FOR OFFICERS IN BPS 19 & 20 CONFIDENTIAL Lu Liman tA "ieee GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN ue ee Ministry Division’ Service/Group Department/Office BLP IepSleais oh, PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE PERIOD “2 To a ” bam aa (TO BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON) (us EAR) 1, Name gn stoae tetas (euvtingt 2. Personnel n Aoi 3, Date of birth Ugtoe 4. Date of entty in service bot Aversa 5 Postheld ibicrmar ttl 6, _ Academic qualifications ngthe period wth ars) Knowledge of languages (iesse indicate profcieroy in speaking (), ating ®) UE and tng waz SIME ak He 2-1)J received during the evaluation period craising source attended sation, if any, may plaace te listed esparatalyon the bask page ofthe roped) Cp Poa CPL dn Rt bed a LeU ets 5 One fake? Name af ccurse attended Duration with dates Name of institution and county phe [eae Luke 7 Haan 9. Petiod served way ‘Dlr persent pest (i) Uncer the reperting officer evs reAL Bigs PART Il pe (10 BE FILLED IN BY THE OFFICER REPORTED UPON) Usps ree) 1. Job, descr Ulu nes2 Brief account of achievements during the period supported by statistical data where possible. Targets given and actual performance against such targets should be highlighted. Reasons for shortfall, if any, may also be stated ta Eton ig PWN ba sie Sole RE mele Ses, ol PART Ill fre (REPORTING OFFICER'S EVALUATION) CALC A By.) flease comment on the ffs. petfermance as given in Part Mh (2) ith special reference to his knowledge of work, ability to plan, organize and supervise, analytical skills, competence to take decisions and quality and quantity of output. How far was the officer able to achieve the targets? Comment on the officer’s contribution, with the help of statistical data, if any, n the ovorall performance of the organization. Do you agroe with what has been stated in Part il 2}? CL Las only Wyler FLAVA PL A late LAV Co EO pe Boul Ae A Aig Katy yre ie LE abil lego rE ee LO Wyeth Lvl hoa WL At baw alocick el MSity (Morality, uprighinase and honasty) PB sslensifen) Pen picture including the officer's strenghs and weaknesses with focus on ‘emotional stability, ability to work under pressure, communication skills and iterpersonal effectiveness (Weakness will not be considered as adverse entry unless intended te be tented as adverse) het Maer SL PK tell Life i Mlle AK l oA yere FSIS (ESA AB yao Wort Pied BNE Allee WAS ag Area and level of professional expertios with suggessions for future po wet dicho tateule oaady5 Trai ing and developmentneeds LL ey 8. Overall grading a ee Very Good Good Average Below, Average & yr bo! Fates 7. Fitess for promotion ered Lr Name ofthe reporting officer (Capital leer itn bnr Ws Big, Designation ut Comment on the officers potential for holding a higher positian and addtional respansbiities Legh Bie yaesdlnad Akg > weno) Signatu a Date GePART I coed (REMARKS OF THE COUNTERSIGNIND OFFICER) (eu AB Zi) 1 How often have you seen the work of the officer reported upon? Shoda AU Thou PK Very frequently Frequently Rarely Never Pah vi cateite vit 2, How well do you know the officer? If you disagree with the assossmont of the reporting officer, please give weasons CPTI ZA Bi AES bog 3. Overall grading 2a Vary good Goad Average Below Average & we be (ates 4. Recomendationfor promotion —_(Commenton the office's potential for holding 2 del£d7 higher positon an¢ acdtionalresponibites Linde AL2td 3 ue ine ideal Set ge seh we5. Evaluation of the quality of assessment made by the reporting officer Ei MEK tea L ll Ng, Exaggerated aha Fair oe Biased sot Name of the countat ng officer (Capita Ieten) ne ieouor WA Bre Designation Me Date 6S (REMARKS OF THE SECOND COUNTERSIGNING OFFICER (F ANY)) EWE DALLA po Name rt Design: ut ion Signature fey Date bb