You are on page 1of 3
™ epee atthe nara heing i ket eters with him. The nara pais ste ig the “eioge” ofthe pcm (493-5154), the shouting ofthe dead con fines sas of lament They descrie tee Geplrabe stato i ei, (Mure tr eqs forthe arate ring hs message oh vin. bt ‘cmd they mae the serif request ht hi fais ve charity w the een tre wave ts ul ofthc deed elas. Ti aj ic bo aed nd potnged inthe rind eso ofthe te “Thus ethe end ofthe oy. We ae on tld whee th mtr wakes ‘pw raise tat he bs only teen deaming. To gute Alexion M. 1991 2. "epee i nt wakeup. aer a.” 12 Authorship an ing tes nt Ben posible to deni the poet with eran, not fia he a ‘sr composton with reat peisn. The fermina ate quem is of couse 159th pear tht chapbook elton (A) ws bined "Fone agement Mae the blind form of Brain) J erg he ume of» Vencin sable family in Crt Four members ‘th amy are recorded members ofthe Crt Senate during the 18th cei and in cemur of 164 he fami is came among me “oh ‘ect of ety in Wester Cte” But he mae nly pears acy earl documens rm the a and 1th entry, Tiss probly et ihe ac th family hd i ents Wester Cree forthe achive om thse aes oposed to hn ro Central Crete gly be ost! Now sas have tee med tht th oct Mc was om te Rathymon region St. Alexion, However, ses that this not rove art and ht the ngage of he poem docs wt Help ust ove the Soon of te exact peograptics provenance * "Ate roan pets who have heen ened telonged iter the obs eth Borex, may of them were of Venebas ee, nia ie, 8) 39 wih ference Kp i319) 46, pao Ale S28, ahr ond ine os ont ttm fen Av i ee om ait cay ay A cot seen nena "Secnan am htc ensrts s Satay eo naneeacitomoees elec een eemrane tan Seinen tous Sinema — ‘comparisoe of the language and versification would lead 1 the con papain pment ‘rant aa rocieantaser eit meereeenatnts meameareeee See meen temer cee act re van srepe asin bon ope Sanh ery weal Sipe alec er cmmen nr oe ei aveay pail mae Seana eaten esc Scare, Sltapal pty ecm Semen rape spate coe eae eapey sme Fy rete ong “ase eupresaeremeianne Seip Tamas pe oes out «literary convention of the tie. Thus Bergdis’ audience need not Sree ise react aeeaigha e 109: 171 and van Gomes 2005 accept Lasithinai’ cautious hypo ‘Avan Geet now favo an even ter erminu ost quem than 1420, aly 140 (id) To Ls line of gent ea the cha ‘on tha th kaown sures sow ts un 455 the Minar Ossersn were walked by he nobility and he Bourgeoisie of the Cretan owns, Not wi ste that ime did they become the abet of resentment. Therefore, van ‘Gomer ages in ade fr Creu poet accuse them of red and the t= ‘nce t be file with ppative aspects of thei bebavibr, ome tine Inst have passed since 455, Api haunt seule ed at fet he ri in cops ine 20 who re being ares of pred but the “Tales” who ate intediced in ie 205 (6 Comm 2080). They ae sci as pstrng he atl widows the onsecrail temp 4 ay hans on thet inberance. When they finaly ve wp. "ey ron <>, Jer untied Ie the farsa clogs’. The cma of he sae against the “a then shir apparans Bing tend oat of he ism cog. See ‘Como, 20, where aretha the sie is diece apnins the behavior of ‘eqesentives ofthe Church in gener, ad ot apa any prc et toy of een) “A van Gemet frter quotes Nikos Panagiotis cautious hypothesis ‘hat peas “Berga wae fom Retymnon bt ived abd wrt in Chandax {ttrneono(-

You might also like