Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wcyns WHcs NXHJ GLXF5 C T6 HP
Wcyns WHcs NXHJ GLXF5 C T6 HP
Abstract - Performance of a wire-plate electrostatic precipitator in the removal of particles with a wide
particle size distribution was evaluated. The experimental rig utilized consisted of a set of three precipitators
whose dimensions could be varied. It was observed that precipitator performance increased with an increase
in the gap between the collecting plates, which resulted in a substantial increase in energy consumption per
volume of cleaned gas. The grade efficiency predicted by correlations from the literature did not match the
experimental measurements, and a new correlation is proposed.
Keywords: electrostatic precipitator, gas cleaning, particle collection.
Collection Efficiency Co b v
C(x, y) exp(X ') (5)
In the literature there are several correlations for 2 SD p x
prediction of collection efficiency in electrostatic
precipitators. However, their use has been limited by with
empirical constants that are difficult to estimate as
well by their complexity in some cases (Zhao and 2
§ wx ·
Pfeffer, 1996). v¨ y ¸
v ¹
The classic model for collection efficiency, X' © (6)
known as the Deutsch equation, Equation 1, is still 4Dp x
frequently used to predict the performance of
precipitators due to its simplicity (Riehle, 1997). In where y and x are the axial and traverse distances in
this model it is assumed that the profile for respect to the gas flow, respectively.
concentration of particles in any traverse section of From the definition of collection efficiency, it
the duct is uniform. follows that
§ w th A · § w th L NE ·
¨ ¸ ¨
vos
¸ § Pe( [ De)2 ·
Kdpi 1 e © Q ¹ 1 e © ¹ (1) 0.5 ¨ ¸
§ Pe · 1 ¨ 4De ¸
Kdpi 1 ¨ ¸ ³ e© ¹ d[ (7)
In this equation, wth is the theoretical migration © 4SDe ¹ 0
Qf w th .s
p ECu Pe (8)
w th (2) Dp
3SPd p
Attempting to avoid the assumption of a constant The experimental system used in this study
concentration profile in the Deutsch model, several consisted of three electrostatic precipitators of the
other researchers suggested new models that consider wire-plate type, whose main dimensions are given in
the diffusivity of the particle in the flowing gas. Table 1. A schematic view of one of the three
Zhibin and Guoquan (1994) included the effect of modules is shown in Figure 1.
diffusion in their development of an analytic model Each precipitator consisted of a rectangular box
for collection efficiency in which the equation of built of acrylic and PVC, with the lateral walls
bidimensional transport of the particles as a function covered by grounded copper plates. These plates
of concentration (Equation 4) was analytically constituted the collection electrodes. The discharge
solved. Equation 5 gives the solution presented by electrodes were stainless steel wires, stretched
the authors. halfway and orthogonal between the collecting
plates. The distance between the electrodes (2c)
w 2C wC wC could be varied for each precipitator, according to
Dp 2
vo w th (4)
wy wx wy the values presented in Table 1.
Precipitator
01 02 03
2s (cm) 10 15 20
2c (cm) 3.3; 5.0; 10.0 5.0; 7.5; 15.0 6.6; 10.0; 20.0
2rSE (mm) 0.5 0.5 0.5
LNE (cm) 60 60 60
hNE (cm) 30 30 30
high-voltage
supply
blower
hNE
2c
2rSE LNE
(b)
Figure 1: (a) Scheme of a module of the experimental unit; (b) Shape of the precipitator
100
90
80
70
Accum. fraction (%)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.1 1 10 100
dp (Pm)
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 21, No. 02, pp. 275 - 284, April - June 2004
278 S. W. Nóbrega, M. C. R. Falaguasta and J. R. Coury
100
90
80
Kdpi (%)
70
E = 3 kV/cm
60
2s = 0.10 m
2s = 0.20 m
50
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
100
90
80
Kdpi (%)
70
E = 4 kV/cm
60
2s = 0.10 m
2s = 0.20 m
50
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
100
90
80
Kdpi (%)
70
60 E = 5 kV/cm
2s = 0.10 m
2s = 0.20 m
50
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
Figure 3: Influence of 2s on collection efficiency: A/Q = 12 s/m; s/2c = 0.5
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 21, No. 02, pp. 275 - 284, April - June 2004
280 S. W. Nóbrega, M. C. R. Falaguasta and J. R. Coury
1800
22%
2s = 0.10 m
1600
2s = 0.20 m
1400
1200
3
800 50%
600
400 199%
200
0
3 4 5
E (kV/cm)
Figure 4: Power consumption per unit of gas flow rate: A/Q = 12 s/m; S/2c = 0.5.
100
Kdpi (%) 90
80
70
60
50
3
P = 100 Watts/m /s
40
2s = 0.10 m
30 2s = 0.15 m
2s = 0.20 m
20
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
100
95
Kdpi (%)
90
85
80
3
P = 300 Watts/m /s
75
2s = 0.15 m
2s = 0.20 m
70
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
Figure 5: Influence of the distance between the plates on efficiency for precipitators
with the same power consumption per unit of gas flow rate.
Therefore, analyzing the influence of duct width the center of the precipitator duct and increases moving
(2s) on the performance of the precipitator, it becomes towards the collection plates, which seems quite
evident that an increase in this parameter generally reasonably in agreement with the experimental data
causes a higher energy consumption without, however, obtained by Schmid and Umhauer (1998) and shown in
resulting in a significant improvement in precipitator Figure 7. Riehle and Löffler (1993) also depicted this
performance. behavior in a number of photographs taken from inside a
wire-plate precipitator.
Comparison Between Theoretical Models and
Experimental Data on Grade Collection Efficiency v1.5 yCo b
C(x, y) exp(X ') (11)
Figure 6 compares values for grade collection wx SD p x
efficiency, obtained experimentally with predictions
by the models of Deutsch and Zhibin and Guoquan, where X' is given by Equation 6.
Equations 1 and 7, respectively. As can be seen in The equation for collection efficiency is given in
these figures, those correlations did not represent this case by
well the experimental data.
An alternative proposal to the solution given by Pe
Zhibin and Guoquan is shown in Equation 11, which is ª Pe 2º
1 «¬ 4De [ De »¼
also a solution to Equation 4. In this new equation, it is Kdpi 1 S ³0 [e d[ (12)
assumed that the concentration of particles is smaller at De1.5
100
90
80
Kdpi (%) 70
60
50
40
30 (a)
20
Experimental
10 Deutsch (Eq. 1)
Zhibin-Guoquan (Eq. 7)
0
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
100
90
80
Kdpi (%)
70
60
50
40
30
(b)
20
Experimental
10 Deutsch (Eq. 1)
Zhibin-Guoquan (Eq. 7)
0
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
Figure 6: Comparison between theoretical models and experimental data for collection efficiency
2s = 0.20; s/2c = 1 (a) vo = 1.5 m/s and E = 5 kV/cm; (b) vo = 1.0 m/s and E = 3 kV/cm.
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 21, No. 02, pp. 275 - 284, April - June 2004
282 S. W. Nóbrega, M. C. R. Falaguasta and J. R. Coury
0.6
rd
after the 3 electrode
th
0.5 after the 4 electrode
th
after the 5 electrode
th
after the 6 electrode
0.4
0.3
JN/JN,0 0.2
0.1
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100
y (mm)
Figure 7: Profile of particle flow in consecutive crossections of the precipitator for V = -45 kV,
vo = 1.0 m/s, dp = 1.0 Pm, 2s = 0.2 m, from Schmid and Umhauer (1998)
The value to be attributed to the diffusion (1988), is in agreement with the tendencies observed.
coefficient, Dp, was a matter of concern. No reliable
theoretical correlation is currently available and the 2x107
Dp (m2/s) (13)
one used by Zhibin and Guoquan (1994), in which dp
Dp was independent of particle size, did not seem
reasonable. For simplicity, Dp was assumed to be for dp in meters.
inversely proportional to particle size, and the A comparison between experimental results and
proportionality constant was obtain from the experiment. the new correlation (Equation 12) in presented in
The resulting expression is shown in Equation 13. The Figures 8, 9 and 10. It can be observed that the
values obtained for the range of particle diameters model represents the experimental behavior well,
between 0.1 and 10 Pm varied between 0.01 and 3 responding satisfactorily to the changes in the
m2/s, which according to Cooperman apud Licht operational conditions and precipitator shape.
100
95
90
Kdp (%) 85
i
80
75
70
65
60
2s = 0.10 m: eq 12 experim.
55 2s = 0.15 m: eq 12 experim.
2s = 0.20 m: eq 12 experim.
50
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
100
95
90
Kdpi (%) 85
80
75
70
65
100
90
80
Kdpi (%)
70
60
50
40
30
Ep = 3 kV/cm: eq 12 experim.
20 Ep = 4 kV/cm: eq 12 experim.
Ep = 5 kV/cm: eq 12 experim.
10
0.1 1 10
dp (Pm)
Figure 10: Comparison between theoretical prediction (Equation 12) and experimental
data for grade collection efficiency. vo=1.5 m/s, 2s = 0.2 m and s/2c = 1.0.
CONCLUSIONS NOMENCLATURE
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 21, No. 02, pp. 275 - 284, April - June 2004
284 S. W. Nóbrega, M. C. R. Falaguasta and J. R. Coury