Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v=LXW7mHp9j4E&t=850s
1947
Internal issues:
- Redcliff awards- Manipulation of allocation, lead to conflicts in geographic and water issues
- Financial issue- India had to 750mn to PK and India didn’t give a share of 75% to us
- Refugee Influx- No mechanism to deal migration b/w indo-pak migration.
- No administration, political parties, constitution, industries (PK had no as such industries- Most
industral zones were Calcutta and others except a lil bit in Punjab).
External issues:
- Kashimir in 47-48: India annexated. It was important for both muslim majority and geographic sig
due to water.
- Afghan: Durand line disputed, which was draw agreement between British and Afghan- Afghan
refused to recognize this new state of Pakistan and claimed to have KPK as Pashtunistan. Led to
Afghans sent in KPK and led to insurgency and movement of Pashtunistan
Solution: “Make strategic alliances for security purposes” -> Rise of Armed forces
Led to investing in armed forces and their increase in dominance as compared to political sphere.
New countries have such problems- American revolution faced such problems, French revolution
had same too.
Constitutent Assembly:
Tasked with making constitutent assembly to make constitution, make implementation, do
elections.
Took 9 years to make constitution (1st in 1956!)
Religion-
Either theocratic or secular state?
Contraryary interpretations from Jinnah’s statement. With death of Jinnah, it increased
Liaquat Ali Khan passed OBJECTIVES RESOLUTION of 7 March 1949 to deal with this:
Soverignity belongs to Allah
Leader follows Allah
Liberty for non-minorities right. Protecting their rights
PK as federal sys of Govt
PK will have independent judiciary
1956 and 1962 and 1973 Constitution- Objectives resolution has importance of Preamble in all. But
in Zia made it as a FUNDAMENTAL of constitution in 1985.
Islamist groups used Objective Resolutions to fulfill their objective- 1953’s protest against Qadiyanis
in Lahore and Punjab. Justice Munir’s remarks on keeping religion as individual matter but not in
state.
Power Sharing
Provincial autonomy involves devolution of power for better. However, proponents of provincial
autonomy had their own interests. Political parties at that time were at provincial levels. Provinces
being dominated by Feudals who wanted provincial autonomy.
Military started dominating with enternal conflict. While Punjabis and Pashtun dominating, still are.
Punjab’s political elites converged military and wanted centeral power.
East PK’s wanted provincial autonomy: Capital in Khi, bureaucracy and military already dominant
with west.
Presidentital or Parlimantry
East was 56% of PK. And rest in West. Proportion was, east was dominating.
West was 84% of territory. And suggested not the proportion why?
1. 9 Administrative units v 1 Admin units. The domination of territory
2. In 56%, 25% is of non-muslim and if they come in power, it’ll create muslim-hindu conflict. (East’s
response- Assembly is representation of ppl not geography + Muslims may always supersede even if
non-muslims combine. Logical.)
Opposition
1. East issue with why not proptional rep at upper house
2. Islam has accountability of khalifa why give them immunity
3. Provincial leaders: All powers have head of state. Give power to provinces.
4. Question on urdu as language
Changes made
1. Lower house will have equal representation. With 200 east and 200 west PK. (East criticized for
equal rep in lower house even)
2. Non-muslims have separate electorate.
3. Made center strong
4. Head of state must be muslim
5. All answerable to judiciary
6. Board of ulemas to supervise policies
Opposition:
1. East PK on equal rep on lower house.
2. Language still Urdu. Make Bengali.
3. Non-muslims wanted joint electorate because separate electorates mean unequality of making
citizens as second class. Why non-muslim can’t be head of state?
4. Ulemas- Why board chosen by head of state?
Language Controversy
Urdu is spoken by 6%, why nationalise it? Even west didn’t speak urdu. Only elites spoke urdu.
Jinnah said this Urdu-Hindi controversy became controversy of demanding PK. Bengali not conviced
by either Jinnah or Nazimuddin.
Constituent assembly working with Governor Genral Ghulam Mohammad. Final draft of constitutent
assembly:
1. Took away some powers of Governor General. Some powers under 1935 Govt India Act
(Amended) -> “Provisional Constitutional Order” (PCO) gave these powers to Governor:
a. Public Representative Office Disqualification Act (PRODA)- Governor general may disqualify any
legislative, bureaucrat, general for some trouble. It was a non-democratic power; hence, constituent
assembly decided to reduce powers under it.
Ghulam Mohammad’s repsonse: Dissolved constitutent assembly for lack of work in making
constitution.
Made new PM (Bogra) and cabinet.
Governor General appealed federeal court: “Doctrine of Necessity” to dissolve assembly. So dissolve.
It was first development- > Where democracy got hurt due to his personal reason which was later
endorsed by Federal court. It was later used by all marital laws!
Already military and bureaucracy were dominating. To center power, “One unit scehme” was
introduced to make west one unit.
1956 Constitution
Dossol Case-
Ayub (r 1958-69)
Phase 1-
Political party act banned parties.
PODO act- Misconduct may lead to dismiss public office holders.+ EBDO- Dismissal of elective bodies
PPO act- Curtailed media
Phase 2-
Basic Democratic Order (BDO) in 1959- Elections in 60 to be based on independent people not the
political party basis. Later, presidential referendum for his president
1962 Constitution- Presidential form of Govt for Ayub’s power.
Milibus- Military in business in form of social organization. Case in point- Fauji foundation
Land reforms
Military in Economy
GDP growth at that time 5.8% (For whole 11 yrs avg) v recent 4.8%