J Korean Aced Pediatr Dent 30(2) 2003 Kim's analysis] 2|8t Il 4880s: SETHE ABS ott Ors: Ae7|- ANS aardeheta a]zhehe Loa|spey sal alae be Rea5 Supe Ale daaog dal seus] ae aol} Sado] BAG GAS GET, ots AS Bae GO Wels] Aste} aol ASI seh. of F Kim's analysioe +7s}>Moverbite)9| LL OD1Overbite Depth Indicator), 2°84 #239) 2H= APDI(Anteroposterior Dysplasia Indicator), 222 1E9) Bl CF (Combination Factor) AMT. E Fel e}e}9] aa}s} ghee] SHS aejelo} (Extraction Index) sesiae. ole BAW LEE 4 AAASo] VaweS ME HAMA) ofA BEA of ao]s Noles z Ai] al 2 APS ela, B20) 312-40) der} GS TAFE OAS] AAW BAe Sao Ls PUwwt 141G5] FS os el Kim's analysisel o1Gst: SURES Solaion Walslol es} ge Aes Ale. 1. B8agAs 1GA9 BWA MwA] ODI, APDI, A, ULE #512 A1S BsLOU, CFS} ENE FAI #9) AP} sIsteHPCO.OD. 2. Qatartabt] ODI. APDI. HAS] BH 47F 72.63, 80.47. 121.3791 8c. 3. 1 49R%4} ODI. APDI, IAS] BR 42} 64.46, 87.31. 129.80°1Set. 4, ODIS} APDI9) Pearson 2UATE -0.57622 GWAS YENI. 5. IF GE ASASzte] Bee CF(O.777), LL(-0.607), UL(-0.588), TLA(0,485), APDI(0.444), ODI(0.304)9) GAA. oA WAS seed slo} Yeah aoe] Sar} ry label Wedelce AS a) eet 204: 1B", ODI. APDI, El, Kim's analysis 1A & obs} @aizis) Aaa dale Uehhee gel] wale vant dle Ae aaa us age a aes Salve Ale] BE Sas} Je, wet tala ewe} wo} SS Weaslal spopsiar clase Ao] FolwAS Aas}ojoh OH. oe Hay Edel lel Fel Se aA, BRA, WHS Ete] SEH HIAH ARIS] HA] Beale} o. SESH ARle eaalog ql seu] ge a] A) Sad Aeaheolo) Analele] FY che, ARS S yeh: Wal shye} eo) Ba. Broadbent"7} Cephalometriost 224] US 12 @ ole, et RAYE] Balslsich. Downs" Point A 9 Point BE 71AZS] AYA ago agate ad of £8849120) Riedel] ANB angle? +34 Bal B42) N22 ATH, 2 -F Holdaway”, Graber”, Ricketts’, eB AHE OME AYUMI DY VIA AM alo] eho] Fo}2l a 298Steiner”, Tweed”, Jacobson", Cotton", Coben". McNamara” Sof lal cheba peo] ebs]eteh, lel DEMME ade S44) HASSE Foy Fry gy ast wt Agel de eas 8 eye 4S Bold eae 29 AQPRES sispain Hers] GIS Welle Veg SBN. ose de] Bol et PS Saal oz Faq} ga S04 VAs Vee Age ASS) deel Be AFE FA FAIA (overdite)*) 1X ODI (Overbite Depth Indicator)", #94 289) AES APDI (Anteroposterior Dysplasia Indicator)" “Ia. Wardlaw$*"& ROC Analysis® $4 ODI} F43)2T Fy UES Uae + cle 7 Ss Ve Wyola ee AAR] BA. ew ol | FAS WHLVM Wo] So] 0/7} NES Yat VE CF (Combination Factor) ez B aah. ilo, ebot 2A}zh ZH (Dental Convexity), 4 3 deo S258 mae WPA see El(Extraction Index) 4184. B59) ODI BAe 71.95%, aPDIe] aT alt 81.0F eat UE Yt Lew}, ool we} CHS) Baz ale 152.9922 dela ich. BUT Mel HE Bele] Hg vl z7]aH) Wise 1G ¥9n09 Boe HES Woe te a TA BFA}, AAS ARAN SHANA] AI 0]7] Bal of A719] G77} Be} 947} LE slole. -24Y4 of Wale Kim's analysisel 18 8 2oHEs} WG PATHE 2) Abolo} BE APE ach) Wr] Aske} wey BaF VIE Kim's analysis | 22h] TAME] Gala] Boh Sah 1B ¥8MAe+S4 ODI, APDI, CF, Dental convexity, UL, LL, EIS $2aie} Bel. avo} ot= ols} 2} AR Has] Seiayo] Bold Popea7 ata, "he-2ofan}2¢a1x] 30(2) 2003 1. o-peiet St cist ate Pt, PCH #7) Ware avuehwea Lo ]s}o ule 74) AA) AAS) at HRA Gos Bele 2G oh AQSA Aerts. Vlas] ee) waht BARS WA] SE Talal QAfo]s] QarmMebs 729 etex aad. $199) 2 Aeaoe atl, de, TEE of oe} OS} Zo] BHPENSIC. uy, pe 1. SHEA Alo] ae agua 8a asbyAHisisl Se BH! TAR ae Al (Morita Co., Japan) & AES Slaahe SF UA of MAD AAAS) Solel ear ros WII Bole ‘Table 1. Distribution of normal occlusion and class Hl maloc~ clusion ‘Subject number Mee Gere Normal Oot. Clase Or, T year male 8 ir female 8 2 Syear malo 0 9 female 17 10 9 yer male 15 10 female rm u Total =e 33 33 female 29 36 Fig. 1. Landmarks used in caphalomerc arabs 299J Korean Acad Padiatr Dent 30(2) 2003 Us} AGUS Baa FAlsl71a, Adee] Agel +2) ol AES nae SaMUA SOWIE sabia, Bade IAGAF ASA 71g] 5 SIE, BAH B-10MA, BANE 75-80 Kup, KATE 1.7-3.0 22 aon) oF ‘SUAI Solgs= TALE Cassette) 8% 10 14] B(Full Co., Japan) $ ASSIA. FAIA BRE ASAI 4 abate. 29@ 25 qtes Sel ARS Bed) LEB LAP (ortho/trace, RMO, 8x10, 0.003inch)sl) aad $4 FARE WEF Azo dad ASS ABA. 2. Ee Aa Fig. 1) 8 VA ig. 2) SST AGS STE chest a, + Anterior Nasal Spine(ANS): 2¥13B2] 213 Posterior Nasal Spine(PNS): #41489] 22 ~ Gnathion(Gn): FBS] 3atshea Gonion(Go): Construction gonion® a}2}8}@9] als} ae] Fas] Bas] wy Menton(Me): 8921 13412 alebeal. s}e}alo) ar ARAL ae. + Nasion(Na): A412 $2] Aaa Orbitale(Or): 519) alebaa + Pogonion(Pog): 922) 42°84. facial planes) *} 8} Bal dasshe a Point A: 29} 714|B3} ABE7] Aol] Bales) aH sha. da Beha) alee Galall alse a Point B: 8214128713} Pogonion*tols] altel 3] PH. Porion(Po): 249] 89} 33°24 FH plane: Pox} Org sl al Mandibular plane : Go} Me& 9 2 Palatal plane: ANSS} PNS@ Sl 41 Facial Plane : N 3} Pog $= ACB Plane : Point As} Point BE 1 4 E-line : nose tips} soft tissue pogonion® = 3M Oe @ODI (Openbite Depth Indicator): A-B plane3} Mandibular plane ©] 619% 2 3} FH plane3} palatal plane®| ol 2+ HH a @APDI (Antero-Posterior Dysplasia Indicator) Facial angle(FH planes} N-Poge) ol 213} FH plane(Po-Or)3t palatal plane(ANS-PNS)*] 6122+ 3 Facial Planes} A-B plane®l o1# 2h& St &. @ CF (Combination Factor) : ODIS+ APDIE We ak @MACinterincisal Angle) : 3}S21% BtE8A)7+ ole 2 © ULUpper Lip) Als} Az] © LiLower Lip) als Aa. @i(Bxtraction Index) = ODI+ APDI-(130-11A)/5- (UL+LL. Aes] Pt SSI2244) Eine 869] hy SSVSE HE] Hine 4. Bale) ols] AVS Bola ABS ol8alel gah ao] gat aaa. DAY BIS Ut Haat] Bata] 8 RBNA Host 18 #214 Ba 2) FARIS AVA WE ALS VLA (Analysis of Variance) 3) 38 Riis UF Hate Aaa] Bett 4 1, Fal aaa Lamers) Fld det Als el ASA= ODI, APDI, IA, UL*ISiCh.(P(0.01) Ber 2) ODI BFS 72,6301 APDI HE 80470181204 WAS UL9] BEL 32 121.3754 1.39°13icH Table 2) ANT Uo Wud) FACS Fe Ao1S Bel 7 28-2 APDI, UL, LL 2elz EIR $4) LL} ol CHE Table 2. Cephalometric analysis of normal occlusion and class HL malocclusion a, Sak SLIME RE ODI normal 72 72.63 488 lass I 68 6445 5.84 APDI" normal R ss? 3.22 lass IIL 9 8731 4.98 ma” normal irae 12116] eee 75d class I 69 = 1990 11.88 wu" normal 2 1392.00 dass IL 6 004 2.08, Lb normal 2 1752.15 class IL cy 238 216 El normal 2 14928 6.33 class IIL 69 180.34 9.55 oF ‘normal 72 153.10 4.84 _ class IIL 69 151.78 6.48 + p60.05, ** 60.01‘Table 3. Cephalometric analysis of male and female in nor mal group ‘ypsnoaizysnsral 3012) 2003, Table 4. Cephalometric analysis of normal occlusion and class IL malocclusion in male group ODI ‘male 33 7335 4.98 ‘opr normal 3 7331 4.98 female 39 7205 «479 dass I 36 6430 611 ApDIt male 33 7932 © 3.18 ADI" normal 33 7931 3.18 female 39 8146-294 clase IL 36 87.08 5.08, MA male 3312 BIT mat normal 33 «162 BIT female 3996707 class 36 13065 11.08 ut male 33 192185 ut normal 33 1921.85 female 39 09 = 2.08 class 36 0082.38 Lu" ‘male 33 251 231 WL ‘normal 33 251 281 female 39 1191.79 class I 36 249 237 er male 33 M752 605 EI normal 83 147.52 6.05, female 3915069 627 ass 36 149,94 (10.06 cr male 33 REL 475 oF normal 33 | «RL 4.75 female 39153514. 93 class 36 151.38__6.52 ‘a group = normal ‘agender = male #1 p(0.05, ** 0.01 Table 5. Cephalometric analysis of normal occlusion and class malocclusion in fernale grout Sogo oe aE OD normal 39 72.05 4.79 class IL 33 6465 5.63, APDI* normal 39 8146294 class Il 33 ast 4.94 MA" normal 9 e707 cass I 33 aor 12.72 uw ‘normal 39 095 2.04 class I 33 0021.69 uw ‘normal 39 im 179 ass Il 33 226 194 EL normal 39 18069 6.27 dass I 33 150.78 9.10 or normal 3915851 4.93 class IIL 33122) 6.5L ‘gender = female * p( 0.05, ** : pl 0.01 ASAlo} vlad FEA Abels yEpAAH(Table 3), gu SF} aaa} mg YalmPHI ODI. APDI, HA, ULSI E422 Hele bole eas, Aaa eho} vate] Yooh} Bawa Us HAE AE UB} LL9} aol} Be} FEeha abo} S BsicH Table 4.5). TA, 8A 2elD 9AlS) obEAIAT 2} AISI] GBol Oh Bl Yel] al ANOVAS “leststeH(Table 6, 7, 301 *pC0.05, * p0.01 8, 9), Aztd ASYHS Aol whe} Hole ols YepH alt @BA(Table 6). Tet} 7A, Bal, Gal ZF BO F $422 ODI APDIe Bas} I Fala FHL Aol (pCO.01) BAA(Table 7. 8, 9) El} HE ASST BATE CPO.TT7, LLC 0.607), UL(-0.588), 11A(0.485), APDI(0.444), ODI (0,304)2) GA8kCh. 5, Ble} CPE AeA ULat LLZe} AWAF 0.63622 7H} SE Ue BAAS EUS ¥}, ODIS} APD] -0.546, APDIS+ ULZte] -5.049) BATE GEHUSICH Table 10). V2 @ SAAILE Aol WIS AVS geviel BA eS wa of ded Bal S 7s ae es FH Rely. 7] of AE VASES Ae ds) Wash Awe he ATS Be BAS I Aol Aolale, olde] Eel ae] Hae, Be Gol 8S BAe] Hae Aw ges) aeisoio} Gos Ueaa, Fae Bays SANs AR Be Ads AP Male, Howes analysis®, Shedlon’s analysis 1232 Carey's analysis™i2 IGE Wd FRA] BAS Ao} wig] 1 22 MABLLM, Tweed triangle", Steiner's analy- sis", 22] Holdaway” BAYS AW) ESE B71SLE Ao} WAS ARIA. ols el, Kim's analysist= io] BABS B71 of, oid VAS wise Welch, ae Bale) aJ Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 30(2) 2003 Table 6. Cephalometric analysis atthe age of 7 10 9 Mean SD. P05, Ming Max ln ae 55.30, ODI a2 6197 641 65.97 6997 79.80 6 70.05 6.43 68.14 71.96 5320 81.40 age 9 53 67.98 118 65.95 6991 5120 81.30 sum 141 68.63 6174 6151 69.36 51.20 81.40 APDI age 7 42 33.96 474 2.48, 85.44 74.30 92.90 age 8 6 83.32 5.88 8158 85.07 73.50 99.40 age 9 53 wd 551 82.62 85.66 7540 98.90 sum 141 83.82 5.39 82.92 84.72 73.50 99.40 Tia age T a2 125.91 10.75 12287 129.26 ‘111.50 152.20 age 8 6 125.25 12.32 12159 128.91 108.70S—167.90 age 9 53 125.50 9.34 122.93 12808 10520 146.40 sum 141 125.54 10.73, 12376 127.88__—*108.70__—i167.90 UL age T a 9 222 20 1.58 “3.60 5.00 age 8 6 55, 221 =12 iz “3.60 450 age 9 53 7 198 21 1.30 -4.00 6.40 sum ML 73 24 37 1.08 -4.00 640 tL age T a2 24 197 1.53 276 “2.50 5.30 age 8 46 187 231 116 251 5.30 750 age 9 53 2.16 2a 156 276 -2.00 6.10 sum M4 2.06 217 1.60 2.42 5.30 7.50 BT age T a 749.08 805 «146.57 751.59 (18348 ‘167.88 age 8 6 151.01 857 148.47 15355 131.22 174.86 age 9 53 149.28 7.63 14716 151.96 13888 (168.42 sum vit 149.78 8.06, 14844 15112__—131.22 174.86 oF ‘age T 2 151.98 5.99 150.06 15879 «140.20 ‘164.40 age 8 46 158.38 584 151.64 155.11 139.80 166,00 age 9 53 15207 5.40 150.58 15855 141.30 (164.20 sum iil 15245 52, 151,50____15841__—_139:80 166.00 + 960.05 Table 7. Cephalometric analysis of normal occlusion and CL Table 8. Cephalometric analysis of normal occlusion and CL I malocclusion at 7 years of age IL malocclusion at 8 years of age 5 5Group, NT Mean, aD SE Groin No ‘Mean 80 opr" ‘normal 16 72.61 4.32, opr" normal ar ‘73.67 3.86 classIII 6 65.12 5.83, class IIT 19 64.92 5.85 APDI"* ‘normal 16 80.84 3.97 /APDI™* normal a 79.84 2.95 classIII 26 85.88 4.16 cass I 19 88.27 5.46 TA normal 16 123.99 10.99 TA" ‘normal a 120.00 524 cass] «298 12T.10.—«10.64 caw = 19 182.72 15.48, UL ‘normal 16 158 2.10 Ut ‘normal a 1.38 211 classll] 6 OAT 2.22 dass HI 19 0.63 1.98 LL normal 16 1.63, 1.90 LL normal aT 176 2.44 dlassl 26 245 1.99 cass 19 203-233 BL normal «1615004 6.33 EH normal = oT 49T_— 6.16 classIII 26 148.49 9.02 class II 19 158.34 10.91 ce normal = «1615345 4.69 or normal «= 7 15BSL 4.57 lassll 26 150.99 6.57 class IL 19 153.19 741 age = age T erage = age 8 * pC 0.05, "* : pC 0.01 "5 p-0.05, °°: pt 0.01 302A, FAA GAT Va + WE ODI APDI, Tez) & 2 UC CPa GEMdS Uda RIE HeestT. dey | RAVE Gee WLS Dae ola BAe] ohjep s Ars AMG SPAS AAA ade aS SS ‘Table 8. Cephalometric analysis of normal occlusion and CL I malocclusion at 9 years of age : N Mean SD. ODI normal Py 1675.89 dass IT 4 6340 5.94 APDI"* normal 29 8086 3.02, class IIE ot Bll 5.24 mat normal 29 12120 694 class It 2 13069 8.34 u ‘poral 29 129 191 lags It py 09 1.91 1 pormal 29 1812.06 class Ill pt 258 2.8 EI normal 9 BET 665 lass IL 2 8.16 2 525 2 5.64 * 3 p60.05, ** = pC 0.01 ‘"4piotaintas}x| 30(2) 2003, PACT ES she 7162414 (functional analysis)e1, ODI A-B Plane3} Mandibular planes) R= 23} Frankfort horizontal plane} Palatal plane®l ¢}H= 212 ‘We stelch, Palatal planes] AaPBSZ AGA Yow (+) a, absee Beye ORE 7 Kime ODI! A AG overbite7t ANE AB] QE seh, APDIP" Facial angle®) Frankfort horizontal plane# ‘ele 49] Palatal planes} Frankfort horizontal plane®l ol} 2S AR 2154, A-B planes} Facial plane) | SAS AEBS AYA VE of RE HIG. APDTE @ Aa) Nal ASEH MBF] Hele BAe] lo}, was, APD? BEBF BES CARA] B 7heel AIT, iat. 2, APDIE Als Fo] GAAS BIS oles E a) ALE F APDIS) FA17} BUA PASTS WIE seek ad. Sey APDIE BAS F ABE ARAN Fee] a AG BUS AST BS Sey Aa Fo] AE AVIS FH a ge8 ase. Recever Operating Characteristic® <183to} 22) el S} MES] BAS APM Bol Set Fe ODE 7] a Bag Awtlela, ozo) ayo Weise Ve 81% Qu aah. APD} S of BAL 1S FARES Bo] 1B), ozo] FAlBAIA Wale MES B8%e BALM Sh a. ‘Table 10. Correlation coofficients of cephalomatric measurements a ‘obt ‘APD TA, Wi oF Pearson C.c. 1,000 76°") ~272("") =.069 36") opl | P 000 OL al .000 N 41 ad 14. ui ad 441 Pearson CC, -.5T6(") 1.000 3871") =061 A) 265") APDIP. 000 000 469 000 002, N 141 141 11 141 141 141 Pearson GG. = 2721") 01") 7.000 =e) ABB 054 mA OP 0 00, 02, 000 523 N 1 i 11 ML Mt 141 Pearson C54") B04") — A414") eae") = 588") =058 wi oP 000 0 000 000 000 492 N M1 Mi at ui 141 141 ia Pearson GG. —089 = 061-260") 686") 7000” B07") =40 wm oP 414 469 002 000 000 098 N 141 ui 1 141 141 141 11 Pearson €.C._Sa("*) aa) aR) BEI) OT) 1000777) BoP 000 000 000, 000 000 000, N ui 14. ul re a1 141 141 Pearson CC. 6361°*) 2651") 054 = 058 =140 77H") 1.000 cr OP 000 002 523 492 098, 000 N 11 ai ML Ml ML ul 141 ** Coreelation coeficients(C.C) are significant at p(0.01 303J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 30(2) 2003, OF APDISt ODIE We dele. 6} zo] BAIL A ade IES Ud I ARS SoH, BAEC AHL ait SB Alots} wi7} aelstotoh ah zole. EI*e Fol 2ei}9] 1424) 8 Bide] ASSES Use| Bee, ISI STE Lined Ae desl Asta Wale deo. EVE wae aes WS ASS MEAS aelahoh Uh ¥ aE THE geet ages QE IF FARTS Kim's analysis sel esslel PU, dal eh ume) BAoe Role AClSS waleisteh inibis Ie Pah $918 avd Ale 2¢l ASAE ODI, APDI. IA, ULe]eH(PX0.01, Table 2). CF7t a]& Belz] Ek AS APD ABTS AB plane} Mandibular plane®l *o}21%= @ahebael lel ODI 7+ URS Wor, APD} 7H ste} ODL Alobe= AAA S171 Eel Roe BIA. BRB] ODL WHE 72.6301ac. lS Bale] WF TL9SHD WA A") AHeh ve RE sess alah wee} ‘Butt 73.5ache Bate}. APDI= BdeoHSe 4} 80.47 4 Bao, Gaels] AF 142s Bae wh ale Aah Ps} azalohe 2 jolt gate. AS) Sate 121.3752 lsh a o] Bagh 123.680} WE TE VENER, lets Aelis Als} 49) 11.2494 14. 8aArl9] HES HO? @ Oe, Bae G Be Geo ee UOS Ae aa 7] ad ase aad, ARz Way Wud SACS Hole Ale vel A 2S£ APDI, UL, LL 2231 EIRCH(Table 3). BRAD Te VAS 71 VF Wits” appraisal ANE BO Point} AO Point’®¢} 1mm 2% $3}8}e), ol} % AOS BO point? le] WaleicHe ash Bets aap ot. ae B APS) HL] LEAR eee slo oo) 2 ols) Bh Ba we Fell DAMS 4g wola site aged aoe Azted, EQ WU Esq Bats lls HDT ODI, APDI, IIA, ULA BEALE H9le ols YEH SHH Table 4, 5). clea Aste Table 2AME EUs Spat. Map), olele Maes Bhat Ile PT rio BAA Bu 7H Wel Bae 71SS ee aS ad etal 4a. TA, 8H 212 GAS} o}F0}44 2 ASVSS) AV HE Ato] Pote7] Hal ANOVAS A)*BetAte}(Table 6, 7. 8. 9). 7 ASVRS Gaol wish Hole ASE Yelle a )(Table 6.). F2& ODI, APDIS] Al AES] ©] 2471 St WHAT Kim's LAI VAST al te Aste} Beh. Bhatia, Leighton" #5] OF ol 29 ODI, APDIol AS} A122) % facial angle AG Ula) AES AA71 SS HIS Wad Vasa) 304 ec salon), B 2] da} ee Sade Hele) Babel @ + Sa. OL, Lele BSF Biz ODI, APDIAl AE se So] 2471 Se daca Walle HES AB DA] ow Soke BS aeelt H Aeld. ole Boy we} sg ge DE V7] HIE AS Be EL 4] ABE Fo] PES AP} 2 Aho]S vl wah} A lo} a ‘TA, SA, 941 2 BHA SHAS ODIF APDIE BE aS Ws FAW FS ols Geb ((0.01). ol ODI APD} twas} Ue PABA AS AEE A Slo] Bz Aol Baste] WE Ve AT IS AV. TAZA Gast ASHE Se TAS LL 0) #918 ALE Bolan gla] Beal, oe Tal Waly Bet Seay} aa] AEs) ROA 71IS Blow Bech. Ere CF lo} BES} 189 ASSES Dele of AE ele, Bako] Balzt zo] Pat MAE AS Bah ake Bole Mais] Baz Aol 1308 Ma ols 5B We CHE CRO} chtich, ale! zo] sada uch Be AFA 1300} AS Wa 5z WET. EIA IES) AA) S nes] Mel Hine S 2a Hes} Be] SEES mmeiz 48% Aes CFA ach, eet azo] FS}s]o} slow 49318 OFA cad. & azo ALB ELSI Ae Be Holy AVE Wat saei7] slen ct, eel dea ae S9S welsio} 130olee FA Mol Bahay Agee We WAS 1258 Aese} abeisich. telat BIS Aahe o) Basle AAA Ste] Beals AT 248 Sol apie. Id de ASA Eze) ASE OF(0.777), LL(-0.607), UL(-0.588), 1A(0.485), AP- DIU0.444), ODI(O.304)2 EACH Table 10), zi Ba} = WARAS thea) sold est seo] SS} 7h el eA dace AS dala. ©, EIS} CFS M9|3}8 ULs Lilo] HAF 0. IPE eR YD] ALAS YEHALe|, ODIs APDIS] -0.546, APDIS} ULAle] -5.049] AEE YEH (Table.10). °1% ODIS} APDIE -0.5469] Saeki & Aiea -0.54ehn BIE Yo} 9] APRS} Aa] Ale eich. olA@ ODIs APD SEAS 7171 he of loz APD a8 ODKE Ah], YAS APDI 2h ato) ODE AAS Balt Usa, ze Ba Boll Table 2.014) BE] Bawa} Weal CF BAS ALE Bola] al is oleh. Bah AHS lela i3}7t AB plane# Mandibular planee| ol 712} 52 o] ge Bolen HAO, APDI7} BAY Ae BF, ODI & Gee] Bas vimelol Paysse dese WS Aaslole} dela washae. AS SE APS SAH Kim's analysisol Sete AIS 2 ymgo24 Aamiis Deaths BaadAols} BA)s] Soh Ug cleo] BRA FH YOee 7a H. 2229) APE gett WAS Fol EES A aa HWE Aza Shs Wale alae AHS esha, 4 USEC9 dole BE EE FE VLE Ws a HIS WBAe AS wahe] She 2lo] aavtelep vee a. Va €& BAe] Za 245 eet dae THe OAs] Bat PAF SUS AI WPI DWA 14194 bes WS = Gol Kim's #40) OBS ASUS S Balog #4 diol ea} de ass asic. 1 Adee} WAH wet] Wael ODI, APDI. UA, ULE S49 22 $2}48 Boo, CFS} RIES ABA FIAT BAH p(O.0D. 2, BABA ODI, APDI, WAS BRE 37} 72.63. 80.47, 121.37°184. 3. I HUMP ODI, APDI, WAS Bee Az} 64.46, 87.31, 129.80,918i°} 4, ODIS} APDIE Pearson H¥A47t 0.57622 Sabet ae yeuisich. 5. Blt Ge aSaSete] Beata CPO.7TT), LLC 0.607), UL(-0.588), TIA(0.485), APDI(0.444), ODI (0.304)9) ENG. JAS WILAS aed slo} Ae 3 eo SSE 7H asl Uda ale de a. aaee 1, Graber TM, Vanarsdall Jr RL : Current principles and techniques. © V Mosby, St Louis Orthodontics 1994, 2. Broadbent BH = A new X-ray technique and its ap~ plication to orthodontia, Angle Orthod, 1-45-66. 1931. 3, Downs WB : The role of cephalometrics in orthodon- tic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod, 38:162-182, 1952. 4, Riedel RA : The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. AO, 22:142-145, 1952. 5, Holdaway RA : Changes in Relationship of Point A and B during Orthodontic Treatment. Am J Orthod, 42:179-193, 1956. 6. Graber TM : Orthodontics: Principle and practice. 3rd ed Saunders Co Philadelphia WB, 431-452, 305 10. uw 12. 13. M4. 15, 16. 11, 18. 19. 21 23. 24, capi-sobsi243}21%] 30(2) 2008 1972, Ricketts RM : Cephalometric Synthesis. Am J Orthod, 46:647-673, 1960. . Ricketts RM : Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. Angle Orthod, 51:105-115, 1981. Steiner CC : Cephalomerics in clinical practice, Angle Orthod, 29:8-29, 1954. ‘Tweed CH : The Diagnostic Facial Triangle in the control of Treatment objectives. Am J Orthod, 55:651-667, 1969, Jacobson A : Application of the’Wits” appraisal. Am J Orthod, 70:179-189, 1976, Jacobson A : The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmo~ ny. Am J Orthod, 67:125-138, 1975. Cotton WN, Takano WS, Wrong WM : The Downs Analysis applied to 3 other Ethnic groups. Am J Orthod, 21:213-220, 1951. Coben SE : The Integration of Facial skeletal Variants : A Serial cophalometric roentgenographie analysis of craniofacial from and growth, Am J Orthod, 41:407-434, 1955. James A, McNamara, J. + A method of cephalomet ric evaluation, Am J Orthod, 86:449-469, 1984, Kim YH, Caulfield Z, Chung WN, et al, + Overbite Depth Indicator, Anteroposterior Dysplasia Indicator, Combination Factor, and Extraction Index. MEAW MSt@HEI6. 1-32, 1994. Kim YH : Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior openbite. Am J Orthod. 65:586-611, 1974. Kim YH : Antorior openbite and its treatment. with MEAW. Angle Orthod, 57:290-321, 1987, Kim YH : Antoeoposterior Dysplasia Indicator: An Adjunct to Cephalometric Differential Diagnosis. Am J Orthod, 73°619-635, 1978. Kim YH : A comparative cephalometric study of Class 11, Division 1 Nonextraction and Extraction cases. Angle Orthod, 49:77-84, 1979. Wardlaw DW, Smith RJ, Hertweck DW, et al Cephalometries of anterior open bite: a receiver op~ erating characteristie(ROC) analysis, Am J of Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 101:284-243, 1992. AVE O50 heel MIRTIEAT Be YE Avaeea} BF. wal gs), 15(10) + 685-691. 1977. WGA: BFA Overbite depth indicator BY X-Al PU ASIA AP. ABA, 16(3):295-304, 1978, AIG: Fe vaso] de Me az WalaaJ Korean Aced Pediatr Dent 30(2) 2003 Al, 17(6): 443 1979. 25, Howes AE * Case analysis and treatment planning based upon the relationship of the tooth materal to its supporting bone. Am J Orthod & Oral Surg 33:499-533, 1947, 26, Carey CW : Linear arch dimension and tooth size, Am J Orthod, 35:762-175, 1949. 27. Tweed CH : Frankfort Mandibular Incisor Angle(FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod, 48:414-428, 1962, 28. Steiner CC : Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod, 39:729-755, 1953. 29. Steiner CC : Cephalometries in clinical practice Angle Orthod, 29:8-29, 1959. 30. Josef W. Freudenthaler. Ales G. Celar. et al Reprint requests to: KyurHo Yang, 0.0.S.,.M.S.D, PhD. 31. 32, ‘Overbite depth and anteroposterior dysplasia indica~ tors | the relationship between occlusal and skeletal patterns using the recever operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Eur J Orthod, 22:75-83, 2000. Alfa, BAS : W214 (Extraction indew IEA IE SHE WAH as, Gealstarg eal7], 26(4):347- 358, 1996. Tacobson A : The “wits” appraisal of jaw disharmo- ny, Am J orthod, 67:125-138, 1975. ead, Fa: Bats Ae WiDIIEs (Overbite Depth Indication, ODI)2} AE 7}. wet ajs}avg @}2}, 22(1):17-29, 1992. Bhatia SN, Leighton BC : Factors in the develop- ‘ment of overbite: longitudinal study. Trans Eur Orthod Soc.451-64, 1971. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University 8, Hak-Dong , Dong-Gu , Gwangju, 501-757, Korea E-mail: khyang@chonnam.ac-kruypiso}aiaheta|x| 30(2) 2008, Abstract THE LATERAL CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY OF THE GROWING CHILDREN WITH CLASS J MALOCCLUSION BY KIM'S ANALYSIS Ku-Ho Yang, Nam-Ki Choi, Jin-Gug Jeong Department of Pediatric Dentistry, and Dental Research Institue, Gollege of Dentistry, Chonnam National University ‘The purpose of this study was to investigate the distribution and differences of the cephalometric measure~ ‘ments between normal occlusion and the class fl malocclusion. Kim's analysis was achioved and compared on both the 141 elementary school students with proper profile and normal occlusion and the class ll malocclusion group at the age of 7 to 9, in Gwang-ju area and the results were as follows: 1. The ODI. APDIL IA, UL showed statistically significant differences between normal occlusion and class ll ‘malocelusion(p(0.01). But, no significant difference existed in both CF and El. 2. The mean value of ODI was 72.62, APDI 80.47 IA 121.37 in normal occlusion, 3, The mean value of ODI was 64.45, APDI 87.31 IIA 129,89 in class malocclusion. 4. ODI decreased as APDI increased, and the correlation coefficient was -0.576 in both normal occlusion and classi malocclusion, 5. The correlation coefficient related to EI was OF 0.777, LL -0.670, UL. -0.588, IIA 0.485. It means that UL. and LL were very sensitively reflected on El. Key words : Classi malocclusion, ODI, APDI, El, Kim's analysis 307