Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compact Open-Slot Antenna With Bandwidth
Compact Open-Slot Antenna With Bandwidth
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1. Geometry of the proposed antenna.
Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano ITM. Downloaded on February 18,2021 at 20:01:46 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 10,
2 2011
1536-1225/$26.00 © 2011 IEEE
Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano ITM. Downloaded on February 18,2021 at 20:01:46 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Fig. 2. Design evolution of the proposed antenna.
Fig. 4. Photograph of the proposed antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Bottom view.
TABLE I
PARAMETERS OF THE ANTENNAS It is worth mentioning that when the rectangular patch of
the antenna is asymmetrically fed by a 50- microstrip line,
mul- tiple resonances can be generated in the operating band.
How- ever, the impedance matching of the antenna is poor,
especially at the lower frequencies.
To improve the impedance matching of the proposed
design, two bevels are cut on the rectangular edges (Proposed
Antenna). In the design procedure, we found that the
rectangular patch with two bevels could improve impedance
matching of the an- tenna at both lower and higher
frequencies. The proposed an- tenna could get an ultrawide
impedance bandwidth with good impedance matching after
two bevels are cut and its simulated 10-dB return loss
bandwidth is up to 122% (2.95–12.1 GHz),
as shown in Fig. 3.
simulated using the Ansoft HFSS commercial software and III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
are given in Table I. Fig. 4 shows a photograph of the implemented proposed
It begins with the design of Antenna I, which consists of antenna, and Fig. 5 shows the simulated and measured return
a straight microstrip feed line and a U-shaped open slot. As losses of the proposed antenna. The simulated and measured
shown in Fig. 3, when the slot antenna is fed by a straight line, results present a very good agreement. From the measured
a 10-dB return loss bandwidth of 28% from 3.45 to 4.6 GHz result, a wide operating bandwidth of about 122% from 2.95
is achieved, which is like that in [3]. After using a rectangular to 12.1 GHz with 10-dB return loss has been achieved. From
patch instead of the straight microstrip line (Antenna II), the Fig. 5, it can be observed that combination of the U-shaped
an- tenna can get three relative impedance bandwidths with 10- open slot and the asymmetrical beveled rectangular patch
dB return loss about 15% (3.1–3.6 GHz), 59% (4.9–9 GHz), could produce multiple resonant frequencies covering the UWB
and 12% (10–11.2 GHz), respectively. However, it still cannot band. The rectangular patch affects resonances at 5–9 GHz,
sat- isfy the requirement for UWB systems. The impedance and the resonance mode at lower frequency is due to the open
char- acteristics of the slot antenna may mainly suffer from slot.
strong ground-plane effects. To further understand the phenomenon behind this wide
impedance performance, the simulated input impedance of
the proposed antenna on a Smith chart is shown in Fig. 6.
It
Fig. 8. Effects of varying width on impedance matching.
REFERENCES