Professional Documents
Culture Documents
For the purpose of this week’s discussion, I will be reviewing an abstract on the topic
Sha15 \l 1033 ]. This abstract summarizes the whole article in about 243 words (16
words by 15 lines). The abstract gives a concise outline of the background of the study,
the study purpose “to improve the development and targeting of future community health
changes” (Shah et al., 2015), methods used in the study i.e. secondary analysis of 220
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of participants and the statistical methods used to
analyze the study findings i.e. linear regression with effects and Sobel-Goodman
mediation tests. The abstract also included the results of the study “women younger than
age 30 were more likely to reduce ad consumption than older women” (Shah et al., 2015),
the abstract reads in part, and in conclusion, the study recommends the use of tailored
women.
The last part of the abstract is the listing of the Keywords that included an outline of the
important key words used in the study including community health, community-based
I think that the abstract was created in a standard that abstracts should be and contains all
the required key information that summarizes the whole article. Honestly, I didn’t see any
major flaws in the abstract. Given the chance to improve on the abstract, I would arrange
the background, purpose, methods, results, and conclusion in separate paragraphs.
All in all, I would use this style when writing my own abstract with the little modification
above.
Reference
Shah, M. K., Keiffer, E. C., Choi, H., Schumann, C., & Heisler, M. (2015). Mediators