Jas Elner
Seven Style
ee Snr"
snltcn nephron ua he ah
aye Aan“
“Today the sentiment expressed in my epi
thinkable—slthough a receny as 1990 Whitney Davi
fred that most working at hirtorans probably sll”
(Davis 1990, 38), For nearly the whole ofthe twentieth
syle art history has ben the indisputable hing ofthe
bore helio the sms an gh
been dead. The point x proved by the st eition of
ook (1998), whos afl selected rit terms in the
of art excluded not only “style” bu also is key
“orm.” “connoisseurahi.” even chat interesting and
eatalment of stylistic art-historial an
yet to change my (male) metsphor frm monarchy 2
‘he father has een sempossbet ay entirely ores. It
thatthe moment an academe displine enters &
‘we begin to experience a certain nostalgia for things a
{be les lu diene at inn yao nach moe
‘logically and theoretally grounded 20 mach mae
‘ndconextaly sable 30 much more politically m
Silly explict—reoms to lack the empathetic al
tloseness to objects that the special quale of syle
tits best Moreover, most of thor whos insights
in it ew guise were trained and ae experi sod
den in (pont)emvtics the atylitic rofl may sil
though the father may be, we cannot be entirely sre
Fis cldren ae fashioned in his kenes.
‘So what do we mean by “style at history” and
‘remain th evden and eleva? Let me beg with
(ar al good formal analy hol) and with ome oi
‘ans fom along wy Back. Plt 7.1 detail fom
ay
1 monument up ete Coostew onthe eg of he Forum
ety ofRomeand dedi a> 25, Themaerbulk he orchanddo,
ith section of mre ret eulptary some secally cos
tthe inc and some cle fm carer nonmens wach perp ed
no dep o muy eve have ben ded for the pron) sd
Nove of his need be puta supii in the coment fone
Rome, exept tht the Joxtaponion of ebjes rom diferent pods
yo centres separates the let pron tech om felt
5 aso causes concer coef te met ental nd
Becta hiey
Pate7, wo medalions ating fromthe reign of Havin (4.0 47-38)
posed above a ze from the tine of Conran, executed in our
is. The Haine sen showing the emperr ands puty standing
aon in during he hae (lf) and the emperor ondacing actor
les (igh are clean exaple of cscing natural shying te
jf pepsi and ashine in deep ell wth he hel. One can
thes sees taking plc in the “rl words The Constantinian fsse
host emperor fering les tothe popula of Rome ral
nel. The imperil gure (hohe fs ben let inthe vce,
of in) cera font, rounded bya syne arangenee of
and lage chan the other gue. The yeoplearond him ar ersnee
ly vial stacked in he central secon, nd without any of te
ic elpings ofthe Hadi gre or fre Me), The propor
ff the gure ser rope, erste and postures all ede
they were signs ether than nature ita el en Ufone
the draperies the Contaninin sculptures wth hoe of he Hae
Peundl, the ler all urls nting el deting in sone
She former ca ie nnning dil ather than chess
he mack of clthing rather than atemping to inate ny acl no
shout 519, Raphael in his oficial role as the papel agent responsible for
es wrote a famous report to Pope Lo Xin wah he ad
erature, seule psincng. and almstall the other arts had
been declining and had grown worse and worse ant heme of the
emperors, yet architecture wa tll studied and oacticed coding
{fod ls and buildings mere erected inthe ame sty before
ere are many evidences among others the Arch of Constantin,
his well designed and well bul at fara archeccure is concerned
sculpures ofthe same arch ae very feeble and destitute ofall at
Bred design, The, however, that come from the sols of Tejon andAntonin Ps arene nan doen pre
(Gali and Tees 1945-74-75)
tine was phd wi
aw cnury Ine thi ae ne w25
Marthe pece oie 568 ion othe Lie
Pear imgurmed abit ara oder dl
For lk of god maners nt only i hey nl
fuel! Tal
gto Rome om tous ines Those
emelEme af heer are dec
eos aher mens which blog to ante
hp
‘ay ry se a
2 nt rs in mlb tee
rc Norn oor, whe bee
eo thee arse ve, ao very ede one
tl perceive how rg
ip by the scalars of the
hey lee one firmly under the impresion thatthe at of sculpture
eg deline even before the coming of che Goths, (Vasa 963, >)
ile some ofthe fas” reported by Raphael and Vasa are no Tonge con
ferret (the poia are now belived to ome om works comme mora
Majn adrian, and Marcos Auris, ot Anorinas Pas and ae prob
for Rome sl), he facts ate not crucial oth methodological strategy
ies description spay. Bath accounts chooe te describe he arch by vi
the rylisticbriclae of ts salu, and bothuse that stylistic analysis
ahistorical picture of decline Here style i bilan summoned into
ory to make a polemical pint. Te argumentative meth employed
ef stylistic disjunction or dference (between the “good” secondcentry
and che “bad” fourth-