You are on page 1of 2

DEFINING A DOABLE RESEARCH STATEMENT AND ITS JUSTIFICATION

Danna Nathalia Gómez FEEDBACK ON THE RESEARCH STATEMENT-JUSTIFICATION

EVALUATION Excellent Good Fair Poor Not submitted


CRITERIA 5 pts 4 pts 3 pts 2 pts 0 pts
ACTIVITY #1
Research statement and The student elaborates About the research The justification should be The student doesn't apply The student does no
justification from two to three pages to statement: explicitly written. Arguments properly any of the define neither a resear
describe: (1) the research The student describes: should respond to: strategies to select statement nor a
25 % context characteristics and (1) the research context evidences from the justification.
participants’ needs; (2) a characteristics and • Why is it so relevant to context and the
The student applies possible contribution of participants’ needs; (2) a theoretical support so the
do this study?
strategies to select your study to both possible contribution of • What aspects will you elaboration of arguments
evidences from the macroproject and your study to both learn as doing this is poor and inadequate to
context and the subproject; (3) the macroproject and research project? justify a research
theoretical support for contribution for you as a subproject. • What contributions will statement. There is not
the elaboration of future professional English Nevertheless, Danna, the project make to the an elaboration to explain
teacher. The description the project should be subproject on evidences of the context
arguments that justify a
includes the relationship defined NOT on reading “Pedagogical Innovations and the research
research statement. between needs and comprehension, but in statement. It is also
for English Teaching and
evidences according to terms of the English as a Learning. missing the relationship
the macroprojects and the Foreign Language • What pedagogical between the statement
subproject that best fits competences of the Test aspects will you learn as and a subproject and
the initial idea. The Saber-11. I ask you not an English teacher who macroproject of the LLEI.
student includes to focus on reading implements strategies for Evidences were not
evidences such as photos skills, but to establish Saber-11. presented as it was
of the board, the EFL evaluation as the required and there is not
classroom (without main concept of your any explanation to justify
registering people’s research project, which properly the statement.
faces), also pictures of at the same time
books, activities, student’s involves the concept of
evaluations, materials, testing through Saber-
etc. It is included the 11. Final score: 3.5
formulation of an initial
question (core question) Additionally, you need to
that evidences crucial change the question
needs, a problem or a since it includes other
situation that justifies to components that are not
carry out the research study going to make essential
or microproject. part of your research
and create confusion:

What tools should be


used both pedagogically
and ICT tools that
facilitate the timely
learning of grammar
and vocabulary within a
literary context?

You do not need to


investigate about ICT
Tools, neither grammar,
nor vocabulary. If you
are the teacher in charge
of 11th graders, you will
carry out an EFL
Evaluation
implementation to
develop skills and results
with simulations for the
Test Saber Pro 11 in a
group of secondary
graders.

You might also like