Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING OBJECTIVES :
1.2. Be able to explain the Null and Alternative hypothesis and significance
level ?
QUESTION 1 :
State the null and alternative hypotheses to be used in testing the following claims
and determine generally where the critical region is located :
Hypothesis Testing
Test a hypothesis, to make inference on the population based on the sample.
Null Hypothesis ( Ho ) : A claim about the population
Alternate Hypothesis ( Ha ): Evidence against the claim
i. To confirm the accuracy, that a bag of candies has exactly 50 candies. If less, the
customers may feel bad, and if more then it is a loss to the maker.
𝐻𝑜 : µ = 50 | 𝐻𝑎 : µ ≠ 50 | Critical region in both tails.
ii. No more than 20% of the faculty at the local university contributed to the annual
giving fund.
𝐻𝑜 : µ ≤ 0.2 | 𝐻𝑎 : µ > 0.2 | Critical region in right tail.
QUESTION 2 :
Suppose a manufacturer claims that the mean lifetime of a light bulb is at least
10,000 hours. In a sample of 30 light bulbs, it was found that they only last 9,900
hours on average. Assuming the population standard deviation to be 120 hours, at
0.05 significance level, can we reject the claim by the manufacturer?
Ha : μ < 10000
As the population standard deviation is given and sample size is large enough, we
will use z-statistic
Z score = ( x̅ - μ) / ( σ /√n)
Therefore using both methods we conclude that we can reject the Null hypothesis
that the mean lifetime of a light bulb is at least 10,000 hours.
QUESTION 3 :
A car manufacturer claims that a model gives as good a mileage as over 25 miles per
gallon. A consumer group asked 40 owners of this model to calculate their mpg and
the mean value was found to be 22 with a standard deviation of 1.8. Do you support
the manufacturer’s claim?
22 − 25
Z score = ( x̅ - μ) / ( σ/ √n) = 1.8 = - 10.540
√40
Does the calculated sample statistic value lie in the critical region?
i. Z score << Z critical i.e. - 10.540 << - 1.64
It implies the sample statistic we calculated is in critical region, which tells that we
have enough evidence to reject the Null Hypothesis
Therefore using both methods we conclude that we reject the manufacturer’s claim
that the mean mpg for the model exceeds 25 mpg
QUESTION 4 :
Suppose the mean weight of King Penguins found in an Antarctic colony last year
was 15.4 kg. From a sample of 35 penguins at about the same time of this year in the
same colony, the mean penguin weight is 14.6 kg. Assume the population standard
deviation is 2.5 kg. At .05 significance level, can we reject the null hypothesis that
the mean penguin weight does not differ from last year?
Sample Size, n = 35
Sample Mean = 14.6
Population Standard Deviation = 2.5
It implies the sample statistic we calculated is not in critical region, which tells that
we don’t have enough evidence to reject the Null Hypothesis
Therefore using both methods we conclude that we fail to reject the claim that the
mean weight of King Penguins found in an Antarctic colony does not differ from
last year.