DEFINING A DOABLE RESEARCH STATEMENT AND ITS JUSTIFICATION
Danna Nathalia Gómez FEEDBACK ON THE RESEARCH STATEMENT-JUSTIFICATION
EVALUATION Excellent Good Fair Poor Not submitted
CRITERIA 5 pts 4 pts 3 pts 2 pts 0 pts ACTIVITY #1 Research statement and The student elaborates About the research The justification should be The student doesn't apply The student does no justification from two to three pages to statement: explicitly written. Arguments properly any of the define neither a resear describe: (1) the research The student describes: should respond to: strategies to select statement nor a 25 % context characteristics and (1) the research context evidences from the justification. participants’ needs; (2) a characteristics and • Why is it so relevant to context and the The student applies possible contribution of participants’ needs; (2) a theoretical support so the do this study? strategies to select your study to both possible contribution of • What aspects will you elaboration of arguments evidences from the macroproject and your study to both learn as doing this is poor and inadequate to context and the subproject; (3) the macroproject and research project? justify a research theoretical support for contribution for you as a subproject. • What contributions will statement. There is not the elaboration of future professional English Nevertheless, Danna, the project make to the an elaboration to explain teacher. The description the project should be subproject on evidences of the context arguments that justify a includes the relationship defined NOT on reading “Pedagogical Innovations and the research research statement. between needs and comprehension, but in statement. It is also for English Teaching and evidences according to terms of the English as a Learning. missing the relationship the macroprojects and the Foreign Language • What pedagogical between the statement subproject that best fits competences of the Test aspects will you learn as and a subproject and the initial idea. The Saber-11. I ask you not an English teacher who macroproject of the LLEI. student includes to focus on reading implements strategies for Evidences were not evidences such as photos skills, but to establish Saber-11. presented as it was of the board, the EFL evaluation as the required and there is not classroom (without main concept of your any explanation to justify registering people’s research project, which properly the statement. faces), also pictures of at the same time books, activities, student’s involves the concept of evaluations, materials, testing through Saber- etc. It is included the 11. Final score: 3.5 formulation of an initial question (core question) Additionally, you need to that evidences crucial change the question needs, a problem or a since it includes other situation that justifies to components that are not carry out the research study going to make essential or microproject. part of your research and create confusion:
What tools should be
used both pedagogically and ICT tools that facilitate the timely learning of grammar and vocabulary within a literary context?
You do not need to
investigate about ICT Tools, neither grammar, nor vocabulary. If you are the teacher in charge of 11th graders, you will carry out an EFL Evaluation implementation to develop skills and results with simulations for the Test Saber Pro 11 in a group of secondary graders.