Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Strategy, Corporate Strategy, Swot Analysis & Swot Matrax
Business Strategy, Corporate Strategy, Swot Analysis & Swot Matrax
BY
MBA
OPEN UNIVERSITY
MALAYSIA
MAY, 2016
1.1 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................4
1.7 OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................6
RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................21
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................23
APPENDICES...............................................................................................................................25
Business strategy has been concern for many managers and investors, in order for any
organization to be successful in its missions and vision, organization should establish and
implementing the best strategy that can conform to all organization's corporate and business
levels. As famous scholar has already said ''business without strategy is like a ship without
compass''.
Nevertheless, this report discusses the background of Nike Corporation, mission and vision
statement of the company, the company's SWOT analysis in the form of Matrix, the corporation's
competitive Profile matrix, External factor evaluation matrix, Internal factor evaluation matrix,
the report also identifies and evaluates Nike's current corporate and business level, finally the
this report recommends the best strategy that Nike should pursuit in order to be successful in the
athletic market. Nike Corporation is being chosen because there are no corporations that operate
officially here in Mogadishu, Somalia and what is more, data availability is relatively difficulty.
1.1 BACKGROUND
Based in Beaverton, Oregon, Nike is the world’s largest designer, marketer, and distributor of
athletic footwear and athletic apparel. The company also designs, markets, and distributes sports-
related apparel, equipment, and accessories. Led by the company’s flagship Nike brand footwear,
as well as Nike Golf, the company also owns a number of subsidiaries, such as Cole Haan,
Converse, Hurley International, an d Umbro Ltd . (David, Strategic Manegement, 2009).
Nike Corporation was established by University of Oregon track athlete named Phil Knight and
his coach Bill Bowerman in January 1964. Its original name was Blue Ribbon Sports (BRS). The
company primarily operated as a distributor for Japanese shoemaker Onitsuka Tiger , which meet
Knight's automobile. (Nike Inc., 2016)
Nike, Inc. is an American multinational corporation that is engaged in the design, development,
manufacturing and worldwide marketing and selling of footwear, apparel, equipment,
accessories and services. The company is headquartered near Beaverton, Oregon, in the Portland
metropolitan area, United States of America. (Hussain A. Ali Mahdi M. A., 2015).
According to David (2009), ''SWOT Matrix is an essential matching tool that assist managers develop
four kinds of strategies: SO means strengths-opportunities Strategies, WO means weaknesses-
opportunities Strategies, ST means strengths-threats Strategies, and WT means weaknesses-threats
Strategies''.
i. Nike is facing Strong competition from Adidas, Puma, Reebok and many others
ii. Consumer Preferences is dynamic due to technology and many choices
iii. Currency Fluctuation and interest charge is another treat that Nike will suffer
iv. Piracy of footwear and appeal design could decrease sells and adversely affect Nike's image
v. Political un-rest in the supplier countries, due to coup, new legislation, rules and regulations
vi. ongoing challenges in import and export duties
vii. Negative image created by the sponsored athletes
viii. Negative image due to "sweatshops"
ix. Increase in the Price of Raw materials
1) Nike uses contracts for manufacturers that makes difficult to control quality of its products
2) Nike uses sport stars who fail to perform due to retired or injured
3) Heavy dependence on footwear sells
4) Nike uses contract manufacture in foreign countries, this create potential financial problem
due to foreign currency fluctuations and increases interest change
5) Negative image portrayed by poor working conditions in its overseas factories
6) Nike only concentrates on youth and young adult market ignoring others
7) Luck of stores serving females
8) Strong competition from some of its major challengers in all branches of the business
9) Market is becoming saturated and consumers may become sick of Nike brand and move to
other smaller, more individual brands.
NIKE'S SWOT MATRIX
SO Strategies WO Strategies
With the help of brand image and effective Product development (W3,W4)
research and development, Nike can focus Nike uses contracts for manufacturers that
on growing E-Commerce (S2,S3,S7,O2) makes difficult to control quality of its
Market development ( S1,S5 and O1) products, it should sell these to control the
As Nike's Brand name that so familiar quality of its products (W1,w4,O2)
worldwide it can reach new and emerging Heavy dependence on footwear sells
markets (S1, O2) Nike is heavy dependence on footwear
Nike is effective in R& D, so it can sells, so it should produce new other items
develop a new products (S5,O8) (W3,O2,,O5,O8
ST Strategies WT Strategies
“Companies that have taken leadership positions in their industries in the last decade such as
Nike have done so by narrowing their business focus, not broadening it. They have focused on
delivering superior customer value in line with one of three value disciplines: operational
excellence, customer intimacy, or product leadership (Treacy and Wiersema 1993).”
Although Nike was still considered to be the number three athletic footwear brand back in 1987
they were working as if they were on top. They applied new ideas, game changing innovations,
and infused profitable creative assets into their business. With the development of the “Just Do
It” campaign, the brand expansion via the creation of new products and top of the line
communication programs, Nike was making moves (Neiderhauser, 2013)
Nike is currently facing touch completion from many companies like, Adidas, Reebok, Under
Armour, Puma, Li Ning, Toys R us, Taylormade, PVH, Crocs, Rebook, PhatFarm, Atac,
Sketcher, these companies compete with Nike in different ways as Brand, Price, Quality and
other factors social responsibility, Nike is facing better completions from Puma, Rebook and
Adidas in price, quality and brand.
Here, we are comparing Nike's major competitors, Adidas and Puma, Nike faces tough
completion from a number of companies, and here we can identify particular strengths and
weakness from Nike's major competitors, at this point Nike Corporation is performing pretty
well, its weight score is 3.31, it's excellent compared to its major competitors.
Adidas and Puma offer products that are so similar to those provided by Nike, what is more, the
products provided by Nike and its competitor Adidas are used in same purpose and subsumable,
so Nike is facing a tough competition from Adidas.
Opportunities
How does Nike handling the threats it faces and taking the opportunities? Let' as see, based on
these figures, Nike is performing well, the Weighted Score is beyond the average, meaning that
the company taking many opportunities and can resist the threats it faces outside even thought
these listed factors are smaller in number. The worse case that Nike faced in its recorded history
is its harsh policies regarding labour and working conditions in parts of its facilities in Asia. But
Nike had earlier initiated some measures to tackle this bad image by improving its working
conditions in its facilities across the world.
Weakness
Nike does have a diversified range of sports products. 0.1 1 0.1
Nike only concentrates youth and young adult market 0.15 1 0.05
Luck of stores serving females 0.05 1 0.05
Heavy dependence of footwear sales 0.07 1 0.07
Total Score 1.00 2.49
What does Nike's internal factor Evaluation indicates?
As the matter of fact, internal factor Evaluation of a company evaluates organization's major
strengths and weaknesses within the organization's functional areas. so its strategy-formulation
tool summarizes and evaluates the major strengths and weaknesses in the functional areas of a
business, and it also provides a basis for identifying and evaluating relationships among those
areas (David, 2009).
According to Mahdi1, Abbas & Mazar3, (2015), Strategy has different perspectives and points of
views most of them lies in the concepts of (cost leadership, differentiation and focus strategies)
or a combination of them. Porter (1980) suggested the cost leadership strategy for the first time.
According to Phil Knigh, Nike's CEO, Nike is a marketing-oriented company, and the product is our
most important marketing tool.”
6.3 CORPORATE STRATEGY FOR NIKE
NIKE Corporation is capable to continue its long-run business success and even carry on its
growth within its industry for the reason that it produces what it knows best, as well as, develops
and innovates its products (Ros, NIKE Strategy: Strategy Management, 2011).
Nike's functional-level strategy is heading for enhancing the effectiveness of its operations
within the corporation. NIKE is utilizing this strategy within its manufacturing, marketing,
product development, and customer service processes. Consequently, in order to develop its
client services, NIKE struggles to represent the highest service standard within its industry, and
try to establish loyal customer relationships throughout the universe (Ros, NIKE Strategy:
Strategy Management, 2011) .
Global strategy is far beyond others, it points out the firm’s requirements to expand its
operations outside the home country and compete on a global scale. NIKE is employing this
strategy to its fullest extent getting its customers on all on out planets almost the six continents:
Africa, Asia, Europe , Middle East USA, Americas Regions and the Pacific (Ros, 2011).
According to Porteous & Rammohan , (2013). ''Suppliers performing at yellow or red levels can
be subject to serious review. When issues arise such as detection of uncontrolled hazardous
waste, a supplier must create an action plan to address and remediate the issues within a defined
time period after which a follow-up audit is conducted''
.According to Mahdi1,Abbas2,& Mazar, (2015),Nike has been the dominant leader in sports
apparel industry for several decades. They achieved this position by taking an aggressive
approach towards building relationships with celebrity athletes.
6.6.1 NIKE'S CURRENT STRATEGY
Some of Nike's current strategic moves include entering into new athletic areas such as golf and
soccer. Another strategic move identified by Holmes (p. 130) occurred at the business level when
Chairman Phil Knight handed over day-to-day control of the company to a pair of veteran Nike
executives
6.7 NIKE'S BUSINESS PERFORMANCE FOR THIS YEAR
Our principal business activity is the design, development and global marketing of high quality
footwear, apparel, equipment, and accessory products. NIKE is the largest seller of athletic
footwear and athletic apparel in the world. We sell our products to retail accounts, through
NIKE-owned retail including stores and internet sales, and through a mix of independent
distributors and licensees, in over 170 countries around the world (Nike's Annual report, 2009).
6.7.1 Nikes Performance In The Third Quarter Of The Year
Revenues up 8% to $8 billion; 14% growth excluding currency changes
Diluted earnings per share up 22% to $0.55
Worldwide futures orders up 12%; 17% growth excluding currency changes
Inventories as of February 29, 2016 up 8 percent
Revenues for NIKE, Inc. rose 8 percent to $8 billion, up 14% on a currency neutral basis.
NIKE's wholesale market would keep on persistently and be the key driver for deal
Development, for retail accomplices at present foreseen that might represent able more than
eighty percent of the organization's general business by 2017.
7.2 EVALUATION NIKE'S CURRENR CORPORATE & BUSINESS STRATEGY
In athletic market, Nike is a number one, because of its strategies for invention and innovation,
research and development is another key element of course that makes possible for Nike to be
the leader in this industry with in this competitive era. By glancing Nike's factor evaluation
matrix, it becomes very clear that Nike is so strong in every aspects compared to its major
competitors Adidas and Reebok. The company is taking advantage of its opportunities and
handling its internal threats, in its business activities the company is performing well enough
compared to its rivals.
7.2.1 Corporate level strategy
Nikes Ceo one remarked '' Business is like a battle without bullets' 'so to survive and remain in
the market in this intensive competition, effective strategy becomes essential. Nike's
Management has always been engaged in enhancing its business performance in a corporate
level not only thinking about the profitability of Nike but also its stake holders as whole and
finally enhancing its share holder's wealth.
7.2.2 Evaluation Nike's business strategy
Nike as a leader in athletic market is performing great, the company employs many diverse
strategies, but more often than not, it initiates intensive strategy as market penetration, market
development and product development, other times it using combined strategy becomes very
essential for Nike, but really what makes possible for Nike to lead the industry and to remain
competitive is its excellent management, team work, collaboration and of course its constant
research and development. nowadays, the company introduced a code of conduct that guides its
working principles after having been witnessed Nike a widespread scandal regarding its factories
As the matter of fact, internal factor Evaluation of a company evaluates organization's major
strengths and weaknesses within the organization's functional areas. so its strategy-formulation
tool summarizes and evaluates the major strengths and weaknesses in the functional areas of a
business, and it also provides a basis for identifying and evaluating relationships among those
areas (David, 2009).
Nonetheless, Nike's internal factor Evaluation indicates that corporations internal is so strength
and above beyond the required level, its performance is nice, so Nike is taking advantage of the
opportunities and ready to handle appropriately to its weakness.
How does Nike handling the threats it faces and taking the opportunities it has is a question that
so questionable, so based on the figures and strategies that employs, Nike is performing pretty
well, the Weighted Score is beyond the average, meaning that the company taking many
opportunities and can resist the threats it faces outside even thought these listed factors are
smaller in number.
When it come competition, Nike is very competitive and stays at the top of the market due to
tough competition from Adidas, Puma and Reebok, one of the strategies that makes possible for
Nike to remain in market is it's constant research and development, so when compared its major
competitors Nike is a better position and at its competitors in terms of Brand, Financial position,
Technology, Research and Development, invention and innovation
The worse case that Nike faced in its recorded history is its harsh policies regarding labour and
working conditions in parts of its facilities in Asia. But Nike had earlier initiated some measures
to tackle this bad image by improving its working conditions in its facilities across the world.
Nevertheless, Nike may pursuit a number of potential strategies to remain competitive and lead
the athletic industries as Market development Market penetration, Product development
Backward development, Forward integration, Horizontal integration and related diversification
Based in Beaverton, Oregon, Nike is the world’s largest designer, marketer, and distributor of
athletic footwear and athletic apparel. The company also designs, markets, and distributes sports-
related apparel, equipment, and accessories. Nike's goal is to bring inspiration and innovation to
every athlete in the world. Nike's long term goals will be eliminating the concept of waste in our
product design, use of materials, energy, and any resource that cannot be readily recycled,
renewed or reabsorbed back into nature.
Strength: Nike is strong at research and development, Nike is a very competitive organization,
Nike has no factories. It does not tie up cash in buildings and manufacturing workers, Nike is a
global brand, Innovative designs & Nike Strongly controls over its own distribution channel
Weaknesses: Nike does have a diversified range of sports products, Market is becoming
saturated and consumers may become sick of Nike brand and move to other smaller, more
individual brands and Negative image portrayed by poor working conditions in its overseas
factories.
Opportunities: Nike's Product development offers many opportunities, The brand is severely
defended by its owners whom truly believe that Nike is not a fashion brand There is also the
chance for Nike to develop new products such as sport wear, The company might also be
developed globally, building upon its strong worldwide brand., Increased female participation in
athletics and New technology and innovation to stay on top of market needs
Threats: Continuing challenges in import/export duties, Strong competition from some of its
major challengers in all branches of the business, Negative image due to "sweatshops" , Increase
in the Price of Raw materials and Negative image created by the sponsored athletes
Target Market: We focus our NIKE Brand product offerings in eight key categories: Running,
Basketball, Football (Soccer), Men’s Training, Women’s Training, Action Sports, Sportswear
(our sports-inspired lifestyle products) and Golf.
Nike as Leader in Athletic Industry
“Companies that have taken leadership positions in their industries in the last decade such as
Nike have done so by narrowing their business focus, not broadening it. They have focused on
Nike's Strategies
Nike follows many strategies in order to become the world’s leading designer, marketer and
distributor of athletic footwear, apparel and accessories. One of its strategies is continuous focus
on innovation and emphasis on its research and development department and they do their best to
produce footwear, apparel and athletic equipment that reduce or eliminate injury, help in athletic
performance and maximize comfort and enjoyment. (Dermesropia et al., 2004).
Nikes Corporate Strategy: Nike’s overall corporate strategy focuses on Delivering value to
shareholders, consumers, suppliers, employees and the community, Nike can achieve this by
continuing to focus on its mission: To bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the
world. And according to Nike co-founder Bill Bowerman, if you have a body, you are an athlete.
Nike will pursue this strategy to be the leader in athletic industry
Nike's Business Strategy: According to Mahdi1, Abbas & Mazar3, (2015), Strategy has
different perspectives and points of views most of them lies in the concepts of (cost leadership,
differentiation and focus strategies) or a combination of them. Porter (1980) suggested the cost
leadership strategy for the first time Nike's Business Level Strategy
Business-level strategy contains overall business's positioning in the. NIKE stays competitive
due to its cost leadership, product differentiation, and industry segment management.
Corporate Strategy: Corporate-level strategy usually concentrates on the corporation's capacity
to focus on specific businesses that make best use of the long-run profitability of the
organization. NIKE Corporation is capable to continue its long-run business success and even
carry on its growth within its industry for the reason that it produces what it knows best, as well
as, develops and innovates its products.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Nike's business performance is pretty well, but being a leader in the market doesn't necessarily
mean to be a leader forever. So Nike is currently facing a tough competition from Adidas and
Reebok. Adidas's products are quite similar with that Nike and they are used also in the same
purposes. Although Nike is the leader of the industry in terms of brand recognition and quality it
should be careful when sitting the price and not so aggressive any more. Nike also employs
© Jili'ow, Business strategy, corporate strategy, Report: Business Strategy 21
many strategies to increase its presence in the global market but using multiple strategies can be
disastrous some times. Careful selection for the best strategy with right time becomes perquisite,
Nevertheless the following recommendation would be essential for Nike to be successful in the
global market for the generations to come.
Nike should maintain its research and development and that is the only strategies that makes
possible for Nike to remain in the market in this competitive in this digital age.
As Nike's brand became very recognizable in the global markets, it's recommended for
diversification by entering other markets, possible electronics.
Nike should improve its facilities' working conditions to enhance its image locally and
globally.
Conforming Nike's corporate strategy with business strategy is also recommended
Although Nike employs backward strategy and manages it suppliers, good relationship with
its different supplies is also recommended in order to maintain smooth production.
Improving its image by enhancing labour working conditions is also important
As Nike's Brand became very familiar and maintains large percentage of the athletic market
share, using intensive strategy is highly recommended. Intensive strategy is very useful for
Nike as it has full controls its suppliers and its channels of distribution is reliable, this
strategy is also very useful for Nike , because Nike's athletic industry is growing rapidly and
Nike's performance has been perfect for the past decades.
Product development strategy is specifically recommended, because Nike's industry has now
been characterized by a rapid growth, to make matters worse, its major competitor Adidas
provides high quality product at subsumable price, Nike's product are same as those
produced by Adidas and can be used as same purpose. Compared to its competitors Nike is
excellent for its research & development and maintaining this is also highly recommended.
Nevertheless, Nike may pursuit a number of potential strategies, to remain competitive and
lead the athletic industries the following strategies are strictly recommended
Market development
Market penetration, Product development
Backward development, Forward integration &Horizontal integration and related
diversification
© Jili'ow, Business strategy, corporate strategy, Report: Business Strategy 22
REFERENCES
Models of Nike, Inc. and Adidas Group with special reference to Competitive Advantage in the
Models of Nike, Inc. and Adidas Group with special reference to Competitive Advantage in the
Neiderhauser, J. E. (2013). How Nike’s Leadership Affects Brand Image Internally and
Externally. Journal of Undergraduate Research XVI .
Nike. (2016). Nike, inc. Reports fiscal 2016 third quarter results. Beaverton,: Nike.
Rammohan, A. P. ( 2013, November 19). Integration, Incentives and Innovation Nike’s Strategy
to Improve Social and Environmental Conditions in its Global Supply Chain.
Rammohan, A. P. (2013, Nov 19). Integration, Incentives and Innovation Nike’s Strategy to
Improve Social and Environmental Conditions in its Global Supply Chain.
© Jili'ow, Business strategy, corporate strategy, Report: Business Strategy 23
Rammohan, A. P. (2013, November 19). Integration, Incentives and Innovation Nike’s Strategy
to Improve Social and Environmental Conditions in its Global Supply Chain.
Critical Success Factor Weight Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score
External Opportunities
1. Creating sportswear that would incorporate recycled materials from their own
production lines and other places. 0.05 3 0.15
2. Promotion as a fashionable wear, not just sportswear. 0.06 2 0.12
3. Growing segment of the female athletes. 0.08 3 0.24
4. International expansion into emerging markets – e.g. India 0.12 4 0.48
5. Additional marketing of existing products to appeal to new demographic groups. 0.07 2 0.14
6. Develop new alliances with companies that are respected regarding social
responsibility. 0.06 1 0.06
7.Brand reorganization by market regions 0.07 2 0.14
External Threats
1.High competitive industry 0.14 4 0.56
2. Failure to respond to market trends in timely manner could greatly affect
financial position. 0.09 4 0.36
3. Production of counterfeit goods, and generic products. 0.06 2 0.12
4. Negative public perception created by environmental, child labor,contracted
manufacturing issues, and sponsored athletes. 0.09 3 0.27
5. International currency changes could decrease profits. 0.06 2 0.12
6. Federal Trade regulations in dealing with foreign manufactures. 0.05 2 0.27
Totals 1.00 3.03
Internal Strengths
1 Liquidity 6.0
2 Leverage 6.0
3 Working capital 6.0
4 Return on assets 4.0
5 Return on equity 4.0
6 Price per earnings 6.0
7 Earnings per share 5.0
Industry Strength Rating is 1 (worst) to 6 (best) FS Total 37.0
1 Profit potential 6.0
2 Extent Leveraged 5.0
3 Economies of scale 5.0
4 Growth potential 5.0
5 Financial stability 6.0
6 Resource utilization 5.0
7 Diverse Portfolio 5.0
Environmental Stability Rating is -1 (best) to -6 (worst) IS Total 37.0
1 Price range of competing products -2.0
2 Competitive pressure -2.0
3 Ease of exit from market -1.0
4 Successful and recognized advertising -1.0
5 Endorsement agreements -1.0
6 Price elasticity of demand -1.0
7 Risk involved in business -1.0
Competitive advantage Rating is -1 (best) to -6 (worst) ES Total -9.0
1 Market share -1.0
2 Global presence -1.0
3 Strong investor reputation -1.0
4 Technological innovation -1.0
5 Product life cycle -2.0
6 Customer loyalty -1.0
7 Control over suppliers and distributors -3.0
CS total -10.0