Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bioresource Technology: Sciencedirect
Bioresource Technology: Sciencedirect
Bioresource Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech
Fly ash as an additive for enhancing microbial and enzymatic activities in in- T
vessel composting of organic wastes
⁎
Ashootosh Mandpea,b, Sonam Paliyaa,b, Sunil Kumarb, , Rakesh Kumarb
a
Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 2010 02, India
b
CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (CSIR-NEERI), Nehru Marg, Nagpur 4400 20, India
G R A P H I C A L A B S T R A C T
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: In the present study, fly ash was used as an additive for the rapid composting of biomass and kitchen waste with
Microbial jaggery as an activator. The in-vessel composting experiments were carried out in ten plastic vessels of 15 L
Compost capacity containing varying amounts of fly ash, biomass waste, and kitchen waste. The effect of fly ash on the
Dehydrogenase activity microbial and enzymatic activity of the composting system was also ascertained. The compost in Vessel No. 10
Fly ash
having a combination of 50% biomass waste, 30% kitchen waste, and 20% fly ash seemed to have a significant
Substrate
effect on the compost quality. Statistical analysis revealed Vessel No. 10 as significantly separated from other
vessels whereas microbial activity (342.67 CFU 108/g), pH (8.15), temperature (48.50 °C), and heavy metals,
such as Ni (0.1239 mg kg−1), Ba (0.6109 mg kg−1), Cd (0.0004 mg kg−1) were the most influential variables for
the separation.
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: s_kumar@neeri.res.in (S. Kumar).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122047
Received 15 July 2019; Received in revised form 17 August 2019; Accepted 20 August 2019
Available online 22 August 2019
0960-8524/ © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
A. Mandpe, et al. Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122047
wastes and lack of awareness among the common masses led to re- Considering utilization of FA in various applications, it can be un-
straining the progress in the efficient SWM practices (Beliën et al., derstood that despite FA has numerous applications in diverse fields,
2014). the use of FA in agriculture is limited as compared to other sectors as
For fulfilling the food requirements of the ever-increasing popula- well as a behemoth volume of FA remains unutilized. Several studies
tion, the agrarian production has been intensified rapidly by the ap- reported that FA has an elemental property which improves soil health
plication of chemical fertilizers and pesticides which suppresses the and crop yield without causing any phytotoxicity on plant composition
quality of soil (Kumar et al., 2009). In India, the crop production with (Katiyar et al., 2012) still the applicability of FA in composting process
other allied activities associated with agriculture generate around 500 has rarely been tested (Lau et al., 2001).
Million Tonnes (MT) of biodegradable lignocellulosic wastes and dis- Keeping this in view, the present study was carried out to use FA as
posing this tremendous amount of wastes within a short period is a an additive in in-vessel composting of organic wastes for its sustainable
major challenge for the researchers and the environmental planners in utilization and to evaluate its effect on the microbial and enzymatic
India (NPMCR, 2014; Bhuvaneshwari et al., 2019). To manage the activity as well as the quality of compost. The current work is first of its
enormous volume of biodegradable wastes effectively, several tech- kind to use FA in rapid composting of biomass and kitchen waste for its
nologies like anaerobic digestion, pyrolysis, incineration, and gasifica- utilization in an environment-friendly manner and to boost its applic-
tion can be implemented, however; composting is a favourable option ability at a commercial level.
as it is comparatively easier to operate and manage. The waste stream
can be processed biologically, and the end product is well-stabilised 2. Materials and methods
humus, which can be utilized as a soil conditioner (Adewumi et al.,
2005). 2.1. Collection of FA and organic waste
Similarly, to cope up with the surging demand of energy due to the
increased urbanization coupled with rapid industrialization, several FA samples were collected from Khaperkheda Thermal Power
coal-fired thermal power plants have developed all over the world Station (TPS) located at 21.276138°N 79.121518°E in Nagpur district of
(Asokan et al., 2005). The combustion of bituminous, sub-bituminous Maharashtra, India. Biomass wastes (BW) comprising agricultural crop
and lignite coal for energy production in these thermal power plants residue was collected from the farmlands located in outskirts of the city,
generate huge quantities of fly ash (FA), bottom ash, flue gas desul- dry leaves and branches were collected from trees shedding in the CSIR-
phurization (FGD) material and boiler gas as a by-product (Kishor et al., NEERI premises. Also, the kitchen waste (KW) was sampled out from
2010). Disposal of such behemoth volumes of FA is also one of the the canteen of CSIR-NEERI campus.
major issues in developing countries like India. In the Indian context,
the primary source for power generation is coal, which accounts for 2.2. Physico-chemical analysis of FA, substrate, and compost
approximately 56.8 per cent of total power generation capacity (CEA
Report, 2018). The alternate sources of energy are required to be de- The physico-chemical characterization of FA, organic waste sub-
veloped for reducing the stress on excessive utilization of coal for en- strate and compost samples were performed for analyzing pH using
ergy production. Mettler Toledo digital probe; moisture content following gravimetric
FA, which is being dumped in ash ponds by thermal power stations method; total carbon, total nitrogen, carbon: nitrogen ratio and sulphur
occupies around 1,00,000 ha of land in India (Jha and Kumar, 2011) contents using Elementar Vario EL CHNS Analyser. nitrate, sulphate,
and disposal of such a tremendous amount of FA has become an en- phosphate using UV-1650pc, UV-VIS Spectrophotometer SHIMADZU;
vironmental threat since it has been an utterly under-utilized resource and heavy metal analysis using ICP-OES, iCAP 6000 SERIES. Cellulose
for a long time. There are numerous reasons behind the under-utiliza- and Hemicellulose were analyzed by adopting the method followed by
tion of FA, such as lack of awareness, stringent policies regarding FA Liu (2004), and Lignin content was determined using Klasson's method.
management, and the most critical factor is the readily available land. It
has been found that the percentage utilization of the generated FA in 2.3. Pre-treatment of substrate
Denmark is 100%, 85% in West Germany, 85% in France, 50% in the
United Kingdom, 45% in China and it is only 38% in India (Kishor et al., The waste substrates were pre-treated before processing in an in-
2010). FA is enriched with both macro & microelements and also vessel composting system. BW was shredded into smaller parts ranging
contains heavy metals, such as Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), in 0.5–1-inch in size resulting in increased surface area and porosity,
Chromium (Cr), Zinc (Zn), Molybdenum (Mo), Arsenic (As) and Copper which also aids in mixing during the process of composting (Rawoteea
(Cu) (Tiwari et al., 2008). Depending on the sulphur contents present in et al., 2017). The smaller-sized organic waste material was further
the parental coal, the pH ranges from 4.5 to 12.0 (Naiya and Das, subjected to steam treatment to breakdown the higher lignocellulosic
2016). FA contains all the elements similar to those present in soil ex- contents.
cept Nitrogen and a negligible amount of organic carbon (Banerjee
et al., 2014). Thus, except Nitrogen, all other essential elements re- 2.4. Experimental Set-up
quired for the metabolism and growth of microbes and plants are
readily available in FA. In-vessel composting experiments were carried out in ten plastic
In today’s scenario, FA is used for different potential applications vessels, each having 15 L capacity with a height of 32.5 cm. The top and
including cement production, pavement construction, manufacturing the base diameter of the vessels were 28 and 23.6 cm, respectively. The
bricks, synthesis of zeolites, manufacturing of pavement blocks and has vessels were drilled in the bottom part for leachate collection, and the
also been used as fillers in the polymers (Abdel Salam et al., 2011). It internal assembly involved the use of perforated rubber tube of 5 mm
has been used as a soil conditioner for the amelioration of soil quality. diameter, and its end was joined to the aerating pump for maintaining
Pappu et al. (2007) reported that FA could also be used for the ex- the aeration rate of 4 L per minute (LPM) during the composting pro-
traction of heavy metals and treating the wastewater. Wong et al. cess.
(2009) suggested that instead of lime powder, FA can be utilized due to Each vessel contained a different combination of BW, KW, FA and
its unique mechanism which can defile the bioavailability of heavy jaggery as an additive along with 50 ml of microbial consortia con-
metals using physical adsorption and precipitating at a higher range of taining Trichoderma viride, T. harzianum, and T. reesei. The different
pH. FA contains MgO and CaO due to which heavy metals get pre- combinations of waste substrate applied for in-vessel composting are
cipitated in the soil after the addition of FA to it (Wong et al., 2010; presented in Table 1. In vessel 1 only BW (1000 g) was loaded, while
Singh and Kalamdhad, 2013). 150 g jaggery was added as an activator in Vessel 2 along with the
2
A. Mandpe, et al. Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122047
α = Dehydrogenase activity (µg/g/hr) Columns represent mean of three replications and standard error bars; ND: Not
Detected.
3
A. Mandpe, et al. Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122047
Table 3
Analysis of heavy metal in substrates used for composting.
Sr. No. Heavy metals (mg kg−1) Biomass waste (BW) Kitchen waste (KW) Fly ash (FA) Indian permissible limit (Awasthi and Bhatnagar, 2000)
Columns represent mean of three replications and standard error bars; BDL-Below Detection Limit.
3.2.1. pH
The variation of pH in different vessels during the process of com-
posting is shown in Fig. 1(A). The value of pH in all the vessels during
the process of composting was recorded in the range 5.25–8.15 which
indicates that at the initial stage, the pH values decreased due to the
production of organic acids by fermentation of carbohydrates, and
subsequently, the pH in all vessels was found to be increased as a result
of release of ammonia to the proteolytic activities of microbes (Pathak
et al., 2012). The analysis of the compost sample in all the vessels at
different stages showed that the pH value increased until the 15th day
of composting. The increment in pH value during composting indicates
the decomposition of organic matter into ammonium ions (Zakarya
et al., 2018). After the 15th day, the highest value for pH of 8.15 was
observed in Vessel 10 followed by Vessel 7 having pH 7.85, Vessel 6
having pH 7.80 and Vessel 4 having pH 7.75, respectively and further,
the pH values were observed to be constant till maturity. From the
initiation of the experiment until the 8th day (thermophilic stage), drop
in pH indicates the accumulation of organic acids resulting due to the
degradation of organic matter (Zakarya et al., 2018).
3.2.2. Temperature
The highest temperature was recorded on the 8th day in all the Fig. 1. Variation of temperature (A) and pH (B) in vessels with different sub-
vessels, as shown in Fig. 1(B). This initial increment in temperature was strate combination (results are the mean of three replicates and error bars in-
dicates standard deviation).
the result of microbial activity in a thermophilic stage, which leads to
the decomposition of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents
present in organic waste materials. By comparing the temperature re- the temperature recorded in all the vessels was in the range
corded in all the vessels, as shown in Fig. 1(B), it was observed that the 29.50–48.50 °C. During the thermophilic stage, the lowest temperature
highest temperature of 48.50 °C was recorded in vessel 10 followed by of 38.5 °C was recorded on the 8th day in Vessel 1, which may be due to
Vessel 7 having temperature 47 °C, Vessel 4 having temperature 45.50 the absence of jaggery and KW. In the present study, the jaggery was
°C and Vessel 9 with a temperature of 43 °C on the 8th day. The ambient used as an activator, which can be considered as an additional carbon
temperature measured during the composting process was 29 °C, while source resulting in the enhancement of microbial activity in the
4
A. Mandpe, et al. Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122047
Table 4
Physico-chemical characterization of matured compost in different vessels.
Sr. No. Vessel TC (%) TN (%) C:N S (%) P (%) K (%)
1. V1 30.10 ± 0.3 2.05 ± 0.03 25.70 ± 0.6 0.09 ± 0.02 0.61 ± 0.006 0.03 ± 0.001
2. V2 28.04 ± 0.555 1.09 ± 0.01 25.86 ± 0.3 0.24 ± 0.001 0.91 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.001
3. V3 27.26 ± 0.26 0.98 ± 0.01 23.23 ± 0.41 0.21 ± 0.002 0.34 ± 0.002 0.03 ± 0.001
4. V4 23.59 ± 0.37 0.98 ± 0.003 22.64 ± 0.3 0.19 ± 0.002 0.25 ± 0.002 0.01 ± 0.007
5. V5 15.07 ± 0.2 0.63 ± 0.005 28.18 ± 0.4 0.09 ± 0.005 0.21 ± 0.004 0.02 ± 0.001
6. V6 21.56 ± 0.3 1.08 ± 0.004 23.24 ± 0.5 0.22 ± 0.002 0.71 ± 0.006 0.03 ± 0.001
7. V7 17.21 ± 0.11 1.04 ± 0.005 21.59 ± 0.6 0.16 ± 0.003 0.09 ± 0.002 0.04 ± 0.001
8. V8 16.17 ± 0.2 0.82 ± 0.004 24.75 ± 0.6 0.15 ± 0.002 0.05 ± 0.002 0.03 ± 0.001
9. V9 22.41 ± 0.4 1.09 ± 0.05 22.20 ± 0.4 0.23 ± 0.004 0.07 ± 0.001 0.02 ± 0.001
10. V10 22.84 ± 0.4 1.08 ± 0.005 20.77 ± 0.43 0.25 ± 0.003 0.92 ± 0.003 0.04 ± 0.001
5
A. Mandpe, et al. Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122047
Fig. 3(A). The differences observed for metal concentration in the ma-
tured compost reveal the different cellular mechanism of metal accu-
mulation in microbial cells that may control the translocation of metals
in the plants (Ã et al., 2007; Hanc et al., 2014; Manu et al., 2017). The
bioavailability and bioaccumulation of metals depend upon several
factors, such as mineralogy, pH, humic substances, texture, and che-
mical speciation (Dias et al., 2010; Nayak et al., 2015).
Table 5
Effect of fly ash amendment on microbial and enzymatic activity of compost.
Sr. No. Treatment Microbial activity (CFU 108 g−1) Dehydrogenase activity (μg TPF/g−1/h)
1. V1 114.67 ± 14.29 95.67 ± 13.32 78.00 ± 12.12 4.19 ± 0.32 3.45 ± 0.17 1.86 ± 0.10
2. V2 148.00 ± 9.54 139.67 ± 9.07 132.67 ± 10.07 5.33 ± 0.40 3.70 ± 0.21 2.04 ± 0.06
3. V3 216.67 ± 6.11 206.33 ± 8.08 196.00 ± 9.54 8.29 ± 0.70 5.51 ± 0.41 3.78 ± 0.16
4. V4 256.67 ± 9.29 247.67 ± 9.29 240.67 ± 10.26 11.26 ± 0.70 6.48 ± 0.40 4.40 ± 0.47
5. V5 173.00 ± 8.54 160.00 ± 8.54 145.67 ± 7.77 6.52 ± 0.51 4.44 ± 0.36 2.62 ± 0.51
6. V6 225.00 ± 5.57 218.67 ± 8.50 211.67 ± 7.77 11.02 ± 0.55 6.47 ± 0.46 4.08 ± 0.10
7. V7 325.33 ± 14.19 311.67 ± 13.65 300.00 ± 13.11 14.70 ± 1.15 8.58 ± 0.52 6.56 ± 0.37
8. V8 196.33 ± 12.01 191.67 ± 11.06 186.00 ± 11.53 7.58 ± 0.51 4.60 ± 0.35 2.81 ± 0.18
9. V9 287.00 ± 11.00 275.67 ± 11.50 265.00 ± 11.00 12.93 ± 0.43 7.34 ± 0.28 5.52 ± 0.37
10. V10 342.67 ± 15.63 333.00 ± 16.70 325.00 ± 12.17 16.14 ± 1.33 10.89 ± 0.12 8.56 ± 0.53
11. Soil 95.00 ± 9.54 87.33 ± 9.50 85.00 ± 7.55 3.67 ± 0.57 2.94 ± 0.09 1.87 ± 0.17
6
A. Mandpe, et al.
Table 6
Correlation analysis of microbial activity, heavy metals, temperature and pH measured during composting of different FA, OW, KW and additive combinations.
Parameters Microbial Ag Al Ba Ca Cd Cr Cu Fe K Li Mg Mn Na Ni Pb Sr Zn Temperature pH
activity
Microbial 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
activity
Ag −0.577* 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Al 0.751** −0.436 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Ba −0.627* 0.099 −0.844** 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Ca −0.524* 0.050 −0.830** 0.882** 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Cd −0.293 −0.003 −0.245 −0.087 0.177 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Cr −0.253 0.462 −0.235 0.200 0.386 −0.029 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – – – –
Cu 0.114 −0.273 0.591* −0.313 −0.356 −0.203 −0.009 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – – –
7
Fe −0.593* 0.127 −0.829** 0.810** 0.869** 0.338 0.312 −0.568* 1.000 – – – – – – – – – – –
K −0.548* 0.152 −0.795** 0.819** 0.930** 0.212 0.539* −0.392 0.868** 1.000 – – – – – – – – – –
Li 0.058 0.564* 0.153 −0.409 −0.401 0.025 0.453 −0.096 −0.236 −0.264 1.000 – – – – – – – – –
Mg −0.526* 0.040 −0.801** 0.771** 0.940** 0.435 0.393 −0.455 0.945** 0.930** −0.288 1.000 – – – – – – – –
Mn −0.345 0.087 −0.554* 0.421 0.731** 0.566* 0.522* −0.318 0.743** 0.668** 0.039 0.840** 1.000 – – – – – – –
Na −0.059 −0.127 −0.338 0.577* 0.509* −0.234 0.346 −0.247 0.478 0.692** −0.213 0.488* 0.103 1.000 – – – – – –
Ni −0.694** 0.263 −0.773** 0.849** 0.891** 0.023 0.509* −0.222 0.784** 0.908** −0.372 0.806** 0.532* 0.523* 1.000 – – – – –
Pb −0.121 0.174 0.016 0.104 0.261 −0.270 0.578* 0.497 −0.066 0.131 0.049 0.073 0.312 −0.181 0.340 1.000 – – – –
Sr −0.574* 0.027 −0.813** 0.717** 0.905** 0.568* 0.252 −0.412 0.871** 0.869** −0.372 0.962** 0.799** 0.349 0.759** 0.036 1.000 – – –
Zn −0.695** 0.220 −0.761** 0.838** 0.904** 0.123 0.599* −0.118 0.777** 0.895** −0.200 0.840** 0.678** 0.456 0.928** 0.442 0.791** 1.000 – –
Temperature 0.919** −0.375 0.598* −0.487 −0.367 −0.405 −0.058 0.088 −0.527* −0.370 0.079 −0.428 −0.294 0.115 −0.513* 0.022 −0.500* −0.549* 1.000 –
pH 0.845** −0.458 0.598* −0.610* −0.390 0.019 −0.206 0.008 −0.446 −0.334 −0.078 −0.323 −0.220 0.048 −0.529* −0.244 −0.319 −0.625* −0.854** 1.000
Significance levels for positive correlations are *p ≤ 0.05 (significant) and **p ≤ 0.01 (highly significant).
Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122047
A. Mandpe, et al. Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122047
4. Conclusion
8
A. Mandpe, et al. Bioresource Technology 293 (2019) 122047
agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. NPMCR. Available online: < http://agricoop.nic.in/sites/default/files/NPMCR_1.
Environ. 264, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.008. pdf > (accessed on 30th June 2019).
Dias, B.O., Silva, C.A., Higashikawa, F.S., Roig, A., Sánchez-Monedero, M.A., 2010. Use of Pappu, A., Saxena, M., Asolekar, S.R., 2007. Solid wastes generation in India and their
biochar as bulking agent for the composting of poultry manure: effect on organic recycling potential in building materials. Build. Environ. 42, 2311–2320.
matter degradation and humification. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 1239–1246. https:// Pathak, A.K., Singh, M.M., Kumara, V., Arya, S., Trivedi, A.K., 2012. Assessment of
doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.024c. physico- chemical properties and microbial community during composting of muni-
Escobar, N., Solarte, V., 2015. Microbial diversity associated with organic fertilizer ob- cipal solid waste (Viz. Kitchen waste) at Jhansi City, U. P. (India). Recent Res. Sci.
tained by composting of agricultural waste. Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinforma. 5, Technol. 4, 10–14.
70–79. https://doi.org/10.17706/ijbbb.2015.5.2.70-79. Pati, S.S., Sahu, S.K., 2004. CO2 evolution and enzyme activities (dehydrogenase, pro-
Hanc, A., Szakova, J., Ochecova, P., 2014. Differences in the mobility of Cd, Cu, Pb and tease and amylase) of fly ash amended soil in the presence and absence of earth-
Zn during composting of two types of household bio-waste collected in four seasons. worms (Drawida willsi Michaelsen) under laboratory conditions. Geoderma 118,
Bioresour. Technol. 168, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.125. 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00213-1.
Jala, S., Goyal, D., 2006. Fly ash as a soil ameliorant for improving crop production: a Population Reference Bureau, 2017. World Population Data Sheet.
review. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 1136–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech. Rawoteea, S.A., Mudhoo, A., Kumar, S., 2017. Co-composting of vegetable wastes and
2004.09.004. carton: effect of carton composition and parameter variations. Bioresour. Technol.
Jha, G.K., Kumar, V., 2011. Use of fly ash in agriculture. In: Proceedings of National 227, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.019.
Conference on Fly Ash. Singh, J., Kalamdhad, A.S., 2013. Effects of lime on bioavailability and leachability of
Katiyar, D., Singh, A., Malaviya, P., Pant, D., Singh, P., Abraham, G., Singh, S.K., 2012. heavy metals during agitated pile composting of water hyacinth. Bioresour. Technol.
Impact of fly-ash-amended soil on growth and yield of crop plants. Int. J. Environ. 138, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.151.
Waste Manage. 10, 150. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijewm.2012.048362. Surridge, A.K.J., Merwe, A., Kruger, R., 2009. Preliminary microbial studies on the impact
Khater, E.S.G., 2015. Some physical and chemical properties of compost. Int. J. Waste of plants and South African fly ash on amelioration of crude oil polluted soils. In:
Resour. 05, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2252-5211.1000172. Proceedings of the World of Coal Ash Conference, pp. 4–7.
Kishor, P., Ghosh, A.K., Dileep, K., 2010. Utilization of fly ash in agriculture: a way to Tejada, M., González, J.L., 2009. Application of two vermicomposts on a rice crop: effects
improve soil fertility and its productivity. Asian J. Agric. Res. 4 (1), 1–14. on soil biological properties and rice quality and yield. Agron. J. 101, 336–344.
Klein, D.A., Loh, T.C., Goulding, R.L., 1971. A rapid procedure to evaluate the dehy- https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0211.
drogenase activity of soils low in organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 3, 385–387. Tiwari, S., Kumari, B., Singh, S.N., 2008. Evaluation of metal mobility/immobility in fly
https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(71)90049-6. ash induced by bacterial strains isolated from the rhizospheric zone of Typha latifolia
Kumar, S., Bhattacharyya, J.K., Vaidya, A.N., Chakrabarti, T., Devotta, S., Akolkar, A.B., growing on fly ash dumps. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 1305–1310. https://doi.org/10.
2009. Assessment of the status of municipal solid waste management in metro cities, 1016/j.biortech.2007.02.010.
state capitals, class I cities, and class II towns in India: an insight. Waste Manage. 29, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, P.D., 2017. World Population
883–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.04.011. Prospects The 2017 Revision Key Findings and Advance Tables. World Population
Lau, S.S.S., Fang, M., Wong, J.W.C., 2001. Effects of composting process and fly ash Prospects The 2017: 1–46. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
amendment on phytotoxicity of sewage sludge. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 40, Waghmare, P.R., Kadam, A.A., Saratale, G.D., Govindwar, S.P., 2014. Enzymatic hydro-
184–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002440010162. lysis and characterization of waste lignocellulosic biomass produced after dye bior-
Liu, S., 2004. Analysis and Measurement in Papermaking Industry. Chemical Industry emediation under solid state fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 168, 136–141.
Press, Beijing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.099.
Makoi, J.H.J.R., Ndakidemi, P.A., 2008. Selected soil enzymes: examples of their poten- Wan Razali, W.A., Baharuddin, A.S., Talib, A.T., Sulaiman, A., Naim, M.N., Hassan, M.A.,
tial roles in the ecosystem. J. Biotechnol. 7, 181–191. https://doi.org/10.5897/ Shirai, Y., 2012. Degradation of oil palm empty fruit bunches (opefb) fibre during
AJB07.590. composting process using in-vessel composter. BioResources 7, 4786–4805. https://
Manu, M.K., Kumar, R., Garg, A., 2017. Performance assessment of improved composting doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.4.4786-4805.
system for food waste with varying aeration and use of microbial inoculum. Wong, J.W.C., Fung, S.O., Selvam, A., 2009. Coal fly ash and lime addition enhances the
Bioresour. Technol. 234, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03. rate and efficiency of decomposition of food waste during composting. Bioresour.
023c. Technol. 100, 3324–3331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.063.
Manyapu, V., Mandpe, A., Kumar, S., 2018. Synergistic effect of fly ash in in-vessel Wong, J.W.C., Li, S.W.Y., Wong, M.H., 2010. Coal fly ash as a composting material for
composting of biomass and kitchen waste. Bioresour. Technol. 251, 114–120. https:// sewage sludge: effects on microbial activities. Environ. Technol. 16, 527–537.
doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.039. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331608616294.
Naiya, T.K., Das, S.K., 2016. Removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution using fly ash of Yun, Y., Wang, H., Man, B., Xiang, X., Zhou, J., Qiu, X., Duan, Y., Engel, A.S., 2016. The
different sources. Desalin. Water Treat. 57 (13), 5800–5809. relationship between pH and bacterial communities in a single karst ecosystem and
Nayak, A.K., Raja, R., Rao, K.S., Shukla, A.K., Mohanty, S., Shahid, M., Tripathi, R., its implication for soil acidification. Front. Microbiol. 7, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.
Panda, B.B., Bhattacharyya, P., Kumar, A., Lal, B., Sethi, S.K., Puri, C., Nayak, D., 3389/fmicb.2016.01955.
Swain, C.K., 2015. Effect of fly ash application on soil microbial response and heavy Zakarya, I.A., Khalib, S.N.B., Mohd Ramzi, N., 2018. Effect of pH, temperature and
metal accumulation in soil and rice plant. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 114, 257–262. moisture content during composting of rice straw burning at different temperature
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.033. with food waste and effective microorganisms. E3S Web Conf. 34, 1–8. https://doi.
Nielsen, M.N., Winding, A., 2002. Microorganisms as indicators of soil health. Technical org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183402019.
Report No. 388. National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark.