Ee TRETAC DESIGN To 18 Re TAREE PRINE| Be Wena Based on acsrHeice LANDSCAPE DESIGN “Bh IE LWERE TO QPINONALLY COMPARE LANDSCAPE, ON HOW TO YigUALY MARE AREA) LOOK AESTHETICALLY. AND RELAKNG BY INCORPORATING. N. RAL ELEVENSS SuCH Ae PLANTS, EARTH, ROCKS, WATER AND Ae WELL AS SCULTURAL COMPONENTS’ CREULATIONS [ARE-ALSO BENG CONSIDERED IN LANDSCAPE DESIGN. IELANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. IN MY OWN. UNDE! OF RCM TECTURE, ASSTHET CS & BEAUTY), NDING 1S SHEN oF, DEVE LooneT FLING BTOUTILITAS AND FRvTA> ACCORDING AND IN RESPECT TO 7 SUMMARY ABOUT THE RESEARCSES AND STUDIES THAT | Ha FOR THe CERTAIN Torte, Sift Oey PLANNING FOCMSES MOSTLY ON Bavsieat £ S0OAL SITE CONSIDERATIONS, ANTUROPOETeICS 5 ERGONOMICS, PRESIVE. DESIGN, SPECIAL, CONSDERATIONS (FOR THE DSABLED), PISIAL PSIRUCTURAL PRIATY OF BOT! De STE 8 1 Fo Be BULT UPON Th. AND AS WELL AS ALL. KINDS OF CRG CONSIDERATIONS (which Ip THE, SMILAR CONSIDERATIONS IN RESPECT EANDSCAPNG ARCHITECTURE ) OVERALL AND IN cuMMaRY TO ALL THe CONSIDERATIONS THAT | NAVE MENTIONED Aapye, SITE SEV'T PLANNING Booiees MOSTLY ON nNo/OR FoR THE PHYSICAL. CONVENIENCE AND OVERALL COMFORTABILITY # SAFETINESS FOR ALL (KINDS) THE USERS, SO FAR N FORVS OF CIRCULATION : te . eS CIRCULATION WITHIN PARIS |AR3271- PLANNING 1 | 2426 YANG, MIGUEL FERNANDO D6. “SITE DEV'T_VS. LANDSCAPE DESIGN. JAR. NESTOR J. LAZAGA, IBS. ARCHITECTURE 3 (04-07-2024