HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 16 DECEMBER 1971
Remimeo
Int R/D Checksheet
(Revised and updated to include 1971 Int HCOBs)
All changes are in script type.
INTERTORIZATION ERRORS
(Reference HCO B 1l Apr 71 L3B. Reference
HCO B 27 Mar 71 Dianetic Erasure.)
Almost all the Errors in an Interionrization Rundown
are Dianetic errors. Most are very ordinary, even corny
IT IS VITAL TO CORRECT AN INT RD ERROR AS A FIRST ACTION.
There is one Int RD error that is not a purely Dianetic
error and that is the error doing anything else at all before
an Int RD is done properly or an Int RD error is fully
corrected.
The Int R/D error may be simply that "Went in” and
"go in" did not read on the meter yet Int was run. This
classifies as “nunning an unreading item.”
On the Int R/D could kave been overrun. It goes flat
on Secondany F2, Let us say. The auditor ke-vs on going past
the win. This will hang up the Rundown. One of the ways an
overrun occurs is the pe goes exterion during it. Yet the
auditor keeps on. Another way is pe has a big cog, big win.
Auditor keeps going on with the R/D.
When a pe is exteriorized by auditing and is then audited
further without being given an Interionization Rundown, his TA
will go high or low and he may be very upset. Heavy masses
may come in and he may also get ill.
Int RD errors also may go back to earlier Dianetic errors.
A number of unflat incidents invite the overrun of these if
they also occur on a Dianetic Chain.
To clean up a balled up Int RD chain or incident one may
have to find and clean up the Dianetic error it is sitting on
during the clean up of the Int RD error.
Int R/D errors, g00fs ete are hand£ed by using an Int
R/D Connection List Revised HCOB 29 Oct 71.
Auditors who can't run ordinary R3R with great success
should not be let near an Inteadonrization RD as their lack of
smoothness in handling Dianetics will wreck the Int RD.HCOB 16,12.71 -2-
CLASS 1V, HDC_AUDITORS
An excellent Cf£ass IV HDC Auditor can easily repair a
messed up Interiorization rundown after a fold-r study and by
use of an Int R/D Correction List Revised HCOB 29 Oct 71.
A Class IV, HDC Auditor with an excellent Dianetic Record
of wins can be given an Int RD to do or to correct IF HE IS
STARRATED ON THE EXT PACK AND THE TWO WAY COMM PACK.
REPAIR
Wherever you see a TA high and a pe in trouble your
first suspicions should be
1. Audited past Ext in Auditing without an Int RD being done.
2. Int RD botched by being unnecessary (went in didn't read)
on overrun on Auditor gooss in the session.
3. A previously messed up Dianetic action has gotten
fouled up with the Int RD.
4. ‘The Int Command was improperly cleared (such as "means
go in and out again" "means trapped" "meant leaving" etc).
S. Firefights and worries over the high or low TA have
ensued after an Int ball up has occurred.
6. Some major action like grades or items or Power have
been run twice.
a A C/S has hopefully kept on getting the 2c audited
without detecting the real reason as a flubbed Int RD.
PERCENTAGES
The percent of misrun Int RDs is high, many being
unnecessary ok averkun,
The liability of leaving them unrepaired is high.
Reasons for high TA are averaging out close to 100% as
an unrun or a flubbed and unrepaired Int RD.
EXT_IN SESSION
When a pc Exteriorizes in session it is the End Phenomena
for that process or action. One gently ends off in any case.
Then 44 after the fact of going extenrion in auditing, pc's TA
qe hagh, then. you do an Int R/D. You test Int for a read,
test went in and go in per HCOB 24 Sept 71 Int R/O) and if it
reads you do an Int R/D.
You just don't do one because a pe goes exterion,
Maybe it wasn't needed. So if it wasn't needed it wikl
eventually have to be repaired.
If even years after an Int RD the pe has a high TA or a
low TA then Int trouble is at once suspected and the original
Int RD and any repair of it is suspect and must be handled.HCOB 16.12.71 =3-
The Int R/D Correction List Revised, HCOB 29 Oct 71,
has been designed to straighten out Int R/Ds. 138 handles
the Dianetic errors.
There is no real trick to either running a correct Int
RD or repairing a flubbed one.
The whole clue is whether or not the auditor can audit
plain ordinary garden variety R3R.
So when ANY auditor audits a pe past Exterior and the
pe’s TA goes high he should be checked out fully on the Int RD
checksheet so he won't continue to commit the error.
And when ANYONE is going to run an Int RD he must
(a) Be an expert Dianetic Auditor and Class IV.
(b) Be Starrated on all the Int RD pack.
And when any C/S is confronted with high TAs or low TAs
and doesn't handle at once by getting an Int RD properly run
or properly repaired he must be re-checked on the Dianetics
Pack and the Int RD pack.
DN C/S 1
A very careful Dianetic C/S-1 must be done on a
previously unindoctrinated pe before he is run on an Int RD.
Otherwise it's all too new.
A CS-1 isn't auditing.
The pe who can't do what the auditor says or can't
correct an erroneous action is lost.
A fully safe pe would be one who when he goes Ext in
Auditing is made to do an’ HDC at once before he even gets any
ruds put in and not audited again until he is an HDC. He'd
be a pe who was relatively safe. =
A pe who does what an inexpert auditor says without
question can really get fouted up! Uneducated pes require
really flawless top noteh atditors. The auditor who can
audit an uneducated pe is a jewel. He really has to know
his business. Because the pe does whatever he says. And if
he says wrongly, then there goes the session. Ever notice pe
corrections in a worksheet? "I think you by-passed an F/N."
"This feels overrun." "I had Grade I last year." Such
auditors are not fully enough trained to handle wholly
green pes!
SIMPLICITY
Honest fellows, it's as easy to run an Int RD as it is
to run "an ear pain."
It isn't even mysterious or tough.HCOB 16.12.71