Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Primary Source Analysis
Primary Source Analysis
Wilson,
a member of the Free Trade Movement, created this paper as a means to promote free trade and
support the repeal of the corn laws in England, a debate that centered on globalization and
protection rights of London grain farmers, who typically had held positions in the British
Parliament. Originally titled, The Economist or Political, Commercial, Agricultural, and Free
Trade Journal, demonstrates that the paper held explicit motives to promote free trade and foster
the opinions of its founder. The company’s prospectus supports this assumption by outlining
principles that each weekly issue would contain, “original leading articles in which free trade
principles [would] be most rigidly applied to all the important questions of the day”. 1 In addition,
the prospectus also hints towards the promotion of exposing those who may be corrupting the
free trade agenda. Furthermore, the paper would serve as a source for weekly statistical data,
including diamond share prices from various exchanges around the world. The Economist
intended to educate its readers so that they could make well informed decisions about the nature
of the economy.
From 1880-1890, The Economist published the activity in the South African diamond
mining companies in articles that highlighted the “Kaffir Circus”. 2 The terms “kaffir” and
“circus” were derived from derogatory slang that referred to a black person in Africa, and to
refer to highly speculative trading activity on stock trading floors, respectfully. The Circus was
synonymous with mania, high price fluctuations, and unruly gains in South African diamond
shares. These shares became the spectacle of the markets, moving more than other companies,
and capitalizing returns of nearly 400 percent for the period; a result that did not support value of
diamonds alone. The Economist often published frequently that diamonds, “are not necessaries of
1
[ CITATION The43 \l 1033 ]
2
[ CITATION The91 \l 1033 ]
life, but are merely luxuries subject to the vagaries of fashion and to the financial changes which
The diamond mining boom, “kaffir boom”, was built upon speculation of mining
companies. The De Beers Company in particular, was hailed as a “ring master”, who
manipulated its stock through its monopoly on the diamond industry. Cecil Rhodes, a London
businessman and founder of the De Beers Company, used his business savvy and political pull to
enact laws in South Africa that would maintain his control of the diamond industry, and
influence the market supply of diamonds. For example, as an influential member of the Cape
Colony’s governing body, Rhodes was able to pass laws that would essentially eliminate African
ownership of mining claims, such that only white land owners were allowed to seek claims on a
particular mine. In addition, for those who did seek claims to mine, they were indebted with high
payments to the De Beers Company that would render their mining efforts useless. Although
owned by Rhodes and other influential London businessmen, shares in the De Beers mining
company, like other South African mining companies, were not formally traded on the London
Stock Exchange, but in the unregulated Kaffir Circus. This arrangement allowed the company’s
directors to operate in ways that could not be regulated by the exchange. For example, the laws
protecting investors in normally traded shares were not protected from insider investment deals,
and political ties in South Africa, all of which influenced the market, and were common in the
Circus.
Works Cited:
The Economist. August 5, 1843. http://www.economist.com/node/1873493?story_id=1873493
(accessed March 31, 2011).
3
[ CITATION Dia88 \l 1033 ]
2
The Economist. "Diamonds." March 10, 1888: 310.