Professional Documents
Culture Documents
b) Who is a minor?
A minor is someone who is below the age of 18 years. He/she has no legal access to
get into a legal contract or agreement. In case, they get into a contract then it is
considered void.
SECTION – B
Answer any three questions of the following. Each question carries six marks:-
Following are the exceptions by which agreements without consideration are valid:-
7. Define Acceptance. What are the legal rules governing a Valid Acceptance?
The Indian Contract Act 1872 defines acceptance in Section 2(b) as “When the
person to whom the proposal has been made signifies his assent thereto, the offer is
said to be accepted. Thus the proposal when accepted becomes a promise.”
Under Section 2(B) of Contract Act, "when a person to whom the proposal is made
expresses his assent, so the proposal is said to be accepted. Proposal when accepted
becomes a promise, e.g. “A” offer “B” to sell his house for Rs.10 lack, “B” agrees to
purchase the house for Rs.10 lack, and this is acceptance.
Acceptance is defined as when the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his
assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposal when accepted becomes
a promise.
ESSENTIALS OF A VALID ACCEPTANCE
Acceptance must be communicated –The definition of acceptance clearly requires that
the assent must be signified. To signify means to communicate. If the acceptance is not
communicated to the offeror, no contract is created.
Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified –Acceptance of a proposal with
conditions, variations and reservations is no acceptance at all. Acceptance with
variations is a counter proposal and there is no contract unless this counter proposal is
accepted by the original proposer.
Acceptance can be express or implied –is express when it is communicated by words,
spoken or written. If the proposer prescribes any mode of acceptance, the offeree must
follow the same mode. Acceptance is implied when it is to be gathered from the
surrounding circumstances or the conduct of the parties. For example, in an auction sale
if the highest bidder strikes a hammer on the table, it is treated as an implied
acceptance.
Acceptance by a definite person –Where an offer is made to a particular person, he
alone must accept the proposal. Acceptance by anybody else invalidates the offer. If the
offer is made to world at large, one person must accept the offer. It is only then that a
contract is made. The general offer is closed as soon as it is accepted by a definite
person.
Acceptance must be through prescribed or reasonable mode –If the acceptance is not
according to the mode prescribed, or some usual and reasonable mode, the offeror may
intimate to the offeree, within reasonable time that the acceptance is not according to
the mode prescribed and may insist that the acceptance must be in the prescribed mode
only.
Mere mental acceptance is no acceptance –No contract is formed if the offeree remains
silent and does nothing to show that he has accepted the offer. A mere mental
determination to accept unaccompanied by any external indication will not be sufficient.
Acceptance when offer is inforce –Acceptance must be made before the offer lapses. If
any time limit is prescribed, the offer must be accepted before the expiry of the time. If
no time limit is prescribed, the offer must be accepted within reasonable time.
Acceptance must be preceded by offer –Offer must precede acceptance. Without offer,
there is no acceptance.
The following are the essential elements of a contract, arrived at on the basis of a combined
reading of Section 2(H) and Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act:
Offer and Acceptance: There must be a ‘lawful offer’ and ‘lawful acceptance’ of the
offer, thus resulting in an agreement. For example: If X offers to sell his Maruti Car to
Y for Rs. 2,25,000 and Y agrees to pay X Rs. 2,25,000 for the Maruti Car. Here X is
called the offeror or promisor and Y is the offeree or promisee.
Free Consent: The contracting parties must give their consent freely. It must not be
given due to coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake. The
absence of free consent would affect the legal enforceability of a contract.
Capacity of the parties: The parties making the contract must be legally competent
in the sense that each must be of the age of majority, of a sound mind, and not
expressly disqualified from contracting (Section 11). An agreement by incompetent
parties shall be a legal nullity.
Lawful Consideration: An agreement to be enforceable by law must be supported
by consideration. Without consideration, a contract is regarded as a nudum pactum.
Each of the contracting parties must give as well as get something. Moreover, the
consideration must be lawful.
Lawful object: The object of the agreement must be lawful. It is considered unlawful
if it is (i) illegal (ii) immoral, (iii) fraudulent, (iv) of a nature that, if permitted, it would
defeat the provisions of any law, (v) causes injury to the person or property of
another, or (vi) opposed to public policy.
Not expressly declared void: The agreement must not have been declared void by
any law in force in India. The Act has itself declared void certain types of agreements
such as those in restraint of marriage, or trade, or legal proceedings as well as
wagering agreements.
Intention to create legal relations: There must be an intention among the parties
that the agreement should be attached by legal consequences and create legal
obligations.
Legal formalities: The agreement must comply with the necessary formalities as to
writing, registration, stamping etc. if any required in order to make it enforceable by
law.
Possibility of performance: The act contemplated in the agreement should be
capable of performance. Agreement to perform an impossible act cannot be
enforced. For example, A promises to share with B 50 percent of the treasure,
provided the treasure is created by magic. Such an agreement cannot be enforced
because of impossibility of performance.
Certainty of terms: The terms of the agreement must be certain. Vague or uncertain
terms make the agreement unenforceable.
10. Discuss the role of Central Government to prevent and control environmental
pollution.
Role of Central Government in Preventing and Controlling Environmental Pollution
Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Central Government shall have the power to
take all such measures as it deems necessary or expedient for the purpose of
protecting and improving the quality of the environment and preventing controlling
and abating environmental pollution.
In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of sub-section
(1), such measures may include measures with respect to all or any of the following
matters, namely:-
Co-ordination of actions by the State Governments, officers and other authorities-
Under this Act, or the rules made thereunder, or
Under any other law for the time being in force which is relatable to the
objects of this Act.
Planning and execution of a nation-wide programme for the prevention, control and
abatement of environmental pollution.
Laying down standards for the quality of environment in its various aspects.
Laying down standards for emission or discharge of environmental pollutants from
various sources whatsoever;
Provided that different standards for emission or discharge may be laid down under
this clause from different sources having regard to the quality or composition of the
emission or discharge of environmental pollutants from such sources;
Restriction of areas in which any industries, operations or processes or class of
industries, operations or processes shall not be carried out or shall be carried out
subject to certain safeguards.
Laying down procedures and safeguards for the prevention of accidents which may
cause environmental pollution and remedial measures for such accidents.
Laying down procedures and safeguards for the handling of hazardous substances.
Examination of such manufacturing processes, materials and substances as are likely
to cause environmental pollution.
Carrying out and sponsoring investigations and research relating to problems of
environmental pollution.
Inspection of any premises, plant, equipment, machinery, manufacturing or other
processes, materials or substances and giving, by order, of such directions to such
authorities, officers or persons as it may consider necessary to take steps for the
prevention, control and abatement of environmental pollution.
Establishment or recognition of environmental laboratories and institutes to carry
out the functions entrusted to such environmental laboratories and institutes under
this Act.
Collection and dissemination of information in respect of matters relating to
environmental pollution.
Preparation of manuals, codes or guides relating to the prevention, control and
abatement of environmental pollution.
Such other matters as the Central Government deems necessary or expedient for
the purpose of securing the effective implementation of the provisions of this Act.
11. Explain the Constitution and functions of various Consumer Dispute Redressal
Agencies.
“Redressal’ means a remedy for the loss suffered by consumers like us.
The word ‘REDRESSAL’ means a ‘REMEDY’. These Forums (Courts) award
compensation to the consumer if the manufacturer or the trader or the service giver is
at fault. So, anyone who has suffered a loss can claim compensation, i.e., some
amount of money based on the loss incurred by the consumer. For example, if the
manufacturer does not give a new handset, the manufacturer can be compelled to
repay the money and also in some cases special amount of money for the
inconvenience caused due to the faulty product.
DISTRICT FORUM: The District Consumer disputes Redressal Forum (DCDRF) which is also
known as the ‘District Forum’, is established by the concerned State Government in each
District of the State. The State Government may establish more than one District Forum in a
district. It is a district level Court that deals with cases valuing up to twenty lakhs. The
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, better known as District Forum is the first stage of
courts at the bottom of the hierarchy of the consumer redressal courts. The sections 10 to
15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 deal with this forum.
The Section 10(1) of the Act deals with the composition of the District Forum. The
important aspects of this Act involve:
o There is a President with the qualification of a District judge.
o Apart from the President, there are two other members, one being a woman.
o These members are to be chosen based on three grounds. They must be at least 35
years of age, they must have a degree from a recognized university and they must
have at least 10 years of experience in law, economics, and commerce and so on.
Section 10 1(A) of the Act prescribes that every appointment mentioned above will be made
by a committee with is composed of:
o The President of the State Commission as the Chairman
o The Secretary of the Law Department of the State as a Member
o The Secretary dealing in consumer affairs in the State as a Member.
In the absence of the President, the Chief Justice of the High Court may nominate a sitting
judge of the High Court in his place.
Functions:
Section 11 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 defines the jurisdiction of the District
Forum, explained below:
o The value of goods and services and compensation should not exceed 20 lakh rupees.
o Jurisdiction in terms of place can be determined as:
a) The place of residence or carrying out of the business of the opposite party,
b) any party or each party
c) The place where the cause of action wholly or partly arises.
In accordance with Section 14 of the Act, the District Forum has the power to grant
damages. This can be in the form of compensation, removing defects or deficiencies,
discontinuing unfair trade practice, withdrawal of hazardous good for sale and so on.
Section 15 of the Act grants an appeal against the decision of the District Forum within
30 days to the State Commission. Also, the appellant must have paid 50 per cent of the
compensation decided against him or ₹25000, whichever is less.
Section 13 of the Act pertains to the procedure for the admission of a consumer
complaint. Procedure for the complaint against an allegedly defective good which the
Forum should implement is as follows:
a. Within 21 days of filing the complaint, the opposite party should receive a
copy to explain his version. The version should be submitted in 30 days, with
a maximum extension of 15 days.
b. When the opposite party either disputes and denies or fails to take action to
represent his case, clause (c) or (g) must be followed
c. If a complaint needs an analysis of the good, a sample can be taken by the
District Forum to be sent to a certain laboratory for testing for the defect.
The report of the findings should be complete in 45 days unless an extension
is granted by the Forum.
d. The complainant may have to pay a fee in order to carry out the process of
sample testing at the said laboratory.
e. This fee will be given to the laboratory and the report with the appropriate
remarks will be forwarded to the opposite party.
f. If one of the parties disputes the findings of the laboratory, the party’s
objections should be submitted in writing.
g. Both parties will be given a reasonable opportunity to be heard by the
District Forum.
h. Deficiency in services follows a similar procedure, focussing on the evidence
brought to the District Forum.
i. If the complainant fails to appear on the date of the hearing, the Forum may
either dismiss the complaint or act on its discretion.
STATE COMMISSION: The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) which
is also known as ‘State Commission’, is established by the State Government concerned in
the State. It is a State level Court for the redressal of consumer’s disputes. It decides cases
exceeding rupees twenty lakhs but not exceeding rupees one crore.
The Sections 16, 17, 18 and 19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 deal with this
Commission.
The Section 16 of the Act deals with the composition of the State Commission. The
important aspects of this Act involve:
o There is a President who is or was a judge of the High Court, appointed by the State
Government
o Apart from the President, there are two other members, one being a woman.
o The number of members in the State Commission cannot be less than 2
o These members are to be chosen based on three grounds. They must be at least 35
years of age, they must have a bachelor’s degree from a recognized university and
they must have at least 10 years of experience in law, economics, and commerce
and so on.
o Not more than fifty per cent of the members should have a judicial background.
o The State Government determines the remuneration of the members.
o The President can choose the size of the Commission as one or more
o Decisions are of the majority, with the President intervening in case of an equal
division in opinion.
Section 16 1(A) of the Act prescribes that every appointment mentioned above will be made
by a committee with is composed of:
o The President of the State Commission as the Chairman
o The Secretary of the Law Department of the State as a Member
o The Secretary dealing in consumer affairs in the State as a Member.
o In the absence of the President, the Chief Justice of the High Court may nominate a
sitting judge of the High Court in his place.
Functions
Section 17(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 defines the jurisdiction of the State
Commission, explained below:
The value of goods and services and compensation should be at least 20 lakhs but not
exceed 1 crore rupees.
Appeals against the orders of District Forum are settled here
If the District Forum has seemingly acted beyond its power or has failed in its duty, then
the National Commission can call for records.
The State Commission may transfer a complaint to it from the District Forum at any
stage of the proceeding. The State Commission may also outside of its ordinary place of
the capital. These are called Circuit Courts.
As according to Section 18, the State Commission observes the same procedure as the
District Forum under Sections 12, 13 and 14.
Section 19 of the Act grants an appeal against the decision of the National Commission
within 30 days to the State Commission. Also, the appellant must have paid 50 per cent
of the compensation decided against him or Rs. 35000, whichever is less.
NATIONAL COMMISSION: The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC))
which is also known as ‘National Commission’ is established by the Central Government.
Consumer’s disputes exceeding rupees one crore. The sections of the Consumer Protection
Act, 1986 deal with this Commission.
The Section 20 of the Act deals with the composition of the National Commission. The
important aspects of this Act involve:
o There is a President who is or was a judge of the Supreme Court, appointed by the
Central Government
o There must be 4 members at least, one being a woman.
o These members are to be chosen based on three grounds. They must be at least 35
years of age, they must have a bachelor’s degree from a recognized university and
they must have at least 10 years of experience in law, economics, and commerce
and so on.
o Not more than fifty per cent of the members should have a judicial background.
o The Central Government determines the remuneration of the members.
o The President can choose the Bench of the Commission as one or more
o Decisions are of the majority, with the President intervening in case of an equal
division in opinion.
Section 16 1(A) of the Act prescribes that every appointment mentioned above will be made
by a committee with is composed of:
o A judge of the Supreme Court nominated by Chief Justice of India as the Chairman
o The Secretary in Department of Legal Affairs of the Government of India as a Member
o The Secretary of the department dealing in consumer affairs in the Government of
India as a Member.
FUNCTIONS
Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 defines the jurisdiction of the National
Commission, explained below:
o The value of goods and services and compensation should exceed 1 crore rupees
o Appeals against the orders of State Commission are settled here
o If the State Commission has seemingly acted beyond its power or has failed in its duty,
then the National Commission can call for records.
The National Commission may receive a transfer of a complaint from the State
Commission at any stage of the proceeding in the interest of justice. This can be on the
application of the complainant or its own motion. The National Commission may also
outside of its ordinary place of the capital of India, New Delhi. These are called Circuit
Benches.
The National Commission has the power to review any order made by itself when there
seems to be an error on the record, as stated in Section 22.
Section 19 of the Act grants an appeal against the decision of the National Commission
within 30 days to the Supreme Court. Also, the appellant must have paid 50 per cent of
the compensation decided against him or Rs. 50000, whichever is less.