See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/224077334

Self-oscillating buck driver for power LEDs

Conference Paper · October 2009

DOI: 10.1109/ECCE.2009.5316150 · Source: IEEE Xplore

CITATIONS READS
10 3,696

5 authors, including:

Edilson Mineiro Cicero Da Silveira Postiglione

Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará, Brazil, Sobral ABB
41 PUBLICATIONS   373 CITATIONS    23 PUBLICATIONS   95 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

F.L.M. Antunes Arnaldo José Perin

Universidade Federal do Ceará Federal University of Santa Catarina
113 PUBLICATIONS   2,020 CITATIONS    77 PUBLICATIONS   729 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Wireless Converter with ZCS Rectifier View project

Wind Energy Conversion Systems View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Arnaldo José Perin on 27 March 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Self-oscillating Flyback Driver for Power LEDs

E. Mineiro Sá Jr.1, C. S. Postiglione2, R. S. Santiago1, F. L. M. Antunes3 and A. J. Perin2

1 2
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência Universidade Federal de Santa Universidade Federal do Ceará
e Tecnologia do Ceará – IFCE Sobral Catarina UFC – GPEC
317 Av. Dr. Guarany UFSC - INEP PO Box 6001
Ceará, Sobral, Brazil PO Box 5119 Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
edilson.mineiro@ifce.edu.br Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil fantunes@dee.ufc.br
arnaldo.perin@inep.ufsc.br

Abstract -- The self-oscillating flyback converter is a popular
circuit for cost-sensitive applications due to its simplicity and
low component count. It is widely employed in mobile phone
chargers and as the stand-by power source in off-line power
supplies for data-processing equipment. However, this circuit
was almost not explored for supplying power LEDs. This paper
presents a self-oscillating flyback driver for supplying Power
LEDs directly, with no additional circuit. A simplified
mathematical model of the LED was used to characterize the
self-oscillating converter for driving the power LEDs. With the
proposed converter the LEDs manufacturing tolerances and
drifts over temperature presents little to no influence over the
LED average current. This is proved by using the LED electrical
model on the analysis.
Index Terms-- Bipolar transistor oscillators, DC-DC power
conversion, Light-emitting diodes, Lighting and Power supplies.
I. INTRODUCTION
In the past few years there has been an increased
penetration of Solid State Lighting (SSL) into the lighting
market, mainly because of its enhanced efficiency and
flexibility. Recently, the SSL has been used in some niche
applications, such as: post sign, traffic lights, automotive
head lights and architectural implementations. Some authors
estimate that in a near future the SSL will replace standard
lamps used in general illumination [1]. The extended lifetime
inherent to the Light Emitting Diode (LED) qualifies SSL to
compete with other technologies in the market. In addition,
regarding safety issues, SSL has the advantage of being
operated at low voltage levels, when compared to other
technologies [2].
The self-oscillating flyback converter is a robust, low
component count circuit that has been widely used in low
power off-line applications. It is also referred to as ringing
choke converter (RCC) since the regenerative signal for
oscillation comes from ringing of transformer choke. The
merits of the RCC can be attributed to blocking oscillation,
automatically limiting input power when the output is
overloaded. Moreover, the oscillation may naturally cease if
the output is short-circuited. Even though the flyback
converter operating with Pulse Width Modulation (PWM)
also exhibits merits, when voltage-mode control is employed
it presents the trouble of right-half-plane zero while its choke
current is continuous. Furthermore, when working in
discontinuous current mode (DCM), the electromagnetic-
interference (EMI) may be serious since the choke oscillates
while the flyback current returns to zero. Reversely, the
oscillation of the RCC recycles after a quarter cycle of choke
oscillation. Thus, the EMI trouble of ringing is reduced [3].
Since the control of the circuit can be implemented with very
few discrete components without loss of performance, the
overall cost of the circuit is generally lower than the
conventional PWM flyback converter that employs a
commercially available integrated circuit controller [4][5].
This paper presents a self-oscillating flyback driver for
supplying directly power LEDs, without any additional
circuit. Analytical results are verified by laboratory
experiment. Depending on the circuit design, the oscillation
frequency is usually around tens of kilohertz and can be
increased by shortening the storage time of the bipolar
junction transistors (BJT’s). This topology can also be
implemented with MOSFET devices with much higher
frequency, around hundreds of kilohertz, but this increases
the LED driver cost.
II. ELECTRICAL MODEL AND LED JUNCTION TEMPERATURE
INFLUENCE
Fig. 1 shows a simplified electrical model for the Luxeon
III Emitter LXHL-PW09 white LED, produced by Philips-
Lumileds. This electrical model has good accuracy for
currents near the LED rated current.
Fig. 1. Simplified electrical model.
The experimental measurements of the temperature
influence over the voltage VLED is showed in Fig. 2. The VLED
is linearly dependent of the LED junction temperature. The
series resistance, RLED, can usually be considered constant
with a value around 0.77 Ω [6][7].

978-1-4244-2893-9/09/$25.00 ©2009 IEEE 2827


Fig. 2. Temperature influence in the voltage VLED.
III. IMPLEMENTED CIRCUIT
The self-oscillating flyback converter, shown in Fig. 3,
was made up using only discrete components. It operates at
the boundary of continuous/discontinuous conduction mode
(CCM/DCM) and uses peak current mode control. Therefore,
the circuit operates with a variable switching frequency. The
control circuit was developed with a single transistor Q1 and
a positive-feedback winding Laux.
Fig. 3. Self-oscillating proposed circuit.
The R3 is a startup resistor and it is limited by power
dissipation due to the high input voltage. Its power
dissipation should be less than 1% of the converter’s output
power for low powers.
The flyback transformer T1 consists of two secondary
windings and one primary. The output winding, with n2 turns,
forms the inductance Ls, the auxiliary winding forms the
inductance Laux and the input winding, with n1 turns, forms
the inductance Lp.
The components Rs and Cs, along with Laux, sense the
continuous/discontinuous conduction mode (CCM/CDM)
boundary of transformer T1, detecting when the current
2828
through Ls is zero. These components provide current to the
base of main switch S1 to initiate the turn-on process and to
maintain it on. Capacitor Cs blocks DC current and limits the
maximum time that the switch S1 remains in on state.
Capacitor Cp is charged, through D1 and R1, with output
voltage reflected in Laux. A single zener diode DZ1 monitors
the voltage through Cp and prevents an over voltage in the
output, turning off the switch S1. This over voltage may
occur when the LED is damaged or is disconnected of the
circuit. Nevertheless, in the practice, it is necessary to use a
minimum load in the output, or a component to limit surge
voltage, once it is impossible to obtain an unitary coupling of
the windings.
The primary and the secondary currents of the transformer
are shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The primary and the secondary currents of the transformer.
To simplify the equations, the leakage inductance of the
flyback transformer and the temperature dependence of the
flyback components parameters are not considered. The
primary transformer winding has n1 turns (with inductance
Lp) and the secondary has n2 turns. The inductances were
considered ideal without ohmic losses. Consequently, the
primary current increases and the secondary current
decreases, both linearly, when the respective winding is
connected at a constant voltage [8]. A large capacitor Cin is
used in the input filter so that the voltage Vin is considered
constant. The same occurs with capacitor Co and the output
voltage Vo. Once the voltage source VLED, used in the LED
electrical model, is ideal, the output voltage has a small
ripple.
Losses are expressed by the energy transfer efficiency η
from the primary (W1) to the secondary (W2). This relation is
shown in (1).
W2 = η ⋅ W1 (1)
The energy stored in the magnetic core (W1), at the end of
the power transistor conduction time ton is defined by (2).
Vin 2 2
W1 = ⋅ ton (2)
2 ⋅ Lp
The energy supplied to the LED (W2) is defined by (3).
 V2 ⎛n ⎞ 2
2
1 1 V
W2 = o ⋅ ⎜ 1 ⎟ ⋅ toff (3) ⋅η ⋅ I M + ⋅ in ⋅η ⋅ ts
2 ⋅ Lp 2 2 Lp
⎝ n2 ⎠ I LED = (13)
Applying equations (2) and (3) in (1), the relation (4) is ⎛ n2 Vo ⎞
obtained. ⎜ η⋅ + ⎟
⎝ n1 Vin ⎠
2
⎛V n ⎞ n2 V
t 2
off = η ⋅ ⎜ in ⋅ 2 ⋅ ton ⎟ (4) If the condition η⋅  o satisfies the equation, than
⎝ Vo n1 ⎠ n1 Vin
Since the only positive solution has a physical significance, (13) can be approximated as in (14). In general this condition
the equation (4) can be rewritten as (5). occurs either when the transformer turns ratio is
approximately unitary (buck-boost), or when the relation
Vin n2
toff = η ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ton (5) Vin  Vo is satisfied. In both cases it is possible to connect
Vo n1 one, or more LEDs in series, practically without variations on
The period T is defined by (6). the output current. Thus, under these conditions, the
T = ton + toff (6) converter stabilizes the current through the LED.
Applying (5) in (6), (7) is obtained. 1 n V n
I LED ≈ ⋅ 1 ⋅ η ⋅ I M + in ⋅ 1 ⋅ η ⋅ t s (14)
⎛ V n ⎞ 2 n2 2 ⋅ L p n2
T = ⎜ η ⋅ in ⋅ 2 + 1⎟ ⋅ ton (7) The storage time of the bipolar transistor S1 directly
⎝ Vo n1 ⎠
influences the LED current and it normally varies with
The output power P2 in the LED can be determined by (8). current and ambient temperature. To reduce such influence,
1 1 the resistor R2 is used in series with the transistor to avoid the
P2 = W2 ⋅ = η ⋅ W1 ⋅ (8) super saturation of the BJT. A similar solution is used in
T T electronic ballasts for fluorescent lamps.
Applying (2) and (7) in (8) leads to (9).
If the storage time was not considered, equation (14) could
Vin2 be simplified as in (15). Since the input voltage does not
η⋅ ⋅ ton influence the LEDs current, this driver can operate with
2 ⋅ Lp
P2 = (9) universal voltage input (e.g. 80VAC to 240VAC). This
⎛ Vin n2 ⎞ condition can be obtained both when the driver operates with
⎜ η ⋅ ⋅ + 1⎟ low switching frequency, and the storage time is
⎝ Vo n1 ⎠ insignificant, or in high frequency of S1 (e.g. MOSFETs).
The power transistor conduction time (ton) can be 1 n1
determined by (10), where ts is the storage time of the bipolar I LED ≈ ⋅ ⋅ η ⋅ IM (15)
transistor S1 and IM is the current through Lp when the 2 n2
transistor Q1 is turned-on. For the condition adopted in (15), the relation (16) is
I obtained trough equation (5).
ton = L p ⋅ M + ts (10)
Vin toff  ton (16)
Applying (10) in (9) obtains (11). Resistor R1 is used to detect the primary current IM that
1 1 V turns-on Q1. This current can be determined by (17), where
⋅η ⋅ I M + ⋅ in ⋅η ⋅ ts VBE is the base-emitter voltage for turning-on the transistor
2 2 Lp Q1. Depending on the value of resistor R1, it can also
P2 = (11) influence the storage time of S1.
⎛ 1 n2 1 ⎞
⎜ η⋅ ⋅ + ⎟ IM =
VBE
⎝ Vo n1 Vin ⎠ (17)
R1
The average current through the LED (ILED) can be Applying the simplified electrical model for the Luxeon
determined by (12). III Emitter LXHL-PW09 white LED, the flyback output
P2 voltage Vo can be obtained by (18).
I LED = (12)
Vo Vo = I LED ⋅ RLED + VLED (18)
Applying (11) in (12) relation (13) can be obtained. Considering the temperature variation, the voltage VLED
can be determined by (19). VLED_25oC is the VLED for junction
temperature in 25ºC, and the ΔVTemp is the voltage variation
according the junction temperature variation.

2829
 VLED = VLED _ 25D C + ΔVTemp (19) ⎡ ⎛1 n ⎞
2
⎤
−1

⎢ 1
L p = 2 ⋅ Vo ⋅ I LED ( nom ) ⋅ ⎜ ⋅ + 2
⎟ ⋅ f nom ⎥
Applying (19) in (18), (20) is obtained. ⎢ ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ (28)
⎣ ⎝ Vo n1 Vin ( nom ) ⋅ η ⎠ ⎦
Vo = I LED ⋅ RLED + VLED _ 25D C + ΔVTemp (20)
Applying (17) and (20) in (13) leads to (21). The current through Lp when transistor Q1 is turned off
1 V 1 V can be determined rewriting (10) and applying ton(max) which
⋅η ⋅ BE + ⋅ in ⋅η ⋅ ts was determined by (27). To simplify the evaluation, the
2 R1 2 L p storage time is considered constant.
I LED = (21)
⎛ n2 ⎞
⎜ η ⋅ +α ⎟ IM =
(t on ( nom ) − ts ) ⋅ Vin ( nom )
(29)
⎝ n1 ⎠ Lp
Where α is defined in (22). Resistor R1 can be determined rewriting (17).
I LED ⋅ RLED VLED _ 25D C ΔVTemp VBE
α= + + (22) R1 = (30)
Vin Vin Vin IM
The output capacitance Co can be determined trough
By analyzing Fig. 2, the relation (23) can be inferred.
equation (31), where ILED(max_ripple) is the maximum value and
n2 I LED ⋅ RLED VLED _ 25D C ΔVTemp ILED(min_ripple) is the minimum value of the current ripple
η⋅ + +  (23) through the LED.
n1 Vin Vin Vin
From (23), the equation (21) can be approximated as in
ton ( nom )
Co =
(24). The junction temperature variation practically does not ⎛I ⎞ (31)
influence the LED current. This is another way of showing RLED ⋅ ln ⎜ LED (max_ ripple) ⎟
⎜I ⎟
that the current through the LED is stabilized. ⎝ LED (min_ ripple) ⎠
1 V 1 V
⋅η ⋅ BE + ⋅ in ⋅η ⋅ ts IV. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
2 R1 2 L p
I LED  (24) For experimental results a 220 VAC (60 Hz) driver was
n I ⋅R V D designed. The maximum input voltage is 370 V (260 VAC)
η ⋅ 2 + LED LED + LED _ 25 C and the breakdown voltage of BJT S1 is 700 V (VBE=0).
n1 Vin Vin Assuming that the voltage spike is 150 V and the voltage
The T1 turns ratio is given by (25). margin is at least 100 V, the maximum secondary voltage
n1 VR referred to the primary is 80 V, according (26).
= (25) According to (18), Vo is 3.54 V. The forward voltage drop
n2 Vo + VFD 3
of output diode D3 (1N5819) is considered 0.3 V. The
Where VFD3 is the forward voltage drop of D3 and VR is transformer T1 turns ratio is 20.33 given by equation (25).
the maximum secondary voltage referred to the primary, Assuming that the converter efficiency is 0.6, the input
defined by (26). voltage Vin is 311 V and the nominal frequency is 75 kHz.
VR (max) = VCES − Vmargin − Vin (max) − Vspk (26) The nominal power transistor conduction time is 3 μs, given
by the equation (27). For a nominal current of 700 mA, the
VCES is the collector-emitter voltage (VBE=0), Vmargin is the
designed primary inductance of T1 is 8.3 mH, given by
voltage margin, Vin(max) is the maximum input voltage and Vspk
equation (28).
is the voltage spike.
Assuming that the storage time in Q1 (model STBV32,
The nominal power transistor conduction time, ton(nom), can
produced by STMicroelectronics) is 1.5 μs, the current
be determined rewriting (7) for the nominal switching
through Lp when transistor Q1 is turned off is 0.056A,
frequency, fnom, leading to (27). Where Vin(nom) is the nominal
according to (29). The sense resistance R1 is 12.2 Ω,
input bus voltage for this condition and the output voltage,
determined by (30).
Vo, is considered constant.
−1
The secondary inductance Ls is determined applying the
⎛ V ( ) n ⎞ turns ratio in Lp. The auxiliary inductance of T1 is 38 μH, and
ton ( nom ) = ⎜ η ⋅ in nom ⋅ 2 ⋅ f nom + f nom ⎟ (27) it is determined as a reflected voltage of 5 V over Laux with
⎝ Vo n1 ⎠ load. The capacitor Cp is charged with this reflected voltage
Extracting Lp in (9), and applying (12) and (27), (28) can and the diode zener DZ1 (8V2) is used to monitor the instant
be obtained. Where ILED(nom) is the nominal current through when the load is disconnected.
the LED. Table I resume all electronic components used in the
prototype.
TABLE I

2830
 Circuit list of materials
Designator Description
S1 STBV32 (STMicroelectronics)
Q1 PN2222
T1 Lp=7,8 mH, Ls=19,2 μH and Laux=38 μH
D1 1N4148
D2 MUR160
D3 1N5819
D4, D5, D6 and D7 1N4007
DZ1 8V2 500mW zener
R1 12.2 Ω metal film resistor
R2 10 Ω metal film resistor
R3 2.7 MΩ carbon resistor
R4 100 Ω carbon resistor
R5 82 kΩ carbon resistor
Rs 470 Ω
Cin 2.2 μF / 400 V
Cs 10nF / 50 V
Co 330 μF / 25 V with low ESR
C1 4.7 nF / 2kV high voltage ceramic capacitor

Fig. 4 shows the current in the LED with low average Fig. 5. The current in the LED to a capacitor filter of 2.2 µF.
current crest factor. The average current through the LED
was 635 mA, the ripple factor measured was 15% and the
converter switching frequency was 69 kHz.

Fig. 6. LED current versus line grid voltage.

Fig. 7 shows the picture of the implemented circuit LED

driver and the lighting luminary with one power LED.

Fig. 4. The current in the LED.

The DC link can be connected to the output of a bridge

rectifier with a filtering capacitor, which allows the direct
connection of the circuit to the electric grid. Fig. 5 shows
current ripple through the LED for a rectifier output capacitor
filter of 2.2 µF. In this case the magnitude of the line grid
voltage was 220 V.
Fig. 6 shows the curve for LED current versus line grid
voltage, experimental results and theoretical results.
Fig. 7. LED driver and lighting luminary with one power LED.

2831
 V. CONCLUSIONS
A low cost self-oscillating flyback driver for power LEDs
was presented. A simplified mathematical model of LED has
been used to characterize this converter for power LEDs
driver. The mathematical analysis was validated through the
experimental results.
The LED manufacturing tolerances and drifts over
temperature presents almost no influence on the LED average
current for this converter.
This driver can reduce the costs to replace actual compact
fluorescent lamps and incandescent lamps for power LEDs.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank FINEP, FUNCAP and
CNPq for the financial support of this work, and Kleber C. A.
de Souza for his contributions on the original version of this
document.
2832
View publication stats
REFERENCES
[1] E. Fred Schubert, Light-Emitting Diodes, Edition 2. New York:
Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 1-26.
[2] E. Mineiro Sá Jr., E. Agostin Jr., J. Bedin, Eduardo I. and J. Perin,
“Design of a Electronic Driver for LEDs”, in Proc. 2007 Brazilian
Power Electronics Conference (COBEP), pp. 341-345.
[3] Yueh-Ru Yang, “Analysis of Winding Capacitance Effects on Ringing
Choke Converters”, in Proc. Nov. 2004 IEEE Industrial Electronics
Society Conf. (IECON), pp. 1008-1013.
[4] B. T. Irving and M. M. Jovanovic, “Analysis and Design of Self-
Oscillating Flyback Converter”, in Proc. March 2002 IEEE Applied
Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), pp. 897-903,
vol. 2.
[5] AN2228 STD1LNK60Z-based Cell Phone Battery Charger Design,
STMicroelectronics Application Note, September 2005.
[6] E. Mineiro Sá Jr., F. L. M. Antunes and A. J. Perin, “Low Cost Self-
Oscillating ZVS-CV Driver for Power LEDs”, in Proc. 2008 IEEE
Power Electronics Specialist Conference (PESC), pp. 4196-4201.
[7] E. Mineiro Sá Jr., F. L. M. Antunes and A. J. Perin, “Junction
Temperature Estimation for High Power Light-Emitting Diodes”, in
Proc. 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics
(ISIE), pp. 3030-3035.
[8] S. Birca-Galateanu, “Flyback Converter Output Voltage Stabilization”,
IEEE Trans. On Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-23, issue
2, pp. 146-151, March 1987.