Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studies in English
Literature, 1500-1900
ROBERT N. ESSICK
indicate that this was indeed the case, at least after c. 1800.10
Alexander Gilchrist, however, describes one incident suggesting
that Catherine did not always play the submissive wife in the early
years of her marriage and had to be taught. A dispute arose
between Catherine and William's younger brother Robert, and
the husband forced the wife to "kneel down and beg Robert's
pardon." She, "being a duteous, devoted wife, though by nature
nowise tame or dull of spirit, . . . did kneel down and meekly
murmur, 'Robert, I beg your pardon, I am in the wrong'."l' The story
presents almost too neatly an emergence of an independent Fe-
male Will and its quick submission to male authority that reestab-
lishes domestic tranquility on its own terms.
Further complexities in Blake's attitude towards his wife, and
even a glimpse into how their relationship may have influenced
his writings, are provided by Frederick Tatham's oft-repeated ac-
count of their courtship. Tatham, who knew the Blakes in their
later years and with whom Catherine lived after her husband's
death in 1827, claimed that Blake told his future wife that another
girl had rejected his affections. Catherine sympathized, and Blake
"immediately said with the suddenness peculiar to him 'Do you
pity me?' 'Yes indeed I do' answered she. 'Then I love you' said
he again. Such was their courtship."12 The way this tale echoes
Othello's words ("I loved her [Desdemona] that she did pity" the
"dangers I had passed" ) makes one suspicious that it is a literary
invention. But if pity was indeed a significant ingredient at the
beginning of Blake's feelings for Catherine, then it may have
influenced his curious treatment of the emotion in The Book of
Urizen (1794). From Los's compassion for Urizen's plight we learn
that "pity divides the soul" (E 77). This internal bifurcation leads
to the creation of "the first female now separate" who "they call'd
. . . Pity" (E 78). Thus the emotion that in eighteenth-century
theories of moral sensibility,13 and in Blake's and Othello's wooing
of their wives, results in a union is transformed in Blake's myth
into a divisive force connected with the primal creation of the
female-as-other. Her presence as a personification of pity suggests
that the roles played by Desdemona and Catherine are in Blake's
view intrinsic to the female psyche and potentially imprisoning or
destructive for the male. To take these observations a step further
and assert that Blake's marriage included anything resembling the
tragic results of pity played out in either The Book of Urizen or
Othello would be to mistake poetic extrapolations of personal ex-
perience for autobiography. Nonetheless, if we can take Tatham's
account at face value, it suggests some intriguing connections
among Blake's life, precursor texts, and his own writings.
Blake's work by Hayley and his friends. Several of the plates are
over-labored, including the frontispiece to volume one, a portrait
of Cowper based on a drawing by George Romney. Blake had to
please not only Hayley but also Lady Hesketh, Cowper's cousin,
who was always on guard against portraits of the dead poet that
gave any hint of his fatal insanity. In a letter of 29 December 1802
she confessed to Hayley that she was now satisfied with Blake's
frontispiece because it had been "softened" (BR 113). But howev-
er burdensome the task, the project was crucial for Blake's liveli-
hood and for establishing a productive relationship with the chief
employer of his graver.
By 1806 Hayley had completed a revised edition of his Life of
Cowper for publication in four octavo volumes. Blake's frontis-
piece after Romney for volume one of the first edition, published
as a quarto, had to be re-engraved on a reduced scale for the new
edition. Blake would have legitimately expected to receive the
commission for this work, not just as a matter of professional
courtesy, but because the original engraver of a plate is usually the
most adept at copying it on a new copperplate. Blake probably
had similar expectations for the frontispiece picturing "Judith, or
Cowper's Oak" for Hayley's Supplementary Pages to the Life of Cow-
per (1806), a slim quarto volume issued to owners of the first
edition of the Life to bring that work up to date. Although Blake
was back in London and his friendship with Hayley had been
strained, he continued to correspond with and work for the man.
Certainly Blake needed the commission, for he is known to have
engraved only one commercial book illustration published in 1806.
As he told Hayley soon after his return to London, "Art in Lon-
don flourishes. Engravers in particular are wanted. Every Engraver
turns away work that he cannot Execute from his superabundant
Employment. Yet no one brings work to me" (E 736). In spite of
all these reasons for Hayley to employ Blake for both the octavo
Life and the Supplementary Pages, their author hired Caroline Wat-
son to engrave their only illustrations.
Watson was born in 1760 or 1761, the daughter of James Wat-
son, one of England's leading mezzotint engravers.26 She studied
under his direction, but rather than exclusively following his craft
of mezzotint, a profession distinct from engraving, she also devel-
oped a refined style of stipple engraving that imitated the rich
chiaroscuro of mezzotint but no doubt held up better under mul-
tiple printings. By 1785 she had become England's leading woman
engraver and was appointed "Engraver to Her Majesty" Queen
Charlotte, an honorific inscribed after her signature on the plates
she executed for Hayley.27 Watson's graphic method was particu-
larly suitable for the reproduction of oil paintings and pastels, for
it could replicate their continuous tonal gradations without linear
boundaries between them. While Blake was himself a skilled stip-
ple engraver, the strongly linear technique he used for almost all
of his original intaglio graphics and reproductive book illustra-
tions was the very antithesis of Watson's. Blake's opinion of her
style is indirectly indicated by his comments on Francesco Bar-
tolozzi, one of Watson's predecessors in the development of paint-
erly graphic effects. With bitter sarcasm, Blake wrote in his Note-
book that he would attempt to please the public by writing "Verse
as soft as Bartolloze" (E 505). "Soft" has feminine implications
throughout Blake's writings,28 but even without this adjective it
would be clear that, in terms of Blake's gendered aesthetics of line
vs. color, both Bartolozzi and Watson practiced a feminized ver-
sion of Blake's own craft.
Whatever disappointments Blake suffered over Watson's role in
the production of the 1806 Cowper volumes must have been
sharpened by events surrounding the preparation of illustrations
for Hayley's Life of George Romney. Shortly after his return to
London in the autumn of 1803, Blake began to help Hayley with
his biography by locating Romney's paintings and drawings. When
still in the early planning stages of the project, Hayley intended to
have Blake engrave at least two plates for the volume (BR 121). In
May of 1804 Blake proposed to "etch" an unstated number of the
plates "in a rapid but firm manner" (E 749). One month later,
Blake (probably at Hayley's behest) contacted his former partner
James Parker about engraving some of the designs. In his letter to
Hayley about the matter, Blake points out that Parker was swamped
with work, that the engravings should not "be done in a careless
or too hasty manner" (with the implication that Parker would
indeed rush the job), and that Parker's fee would be "Exactly" the
same as what Blake had requested (E 752). Blake clearly wanted a
major portion of the commission for himself. The sculptor John
Flaxman, a long-time friend to both the author and the engraver,
acted as an artistic advisor on the project. In January 1805 he
recommended to Hayley that his book should include illustrations
of several of Romney's more dramatic compositions, for they are
"well worth etching in a bold manner which I think Blake is likely
to do with great success" (BR 138). Flaxman's language, like Blake's
own description of his "rapid but firm manner," implies the mas-
culinity of Blake's graphic style. When the biography finally ap-
peared in 1809, it contained twelve plates-only one from Blake's
hand, but seven by Watson. Her work dominates the visual deco-
ration of the volume, lending to Romney's designs a feminine
NOTES
5David V. Erdman, ed., The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake (Be
keley: Univ. of California Press, 1982), p. 50. All further quotations of Blak
writings are taken from this edition, hereafter cited as E followed by page
number.
6Aers (note 4) describes this process as one that "both discloses and af-
firms dominant male ideology which inevitably feeds back into the realm of
human interrelations from which it has been derived" (p. 37). See also Fox
(note 1), p. 88 of the reprint; and Diana Hume George, Blake and Freud
(Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press, 1980), who discusses how Blake's "problems with
portrayals of sexuality and of women . . . are problems of symbol formation
that express themselves in the limitations of language" (p. 199).
70n Blake's "literalization of figuration," see Robert N. Essick, William
Blake and the Language of Adam (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), pp. 224-30.
8"The Price of Experience: Blake's Reading of Freud," inJoseph H. Smith,
ed., The Literary Freud: Mechanisms of Defense and the Poetic Will, Psychiatry and
the Humanities, vol. 4 (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1980), pp. 77-78. See also
George (note 6), p. 198: "It is improbable that [Blake] could so clearly have
understood the process by which men project women as the elusive other,
and spend their lives pursuing and attempting to appropriate women, unless
he had been the victim of that process himself. Blake resented nature and
what he called the Female Will, and he probably also resented real women as
embodiments of those forces."
9G.E. Bentley,Jr., Blake Records (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969), pp. 5-6,
23-24, hereafter cited as BR followed by page number. Catherine Boucher's
father was a "market Gardener" whose "large family was declining in fortune,"
while Blake's father was a reasonably prosperous hosier (BR 2, 6). Catherine
signed her marriage register with an X, but Bentley comments that this was
"by no means uncommon" for women at the time and "did not necessarily
denote illiteracy" (BR 24). Some of Blake's biographers, however, have taken
Catherine's illiteracy as virtually certain-see Alexander Gilchrist, Life of
William Blake, 2 vols. (London: Macmillan, 1863), 1:38, and Michael Davis,
William Blake: A New Kind of Man (London: Paul Elek, 1977), p. 28. For later
evidence of Catherine's inability (or at least unwillingness) to write, see note
22.
"'See the accounts by Allan Cunningham (BR 481-82), Henry Crabb
Robinson (BR 542-43), and Gilchrist, 1:38, 118, 315-17. Most later critics
repeat the general conclusion, if not the sanctimonious tone, of Herbert Ives,
"The Most Perfect Wife on Record," The Bibliophile 3, 14 (April 1909): 91-98
("She sank her life in that of the man into whose hands she had entrusted
her all," p. 98). For a rare dissenting view, but with an equal measure of male
sexism, see Blackstone (note 2), p. 7: "Probably no man has regretted his mar-
riage more. ... A man who was a 'mental prince' had to live hour in hour
out with a woman who could not sign her name when she married him and
never came to show signs of developing intelligence."
"Gilchrist, 1:58-59. The argument must have taken place no later than
1787, the year of Robert's death. Perhaps it was this incident that led Gilchrist
to claim that "there had indeed at one time been a struggle of wills" (1:118)
between husband and wife; but some other such struggle, not described by
Gilchrist, may have prompted his comment that there had once been "jeal-
ousy on her side, not wholly unprovoked" (1:316). For some speculations on
how Blake's marriage may have influenced his concepts of love in his poetry
after about 1800, see John Sutherland, "Blake: A Crisis of Love andJealousy,"
PMLA 87, 3 (May 1972): 424-31.