Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V.VINOSEL (2017) - Structural and Functional Group Characterization of Nanocomposite Fe3O4-TiO2 and Its Magnetic Property
V.VINOSEL (2017) - Structural and Functional Group Characterization of Nanocomposite Fe3O4-TiO2 and Its Magnetic Property
ABSTRACT. Nanocomposites of Fe3O4/TiO2 were prepared by non-thermal method in the ratio 1:4. In this method
magnetite and TiO2 anatase nanoparticles were prepared individually by hydrothermal and sol-gel respectively.
X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) of the sample reveals that the peaks can be indexed either to Fe3O4 or TiO2.
The morphology and phase composition were characterized by High resolution scanning electron microscope (HRSEM)
and Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX). The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra reveal information about
metal oxygen in the composite. The magnetic properties of the sample were determined by Vibrating sample
magnetometer (VSM).
Introduction. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has much attention due to its applications in environmental
purification like detoxification of wastewater, luminescent material, solar cells, gas sensors and
medical fields. Titanium dioxide is an n-type semiconductor with a wide energy band gap exhibiting
photocatalytic activity. This ceramic material has three different structures: rutile, anatase and
brookite. Since the energy band gap (3.23 eV) of the anatase phase is wider than that of rutile
(3.02 eV) the anatase phase is known to exhibit better photocatalytic behavior [1]. In such
semiconductors, photogenerated carriers (electrons and holes) can tunnel to a reaction medium and
participate in chemical reactions. The efficiency of photocatalyst is enhanced by the wider separation
of an electrons and holes. Titanium dioxide is extensively used in the fabrication of core-shell systems
as a photocatalytic agent because of its exceptional properties such as strong oxidation reaction, large
effective surface area and low toxicity [2].
Fe3O4 is a magnetic material with wide applications in many areas such as gas sensors, optoelectronic
and spintronic devices, biomedicine, etc. Fe3O4 is a kind of functional material and has attractive
physical properties such as half-metallic character and strong spin polarization at room temperature.
Its magnetic properties can be tuned by size, shape and dimension [3]. The researcher has been
investigating on the design of magnetic core TiO2 shell structure for many applications. They have
developed several ways to improve the activity of photocatalysts, such as carbon-doped TiO2, carbon-
coated TiO2, carbon–nanotube–TiO2 and graphene–TiO2 nanocomposites among these graphene TiO2
nanocomposites showed fantastic activity [4]. Fe3O4-TiO2 core–shell nanoparticles were prepared by
a homogeneous method. They found, that Fe3O4-TiO2 core–shell nanostructure has higher
photocatalytic activity in contrast to TiO2 nanoparticles and plays a crucial role in the field of
malignant tumor therapy was reported by He et al [5]. Even though TiO2 has many advantages, there
are some basic challenges in the applications of titanium dioxide nanoparticles 1) collecting and
retrieving titania nanoparticles from reaction media is impossible, therefore, the nanoparticles used
are not accessible anymore and their recycling is not possible 2) recombination of electrons and holes
40
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Magnolithe GmbH. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
excited by ultraviolet radiation would easily take place that reduces the photocatalytic activity of
TiO2. In order to overcome these problems, titanium dioxide was supplemented with magnetite
nanoparticles (Fe3O4) to increase the photocatalytic activity as well as their recyclability with the help
of an external magnetic field [6]. The magnetite was used to enhance separation properties of the
photocatalyst from the treated water, whereas the titanium dioxide was useful for the degradation of
organic contaminants.
In the present study, nanocomposite of Fe3O4/TiO2 was synthesized by non-thermal method. The
magnetite and TiO2 anatase nanoparticles were prepared individually by hydrothermal and sol-gel
methods respectively. A. Hasanpour et al [7] reported TiO2 shell coating on Fe3O4 core nanoparticles
by novel non-thermal method.
Experimental.
Preparation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. In a typical procedure, 2M of FeCl2 and 4M of NaOH was
dissolved in 40 ml of distilled water. The aqueous solution of NaOH was added drop by drop into the
above solution under the vigorous stirring for 20 min. Then the solution was transferred into the
autoclave for heat treatment at 180°C for 12 h. It was allowed to cool down to room temperature after
the reaction. The precipitate was washed several times with ethanol and acetone by centrifugation.
The final product was dried at 50°C for 12 h.
Preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles. In the present study, TiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by Sol-
gel method. 100 ml of isopropyl alcohol was added to 15 ml of Titanium (IV) isopropoxide (TTIP).
The mixture was stirred for 25 min then 10 ml of water was added drop by drop to the above solution
for hydrolysis reaction. It was continuously stirred for 2 h. After an aging period it gets transformed
to gel. Then it is filtered and dried in vaccum oven at 80°C for 3 h. The obtained TiO2 was calcinated
at 550°C for 4 h.
Preparation of Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite. To prepare the nanocomposite of Fe3O4/TiO2 the as
prepared magnetite and TiO2 was dispersed in 40 ml of deionised water and kept under ultrasonication
for about 30 min. TiO2 nanoparticles was added into Fe3O4 solution. Molar ratio of Fe3O4 to TiO2
was kept at 1:4. The mixture solution was then kept under sonication for about 1 h. Then the solution
was centrifuged and precipitate was dried at 300°C for 12 h. The final product was Fe3O4/TiO2
nanopowder.
Result and Discussion
X-ray diffraction analysis. Fig.1 shows the XRD pattern of Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite. Diffraction
peaks corresponding to both Fe3O4 (JCPDS 85-1436) and TiO2 (JCPDS 21-1272) are clearly observed
in the coupled diffraction pattern. For pure Fe3O4, the diffraction peaks are located at 2Ө = 35.53°,
30.20°, 43.05°, 57.48°, 62.69° are associated with [220], [311], [400], [511], [440] planes respectively.
This pattern has been indexed as magnetite phase with lattice constants a=b=c=8.381 Å. The observed
diffraction peaks of TiO2 at 2Ө = 25.4°, 37.9°, 48.1°, 53.9°, 62.8° are associated with [101], [004],
[200], [105], [204] planes respectively, which can be assigned to be anatase phase with the lattice
parameters of a=b= 3.785 Å c=9.513 Å. From the XRD diffraction peak it is found that the intensities
of Fe3O4 have been decreased by TiO2. At the interface between titania and magnetite there is no new
phase formation that indicates absence of extra peaks. There is no chemical reaction between Fe3O4
and TiO2 in non-thermal mechanism. The crystallite size of the sample was calculated by Debye
Scherrer formula.
d = Ө
where is the average crystallite size (nm), is the grain shape factor (0.9), is the X-ray wavelength
(nm), is the full width at half maximum in radians and Ө is the Bragg diffraction angle of the 2Ө
peak.
The average crystalline size was estimated to be 21 nm.
Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) analysis. Helin Niu et al [8] have reported similar absorption
peaks observed in the synthesis of Fe3O4/TiO2 visible light active and magnetically recyclable
nanocomposite. The FTIR transmission spectra of Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite are shown in Fig. 2.
The strong band at 620 cm-1 was assigned to the Ti–O metal oxygen bond. The Fe3O4 high intensity
band at 585 cm-1 has been weakened. The broad band around 3432 cm-1 is the asymmetric and
symmetric stretching vibrations of O-H group, whereas the band around 1630 cm-1and 2919 cm-1 is
the H-O-H bending vibrations of the coordinated water. The Fe3O4 surfaces are linked with hydroxyl
group it also enhances the affinity between Fe3O4 and TiO2 nanoparticles.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. Using electron microscope the surface structure of
the as prepared sample was probed. Fe3O4/TiO2 composites were investigated by High resolution
scanning electron microscopy (HR-SEM). Fig. 3 shows SEM images for different magnification. The
morphology of the as synthesized nanocomposite was spherical in shape and uniform sizes of
nanoparticles with strong agglomeration. A. Banisharif et al. [9] reported the similar nanospheres
morphology for Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite synthesized by ultrasonic- assisted deposition
precipitation method.
Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra revealed the
presence of stoichiometric proportion of Fe, Ti and O elements without extra signals confirms the
pure phase of Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite.
Vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) analysis. Chu- Ling Zhu et al [3] have reported similar
magnetization for Fe3O4/TiO2 nanotubes prepared by wet chemical method. The magnetic behavior
of the sample was investigated using M-H curve from VSM analysis. Fig.5 shows the hysteresis loop
of Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite. For Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite saturation magnetization (Ms),
remanant magnetization (Mr), coercivity (Hc) was estimated to be 16.80 emu/g, 3.723 emu/g, 181.35
Oe, respectively. The narrow magnetic hysteresis loop with extremely small coercivity and
remanence values indicates a near superparamagnetic behavior of Fe3O4/TiO2 nanocomposite. Taking
into account the sample contains 20% of Fe3O4 nanoparticle. The Ms is much lower than that of the
corresponding bulk Fe3O4 (92 emu/g), which may be due to the small size of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
The lower values are attributed by the presence of non-magnetic TiO2.
[5] Q. He, Z. Zhang, J. Xiong, Y. Xiong, H. Xiao, Opt. Mater. 31 (2008) 380–384. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/903612
[6] F. Behrad, M. Helmi Rashid Farimani, N. Shahtahmasebi, M. Rezaee Roknabadi and M.
Karimipour Eur. Phys. J. Plus (2015) 130: 144. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2015-15144-y
[7] A. Hasanpour, M. Niyaifar, H. Mohammadpour, J. Amighian Journal of Physics and Chemistry
of Solids 73 (2012) 1066–1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2012.04.003
[8] Helin Niu, Qinmin Wang, Hongxia Liang, Min Chen, Changjie Mao, Jiming Song, Shengyi
Zhang, Yuanhao Gao and Changle Chen, Materials 2014, 7, 4034-4044. doi:10.3390/ma7054034
[9] A. Banisharif, S. Hakim Elahi, A. Anaraki Firooz, A. Khodadadi, Y. Mortazavi1 Int. J. Nanosci.
Nanotechnol., Vol. 9, No. 4, Dec. 2013, pp. 193-202.
V. Maria Vinosel, M. Asisi Janifer, S. Anand, S. Pauline (2017). Structural and Functional Group
Characterization of Nanocomposite Fe3O4/TiO2 and Its Magnetic Property. Mechanics, Materials Science &
Engineering, Vol 9. doi:10.2412/mmse.36.92.83