Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marcus Daniel
University of Maryland
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 2
Introduction
The increasingly technological driven world has caused enormous changes in the
methods and possibilities of distance education. Over the decades, there have been changes in
medium of delivery: from the post office, to radio, television, VHS tape, DVD, and now through
the internet. (Dammers, 2009) They are many discussions regarding technology use among
the transition from the industrial age to the information age and now the digital age, and social
shifts in multimedia collaboration are factors that are influencing change. This inevitable
ongoing change is affecting all education, including music education. (Crawford, 2017)
Music subjects such as music history, music appreciation and music theory are relatively
simple to learn through online distance learning. (Steels, 2015) Instrument or vocal lessons have
to be individually catered and they can be in synchronous or asynchronous video forms. Through
many private and institutional instructors over the years. Websites have designed their own
proprietary software with cameras and audio microphones that instructors and students who sign
up with them can use. Generic standardized software such as skype, google duo (formerly google
hangouts) and facetime are also extensively used often with just the inbuilt mic and camera of a
While innovative instructors have been trying to use video conferencing ever since the
possibility. The literature indicates that academia has been more reluctant to embrace this.
(Brändström et al., 2012) (Crawford, 2017) The biggest reason is the impersonal nature of the
lessons. When email began to be begrudgingly used within corporates, some protested their
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 3
impersonal nature. Today communication without email cannot be imagined; (Damon &
Rockinson-Szapkiw, 2018) So also, the transition could occur for private music lessons.
Issues that impact formal, synchronous online lessons are low internet speed, limited
view and angles via a monitor, poor audio quality and latency. Latency refers to the time lapse,
particular in audio transmission, and is usually less than a second. Internet speed mainly depends
on two factors, geographic location of both student and teacher, and how far back in time the
lessons are given. This is turn affect video resolution, audio quality and latency. The literature
indicates that internet speeds have been adequate in about the last five years, since circa 2014, in
which both teacher and student were in the developed world. Even the latest articles report that
MIDI
For piano or keyboard online lessons, using MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital Interface)
technology, latency could be reduced, and the audio quality greatly improved. This could be the
reason that until 2014, there appears to be more literature on online piano and keyboard lessons,
than in all other instruments combined. (Parkes & Comeau 2015) (Pike & Shoemaker 2015). In a
nutshell, this is how MIDI works: From digital pianos, through their USB port, they transmit
digital binary data such as what notes are played, their starting and ending points and their
velocity. There is no actual audio being transmitted so there is hardly any bandwidth
consumption. The sound is triggered at the receiving end through another digital piano,
In fact, if both student and teacher have a Yamaha Disklavier, which is an acoustic piano
which has MIDI capabilities, one piano triggers the sound in the other piano. Every nuance is
identically replicated.
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 4
While the Disklavier is an acoustic piano, it is hybrid in the sense that when two
pianos are connected over the internet, MIDI sensors capture details of pedal
depression, key stroke, and velocity when one instrument is played and sends
these to the remote piano so that its keys and pedals are depressed with the same
weight and speed. Thus, when the instrument is played the sound emanates from
the piano at each location, rather than through the web-conferencing system.
(Pike, 2017)
At both ends is the natural acoustic piano's vibrating strings. Latency is eliminated in the piano
sound but not in the talking; The instructor still cannot talk while the student is playing and will
need to wait for a pause. Moreover, Disklaviers are not affordable to most students and teachers.
Researchers have been documenting their formal online synchronous instrument and
vocal lessons. Four articles are selected for a closer examination. Technical issues pertaining to
slow internet occupy a larger percentage of the content of earlier articles. Newer articles are
preferred. The main basis for selection is in whether or not the lessons are deemed viable and
effective in terms of student progress. There is a deliberate limit of piano teaching articles to two,
or half of the total, as it is the overwhelming majority in available literature. Also, due to the
subtleties of the voice, at least one article on vocal lessons had to be included. All the online
lessons were formal, synchronous and mostly followed a regular weekly schedule.
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 5
The Articles
In this narrative single-case study, co-authored by the student herself, there are some
finer details that studies with a large number of participants may not be able to include. Hence,
One additional difference between case studies and other types of research is that
your case study can itself be a significant communication device. For many
case study may be enhanced by simple but appealing nontextual materials, such as
vignettes, pictures, and graphics. all this information can help others to understand
In this study, the student, Isabelle Shoemaker, started as a complete beginner in piano,
although she had a background in violin and singing in chorus. The lessons were for a period of
three years. In less than a year, having made rapid progress, she upgraded to a Disklavier as
The lessons were conducted between Louisiana and Minnesota and the internet
connection was good. There were only a handful of times that internet slow down caused a
disruption in the lessons. The student had no trouble using the technology. They never met in
person though Pike knew Isabelle's mother and they would meet at Music Educator conferences.
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 6
Isabelle's mother, Kristin Shoemaker, had taught students in rural Zambia from her home in
Minnesota (Shoemaker & Stam, 2010); Therefore, there was good parental support for the online
method of learning. Isabelle even played at the Pike's students' recitals, held in Louisiana, by
Through sections written by both instructor and student, excitement and joy emanate.
There is a poignant photograph included where the student is seated at her piano and the
instructor is looking at her through a laptop positioned on a stand to the left of the piano. The
teacher is also seated by a piano and is looking at the student as she is playing. From their
descriptions, and the section titled "Forging ahead ... together", it appears to have been a
successful venture.
This is an exploratory study, where a piano teacher chose five of her existing in-person
young piano students to continue the lessons online from their homes. They all had been her
students for at least three years. In this project, each student was given 15 online lessons over a
course of about five months. Before and after the five-month period, there were interviews with
the parents and the children. During the course of the lessons, surveys were given out. The
lessons were also video recorded by the instructor. This study is selected for review as it is the
same students and teacher for the both the situations; in-person and online. This makes for
helpful comparison.
Although students felt that the lack of physical presence made the lessons impersonal,
having personally known her for a few years seems to have reduced this social barrier somewhat;
They still felt the difference. The lack of touch was frequently mentioned and was noted by both
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 7
teacher and students. Positioning of arms and elbows were formerly manipulated by the teacher.
Now she had to rely more on verbal explanation. There was a little bit of latency in speech, she
could not count, play or sing along while the students is playing. When, at the end of the fifteen
lessons, they physically gather in the teaching studio for a masterclass, the teacher could pick out
and correct issues of tone that she had not been able to distinguish online.
The final conclusion is "Throughout the 15 weeks of lessons, all five students made
(Dye, 2016)
increasing internet speeds, a more recent article bears examining. In this study three music
education university undergrads teach their particular wind instrument online to two students
each; therefore, there are six students in total. The instruments were trumpet, clarinet and
saxophone. The saxophone teacher had taught the students in-person previously, but for the other
30-minute lessons were given over an eight-week period. While the brief time span may
be too brief in determining student progress, there was extensive data collection on instructor and
student behavior, listed in three different tables, through which effectiveness of the lessons could
be measured. All the lessons were video and audio recorded and the audio was transcribed and
coding was done similar to the criteria of a preexisting model. (Siebenaler, 1997) For the teacher,
the categories were clap/sing, play, general directive, specific directive, questions, music talk,
off-task technical difficulty (in communication). For the student the categories were clap/sing,
play, questions, music talk, off-task, technical difficulty (in communication). The study was
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 8
designed to place the responsibility on the instructor for successful learning. Overall, higher
"demonstration" by the instructors such as clapping, singing and playing brought about better
results than talking. It is deemed that "participants' behavior fulfilled expectations of learning".
The data represented various correlations between teacher methods and student engagement,
One puzzling condition, for which no explanation was given, is the deliberate lowering of
internet speed, of which the number of bytes per second are not specified. The comment is made
that "any consistent enhancement in the available bandwidth and transmission of data speeds
would have served to enhance the lesson experiences of all participants". It is unclear as to what
is being simulated by slower internet, or the intention. Due to the impersonal nature of the
lessons and to technical issues, the author concludes with a pessimistic view on online lessons.
It is important to consider vocal lessons online as there are unique aspects compared with
instrument lessons. Nuances and finer details and shades of tone are important for instruments
and it is likewise for singing. However, for singers, the vocal apparatus is the singers own
physical organs, muscles and tissues. How each part of the apparatus is used determines the tone,
and it is important for an instructor to hear very clearly. Instruments as they are made of
manufactured parts that do not have life of their own. The tonal and timbral variation
possibilities in the human voice is far greater, even in speech, and so much more in singing.
(Titze, 2018)
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 9
Secondly, for the same reason regarding the singing apparatus, there is a greater
discomfort level in private voice lessons. While all articles agree that online lessons are
impersonal, this impersonal aspect could affect singing lessons to a greater extent.
The singer is exposed and vulnerable, as the vocal instrument is a part of the
internal self; and therefore, extremely personal to the singer. For example, if a
trumpet player is out of tune, the player may be instructed to adjust the
mouthpiece, have the tuning slide shortened, or check the valve for leaks. This
hands of the student. However, instruction for the singer, focuses on the changes
that need to be made inside of the student personally via laryngeal position, soft
palate height, or rounded lips. Thus, when a singer is singing out of tune,
correction is usually stated as “You are out of tune”, not “Your voice is out of
must be one of deep trust that facilitates a level of comfort to try new things, to
fail, and to try again. Success in the vocal studio, then, requires a relationship with
perhaps a higher level of trust than with other music courses. It is thus
With the intricacies that come with singing lessons online, if they can be successful, there is no
Of the four featured studies, this has the highest validity for being the most recent, most
objective, most empirical, having the highest number of participants, and having a concurrent
comparison scenario. There are 78 female voice majors at a university, 37 are given online
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 10
lessons and 41 are given face-to-face lessons. Each student is individually given the same
content and training methods by their voice professors, whether online or directly, across the
Pitch accuracy is decided as the sole measure of improvement and success in each voice
student. This is based on several voice experts and studies that consider pitch precision as
paramount to any other attribute necessary to determine a voice as pleasing. During one of the
last lessons of the semester, Sing and See software is used in the room for face-to-face students,
and the same software through the internet for online students. The students were to listen to a
particular pitch and sing it back. The results are the same for students of both delivery methods
and the authors conclude that online voice training is just as effective as traditional face-to-face
voice training. The strongly believe that there is future in online lessons even at university level
and also lament the fact that universities are wary of transitioning to online. There is future scope
for more research in this area, measuring more facet's than only pitch accuracy.
One advantage of online lessons is that the instructor and student can be anywhere in the
world. Places where there is a lack of trained instructors should be able to benefit from places
where there is high teacher knowledge and skill. While this is ideal, the literature seems to
In the lessons from Minnesota to the remote village of Macha in Zambia, the
author/instructor bemoans the slowness of the internet, an eighth, of the speed at her end. There
had to be compensation using asynchronous video submissions by the instructor. She does not
Jazz guitar lessons from the Swedish University's department of music in Piteå were
taught to three students in Gällivare, a little Swedish hamlet North of the Arctic Circle where
there is not a single music teacher. There are interruptions in the lessons due to inconsistent
internet. There is compensation by asynchronous video submissions by the instructor and the use
of cell phones sometimes, for better verbal clarity. There was a moderate amount of success and
some learning could take place in spite of some periods of confusion and miscommunication.
In the Canadian four-year Innuit keyboard project, the lessons were taught from Ottawa,
Ontario to Kangiqsualujjuaq in Northern Quebec where there are less than 1000 people. Internet
was only through satellite and was slow; at one point it failed for six months. MIDI was used.
Music learning was slightly successful, owing more to the large time span of four years than any
From the three mentioned items of literature, the conditions that create a dearth of music
these same conditions that internet speed is not fast enough for synchronous online instrument or
vocal lessons. Three cases may be too few to make a general statement; they indicate a likely
scenario, that in undeveloped regions students may not be able to benefit as much from online
Conclusion
The main factor for successful teaching and learning in private studio and voice lessons is
good internet speeds at both ends. This ensures good audio and video quality. Disklavier’s and
MIDI are great for audio quality, but it does not help instruments other than piano or keyboard.
So, the common solution of fast internet is what is needed. Even the fastest internet speeds today
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 12
do not overcome latency. Clapping and singing along, and simultaneous talking while the student
is playing cannot occur. Adaptation will need to be innovated, perhaps through technology itself.
The impersonal nature of online lessons is not ideal, but this does not affect progress.
While piano teachers and some students missed the ability to touch, again, extra verbal
explanation will be required. In the United Kingdom the touching of pupils can be an offence,
and this "no touch policy" may be gaining support in some regions of the British Commonwealth
and Europe. (Piper & Smith, 2003) Therefore, online instructors in some areas can be safe from
allegations, or even accidently touching, and not being able to touch would not be a drawback.
In the future, as long as internet speeds worldwide keep increasing, and costs keep decreasing,
(Crawford, 2017) online instrument and vocal instruction is likely to replace in-person lessons
more and more. Online lessons are certainly viable; learning can take place and progress can be
made.
Online Musical Instrument and Vocal Lessons 13
References
Brändström, S., Wiklund, C., & Lundström, E. (2012). Developing Distance Music Education in
Arctic Scandinavia: Electric Guitar Teaching and Master Classes. Music Education
Research, 14(4), 448-456.
Crawford, R. (2017). Rethinking Teaching and Learning Pedagogy for Education in The
Twenty-First Century: Blended Learning in Music Education. Music Education Research, 19(2),
195-213.
Damon, M., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2018). Online and Face-To-Face Voice Instruction:
Effects on Pitch Accuracy Improvement in Female Voice Majors. Pedagogy Development for
Teaching Online Music (Pp. 21-44). IGI Global.
Dye, K. (2016). Student and Instructor Behaviors in Online Music Lessons: An Exploratory
Study. International Journal of Music Education, 34(2), 161-170.
Parkes, E., & Comeau, G. (2015). The Inuit Keyboarding Project: A Cross-Cultural Teaching
Experience. Journal of Technology in Music Learning, 5(2).
Pike, P. D. (2017). Improving Music Teaching and Learning Through Online Service: A Case
Study of a Synchronous Online Teaching Internship. International Journal of Music
Education, 35(1), 107-117.
Pike, P. D., & Shoemaker, I. (2015). Online Piano Lessons: A Teacher's Journey into An
Emerging 21st-Century Virtual Teaching Environment. American Music Teacher, 65(1), 12-16.
Piper, H., & Smith, H. (2003). ‘Touch’ In Educational and Child Care Settings: Dilemmas and
Responses. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 879-894.
Riley, H., MacLeod, R. B., & Libera, M. (2016). Low latency audio video: Potentials for
collaborative music making through distance learning. Update: Applications of Research in
Music Education, 34(3), 15-23.
Shoemaker, K., & Van Stam, G. (2010, April). E-Piano, A Case of Music Education Via E-
Learning in Rural Zambia. In Web Science Conference 2010.
Steels, L. (2015). Music Learning with Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS).(The future of
learning, volume 6). Amsterdam: IOS Press. (2015).
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage
publications.