Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Early Urban Archaeology in Southeast Asi
Early Urban Archaeology in Southeast Asi
Janice Stargardt, Gabriel Amable, Sheila Kohring, Sean Taylor, Stewart Fallon,
Win Kyaing, Tin May Oo, Tin Tin Htay, Kyaw Myint Oo, Nyo Nyo Yin Mauk, Naw
Poe Wah & Win Sein
Click to enlarge Sri Ksetra (‘Noble Field’ in Sanskrit; Figure 1) is the largest of the Pyu
cities, enclosing 1857ha within its monumental brick walls, with an
extramural area of a similar size. It was the largest city in Southeast Asia
before Angkor, some seven centuries later. The outline chronology of Sri
Ksetra rests on a small number of reliable dates acquired since 2012,
augmented by styles in palaeography, iconography, architecture, Chinese
records and Burmese traditional history (Hudson 2012; Stargardt 2016).
Monuments, mainly of brick, surviving above ground at Sri Ksetra,
comprise massive outer walls (some still approximately 5m high), a fortified
inner area (‘palace’), elaborate gateways, stupas, temples, an artificial
‘cave’ and stepped terraces of rammed earth and brick containing
numerous cremation burials in urns. Some 105 brick mounds have been
listed inside the walls and 172 outside of that—mostly unexcavated. No
Pyu habitation site has previously been found, and few are known in
Myanmar as a whole.
All Pyu sites occupy niches in the vast Dry Zone of central Myanmar.
During the 1980s, systems of ancient water control were traced and
mapped by surface and aerial surveys at the three major Pyu cities
(Stargardt 1990). Since 2006, Sri Ksetra has been progressively remapped
using remote sensing and ground-truthing to identify four linked phases of
water control and urban development between approximately the second
Figure 2. Phase 2 of urban and irrigation development at Sri
century BC and the ninth century AD (Stargardt & Amable 2015; Figure 2).
Ksetra, first–fifth centuries AD; © Gabriel Amable and
Janice Stargardt.
Excavations were undertaken between 1 January and 26 February 2015,
with the primary aims of investigating the mode of habitation in a Pyu city,
strengthening the objective chronology of Sri Ksetra and instigating a
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
datable ceramic typology.
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
Click to enlarge Click to enlarge
Carbon sample H59/2/120/6 in Figure 6 was taken from just below the Click to enlarge
hard surfaces, while sample H59/3/80/5 comes from about 30cm below
their upper horizon. Together, these samples expose an approximately
250-year chronology of hardened work surfaces, extending from the mid-
fifth into the late-seventh century AD, and probably into the eighth. The
presence of iron nails throughout this habitational sequence indicated the
presence of wooden structures nearby. Below the hardened work surfaces,
a sherd pavement covered the entire surface of test pits 1–3 (Figure 4,
contexts 5 and 6). Sample H59/1/160/7–8, taken from below them in
context 7, provides an AMS benchmark at the beginning of the fifth
century AD. Below it, there are five further occupational contexts, as yet Figure 6. Calibrated AMS C14 dates for Sri Ksetra Yahanda
undated but probably older. mound HMA59, test pits 1–3; courtesy of Stewart Fallon,
Director, Radiocarbon Laboratory, Department of Earth
Sciences, Australian National University; © Stewart Fallon
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
& Janice Stargardt; (Fallon et al. 2010).
The Yahanda mound, HMA59: test pits 4–6
The eastern slope of the Yahanda mound was badly affected by erosion. In test pit 4 an estimated 170cm has been lost, while in test
pits 5–6 an estimated 240cm was lost to erosion. Anthropogenic deposits began on and immediately below the surface, with marked
contrasts in density (Figure 7). Test pit 4, context 4, was the former floor of a wooden building, with two postholes reaching into
context 6. One of these postholes rested on a large cremation burial, without an urn or grave goods. Around and below this important
find were the remains of a brick and earth structure. Better preserved nearby in test pits 5 and 6 were three brick steps and fragments
of the brick facings (Figure 8) of a burial terrace, extending from test pits 5–6 to the cremation burial, and to associated bricks in test
pit 4. The burial terrace was thus located directly under the postholes, while four habitation layers (out of a probable longer habitation
sequence now lost to erosion) survived above the wooden floor.
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
Conclusions
Click to enlarge
Sample H59/2/120/6 in Figure 6 agrees in part with fifth- to seventh-
century AD AMS dates obtained from two burial terraces nearby (which
may in fact have much earlier origins), but it has much clearer associations
(cf. Hudson 2012; Stargardt in press). Dates for contexts 8–12 in test pit
1 are not yet available, but sample H59/1/160/7-8 already sets a
benchmark for context 7 at the beginning of the fifth century AD; contexts
8–12 underlie it and can be presumed to be earlier. Domestic cord-marked
wares continued there, but major new ceramic types appeared: finely
incised, rouletted and stamped ceramics with sacred Buddhist-Hindu motifs
(Figure 9), which reflect contacts with Indic religions and ceramic decorative
techniques. Preliminary tests indicate that they were made from local clays
(Sean Taylor pers. comm.) to be confirmed). Similar ceramics appeared in
sixth or post-sixth century AD contexts in some Dvaravati sites of Central
Thailand and were thought to have been introduced by Indian potters
(Indrawooth 2009: 39). Yahanda research will illuminate the origins and
Figure 9. Fine stamped, rouletted and incised pots with date of these important ceramics.
Buddhist-Hindu motifs found below hard surfaces; © Janice
Stargardt. The earliest habitation layer exposed so far at the Yahanda mound (in test
pits 4–6) is pre-fifth century AD and rested on a cremation burial found in
the remnants of a burial terrace. One example does not prove that the
posthole of an early dwelling was deliberately sunk to touch the cremation burial. But the existence of the burial terrace directly under
the house suggests that this was probably a deliberate choice. Grouped cremation burials have previously been found at Sri Ksetra
surrounding Buddhist stupas of c. fifth–seventh century date and in burial terraces of c. sixth–seventh century date. The discoveries
at the Yahanda mound may offer glimpses of the presence of the dead under a Pyu house before the fifth century AD, as with the
approximately contemporary residential burials found in late Iron Age contexts at Ban Non Jak, north-east Thailand (Higham 2015).
The Yahanda mound excavations have revealed the first, long habitational sequence of any period exposed in Myanmar, demonstrating
significant phases of change and producing reliable, scientific dates. The time-span shown in Figure 6 confirms stylistic indications that
the fifth/sixth–eighth centuries AD were a flourishing period in late Pyu culture at Sri Ksetra. H58/3/80/5 is at present the only reliable
date for the Pyu in the late first millennium AD from any site in Myanmar. Hardened work surfaces, identified and dated here for the first
time, will be diagnostic indicators of other habitation sites in this city and perhaps elsewhere. The first outline stratigraphy, typology
and chronology of ceramics and iron at Sri Ksetra has begun. Previously, pre-fifth century AD evidence for Indic-inspired religion and
literacy in Southeast Asia was rare, isolated and stylistic: the palaeography of a few inscriptions in Vietnam, Java and Borneo. The
Yahanda excavations provide objective dates for the appearance at Sri Ksetra of Indic religions before the fifth century AD and do so in
the context of habitational activities. They begin not only to fill a gap in Myanmar archaeology, but also to respond to regional
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
questions of trade, cultural change and urbanism in early first millennium Southeast Asia, for which other evidence is sparse indeed.
Acknowledgements
Excavations began at the invitation of the Director-General, Myanmar Department of Archaeology and Museums, with permission from
the Minister and Deputy Minister of Culture, and were conducted as a cooperative project between the Field School of Archaeology,
Pyay, and the University of Cambridge. Surveys from October–November 2014 were supported by the McDonald Institute of
Archaeological Research and Sidney Sussex College, University of Cambridge; excavations from January–February 2015 were supported
by the ERC Synergy Grant 609823 ASIA.
References
FALLON, S.J., L.K. FIFIELD & J.K. CHAPPELL. 2010. The next chapter in radiocarbon dating at the Australian National University:
status report on the single stage AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B268: 898–901.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2009.10.059
HIGHAM, C.H. 2015. From site formation to social structure in prehistoric Thailand. Journal of Field Archaeology 40: 383–96.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/2042458214Y.0000000010
HUDSON, B. 2012. A thousand years before Pagan. Radiocarbon dates and Myanmar’s ancient cities’ (Conference on early
Myanmar and its global connections, Pagan, February 2012). Available at:
https://www.academia.edu/5489143/Hudson_Bob_2012_A_Thousand_Years_Before... (accessed 19 November
2015). .
INDRAWOOTH, P. 2009. Un antique royaume urbanisé de Thailande, in Pierre Baptiste & Thierry Zephir (ed.) Dvaravati; aux
sources du bouddhisme en Thailande: 31–45. Paris: Musée Guimet.
STARGARDT, J. 1990. The ancient Pyu of Burma. Volume 1: early Pyu cities in a man-made landscape. Cambridge & Singapore:
PACSEA & ISEAS.
– 2016. From the Iron Age to early city at Sri Ksetra and Beikthano, Burma [Myanmar], in Stephen Murphy & Miriam Stark (ed.)
Transitions from late prehistory to early historic periods in mainland Southeast Asia, ca. early to mid-first millennium CE
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies (Special issue).
STARGARDT, J. & G. AMABLE. 2015. Water in the ancient city: a new method of satellite surveys of irrigation works at Sri Ksetra,
Burma, in Noel Hidalgo Tan (ed.) Advancing Southeast Asian Archaeology 2013: 144–52 & 184–87. Bangkok: SEAMEO SPAFA,
Regional Centre for Archaeology and Fine Arts.
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
Authors
* Author for correspondence.
Janice Stargardt*
Sidney Sussex College and McDonald Institute, University of Cambridge, Sidney Street, Cambridge CB2 3HU, UK (Email:
js119@cam.ac.uk)
Gabriel Amable
Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, UK
Sheila Kohring
Materiality Laboratory, McDonald Institute, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK
Sean Taylor
McBurney Laboratory, Archaeology Division, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK
Stewart Fallon
Radiocarbon Laboratory, Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University, 1 Mills Road, Building 142, Canberra
A.C.T. 2601, Australia
Win Kyaing
Field School of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Museums, Pyay, Myanmar
Tin May Oo
Field School of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Museums, Pyay, Myanmar
Tin Tin Htay
Field School of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Museums, Pyay, Myanmar
Kyaw Myint Oo
Field School of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Museums, Pyay, Myanmar
Nyo Nyo Yin Mauk
Field School of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Museums, Pyay, Myanmar
Naw Poe Wah
Field School of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Museums, Pyay, Myanmar
Win Sein
Field School of Archaeology, Department of Archaeology and Museums, Pyay, Myanmar
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com
Home Terms and conditions Antiquity, Department of Archaeology
Current Issue Site map Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Antiquity+ Privacy policy
Archive Cookies and accessibility assistant@antiquity.ac.uk | editor@antiquity.ac.uk
Contribute Administrator login Tel: +44 (0)191 3341125 | Fax: +44 (0)191 3341101
Subscribe
open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com