Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3102160022
9.7.2021
Thesis Statement = In this paper, I will study and analyze the aspects of tragic betrayals in
William Shakespeare’s one of the most acclaimed plays, Julius Caesar by providing historical
background which includes the setting, diplomatic and political climate, religious drives and
personal relationships of the time and its reflection on the mentioned play.
Outline
1. Introduction
a. Ancient Greek
3. William Shakespeare
a. Shakespearean Tragedy
a. Inter-character Betrayal
5. Conclusion
Bayram 2
6. Works Cited
Introduction
Julius Caesar is one of the significant tragedies of Shakespeare which deals with the events of
the prior to, during, and afterwards of the assassination of Rome’s arguably the most influential
son, Gaius Julius Caesar with the plot including many different concepts regarding the
character’s ambitions, internal thoughts which are derived from past and present, drives that push
them towards their future, schemes, doubts and hesitations, prophecies, visions and other
supernatural events, political and humane corruptions which eventually lead to the mentioned
assassination and its eventual retribution. In this paper, I will study and analyze the aspects of
tragic betrayals in William Shakespeare’s one of the most acclaimed plays, Julius Caesar by
providing historical background which includes the setting, diplomatic and political climate,
religious drives and personal relationships of the time and its reflection on the mentioned play.
infidelity with their many other synonyms in many different languages underline why this
sentiment is so prominent among many other feelings. Belief and trust which are fundamental to
create such emotions in which their depth are strong sensations. They are hard to put forward and
lay in front of another person, a belief or an ideology. That is the reason when misplaced and
violated, these risky emotions create immense amount of sorrow, guilt, shame and wrath for not
only the person of interest, but also for the people around the betrayed one and therefore spreads
like wildfire.
I will explore the reasons, motives and justifications behind this endeavour and their
portrayal within William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar by utilizing a magnifying glass on the acts
Bayram 3
of multidimensional treacheries and by comparing the acts in parallel with this throughout
historical tragedies.
Aristotle, the author of Poetics defines tragedy as “the imitation of an action that is
serious and also, as having magnitude, complete in itself” (6) which indicates the existence of
strong emotions and the necessity of their existence in this genre. One’s chances of experiencing,
or simply observing a tragedy as a sense of tragic event can be considered as more than probable.
Events such as these are volatile in nature, and their impacts can likewise be considered as quite
negative, so avoiding them might be the best course of action. Thus, the need to observe them
from afar, experiencing their taste whilst sitting on a comfortable seat without being the subject
has been attractive for different people from different cultures for a long time. This reality is one
of many reasons why tragedies have been popular and something as iconic as tragedies would
have a tradition. Methods to create them, claims of the right and proper way to produce quality
contents, and with time’s ever-changing nature, observing many alterations from traditional
senses towards modern theater is a might be considered as a normal phenomenon. On the other
hand, some of the core elements of tragedies such as tragic flaws, building up tension that
eventually leads to catharsis, a heartbreaking ending which usually derives from aforementioned
flaws stayed within the genre in order not to lose the recipe which leads to the successful
achievement of the desired effect. The concept of betrayal, even if it isn’t one of the essentials, it
can be considered as a popular choice since there are many of them throughout the history of
tragedies.
a. Ancient Greek
Bayram 4
Ancient myths include many famous and important characters such as Odysseus from
The Odyssey, Achilles of Iliad, Medea of Medea. In fact, actual tragedies include much more
significant characters such as Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex. His story mainly consists of events that
occur outside his control, even though he has the illusion of being in control, and signifies faith’s
webs are inescapable no matter how much one tries to elude it. Attempts of these evasions start
from the very beginning with Jocasta, giving her son Oedipus away to a shepherd from a
different city in order her son to be raised by him, away from the dreadful prophecy that was
made even before he was born. His tragic flaw, which is also called Hamartia by Aristotle in his
Poetics fills one more of the requirements of a proper tragedy and his flaw which is hubris leads
him towards his demise. Gradual sense of fear of a tragedy therefore planted with an eerie
divination and proceeded with a constant reminder of its disembarking, keeping the audience
with expectation of damnation. Aristotle states that weaving of such effect, without brutality or
gore is what a good tragedy seeks in order to be in touch with the concept and enjoying its own
unique pleasure (14). Betrayal is not the main point of Oedipus Rex but could be considered as
existent if it is looked from the deities’ point of view. Oedipus’ pride prevents him from taking
the prophecy seriously, overlooks the potential of its reality, and thus commits relatively sinful
acts knowingly or involuntarily. After he leaves his own original city to evade what the oracle
tells him, he never questions who he murdered on the way, or how the position of king is vacant
in Thebes, where he solves the sphinx’s riddle and marries his mother. When the truth reveals
itself, he is shocked, and in order to purify himself from his sins, he takes dreadful actions which
leads to the catharsis, the upcoming retribution of the gods is felt, and his betrayal avenged.
Middle English period consists of various examples of texts which include betrayals that
appear according to the moral values, codes and creeds of the time. The idea of chivalry and
being honor-bound is dominant within Middle English literature and their natural gravity and
inherent prerequisite of trusting relationships bring many opportunities to display and utilize
treason to affect the audience towards being captivated. As Gregory L. Laing suggests in
Treason and Betrayal in the Middle English Romances of Sir Gawain, treason and loyalty
become pivotal motifs to deprive the protagonists of their inheritance, divide them from “true
love” and challenge the bonds of loyalty to others (2). Typically, treacheries on behalf of true
love often lead to the division of the lovers, and create an arc of tension, later get resolved by a
conflict and eventual reunion. He continues to underline the diversity of the meaning of the word
‘treason’ by giving its The Middle English Dictionary definition “disloyalty, faithlessness, or
meaning is also emphasized by Richard Firth Green, a Canadian scholar in his book A Crisis of
Truth by regarding the word ”treason” as the antonym of “truth” in which itself also possesses a
similar, complex meaning (207). Overlapping meanings of treason become relevant especially in
the Arthurian chivalric romance Sir Gawain and the Green Knight by Gawain Poet, as Laing
suggests that it is different from other Middle English romances since the betrayal within Gawain
romances not only endangers not only the hero of the story, but also the Arthurian world (5).
Treachery in question, adultery of Arthur’s Queen Guinevere and Lancelot brings the betrayal of
trust as well as a breach in marital vows and insubordination to their Feudal authority figure, thus
William Shakespeare
Bayram 6
William Shakespeare was an English playwright who is widely known for his works
which are widely considered amongst the best. His works are translated into every single living
language and keep being studied. He was born and raised in Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire
in 1564. He married Anne Hathaway and they had three children: Susanna and twins Hamnet and
Judith. In between 1585 and 1592 he began his career as an actor, and a writer. At the age of 49
he retired to Stratford and died in 1616. Most of his private life is unknown, and this fact gave
way to many different speculations about his physical appearance, sexuality, religious belief or
His early works mainly consisted of comedies and histories. After that, he mainly wrote
tragedies, Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth and Julius Caesar are
amongst the most famous ones and they are considered to be amongst the finest works of English
literature.
Shakespearean Tragedy
presents a variety of different tastes to the audience as they are rarely distinguished as a
Companion to Shakespearean Tragedy, and it sets the expectation of uniqueness by stating that
there isn’t a formula which fits every one of Shakespeare’s tragedies, and attempts to distinguish
them collectively from other dramatists aren’t quite successful (1). Yet, there are ties that present
a common denominator such as revenge and ambition, and their moral or immoral reasons which
affects the audience to whether justify the act itself or deem it unforgivable according to the
norms of the time and the place. Shakespeare’s observations of his audience might have led him
to create such scenarios that would be satisfactory in an unfair society where the upper class may
Bayram 7
have gotten away from any sorts of crime with impunity due to their position within their society
whereas the struggles of lower class, as basic as matters of survival, may have been overlooked
since justice was a rare commodity amongst them, let alone an inter-class resolution. Claire
McEachern states that Shakespeare takes very ordinary human situations and impulses, and
magnifies them and reflects them into his plays (162). Ambition lays way to betrayal in which
illusion of achievement without any response from the protagonist, and betrayal leads to revenge,
Betrayal is the prominent sentiment in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. One can observe
there are many conversations that spark the flame of treachery, characters such as Brutus getting
persuaded, or from the other perspective, deceived into foregoing their friendship and promises
in return for the rescue of the already fragile republic, honoring their ancestors and their beliefs
and by proxy, as humble as they are in their facade, their own personal honor and reputation.
Concocting the conspiracy at the initial pages of the play spreads the seeds of treachery,
orchestrated by Cassius and like-minded concerned citizens to end the upcoming tyranny of
Caesar, and from there, events spiral out of control, instability, violence, blood and revenge
follows after. There are many aspects of betrayal that one can observe besides the blatant inter-
character ones such as Caesar’s dismissive approach to the belief of republic due to his
bolstering confidence and contempt from his early conquests against outsiders such as barbaric
tribes of Gaul, and against fellow Romans, the ones who defy his will and pushes him to cross
the Rubicon, take up arms against the people he loves the most, and his eventual colossal victory
against all odds, especially at Pharsallus against Pompey the Great, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus,
Bayram 8
the ‘adolescent butcher’. His achievements and the stability and security that come along with
success gained the love of the people of Rome and the assassination that took place in the senate
house stripped that away, with pretenses of preserving the republic, or acting out of impulses
such as jealousy of nobleman which Shakespeare greatly reflects within the play.
a. Inter-Character Betrayal
Betrayals amongst characters are the main focus of the play as a drama since they are the
most relatable ones to the audience. In act one, he mainly focuses on Cassius and Marcus Brutus
to be the spearhead of the conspiracy, and one might claim that this is due to the fact that they
had risen against Anthony and Octavian in the second civil war and not Decimus Brutus except
for the initial deceive of Caesar at his estate, telling him that he would be crowned, for him to go
to the senate. He was a solid Caesarian supporter throughout his Gallic conquests and the
following civil war against Pompey, who was one of the three instigators of the assassination and
was present in Caesar’s will to be his second heir, according to ancient historian Plutarch. He
goes on to elaborate that his trust to Decimus Brutus was so tangible that he named him his legal
guardian to his children, if they happen to exist (593). In the play, his betrayal is seen
Marcus Brutus is seen being goaded into being utilized, if not lead the oncoming daring action
by Cassius who urges him to join the conspiracy since his name is ancient and noble, he deserves
love and respect as much as Caesar. Brutus takes these thoughts into long consideration and he is
torn since on one hand, there is the future of the republic and Caesar is seen as he is destroying it
by being adored by the public and hailed as the King of Rome, even though he rejects the offer.
On the other hand, he has a close personal relationship with Caesar and was given a full amnesty
and a province, which was Cisalpine Gaul, a profitable and fitting one to his name, after he took
Bayram 9
arms against Caesar in Greece (553) and further than that, offices of praetor after the Battle of
Munda ended the civil war decisively (575). Afterwards in the play, Cassius’s haste towards
Brutus’ house before sunrise is shown, and with that Shakespeare greatly reflects the urge of his
actions is to persuade him as quickly as possible, cutting off his time of consideration to finalize
the act, giving him the illusion of a fading opportunity to be the savior of the republic. When the
act is committed, Anthony sends word for a meeting with the conspirators, and arrives at the
scene to shake their hands, shown as slightly distraught by the bloodied corpse of Caesar, gives
his word that he finds them honourable, and asks to tend to Caesar’s funeral, merely out of his
friendship. When the conspirators leave, he confesses how he feels about them, calling them
butchers for what they have done, revealing his true colors, and insinuates that the funeral is an
opportunity to lead people into a blazing torch of revenge, thus betrays conspirator’s trust as he
does what he intends with his infamous speech and causes Brutus and Cassius to flee from the
capital. Furthermore, within the play itself, there is a deception towards Lepidus as well, as
Shakespeare reflects the creation of the second triumvirate even though at that stage was quite
premature, with a conversation between Octavian and Antony, revealing their intention of
utilizing him for his merits until he serves his purpose to their satisfaction, even goes further to
throw a simile as Lepidus is a donkey, carrying their valuables until they reach their destination.
When all of these scenes considered, Shakespeare brandishes the potential of betrayal and the act
of it is possible for both sides of the conflict, as later on gratifies Brutus with the words of
Anthony related to his honour and motives of assassinating Caesar, being the sole pure one and
The Roman ideology is a broad term to elucidate, but one can infer from the symbol of
S.P.Q.R. which means the Senate and the People of Rome, that the way of ruling belongs both to
the senate as aristocrats, and to the plebeians, a balance between the classes of society which is
not only symbolic, but in itself, might be considered as an effective way to include everyone to
make decisions for the future of the state. Even though Roman Republic didn’t have an equal
society as it was an ancient society included and utilized thralls, it gave a sort of power to the
people to affect it. Slaves could earn their freedom, eventually become citizens, and plebs could
affect the senate with their power to veto any legislation, even if the entirety of the nobility
agreed on a decision unanimously, except for the Final Act, or Senatus Consultum Ultimum.
When Julius Caesar entered the frame, he belonged to The Populares, the faction which favored
the rights and wishes of the plebs and he wanted many reforms. He was elected as a Consul, hold
the fasces for the first month of his consulship, and on the first day he revealed his intentions of
changing many rooted issues dramatically as he laid his plans before the senate. Plutarch states
that he was constantly interrupted and vetoed by his co-consul Bibilus, and his motions were
dragged on by Cato the Younger in order to fall the senate into a state of stupor. Due to these
reasons that impede his work, Caesar threatened the senate with a show of force, along with his
ally Pompey, unsheathing swords to those who intended to show resistance to the legislations he
proposed (474-476). This event, along with many more to come afterwards, emphasizes that
Caesar had neither the patience nor the respect to the elder man in senate, was greatly troubled
by their interferences, had malicious sentiments towards them which were mostly originated
quite recently, when the senate had rejected his offer to join elections in absentia, which meant
he could not participate to the elections without releasing his command as the general, devoiding
Bayram 11
him from his triumph over the victory he took in Spain. After the aftermath of the Battle of
Thapsus which he returned to Italy, having eliminated the resistance of Cato the Younger, he
ordered four lavish triumphs, three of them were against enemies of them, and one of them
devoted to his victory over fellow Romans under the pretense of having defeated a foreign king,
Juba of Numidians where in reality it was against the senate’s final resistance (568). After his
victory over Munda against Pompey’s sons and his life-long friend Labienus, he returned to
Rome, and he was appointed as dictator for life, which practically was tyranny. This decision,
perpetrated by Marcus Tullius Cicero, aimed to damage Caesar’s public image, to present him as
obnoxious as possible to the people’s eye, as he already possessed the power of dictatorship
without the decree (575). Then he proceeded to get his statue made amongst the statues of the
kings of Rome, gave his soldiers many plots of land, reigned as free as possible without any
opposition which concerned the aristocracy gravely (576). He was ambitious to say the least, and
possessed unprecedented power. He even snubbed the senate, which were coming to bestow him
extravagant honours and titles in front of the populace in broad daylight by refusing to rise in
front of the consul and continuing his conversation with his colleague over a construction site
(583).
Shakespeare reflected the view to Caesar from many different perspectives, starting with
Murellus and Flavius, insignificant characters that do not show condone to Caesar’s triumph,
stating their hypocrisy by reminding how they cheered for Pompey whilst they do the same thing
to his demise by the hands of Caesar. They even go further to disrupt the statues which were
decorated in tribute to Caesar, aiming somehow to take away his support. Brutus and Cassius
debate many times on how they wouldn’t proceed to be one of Caesar’s slaves, and how they
rather to die as free man. The sense of sincerity was given to Brutus as many times he was hailed
Bayram 12
as honourable and just by his companions, and this fact even enhances itself with the argument
between Cassius and Brutus as he scolds Cassius for taking bribes to place people in positions of
power, referring to the Ides of March as an act of honesty, and shames him, partially caused by
his grief over his wife Portia’s passing. Shakespeare justifies both parties by presenting
justifications for their acts, leaving any sort of conclusion on which side is right for their actions
with ambiguity as it was even for historians such as Plutarch and Cassius Dio, one might be
considered being pro-caesarian and the other being naught. His sheer focus is on the drama itself,
as the events affected the known world with magnitude, caused another civil war, and changed
plebeians even though his blood carried nobility, and through acts which might be considered as
tyranny, he delivered many of his promises to empower plebs whether it was solely for the sake
of them or for the detriment of the aristocracy. Plutarch states that as soon as he was elected as a
consul for the first time in year 59 B.C.E. he presented a radical land reform which lead to a land
distribution, buying relatively unused and non-efficient farmlands at inflated prices from mega
plantations with the gold from Rome’s coffers, and redistribute it to the farmers of Rome who
were impoverished and reduced into living in slums, through a lottery which was supervised by
government officials. By proposing of this law, which were ‘fitting not for a consul, but for a
most radical tribune of the people’, he brought solution to one of the problems that reformists
were pushing for approximately 70 years (473). He pushed anti-corruption legislations to prevent
people of power taking advantage of their held offices, distributed money to the poor citizens
Bayram 13
over his victory in the civil war as a way to increase his popularity and aid Romans who suffered
through the war. He brought exiles home, restored civic rights of the children who had suffered
in the time of Sulla, relieved the burdens of the debtor-class by a certain adjustment of interest
(533). Prior to his assassinations, he made plans to an invasion of Parthia, restoring the Roman
honour and Roman eagle standards which were humiliatingly lost with the defeat of Marcus
Licinius Crassus at the Battle of Carrhae. He intended to divert the Tiber River into a deep
channel to give merchants safe and easy passage to Rome, and to convert marshes of Pomentium
and Setia into a plan which afterwards could be cultivated, build moles to prevent and clear the
dangers of Ostia, construct harbours and roadsteads for fleets to visit. Along with the work of
many great mathematicians such as Sosigenes of Alexandria, he reorganized the broken lunar
calendar, pondered on it for many days and spread the seeds of Julian calendar, which is roughly
the foundation of the calendar people use to this day (579-581). He reorganized the grain dole, a
system of welfare for the poorest of citizens to take a portion of food to eliminate their most
prominent need for the sake of getting out of poverty, by reducing the number of participants,
which was infested with the rich having added their family names due to the earlier generations’
struggles and were out of any sort of need, and by forcing it to be strictly supervised so the actual
poor could benefit (571). These achievements and ongoing projects, along with his countless
victories against the enemies of Rome through his ingenuity and political prowess, made Caesar
extremely popular amongst plebeians. By means to an end, Caesar eliminated his opposition
through unorthodox measures and he was blatantly egotistical for he loved to be loved. When he
was at leisure and was reading from the history of Alexander, he burst into tears and told his
friends that it was a matter of sorrow that whilst Alexander at his age was already king of so
many people, and he hadn’t achieved any brilliant success. Nevertheless, the conspirators
Bayram 14
deprived the people of Rome of much advancement which would undoubtedly strengthen their
quality of life by stripping him from life. Even in doing so, they could not stop him from further
contributing, and it was revealed that Caesar left a sizable monetary gift and donated private
gardens and newly planted orchards for public to enjoy at their leisure (603).
Shakespeare presents the love of the people for Caesar as changeable, irrational and
overall over the top. Whilst Brutus presents his side of the story of how and why the
assassination went on, people praise him for being honourable and noble, but their demeanor
dramatically shifts when Antony shows up to stir and provoke them with his worlds and the
usage of vivid imagery on the dead body of Caesar. After discovering his will, the crowd
becomes uncontrollable, ravaging through the city with the cries of retribution, rallying in front
of their estates to get them out, and having stumbled upon their bodyguards, they even attempt to
burn their houses down in order to force them out, or incinerate within. After this point in the
play, their loyalty is constant towards Caesar and anyone who would pledge to avenge him such
as Anthony and Octavian Caesar, nephew and adopted son of Julius Caesar, later known as
Augustus, the first emperor of Rome. They take their betrayal harshly, even ending up
accidentally assaulting Cinna the Poet who had no business of assassinating Caesar, by mistaking
him for Cinna the Conspirator. The gravity of their fury is fully reflected by Shakespeare, even
though they are brandished as tools for Anthony to utilize them for his ploy.
Bayram 15
Conclusion
betrayal and its inherent tragedy, cogitated through great research and understanding the scale of
the historic event which is immortalized for being one of the most controversial stories of
treachery if not the most, save Judas Iscariot’s betrayal to the Christ. Its delivery is still upheld
and cherished with critical acclaim to this day, its words and idioms invented such as it’s all
Greek to someone is still used, and its influences and multidimensionality still cause debate
amongst friends whether it portrays or sides with morally acceptable party, or takes sides of any
end whatsoever.
Bayram 16
Works Cited
Aristotle, et al. Aristotle on the Art Of Poetry: Translated By Ingram Bywater With A Preface By
Gilbert Murray. Lector House, 2020.
Laing, Gregory L. Treason and Betrayal in the Middle English Romances of Sir Gawain. Vol. 3,
2009. Print.
Green, Richard Firth. A Crisis of Truth: Literature and Law in Ricardian England. Philadelphia,
PA: U of Pennsylvania, 2002. Print.
Plutarch, et al. Demosthenes and Cicero. Cambridge, Massachusetts Harvard University Press,
1919.