n s an d

PREVENTIONS / m or e, it is n o t
v
o
e
n
a
ly
r o
o
l
r
e
g
in
a n
e
i
f
z
f
at
o
o
r
d
io
t
b
s
r
to
o u
so
gh
lv
t
e

SOLUTIONS Fur th er h at se r o th e g o
u tion s t , it is als t io n s.
it e
inst net’s demis individual a ns by which s c
the plaby collective wing are mea consequence
Third, the Land Institute which was founded in about ore, the follo alleviate the o reducing
1976. It is an organization based on scientific Theref uals can help ith regards ts, farmers
research that uses nature as its model for individd pollution. Wand pesticide nd
agriculture in order to promote sustainable of lan al fertilizerssted manure aally active
food production. In order to accomplish this chemic to use compo and biologic ria that can f
objective, the Land Institute establishes ought tilizers whichgae and bacte soil. The use o o
growing perennial grains in mixtures to create biofer cts such as al en fixation in ulture leads t
ecosystems that reflect the productivity and produ itiate nitrog cides in agric
resilience of prairies. Other objectives of this help inzers and pesti erns.
institution includes ending soil erosion, fertili nmental conc
moving away from chemical inputs in enviro
agriculture, restoration of soil health,
decreasing carbon emissions, and enhancement
of food security.
 l ob n a l l y
IL AND LA ND PO LL UT ION
ro b l e m g
ce p t io SO N ES
i s a s e v e r e
i
p
s n o t a n e
m
x
u c h m o r
l
e
IN THE PH ILI PP I
i o n in e s n i s p ic a
l lu t l ip p u t io t r o
il p o . P h i o ll il in e
So 1 0 ) o i l p s s o o t h
o , 2 0 c t , s a s a u e t t i e s
(Asi is. In fa cal are more d prope r
th p i d e e ir t io n
to e in tro degra e of th g r a d a
n t o tu r d e
pro tend e n a s , s o i l
o s t ).
d s t h i n e e m Ib i d
lan te and hilipp o f t h
d a y (
s
m a e P n e t o n a
cli In t h
o b e o
t u r e n o w
id .). e d t
o f n a l s o k a s a
(Ib s i d e r
l em s a n , a
a t i o n
e
c o n r o b n P l r a d t h
is g p c t i o d e g y o f
s s in a l A o il u r it o n
p r e io n ie d s s e c il y
N a t n t if o o d e a v s
Th e id e h e f i e s h h a
h a s t o t r e l N A P a re
A P , e a t in e s i m e , r e s
N t h r i li p p is t e c t a
a j o r P h t t h n h -50
m y a s d ) . A il l io f 3 0
n t r (I b i . 2 m n t o vit y
co u t u r e a t 5 p o i c t i
cu l d th t h e o d u
r i t e t o p r
ag e p o r
a d e d
n s o il
s o r e g r o n i
al e l y d u c t i
e r r e d
sev nt of
e r c e
p .
i d )
(Ib
 se a r ch st
o
IL AND LA ND PO LL UT ION
ic al R
op n to datio
e
be th ne m
SO N ES
n na ls o f
i
T
s
r
no w gra
k il de he s se s IN THE PH ILI PP I
er A s io n f so in t roce n,
p ap er o ess o died on p ti o
a il c u
In .31, so d pro st st adat aliniz nd i a
vol esprea the mo il degr ents, s ction, a so
id
w is a l so r s o u tr i pa e a l
th e f n , co m hav
and ntry. O : Loss o lution tudies f soil
cou wn are on, pol 2009). S auses o ,
kno ificati (Asio, main c station tices, e
acidsidence hat the Defore al prac d wast to
sub ealed t n are: icultur ing, an known n
rev radatio g, agr ies, min tion is ation i st
deg rgrazin activit foresta degrad r at leah
ove ustrial id). De of soil event o esearc
ind osal (Ib cause r to pr more r io-
disp he main In orde ation, nd soc raded per
be t (Ibid). degrad sical a s of deg of pro
Asia en soil the phy eristic lation needed
less arding haract e formu ies are the
reg nomic c d in th strateg o this, tly
eco ds to ai ement ation t curren
lan manag ). In rel ment is Ibid).
soil o, 2010 govern tudies (
(Asi ippine such s
Phil moting
pro