2020

location 1

1780~
,.l 3
Pdi • I 611 x I0
Pdl • t + 0.10 l
m

Pdi
Crl ·• - - Cd• 0.9l2
1700
l
.
location 2

1£20!1
,.l

.
3
Pdl • I + 0.09 Pd2 • I '57 • I0
3

Pdl
ca--- ca-om
1,00.~
,.l

3
Our analysis indicates that the relative
mo~
Pd] ·• I+ 0 10
.3
Pd]• IJ1>1 • I0
3
3
compaction achieved in the third location
(location #3) is lower than 95%.
m

Pd]
Therefore, we must urge the contractor to
Cil~-- Cu• 0936 re-compact the soil in that general
1700~
location .
•.3

133
8