, 4~ h H20 Leaf 1.3 0 Mo, 2 days Mo Leaf 1.2
Stem 2.4
13 0 No, 5 days Mo Leaf 1.2
Spinach Stem 1.8
0 Mo, control Leaf O.C 0 Mo, 7 days No Leaf 0.5
Stem 0.5 Stem 2.4
Seed leaf 0.5
OMo, I d a y M o Leaf 3.7
* Averages values for protein-N, soluble non-protein-N (except nitrate-N), and ni-
trate-N, in % of dry matter, respectively, of:
Cauliflower: A, 0 Mo control, leaf: 3.2, 1.7, 2.2; stem: 1.5, 1.I, 3.9; + Mo control,
leaf: 4.4, 1.4, 1.1; stem: 1.5, 1.1, 3.3. B, 0 Mo, H20, leaf: 3.3, 1.8, 2.4.
Spinach: 0 Mo control, leaf: 2.8, 1.6, 3.1; stem: 1.9, 1.4, 3.4; seed leaf: 2.3, 1.1, 3.0; +
Mo control, leaf: 4.5, 1.6, 0.7; stem: 2.3, 1.5, 2.7; seed leaf: 2.8, 1.4, 1.5; 3 and 6 days after
treatment NOs-N of the leaves had decreased to 2.7 and 1.8% respectively.
Tomato: 0 Mo control, leaf: 3.9, 0.9, 2.3; stem: 1.6, 0.6, 3.8; 2, 5 and 7 days after Mo
treatment NOa-N of the leaves had decreased to 1.9, 0.7, and 0.5% respectively.
** Averages of duplicate values expressed as/~g NaNO2 formed per }h per mg protein.
b) N i t r a t e r e d u c t i o n in m o l y b d e n u m - d e f i c i e n t plants
upon infiltration with sodium molybdate.
C a u l i f l o w e r p l a n t s . One half of molybdenum-deficient leaves
was infiltrated with a solution containing 25 ppm of Na2MoO4.2H20,
the other half with H20. It was shown that two hours after com-
pletion of the infiltration with molybdate, the nitrate reducing
capacity had reached its maximal value (Table II, A).
S p i n a c h p l a n t s . A comparison was made between nitrate-
TABLE II
A B (Spinach continued'
Cauliflower q- Mo, HlO 1 3.1
0 Mo, 1120 0.4 q- Mo, HlO 4.25 4.1
0 Mo, Na2MoO4 5.8 n- Mo, Na2Mo04 1 3.3
0 Mo, Na~MoO4 4.2 + Mo, Na~Mo04 4.25 4.5
B G
Spinach Tomato
0 Mo, no infil- 0 Mo, H20 0.4
tration 0 0.6 0 Mo, Na2IKoO4 2.4
0 Mo, H20 1 2.2 0 Mo, Hi0 0.4
0 No, H20 4.25 3.4 0 Mo, Na2MoO4 4.9
0 Mo, Na2MoO4 1 4.3
0 Mo, Na2MoO4 4.25 8.4
q- Mo, no infil-
tration 3.5
* Average values for protein-N, soluble non-protein-N (except uitrate-N), and nitrate-
N, respectively, in % of dry matter: Cauliflower: 2.9, 1.4, 2.3. Spinach, 0 Mo: 3.2, 1.5,
2.3; + Mo: 4.3, 1.5, 0.7. Tomato: 3.3, 1.2, 2.2.
** Averages of duplicate values expressed as #g NaNO2 formed per ½ h per mg protein..
TABLE I I I
A B
spinach Tomato
0 N, control Lear 0.8 0 N, control Leaf 0.0
Stem 2.1 Stem 3. l
Seed leaf 0.1 0 N, 1 day KNOa Leaf 0.8
i
0 N, 2 days KNOg i Leaf 4.3 Stem 7.6
I Stein 3.7 0 N, 2 days KNOB Leaf 0.4
Seed leaf 2.5 Stem 4.1
0 N, 3 days KNOa [
Leaf 3.3 0 N, 5 days KNOa Leaf 1.9
] Stem 3.9 Stem 3.4
Seed leaf 1.9 0 N, 7 days KNOa Leaf 1.I
0 N, 6 days KNOa Leaf 2.1 Stem 2.0
Stem 2.8
: Seed leaf 1.6
+ N, control 1 Leaf 0.9
I Stem 2.7
Seed leaf 0.5
* Average values for protein-N, soluble non-protein-N (except nitrate-N), and ni-
trate-N, respectively, in. % of dry matter:
spirmch: 0 N control, leaf 3.7, 1.3, 0.l; stem 2.2, 1.7 0.0; seed leaf 1.8, 0.9, 0.1; 2
and 6 days after KNOa treatment NOa-N in the 1eaves increased to 0.6 and 0.7~0
respectively.
Tomato: 0 N control, leaf 1.9, 0.3, 0.0; stem 0.7, 0.5, 0.0; 2 and 7 days after KNO3
treatment NOa-N in the leaves had increased to 0.4 and 0.7% respectively.
** Averages of duplicate values expressed as [zg NAN02 formed per } h per mg of
protein.
leaves had died. Ten pots of this series were dressed with 5 ml of a
solution containing I00 mg KN03 per ml. This solution was washed
into the soil with 20 ml H20. A second series of ten pots was dressed
with an equal amount of nitrogen in the form of (NH@ 2SO4, whereas
a third series received H~O only. At different periods of time after
the addition of the nitrogenous compounds, plants were harvested
and tested for nitrate-reducing capacity. The results of this experi-
ment are recorded in Table IV. It will be seen that 4½ h after the
TABLE IV
* Average values for protein-N, soluble non-protein-N (except nitrate-N), and ni-
trate-N, respectively, in % of dry matter: 2.0, 0.7 and 0.0.
** Averages of duplicate values expressed as /~g NaNO2 formed per ½ h per mg
protein.
TABLE VII
E f f e c t of c u t t i n g a n d g r i n d i n g of t o m a t o l e a v e s on n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g c a p a c i t y a n d
nitrite removal.
Nitrate-reducing
TreatmeIlt of leaf tissue
capacity *
1. Whole l e a v e s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
2. F r a g m e n t s of 5 b y 5 m m . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
3. F r a g m e n t s of 1-2 b y 1-2 m m . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4. Leaf m a c e r a t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
5. L e a f m a c e r a t e + 70/~g N a N O e . . . . . . . . . . . 51
6. W a s h e d residue of m a c e r a t e . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
7. F r a g m e u t s of 5 b y 5 m m , i n f i l t r a t e d w i t h leachings of
treatment 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 54
* A v e r a g e s of d u p l i c a t e v a l u e s e x p r e s s e d as # g N a N O 2 f o r m e d per ½ h p e r ½ g fresh
tissue.
N I T R A T E R E D U C T I O N IN P L A N T T I S S U E S 347
TABLE VIII
T A B L E IX
zx
rn{ O~ per mg p r o t e i n
j zx
0 Mocauliflower leaves
+ Mo ,,
0 0 Mo spinach ,,
---1- + M o
7 ~
. . . . . . . . " .........
I ju~ o ........
. . . . 1 I I I
30 60 90 120
Fig. 1. The effect of molybdenum supply on the catalase activity (ml 02 per
mg protein) of cauliflower and spinach leaves. + Mo = 2.5 mg Na2MoO4.2H.20
per pot, Averages of quadruplicate values.
DISCUSSION
SUMMARY
T h e effect of m o l y b d e n u m on t h e n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g c a p a c i t y of p l a n t tissue
was s t u d i e d b y u s i n g coarsely c u t tissue f r a g m e n t s f r o m p l a n t s g r o w n in 3/[o~
deficient soil a n d dressed or i n f i l t r a t e d w i t h a m o l y b d a t e - c o n t a i n i n g s o l u t i o n
s h o r t l y before testing. T h e tissue f r a g m e n t s were s u s p e n d e d u n d e r a n a e r o b i c
c o n d i t i o n s in a n i t r a t e - c o n t a i n i n g b u f f e r s o l u t i o n w i t h m a l a t e s e r v i n g as a
h y d r o g e n donor. F o r m a t i o n of n i t r i t e was used as a m e a s u r e for t h e n i t r a t e -
r e d u c i n g power. V e r y low v a l u e s for n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g c a p a c i t y were f o u n d in
m o l y b d e n u m - d e f i c i e n t tissues. As little as four h o u r s a f t e r t h e a p p l i c a t i o n of
m o l y b d e n u m , h o w e v e r , e n z y m e a c t i v i t y h a d r e a c h e d its m a x i m a l value.
Cauliflower, spinach, a n d t o m a t o p l a n t s , g r o w n w i t h i n a d e q u a t e a m o u n t s
of n i t r o g e n , s h o w e d also v e r y low n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g activities. A d d i t i o n of
n i t r a t e to t h e s e p l a n t s , e i t h e r b y a p p l i c a t i o n t o t h e soil or b y i n f i l t r a t i n g i t
i n t o t h e leaves, r e s u l t e d in a r a p i d rise in n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g c a p a c i t y . A m m o -
n i u m s u l p h a t e , a d d e d t o t h e soil, h a d some beneficial effect o n n i t r a t e re-
d u c t i o n in t h e leaves of cauliflower p l a n t s b u t in t h e case of i n f i l t r a t i o n n o
effect was observed.
E v i d e n c e was o b t a i n e d t h a t t h e n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g a c t i v i t y of leaf f r a g m e n t s
d e p e n d s o n t h e p r e s e n c e of u n d a m a g e d cells. G r i n d i n g of t h e cells i n a c t i v a t e s
t h e e n z y m e s y s t e m ; in a d d i t i o n i t m a y d e s o r g a n i z e t h e e l e c t r o n - d o n o r
s y s t e m . F u r t h e r m o r e a loss of n i t r i t e m a y o c c u r in leaf m a c e r a t e s . A d d i t i o n of
y e a s t e x t r a c t , w h i c h is a source of f l a v i n a d e n i n e dinncleotide, a c o - e n z y m e of
n i t r a t e r e d u c t a s e , r e s t o r e d in some cases t h e n i t r a t e - r e d u c t a s e a c t i v i t i e s of leaf
m a c e r a t e s t o a large e x t e n t . I n o t h e r cases its effect was slight or negligible.
P l a n t s k e p t in t h e d a r k for a p r o l o n g e d p e r i o d of t i m e s h o w e d lower
n i t r a t e - r e d u c i n g capacities t h a n t h o s e k e p t u n d e r n o r m a l l i g h t conditions.
I n some e x p e r i m e n t s t h e m a l i e - d e h y d r o g e n a s e a c t i v i t y of m o l y b d e n u m ~
deficient p l a n t tissues was f o u n d to b e p r o m o t e d b y t h e a d d i t i o n of m o l y b -
date, T h i s effect was less c o n s i s t e n t a n d far less p r o n o u n c e d t h a n t h a t o n
nitrate-reducing capacity.
M o l y b d e n u m - d e f i c i e n t p l a n t tissues u s u a l l y h a v e a lower c a t a l a s e a c t i v i t y
t h a n p l a n t s supplied a d e q u a t e l y w i t h m o l y b d e n u m .
Received July 9, 1958
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES