You are on page 1of 6

LIU et al.

: COMPACT OPEN-SLOT ANTENNA WITH BANDWIDTH ENHANCEMENT


1

Compact Open-Slot Antenna With Bandwidth


Enhancement
WeiXing Liu, YinZeng Yin, WenLong Xu, and ShaoLi Zuo

Abstract—A compact open-slot antenna for bandwidth enhance-


ment is presented. Multiple resonances are generated by using an
asymmetrical rectangular patch with the U-shaped open-slot struc-
ture. Two bevels are cut on the patch to improve the impedance
matching. The proposed antenna provides a wide impedance band-
width of 122% from 2.95 to 12.1 GHz with 10-dB return loss. It is
shown that the impedance bandwidth can be enhanced from 28%
to 122% by using different antenna types. Moreover, this slot an-
tenna is with a small size of mm , while main-
taining the ultrawideband (UWB) performance.
Index Terms—Bandwidth enhancement, compact antenna,
microstrip slot antenna, printed antennas, ultrawideband
(UWB).

I. INTRODUCTION
Fig. 1. Geometry of the proposed antenna.

I N MODERN wireless communication systems, antennas


are required to be simple in structure, compact in size, and
stable in radiation patterns while retaining an extremely broad An inverted-L-shaped open slot antenna [8] and a linear
operating frequency range. However, the design of a wideband tapered slot antenna [9] are presented to enhance the
antenna is not an easy task, especially for a portable device since impedance band- width. In [10], a stepped-slot antenna is
a compromise between the size, cost, and bandwidth has to be effective in enhancing the bandwidth (3–11 GHz). However,
achieved simultaneously. Recently, printed planar slot antennas its size mm is slightly large. Therefore, it is
have become very attractive candidates for wireless systems due important to further reduce the size of the antenna.
to their low profile, wide bandwidth, compact size, ease of In this letter, a new open-slot antenna with bandwidth
fab- rication, etc. When a slot antenna is fed by a microstrip enhancement and size reduction is presented. The measured
line, it does not add weight and size to the system and is impedance bandwidth of the proposed antenna is about 122%
suitable for portable applications. A variety of printed slot from 2.95 to 12.1 GHz (defined by 10-dB return loss). In ad-
antenna config- urations have been reported in the open dition, the proposed antenna has a simple structure and a small
literature [1]–[5], in- cluding straight slot, wide slot, L- size mm . The designed antenna has been
shaped slot, inverted T-slot, step slot, and fractal-shaped slot. successfully implemented, and the effects of the key structure
However, the traditional slot antenna is about a half- parameters on the antenna performances are also analyzed and
wavelength resonance, which is a large size. On the other discussed.
hand, some slot antennas have the limited bandwidth, which
is not enough to use for more applications. To reduce an II. ANTENNA CONFIGURATION AND DESIGN
antenna size and enhance its bandwidth, a open slot The geometry of the proposed open-slot antenna is shown in
with the nonsymmetric ground is used in [6], and the Fig. 1. The antenna is printed on an FR4 substrate (thickness
obtained bandwidth is about 94% (2.2–6.1 GHz). A tapered mm, relative permittivity , loss tangent of 0.027).
slot is used in the design of an antenna for lower ultrawide- The dimensions of the substrate are mm .
band (UWB) (3.1–4.85 GHz) applications [7], but the band- This proposed open-slot antenna has a bevelled rectangular
width is too limited to meet the demands for UWB systems. patch on the top side of the substrate, which is fed by a 50-
microstrip line of width and length . The patch size is op-
timized to achieve a miniaturized design. A U-shaped open slot
Manuscript received July 07, 2011; revised August 08, 2011; accepted Au- is etched on the ground plane to enhance the bandwidth in the
gust 11, 2011. Date of publication August 18, 2011; date of current version opposite side. By using the asymmetrical beveled rectangular
September 01, 2011.
The authors are with National Key Laboratory of Antennas and Microwave patch and the U-shaped open slot, a wideband impedance char-
Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China (e-mail: liuwx@mail.xi- acteristic (2.95–12.1 GHz) can be obtained.
dian.edu.cn; yyzeng@mail.xidian.edu.cn; xwenlong0232@163.com; zuoshao- The design evolution of the open-slot antenna is shown in
li@163.com).
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this letter are available Fig. 2, and the corresponding simulated return losses are
online at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org. shown in Fig. 3. For detailed design, all parameters of the
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/LAWP.2011.2165197 antennas are

Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano ITM. Downloaded on February 18,2021 at 20:01:46 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 10,
2 2011
1536-1225/$26.00 © 2011 IEEE

Authorized licensed use limited to: Instituto Tecnologico Metropolitano ITM. Downloaded on February 18,2021 at 20:01:46 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Fig. 2. Design evolution of the proposed antenna.
Fig. 4. Photograph of the proposed antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Bottom view.

Fig. 3. Simulated return losses of antenna in different types corresponding to


Fig. 2. Fig. 5. Simulated and measured return losses of the proposed antenna.

TABLE I
PARAMETERS OF THE ANTENNAS It is worth mentioning that when the rectangular patch of
the antenna is asymmetrically fed by a 50- microstrip line,
mul- tiple resonances can be generated in the operating band.
How- ever, the impedance matching of the antenna is poor,
especially at the lower frequencies.
To improve the impedance matching of the proposed
design, two bevels are cut on the rectangular edges (Proposed
Antenna). In the design procedure, we found that the
rectangular patch with two bevels could improve impedance
matching of the an- tenna at both lower and higher
frequencies. The proposed an- tenna could get an ultrawide
impedance bandwidth with good impedance matching after
two bevels are cut and its simulated 10-dB return loss
bandwidth is up to 122% (2.95–12.1 GHz),
as shown in Fig. 3.

simulated using the Ansoft HFSS commercial software and III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
are given in Table I. Fig. 4 shows a photograph of the implemented proposed
It begins with the design of Antenna I, which consists of antenna, and Fig. 5 shows the simulated and measured return
a straight microstrip feed line and a U-shaped open slot. As losses of the proposed antenna. The simulated and measured
shown in Fig. 3, when the slot antenna is fed by a straight line, results present a very good agreement. From the measured
a 10-dB return loss bandwidth of 28% from 3.45 to 4.6 GHz result, a wide operating bandwidth of about 122% from 2.95
is achieved, which is like that in [3]. After using a rectangular to 12.1 GHz with 10-dB return loss has been achieved. From
patch instead of the straight microstrip line (Antenna II), the Fig. 5, it can be observed that combination of the U-shaped
an- tenna can get three relative impedance bandwidths with 10- open slot and the asymmetrical beveled rectangular patch
dB return loss about 15% (3.1–3.6 GHz), 59% (4.9–9 GHz), could produce multiple resonant frequencies covering the UWB
and 12% (10–11.2 GHz), respectively. However, it still cannot band. The rectangular patch affects resonances at 5–9 GHz,
sat- isfy the requirement for UWB systems. The impedance and the resonance mode at lower frequency is due to the open
char- acteristics of the slot antenna may mainly suffer from slot.
strong ground-plane effects. To further understand the phenomenon behind this wide
impedance performance, the simulated input impedance of
the proposed antenna on a Smith chart is shown in Fig. 6.
It
Fig. 8. Effects of varying width on impedance matching.

Fig. 6. Simulated input impedance on a Smith chart of the proposed antenna.

Fig. 7. Effects of varying width on impedance bandwidth.

presents four loops on the Smith chart, corresponding to four


resonant frequencies present on its return loss plot in Fig. 5.
The U-shaped slot comprises two vertical slots and one
hori- zontal slot. The width of the vertical slot affects
impedance bandwidth of the proposed antenna. Fig. 7 shows
the simu- lated return loss curves for different values of
with other parameters are fixed. The simulated 10-dB return
loss band- widths are about 68% (4.02–8.17 GHz), 119% (2.95–
11.6 GHz), and 122% (2.95–12.1 GHz), respectively, when
varies. In- creasing enlarges the impedance bandwidth of Fig. 9. Radiation patterns at 4, 7, and 10 GHz in the -plane and -plane.
the antenna. This is mainly due to the mutual coupling
between the separate ground plane and the rectangular patch is L-shaped ground plane plays an important role in impedance
reduced. matching, especially at higher frequencies.
The width of the horizontal slot affects the impedance The simulated and measured radiation patterns at 4, 7, and
matching of the proposed slot antenna. As shown in Fig. 8, when 10 GHz in the E-plane ( -plane) and H-plane ( -plane) are
is increased, impedance matching of the open-slot antenna plotted in Fig. 9. From a view of the results, the proposed an-
is significantly improved. This indicates that the gap distance tenna displays omnidirectional radiation patterns in the H-plane.
between the separate ground plane and the lower edge of the
rectangular patch with the U-shaped open-slot structure,
impedance bandwidth of the designed antenna is improved
from 28% initially to 122%. Effects of key parameters on the
antenna performances are also investigated. The proposed an-
tenna features an ultrawide impedance bandwidth from 2.95 to
12.1 GHz with a small size, which is very suitable for portable
UWB applications.

REFERENCES

[1] N. Behdad and K. Sarabandi, “A wide-band slot antenna design


employing a fictitious short circuit concept,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
Propag., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 475–482, Jan. 2005.
[2] J.-Y. Jan and J.-W. Su, “Bandwidth enhancement of a printed wide-slot
antenna with a rotated slot,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53,
Fig. 10. Peak gain of the proposed antenna. no. 6, pp. 2111–2114, Jun. 2005.
[3] S. I. Latif, L. Shafai, and S. K. Sharma, “Bandwidth enhancement
and size reduction of microstrip slot antennas,” IEEE Trans.
Antennas Propag., vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 994–1003, Mar. 2005.
The asymmetrical radiation patterns in the E-plane are due to its [4] Z.-A. Zheng, Q.-X. Chu, and Z.-H. Tu, “Compact band-rejected
asymmetrical structure. ultra- wideband slot antennas inserting with and resonators,”
Finally, the simulated antenna gains against frequency are IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 390–397, Feb.
2011.
shown in Fig. 10. The average gain in the 2.95–12.1-GHz op- [5] W. L. Chen, G.-M. Wang, and C.-X. Zhang, “Bandwidth
erating band is observed to be 3.96 dBi. The maximum value enhancement of a microstrip-line-fed printed wide-slot antenna with a
is about 5.4 dBi at 8.3 GHz. As a result, the gains of the pro- fractal-shaped slot,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, no. 7, pp.
2176–2179, Jul. 2009.
posed antenna within the operating band are enough to meet [6] C. Wen-Shan and K. Kuang-Yuan, “Broadband design of the non-
the requirement for UWB systems. sym- metric ground open slot antenna with small size,” Microw.
It is interesting to find that the proposed antenna has an J., vol. 50, pp. 110–121, 2007.
[7] J. R. Verbiest and G. A. E. Vandenbosch, “Low-cost small-size
overall size of mm , which is less than the size of tapered slot antenna for lower band UWB applications,” Electron.
the presented antenna in [10] with dimensions of mm . Lett., vol. 42, pp. 670–671, 2006.
The impedance bandwidth of the antenna (on an FR4 [8] W. S. Chen and K. Y. Ku, “Bandwidth enhancement of open slot an-
substrate) in [10] is 114% (3–11 GHz), whereas the tenna for UWB applications,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 50,
no. 2, pp. 438–439, 2008.
impedance bandwidth of the antenna in this design is 122% [9] M. Gopikrishna, D. D. Krishna, C. K. Aanandan, P. Mohanan, and K.
(2.95–12.1 GHz). Vasudevan, “Compact linear tapered slot antenna for UWB applica-
tions,” Electron. Lett., vol. 44, no. 20, pp. 1174–1175, Sep. 2008.
CONCLUSION
IV. [10] M. Gopikrishna, D. D. Krishna, C. K. Aanandan, P. Mohanannd, and
K. Vasudevan, “Design of a microstip fed step slot antenna for UWB
A novel compact open-slot antenna with bandwidth en- communication,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 51, pp. 1126–
hancement is presented. By using an asymmetrical beveled 1129, Apr. 2009.

You might also like