™ epee
atthe nara heing i ket eters with him. The nara pais
ste ig
the “eioge” ofthe pcm (493-5154), the shouting ofthe dead con
fines sas of lament They descrie tee Geplrabe stato i ei,
(Mure tr eqs forthe arate ring hs message oh vin. bt
‘cmd they mae the serif request ht hi fais ve charity w the
een tre wave ts ul ofthc deed elas. Ti aj ic bo
aed nd potnged inthe rind eso ofthe te
“Thus ethe end ofthe oy. We ae on tld whee th mtr wakes
‘pw raise tat he bs only teen deaming. To gute Alexion M. 1991
2. "epee i nt wakeup. aer a.”
12 Authorship an ing
tes nt Ben posible to deni the poet with eran, not fia he a
‘sr composton with reat peisn. The fermina ate quem is of couse
159th pear tht chapbook elton (A) ws bined
"Fone agement Mae the blind form of Brain)
J erg he ume of» Vencin sable family in Crt Four members
‘th amy are recorded members ofthe Crt Senate during the 18th
cei and in cemur of 164 he fami is came among me “oh
‘ect of ety in Wester Cte” But he mae nly pears acy
earl documens rm the a and 1th entry, Tiss probly et
ihe ac th family hd i ents Wester Cree forthe achive om
thse aes oposed to hn ro Central Crete gly be ost!
Now sas have tee med tht th oct Mc was om
te Rathymon region St. Alexion, However, ses that this not
rove art and ht the ngage of he poem docs wt Help ust ove the
Soon of te exact peograptics provenance *
"Ate roan pets who have heen ened telonged iter the
obs eth Borex, may of them were of Venebas ee,
nia ie, 8) 39 wih ference Kp i319) 46,
pao Ale S28,
ahr ond ine os
ont ttm fen Av
i ee om
ait cay ay A cot
seen nena
"Secnan am htc ensrts s
Satay eo naneeacitomoees
elec een eemrane tan
Seinen tous Sinema
— ‘comparisoe of the language and versification would lead 1 the con
papain pment
‘rant aa rocieantaser eit
meereeenatnts meameareeee
See
meen temer cee act re
van srepe asin bon ope
Sanh ery weal
Sipe alec er cmmen nr oe
ei aveay pail mae Seana
eaten esc
Scare,
Sltapal pty ecm Semen rape
spate coe eae eapey sme Fy
rete ong
“ase eupresaeremeianne
Seip Tamas pe oes
out «literary convention of the tie. Thus Bergdis’ audience need not
Sree ise react aeeaigha e109: 171 and van Gomes 2005 accept Lasithinai’ cautious hypo
‘Avan Geet now favo an even ter erminu ost quem than 1420,
aly 140 (id) To Ls line of gent ea the cha
‘on tha th kaown sures sow ts un 455 the Minar Ossersn were
walked by he nobility and he Bourgeoisie of the Cretan owns, Not wi
ste that ime did they become the abet of resentment. Therefore, van
‘Gomer ages in ade fr Creu poet accuse them of red and the t=
‘nce t be file with ppative aspects of thei bebavibr, ome tine
Inst have passed since 455, Api haunt seule ed at
fet he ri in cops ine 20 who re being ares of pred but the
“Tales” who ate intediced in ie 205 (6 Comm 2080). They ae
sci as pstrng he atl widows the onsecrail temp 4 ay
hans on thet inberance. When they finaly ve wp. "ey ron <>,
Jer untied Ie the farsa clogs’. The cma of he sae against the “a
then shir apparans Bing tend oat of he ism cog. See
‘Como, 20, where aretha the sie is diece apnins the behavior of
‘eqesentives ofthe Church in gener, ad ot apa any prc et
toy of een)
“A van Gemet frter quotes Nikos Panagiotis cautious hypothesis
‘hat peas “Berga wae fom Retymnon bt ived abd wrt in Chandax
{ttrneono(-