Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental

stains (Review)

Wakiaga JM, Brunton P, Silikas N, Glenny AM, Gopakumar A, Boyle L

Wakiaga JM, Brunton P, Silikas N, Glenny AM, Gopakumar A, Boyle L.

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD004347.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004347.pub3.

www.cochranelibrary.com

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (Review)
Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
HEADER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
REASON FOR WITHDRAWAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
WHAT’S NEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
SOURCES OF SUPPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (Review) i
Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[Intervention Review]

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental

stains

John M Wakiaga1 , Paul Brunton2 , Nick Silikas3 , Anne-Marie Glenny1 , Ashish Gopakumar4 , Liam Boyle4
1 Cochrane Oral Health Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 2 Fixed & Removable Prosthodon-

tics, Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds, UK. 3 Unit of Biomaterials Science, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester,
UK. 4 Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Contact address: Ashish Gopakumar, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool,
Room 303, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5PS, UK. ashish_gopakumar@yahoo.co.uk.

Editorial group: Cochrane Oral Health Group.

Publication status and date: Withdrawn from publication for reasons stated in the review, published in Issue 12, 2015.
Review content assessed as up-to-date: 19 November 2003.

Citation: Wakiaga JM, Brunton P, Silikas N, Glenny AM, Gopakumar A, Boyle L. Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic
dental stains. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD004347. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004347.pub3.

Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

REASON FOR WITHDRAWAL

The Cochrane Oral Health Group withdrew this review as of Issue 12, 2015. The review is out of date and does not meet current
Cochrane methodological standards.

WHAT’S NEW
Last assessed as up-to-date: 19 November 2003.

Date Event Description

2 December 2015 Amended The Cochrane Oral Health Group withdrew this review as of Issue 12, 2015. The review is out of
date and does not meet current Cochrane methodological standards

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (Review) 1
Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
HISTORY
Protocol first published: Issue 3, 2003
Review first published: Issue 1, 2004

Date Event Description

13 August 2008 Amended Converted to new review format.

SOURCES OF SUPPORT

Internal sources
• University Dental Hospital of Manchester, UK.

External sources
• No sources of support supplied

Direct versus indirect veneer restorations for intrinsic dental stains (Review) 2
Copyright © 2015 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.