Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Relative Clinical Value of Coronary Computed Tomography and Stress Echocardiography Guided Management of Stable Chest Pain Patients
Relative Clinical Value of Coronary Computed Tomography and Stress Echocardiography Guided Management of Stable Chest Pain Patients
doi:10.1093/ehjci/jeaa303
Received 25 May 2020; editorial decision 22 October 2020; accepted 22 October 2020
Aims The European Society of Cardiology recommends coronary computed tomography (CCT) for the assessment of
low-risk patients with suspected stable angina. We aimed to assess in a real-life setting the relative clinical value of
stress echocardiography (SE)- and CCT-guided management in this population.
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Methods Patients with stable chest pain and no prior history of coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent CCT or SE
and results as the initial investigative strategy were propensity-matched (990 patients each group-age: 59 ± 13.2 years, males:
47.9%) to account for baseline differences in cardiovascular risk factors. Inconclusive tests were 6% vs. 3%
(P < 0.005) in CCT vs. SE. Severe (>_70% stenosis) on CCT and inducible ischaemia on SE detected obstructive
CAD by invasive coronary angiography in 63% vs. 57% patients (P = 0.33). Over the follow-up period (median 717,
interquartile range 93–1069 days) more patients underwent invasive coronary angiography (21.5% vs. 7.3%,
P < 0.005), revascularization (7.3% vs. 3.5%, P < 0.005), further functional testing 33.4% vs. 8.7% (P < 0.005), but
more patients were prescribed statins 8.8% vs. 3.8% (P < 0.005) in the CCT vs. the SE arm, respectively. Combined
all-cause mortality and acute myocardial infarction was low—CCT-2.3% and SE-3.3%—with no significant differ-
ence (P = 0.16).
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
Conclusion Initial SE-guided management was similar for the detection of obstructive CAD, demonstrated better resource util-
ization, but was associated with reduced prescription of statins although with no difference in medium-term out-
come compared to CCT in this very low-risk population. However, a randomized study with longer follow-up is
needed to confirm the clinical value of our findings.
䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏 䊏
Keywords stress echocardiography • coronary computed tomography • stable chest pain • coronary
angiography • revascularization
* Corresponding author. Tel: þ44 208 869 2547, þ44 207 349 7740; Fax: þ44 207 351 8604, þ44 208 864 0075. E-mail: roxysenior@cardiac-research.org
C The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. V
2 A. Vamvakidou et al.
..
Cost analysis .. using a caliper of 0.2 was performed.10 The propensity score matching
A simple cost analysis was performed for the assessment of downstream
.. excluded unmatched patients of the CCT and SE groups leaving 990
.. patients in each group. Further propensity matching was performed for
resource utilization for each group. The costs of the different tests and ..
the modes of revascularization were derived from the 2013 to 2014 hos- .. the subgroup of patients who underwent CCT angiography vs. SE (with
.. exclusion of patients who underwent CT calcium scoring only) and 640
pital resource group tariffs, which is the year the tests were performed. ..
For cardiac stress magnetic resonance imaging and for a more realistic .. patients for each group were identified.
.. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, log-rank P-values and cox-regression
representation of the cost the code RA07Z (Magnetic Resonance ..
Imaging Scan, requiring extensive patient repositioning and/or more than .. analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic impact of each manage-
.. ment strategy. As the number of deaths and myocardial infarctions were
one contrast agent) was selected.8 ..
.. very low in this population, the combined death, myocardial infarction
Reporting protocol
.. and late revascularization (>6 months after the initial tests) outcome was
..
Coronary calcium is largely automated and therefore there is no signifi- .. used to assess the prognostic value of each test. To reduce overfitting
cant interobserver variability reported in the literature.9 CCT angiogra-
.. due to the low number of events (even when combined events were
.. assessed), the three most significant prognostic variables as per P-values
phies were jointly reported by one Consultant Cardiologist and one ..
Consultant Radiologist, and difficult cases were discussed in the Imaging
.. in the univariable analysis were selected for inclusion into the multivari-
.. able model.
meeting. Although variability was likely minimized, we do not have specif- ..
ic data. SE was performed by appropriately trained cardiology fellows and .. For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Hazard
.. ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated.
co-interpreted by a cardiologist (Consultant Cardiologist—R.S.). ..
.. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS, version 26.0 (SPSS Inc.,
.. Chicago, IL, USA).
Statistical analysis ..
Categorical and continuous variables were expressed as percentages and ..
..
mean values or median values with interquartile range (IQR). Categorical ..
variables were compared with the use of v2 test. .. Results
..
A propensity score was calculated using a logistic regression model to .. Demographics
correct for differences in patient characteristics, based on widely ..
.. The demographics of the total and the propensity-matched popula-
accepted predisposing factors for CAD including age, male gender, hyper- ..
tension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, smoking, family history .. tion are shown in Table 1. The mean age of the propensity-matched
of IHD, peripheral artery disease, and chronic kidney disease in addition
.. population (N = 1980) was 59 ± 13.2 years and 949 (47.9%) of these
..
to typicality of chest pain and outpatient or inpatient presentation (11 .. patients were male. The vast majority of patients in the propensity-
variables in total). A 1:1 comparison with the nearest neighbour matching
.. matched population (83%) presented with chest pain, the remaining
4 A. Vamvakidou et al.
Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing coronary CT vs. stress echocardiog-
raphy in the unmatched and matched populations
..
.. following CCT and SE, a further 84 patients vs. 30 patients (log-rank
.. P < 0.005) in the CCT vs. SE groups, respectively underwent invasive
..
.. angiography remotely from the initial testing.
..
..
Table 2 Incidence of invasive coronary angiography, revascularization death, and major cardiac events in the propen-
sity-matched population
CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CT, computed tomography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
..
the 28 patients with ischaemia on SE 21 (75%) underwent coronary .. moderate lesions. The increased rate of revascularization in the CCT
angiography of which 11 (52.4%) had obstructive CAD and 11 .. arm subsequently was likely because of the higher rates of functional
..
(100%) were revasularized. There was no significant difference in the .. tests and invasive coronary angiography in patients with mild-
number of coronary angiographies or detection of obstructive CAD .. moderate CAD, in some of whom these would have been positive
..
The authors would like to thank Reinhard Seifert for his valuable con- .. 18. Henzler T, Porubsky S, Kayed H, Harder N, Krissak UR, Meyer M et al.
.. Attenuation-based characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaque: compari-
tribution to the statistical methodology of this manuscript. .. son of dual source and dual energy CT with single-source CT and histopath-
.. ology. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:54–9.
Data availability .. 19. Budoff MJ, Ahmed V, Gul KM, Mao SS, Gopal A. Coronary anomalies by cardiac
.. computed tomographic angiography. Clin Cardiol 2006;29:489–93.
The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its .. 20. Malagò R, Pezzato A, Barbiani C, Tezza M, Sala G, Alfonsi U et al. Learning curve
online supplementary material. .. in multidetector CT coronary angiography (MDCT-CA). Radiol Med 2013;118:
..
Conflict of interest: R.S. has received speaker fees from Bracco
.. 1281–93.
.. 21. Gueret P, Deux JF, Bonello L, Sarran A, Tron C, Christiaens L et al. Diagnostic
(Italy), Phillips (Netherlands) and Lantheus medical imaging. .. performance of computed tomography coronary angiography (from the
.. Prospective National Multicenter Multivendor EVASCAN Study). Am J Cardiol
.. 2013;111:471–8.
References .. 22. Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Burgstahler C, Schumacher F, Herberts T, Tsiflikas I et
1. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C et al.
.. al. Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography
..
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syn- .. in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and
dromes. Eur Heart J 2020;41:407–77. .. coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol
2. Knuuti J, Bengel F, Bax JJ, Kaufmann PA, Le Guludec D, Perrone Filardi P et al. .. 2008;66:134–41.
Risks and benefits of cardiac imaging: an analysis of risks related to imaging for .. 23. Ramanathan S, Ladumor SB, Francis W, Allam AA, Alkuwari M. Incidental non-
coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2014;35:633–8. .. cardiac findings in coronary computed tomography angiography: is it worth
3. Shreibati JB, Baker LC, Hlatky MA. Association of coronary CT angiography or .. reporting? J Clin Imaging Sci 2019;9:40.
stress testing with subsequent utilization and spending among Medicare benefi-
.. 24. Peteiro JC, Monserrat L, Bouzas A, Pi~ non P, Mari~nas J, Bouzas B et al. Risk stratifi-
..
ciaries. JAMA 2011;306:2128–36. .. cation by treadmill exercise echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006;19:
4. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E et al. Diagnostic .. 894–901.
performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiog- .. 25. Lancellotti P, Pellikka PA, Budts W, Chaudhry FA, Donal E, Dulgheru R et al. The
raphy for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known . clinical use of stress echocardiography in non-ischaemic heart disease:
Relative clinical value of CCT- and SE-guided management of stable chest pain patients 9
recommendations from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and ... 30. Wang X, Le EPV, Rajani NK, Hudson-Peacock NJ, Pavey H, Tarkin JM et al. A
the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017;30:101–38. .. zero coronary artery calcium score in patients with stable chest pain is associ-
26. Shah BN, MacNab A, Lynch J, Hampson R, Senior R, Steeds RP. Stress echocardi- .. ated with a good prognosis, despite risk of non-calcified plaques. Open Heart
ography in contemporary clinical cardiology: practical considerations and ac-
.. 2019;6:e000945.
..
creditation. Echo Res Pract 2018;5:E1–E6. .. 31. Villines TC, Hulten EA, Shaw LJ, Goyal M, Dunning A, Achenbach S et al.