- -

318T, YTUTFT u3d, UilTT

***

geg 26571i./2015 fATH, fa: 06.06.2015

9 SUW 2015 31TT

i NTT 8 BOT0*O KTOTVT Hftar, Pats 06.06.2015 t urfRa)

2.
13

2.1 37tTRY aeta/yTTeT ITTT, i jfaHTITY 3TT 377

.

2.2 F f e ustice delayed is justice denied v t ordT f 3

raToT ET frivolous adjournment arii akanfkat arT-a

31FTT faie orad I 77 Vvt ardarst abuse of judicdal process

"We must always remember that procedural law is not to be a tyrant buta
servant, not an obstruction but an aid
justice. Il has been wisely
to

observed that procedural prescriptions are the handmaid and not the
mistress, a lubricant, not a resistant in adiministration ofjustice. W¢
should not enthrone a regulatory. requirement into a dominant
**

desideratum. After all, courts are to do justice, not to wreck this end
product of technicallties."

2.3

.'

, forH litigation 37-1T47q7 qf sthi i 3ETERUJE57 HfBT UTRT

185-189-190, aFU fATa irh ATHiTOI, tfdir 3refArH IRI 170 -

, T HN 3TR TVT qUE G apex revenue court rTTy aT FTAR

.

2
 gT YHTN TTT primarily revenue officcrs Auit 73Td 3T:

3
STfereP H . 37eher

4.

4.1

(hearing) Yu

4.3 3fafra f ta UT HIHT sTTerfrr4, ATT 165 (6) TeT

165 (7-). 185-189-190 3ata afra ta/JTtieruI yrud a

*
frivolous adjournment EatensT frai r yu T yUvoif a7 STf7T
3T fANT»vUI fAT TÀI

4.6

t. yH. fua)

5 r 255/RIH./HUT./2015 1iTyY, f T : 06,06.2015

ffei

2. 37TryT, q-YHaY, F0T1O, RTYJR