ye10812021 Machine Learning for User Medeting | SpringerLink @ Springer Link search QQ Log in Download PDF Published: March 2001 Machine Learning for User Modeling Geoffrey |. Webb, Michael J. Pazzani & Danie! Billsus User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 19-29 (2001) 7054 Accesses | 199 Citations | Metrics Abstract At first blush, user modeling appears to be a prime candidate for straightforward application of standard machine learning techniques. Observations of the user's behavior can provide training examples that a machine learning system can use to form a model designed to predict future actions. However, user modeling poses a number of challenges for machine learning that have hindered its application in user modeling, including: the need far larga data cots: the need far laheled data Your privacy ise cookies to make tional” cookie how people use our site. By jour personal data, including nat do no! cide which optional where yi also find more information ur per View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175 19ye10812021 Machine Leaming for User Medeling | SpringerLink Baffes, P. and Mooney, R.: 1996, Refinement- based student modeling and automated bug library construction, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 7, 75-116. ve . Bauer, M., Pohl, W. and Webb, G. (eds.): 1997, UM97 Workshop: Machine Learning for User Modeling. Online proceedings: hitp://www.dfki.uni-sb.de/_bauer/um-ws/. Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P. and Pohl, W. e (eds.): 1999, UM99 Workshop: Machine Learning for User Modeling. Online proceedings: http://www.dfki.de/_bauer/umg99-ws/. 4, Billsus, D. and Pazzani, M.: 1999, A hybrid user model for news story classification. In: User Modeling (Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference). Banff, Canada, pp. 99-108. . Brown, J. S. and Burton, R. R.: 1978, gn Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic Your privacy ur website ks properly, tional" c¢ g, provide social media feature ow people use our si al data, including you give consent to the pr me in countr ide of the Europear Settings", where you can also find more information ed. View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175‘e1oer021 Machine Leaming for User Modating | SpringerLink 7. Chiu, P. and Webb, G.: 1998, Using decision trees for agent modeling: improving prediction performance. User Modeling and User- Adapted Interaction 8, 131-152. 8. Gilmore, D. and Self, J.: 1988, The application of machine learning to intelligent tutoring . Self (ed.): Artificial Intelligence systems. In: and Human Learning: Intelligent Computer- Aided Learning. London: Chapman and Hall, Pp. 179-196. 9. Goettl, B., Halff, (eds.): 1998, Intelligent Tutoring Systems: , Redfield, C. and Shute, V. Fourth International Conference, ITS'98. Berlin: Springer. 10. Gupta, D., DiGiovanni, M., Narita, H. and Goldberg, K.: 1999, Jester 2.0: A new linear time collaborative filtering algorithm applied : Proceedings of the SIGIR-99 Workshop on Recommender Systems: to jokes. I Algorithms and Evaluation. Berkeley, CA. Your privacy kies to make sure that all optional fanage Settings", wher ata out how your personal View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175‘e1oer021 Machine Leaming for User Modating | SpringerLink 13. Kay, J. (ed.): 1999, User Modeling: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference UMg9. New York: SpringerWien. 14. Klinkenberg, R. and Renz, I.: 1998, Adaptive information filtering: learning in the presence of concept drift. In: AAAI/ICML-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization. Technical Report WS-98-05. Madison, Wise. 15. Kwok, K. and Chan, M.: 1998, Improving two- stage ad-hoc retrieval for short queries. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Melbourne, Australia, pp. 250-256. 4 s Lajoie, S. P. and Vivet, M. (eds.): 1999, Artificial Intelligence in Education: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference AIEd-99. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 17. Lang, K.: 1995, NewsWeeder: Learning to filter news. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Your privacy kies to make sure that ne or all optional cookies you g ncluding clicking on "Manage Settings", where you can a processed. View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175‘e1oer021 Machine Leaming for User Modating | SpringerLink 19. Lieberman, H.: 1995, An agent that assists web browsing. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Montreal, Canada, pp. 924-929. 20. Martin, J. and VanLehn, K.: 1993, OLAE: Progress toward a multi-activity, bayesian student modeler. In: Proceedings of the 1993 World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 410-417. 2 . Mizoguchi, R., Ikeda, M. and Kakushu, 0.: 1987, An innovative framework for intelligent tutoring systems. In: Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education. Amsterdam-New York, PP. 105-120. 22. Mooney, R., Bennet, P. and Roy, L.: 1998, Book recommending using text categorization with extracted information. In: AAAI/ICML- 98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization. Madison, Wise. 23, Nigam, K., McCallum, A., Thrun, S. and Your privacy ur website ks properly, tional" c¢ J, provide social media feature ow people use our si al data, including the pr me in countr ide of the Europear nat do not off ed. View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175‘e1oer021 Machine Leaming for User Modating | SpringerLink Machine Learning in User Modeling, Chania, Greece. 25. Pazzani, M. and Billsus, D.: 1997, Learning and revising user profiles: The identification of interesting web sites. Machine Learning 27, 313-331. 26. Reiser, B. J., Anderson, J. R. and Farrell, R. G.: 1985, Dynamic student modelling in an intelligent tutor for LISP programming. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Los Angeles, CA, pp. 8-14. 27. Rudstorm, A., Bauer, M., Iba, W. and Pohl, W. (eds.): 1999, LICAI Workshop ML-4: Learning About Users. IJCAI Inc. 28, Segal, R. and Kephart, M.: 1999, MailCat: An intelligent assistant for organizing e-mail. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents. Seattle, WA, pp. 276-282. Your privacy ur website tional" c¢ ks properly g, provide social media feature ow people use our si al data, including you give consent to the pr nat do not off me in countr ide of the Europear ne ed. View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175ye10812021 Machine Leaming for User Medeling | SpringerLink Carbonell, and T. M. Mitchell (eds.): Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 483- 510. 31. Ungar, L. H. and Foster, D. P.: 1998, Clustering methods for collaborative filtering. In: AAAI-98 Workshop on Recommender Systems. Madison, Wisc. 2 Be . Valiant, L. G.: 1984, A theory of the learnable. Communications of the ACM 27, 1134-1142. 33. VanLehn, K.: 1982, Bugs are not enough: empirical studies of bugs, impasses, and repairs in procedural skills. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 3, 3-72. 34. Webb, G. I.: 1993, Feature based modelling. In: Proceeding of AI-ED 93,WorldConference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 497-504. 35. Webb, G. I., Chiu, B. C. and Kuzmycz, M.: 4nd Camnarativa avalvatian af alternative: Your privacy ur website ks properly tional" c¢ g, provide social media feature ow people use our si you give consent al data, including the pr me in countr ide of the Europear live nat do not off ed. View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175 19‘e1oer021 Machine Learning for User Modeling | SpringerLink UserModeling and User-Adapted Interaction 5(2), 117-150. 37. Widmer, G. and Kubat, M.: 1996, Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Machine Learning 23, 69-101. 38. Young, R. M. and O'Shea, T.: 1981, Errors in childrens’ subtraction. Cognitive Science 5, 153-177. Author information Affiliations 1, School of Computing and Mathematics, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3217, Australia Geoffrey I. Webb 2. Department of Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine, Your privacy ur website ks properly, tional" c¢ g, provide social media feature ow people use our si al data, including the pr me in countr ide of the Europear nat do not off he country wher You can decide whic ed. View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175ye10812021 Machine Leaming for User Modeling | SpringerLink Cite this article Webb, G.L, Pazzani, M.J. & Billsus, D. Machine Learning for User Modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 19-29 (2001). hitps://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011117102175 * Issue DateMarch 2001 « DOlhttps://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011117102175 Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content- sharing initiative user modeling machine learning concept drift computational complexity World Wide Web Your privacy ur website ks properly, tional" c¢ g, provide social media feature ow people use our si al data, including you give consent to the pr me in countr ide of the Europear nat do not off processed. View our privacy policy Manage Settings Accept All Cookies htps:iink springer comfarticte/10.1020/8:1011117 102175