Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BHARAT RK
935 | IX SEMESTER
Judicial Review
In the post-independence India the inclusion of explicit provisions for Judicial Review were
necessary in order to give effect to the individual and group rights guaranteed in the last of the
constitution Dr. B. R. Ambedker, who chaired the drafting committee of our constituent
Assembly had described the provision related to the same as the ‘heart of the constitution’
Article 13(2) of the constitution of India prescribes that the Union or the state shall not make any
law that takes away or abridges any of the fundamental rights and any law made in contravention
of the a fear mentioned mandate shall to the extent of the contravention be void.1 While Judicial
Review over administration action has evolved on the lines of common law doctrines such as
‘proportionality’, ‘legitimate expectations’, ‘Reasonableness’, and principles on natural Justice,
the supreme court of India and the various High courts were given power to rule on the
constitutionality of legislative as well as administrative actions. In most cases the power of
Judicial Review is exercised to protect and enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed in part III
of the constitution.
The scope of Judicial Review before Indian courts has evolved in three dimensions:
(1) To ensure fairness in administrative action.
(2) To protect the constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights of citizens and
(3) To rule on questions of legislative competence between the center and the state.
The supreme court of the India to enforce these fundamental Rights is derived from Article 32 of
the constitution. It gives citizens the rights directly approach the Supreme Court for seeking
remedies against the violation of these fundamental rights. These entitlement of constitutional
1
Justice K. G. Balakrishan, chief Justice of India “Judicial Activism under the Indian constitution (trinity college
Dublin Ireland-October 14, 2009)
remedies is itself a fundamental right and can be enforced in the form of writ evolve in common
law. Similarly Article 226 recognizes the right to move the High court for the purpose of
enforcing fundamental Rights. Through these remedies the aggrieved person is entitled to redress
his or her grievance.
Legislative competence
The constitution does not directly recognize right to health as fundamental right but different
legislative enactments passed with regard to health and health care deal more with the regulatory
aspects rather than the right to health. Preamble to the constitution of India categorically directs
the state to initiate measures aiming at improving the health of the people. This is to be inferred
from the broader parameters of social and economic Justice.2
The state legislature is under entry 6 of the state list contained in the seventy schedule to the
constitution of India, empowered to make law with Related or Respect to public Health and
sanitation, hospitals and dispensaries , Both the center and the states have power to legislate in
the matters of social security and social insurance, medical professions, and prevention of the
extension from one state to another of infectious or contagious diseases or pests affecting man,
animals or plants by entries 23, 26 & 29 respectively contained in the concurrent list of seventh
schedule. Judiciary has vital Role play in ensuring access to essential services for all citizens,
irrespective of their ability to pay, in present state also play important Role to providing Health
services through the public health system and an increasing investment in expensive private
Health care. The right to health and the availability of health care issues that have been addressed
all over the world. Health care issues are world famous issue at present. Health care passed time
to line by different legislation According to circumstances or peoples need.
Fundamental Rights
Part III of the Indian constitution deals with various fundamental rights. The fundamental Right
to life, as stated in Article 21 of the Indian constitution, guarantees to the individuals life and
personal liberty which cannot be taken away except by a procedure established by law. The
Supreme Court has widely interpreted this fundamental right and has included in Article 21 the
right to live with dignity and all the necessities of life such as adequate nutrition clothing. The
recognition that the right to health is essential for human existence and maintain his proper life
for live with dignity so it is evolve the integral part of Right to life supreme court has also
already that Right to Health care is fundamental Right involve in the Right to life. A personal of
the same reveals the following fundamental rights which or related to the health and health care
of the people.
2
Ravi Duggal, Leena V. Ganguly “Review of Health care in India”
However, the Indian Supreme court in the true with the spirit of Article 21 and Directive
principle has come up as location of liberty for such little Indians who are crying for Justice.
Indian Judiciary has truly come forward to provide social justice to most vulnerable section those
who deprived of their fundamental Rights. Judiciary provides social justice to these poor Masses
and has played a vital Role in implementing laws or provisions of health facilities and ensures
that they are maintaining standard of care.3
The Supreme court in its land mark Judgment in Paramanand Katara vs. union of India4, Held
that every doctor whether government or private or otherwise has the professional obligation to
extend his services with due expertise for protecting life. No law or state action can intervene to
avoid delay.
The discharge of the paramount obligation cast upon member of the medical profession or
provide medical assistances to the needy as tight to health is a fundamental Right. The obligation
being total, absolute and paramount, laws of procedure whether in statutes or otherwise which
would interfere with the discharge of this obligation cannot be sustained, and must therefore,
give way.
Another significant decision which strengthen the recognition of the “right to health” was that
in Indian medical Association vs. V.P. Shantha 5, In that case, it was ruled that the provision of a
medical service whether diagnosis or treatment) in return for monetary consideration amounted
to a “service” for the purpose of the Consumer Protection Act,1986. The consequence of the
same was that medical practitioners could be held liable under the Act for deficiency in service
in addition to negligence. This ruling has gone a long way towards protecting the interests of
patients. However, medical services offered free of cost were considered to be beyond the
purview of the said Act.
The parliament has enacted the Indian medical council Act in 1956 and other corresponding
legislation governing various branches of medical/medicine such as the Indian system of
medicine, Dentists, Homeopaths of the conduct of doctor, hospitals and nursing homes and have
failed to protect the interests of persons who have suffered on account of negligence or
deficiency on the part of medical professionals. This field left untouched by medical council Act
is covered by the law of tort in general, and now by the consumer protection Act 1986. Prior to
the enactments of the consumer protection Act 1986, the field of medical negligence is perhaps
not possible, rather it would remain quite vague.
Indian society is experiencing a growing awareness regarding patient’s right. This trend is clearly
discernible from the recent sprout in litigation concerning medical professional an establishment
liability claiming redressed for the suffering caused due to medical negligence, vitiated consent
and breach of confidentially arising out of the doctor patient protection relationship. The patient
centered initiative of right protection is required to be appreciated in the economic context of the
rapid decline of state spending and massive private investment in the sphere of the health care
3
Dr. G. A. Solanki “Striking the balance between the laborers Right to Health and constitutional Guarantee” H. S.
University of Baroda.
4
AIR 1989 SC 2039
5
(1995)6 SCC 651
system and the Indian Supreme Court pains staking efforts to constitutionalism a right to health
as a fundamental protection of patient is Right shall not be at the cost of professional integrity
and autonomy.
Ombudsman in India:-
The concept of ombudsman at first in Sweden, Sweden govt. appointed an independent executive
for resolving disputes their citizens. Government of India with notification date 11th Nov, 1998.
Ombudsman was appointed for quick solution of customers problems involved in redressed of
those grievances. The institution impacts the importance of policy holder’s interest and helped to
generate and sustain the faith and confidence amongst the consumers and insurers. Ombudsman
is an independent officer usually appointed by govt. or by parliament with responsibility to
secure public interest when the violation of their right.
Award:-
The ombudsman shall pass an award within a period of three month from the receipt of the
complaint. The awards are binding upon the insurance companies. If the policy holder is not
satisfied with the award of the ombudsman he can approach other venues like consumer forums
and courts of law for redressed of his grievances. As per the policy holder’s protection
regulations, every insurer shall inform the policy holder along with the policy document in
respect of the insurance ombudsman in whose jurisdiction his office falls for the purpose of
grievances redressed arising if any subsequently. Steady increase in number of complaint
received by various ombudsman shows that the policy holders are responding their confidence in
the institution of insurance ombudsman.
6
www.irda.gov.in/ADHINCMS/cms/normalData_Layout.aspx?page=pageNo233&mid=7.1
Consumer Protection Act 1986
Consumer protection is not a new concept. An ancient period there is references to the concept of
consumer protection against expiration by producer. Consumer protection Act1986 has important
act in the history of the consumer movement in the country. In this act provide rights of
consumer and protection from unfair trade practices or exploration by the producer. It is the
milestone in the history of socio economic legislation and directed towards public welfare and
public benefits.
Under the Act, Consumer Dispute Redressal agencies have been set up throughout the country
with the district forum at the district level, state commission at the state level and national
commission at national level to provide simple inexpensive and speedy justice to the consumer
with complaints against defective goods, deficient services and unfair and restrictive trade
practices.
CONCLUSION
Indian landscape of health insurance has under gone a tremendous changes in the
last 60 years, government launch several health policies and scheme for country
.central and state government make policies for the all people of the community an
all levels . It is fascinating to observe the rapid and significant change in the
geometry of health insurance coverage in the country.
IRDA is playing a significant role while insurance penetration and density of
insurance which reflects the level of development of insurance sector in a country.
The growth Performance of the insurance industry has been increased
Worldwide, Mumbai Silicon Valley
9
The insurance amendment act 1968 section 64U (1)
tremendously since the establishment of IRDA in India, which supervise and
controlled the entire insurance industry. The increase in no. of insurer both in life
and non-life, growth in insurance penetration and density, increase in number of
policies issued and increase in the speed of claims settlement and in many more
aspects the IRDA is playing a prominent role in the Indian insurance sector.
The role of the Indian judiciary in enforcing right to health in many dimensions.
The study is focus on certain select decisions of the Supreme Court and high Court,
where in the court while interpreting the rights to health have entered the policy
space. The recommendations of the central government through the main council
of the ministry of health and family welfare and various and committee
recommendations, has shaped health policy and planning in India. It is being
implemented through one of India’s five year plans with a programmatic approach.
The central government designs national programs and the state’s govt. is required
to implement them. There is clear distribution between the central and state
government’s provision of health services.
BIBLIOGRAPGY
Nishith Desai Associates, Webinar on Insurance Regulation and certain other trending
matters in India.
ASI HIB Workshop on Health Insurance/ care Regulatory issues
Health Policy Challenges for India: Private Health Insurance and Lessons from the
international Experience by Ajay Mahal
IRDA journals
Life and Health Insurance Law, 2018 ed. at Legal Solutions from Thomson Reuters
Modern Law of Insurance in India
Manupatra
India Kanoon