Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contras tive
Linguis tics
Les s on 1
Ins tructor: Le Nguyen Nhu Anh
Slide 2
ORIENTATION
Slide 3
Learning Outcomes
01 02 03
Unders tand principles Develop s ound Apply CA in differe nt
of CL: his tory, knowledge of both ESL area s :
objectives , target and na tive interlanguage, Error
methodology & la nguage s ys te ms Analys is , tra ns lation,
applications L2 writing, langua ge
typology and la ngua ge
unive rs als
Slide 4
Cours ebook
Slide 5
Official Class time: Tuesday
Important • Class 1: 10.00 AM - 11.40 AM
Announcements: MS Teams
Slide 6
As s es s ments
As s es s ment 1 (40%): Multiple Choice Quiz
• Compute r - bas e d tes t cove ring contents from the firs t 3
les s s ons
• Number of items : 50
• Time allotted: 60 minute s
Slide 7
As s es s ments
As s es s ment 2 (60%): There are 2 options :
Option 1 Option 2
Write a Contras tive Analys is Es s ay Take another Multiple Choice Quiz &
- Each s tudent choos es a linguis tic Write a s ummary of a Linguis tic res earch
as pect to do a s mall CL res earch on paper
and write an es s ay to report findings . - Computer- bas ed Tes t covering
- Length: from 2000 to 2500 words contents from les s ons 4 to 7 ,
- Maximum s core: 10 (TEN) number of items : 50, Time allotted: 60
minutes
- Summary length: 200 words
- Maximum s core: 9 (NINE)
+ Tes t: 8 (EIGHT)
+ Summary: 1 (ONE)
Englis h and Vietnames e Contras tive Linguis tics
Slide 8
Slide 9
Tentative Clas s Schedule
We ek Te s t- takers Es s ayis ts
10 No clas s , s tude nts review Les s on: “Writing a Contras tive
le s s ons for as s es s ment 2 Linguis tics es s ay”
11 the ms elve s Students s ubmit their topics and
outlines for feedback
12 As s es s me nt 2 MPC tes t No clas s , s tudents write their
13 No clas s , s tude nts write their res earch es s ays
14 s ummary of an article
15 Summary Submis s ion Deadline Es s ay Submis s ion Deadline
Slide 10
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Slide 11
1.1 What is Contras tive Linguis tics ?
1.1.1 The Name and Nature of Contras tive Linguis tics
1.1.1.1 Linguis tics
Language is us ed by us ever y day. It is a re ality.
PHYSICAL
ASPECT
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL
LINGUISTICS
ASPECT ASPECT
3 as pects of reality
Englis h and Vietnames e Contras tive Linguis tics
Slide 12
PHYSICAL
ASPECT
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL
LINGUISTICS
ASPECT ASPECT
3 as pects of reality
Language : created & us e d Language: human
in the human s ociety => a behavior =>
s ocial phenomenon => ps ychologically real
s ocially re al
Englis h and Vietnames e Contras tive Linguis tics
Slide 13
THEOLOGICAL
PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH HERMENEUTIC
APPROACH APPROACH
LINGUISTICS
MATHEMATICAL SCIENTIFIC
APPROACH APPROACH
Modern language
s tudy claims to be
an empirical
s cie nce, aiming at
SCIENTIFIC producing true
LINGUISTICS s tateme nts by
APPROACH means of
formulating
te s table
hypothe s e s
Slide 15
Slide 16
1.1 What is Contras tive Linguis tics ?
1.1.1 The Name and Nature of Contras tive Linguis tics
1.1.1.2 Contras tive Linguis tics
- A branch of linguis tics
- Involves contras t or comparis on
- Method of comparis on: widely us ed in linguis tics to identify &
elabor ate on featur es of human language
Ex: to es tablis h the gr ammatical feature of the plural, linguis ts
compare diffe rent languages to identify pos s ible forms s uch as
inflection (Englis h), lexical means (Vietnames e, Chines e, etc.)
Englis h: cats , clas s e s
Vietnames e: nhiều con mèo, nhiều lớp học
Chines e : 好些猫, 多个班级
Slide 17
Slide 18
Synchronic Diachronic
Intralingual (1) Synchronic intralingual (2) Diachronic intralingual
comparis on comparis on
Inte rlingual (4) Synchronic (3) Diachronic interlingual
interlingual comparis on comparis on
syn:at 1 time
inter: among
Slide 19
Synchronic Diachronic
Intralingual (1) Synchronic intralingual (2) Diachronic intralingual
comparis on comparis on
Inte rlingual (4) Synchronic (3) Diachronic interlingual
interlingual comparis on comparis on
Slide 20
Synchronic Diachronic
Intralingual (1) Synchronic intralingual (2) Diachronic intralingual
comparis on comparis on
Inte rlingual (4) Synchronic (3) Diachronic interlingual
interlingual comparis on comparis on
Slide 21
Slide 22
Slide 23
Synchronic Diachronic
Intralingual (1) Synchronic intralingual (2) Diachronic intralingual
comparis on comparis on
Inte rlingual (4) Synchronic (3) Diachronic interlingual
interlingual comparis on comparis on
Slide 24
Slide 25
Slide 26
Some languages als o
have agglutinative characteris tics which
means that ideas are joined together within
words to make new meanings .
For example, in German, we can
have Hauptbahnhofgas ts tätte which breaks
down roughly as m ain + line + yard + gues t
+ place and me ans the m ain railw ay s tation
res taurant.
Slide 27
Slide 28
Slide 30
Slide 32
Slide 33
1.2 Why Contras tive Linguis tics ?
1.2.2 The Practical Need for Contras tive Linguis tics
The s tudy of contras tive data might s ugge s t s olutions to various
practical linguis tic problems
• Example: Inte rlingual trans lation
Slide 36
Slide 37
1.3 The His tory and Development of
Contras tive Linguis tics The rise of CL
Frie s (1945, p.9): “The m os t e fficie nt [teaching] m aterials are thos e
bas ed on a s cie ntific des cription of the language to be learned,
care fully com pared w ith a parallel des cription of the native
language of the le arner.”
Slide 38
Slide 39
1.3 The His tory and Development of
Contras tive Linguis tics The rise of CL
- Ame rican s tructural linguis tics bloome d with methods and
procedures for conducting hie rarchical componential analys is
of the s tructure s of language
- E.g.:
He {like s to [play (tennis )]} vs "Anh ấy {thích [chơi (quần vợt)]}".
Slide 40
Slide 41
1.3 The His tory and Development of
Contras tive Linguis tics The crisis of CL
- Be ginning from the late 1960s , CL came unde r s evere criticis m
in the US be caus e :
1. The the oretical bas is of contras tive des cription appeare d to
be s hake n by newly eme rged approache s to ps ychology &
linguis tics : Be havioris t Ps ychology vs Cognitive Ps ychology;
Structural Linguis tics vs Trans formational Grammar.
2. Language learning was les s predictable from contras tive
linguis tic des cription than teache rs had been led to be lieve.
Slide 42
Slide 43
1.3 The His tory and Development of
Contras tive Linguis tics Current view of CL
- The curre nt view of CL
- A s ource for e xpe rimental s tudies into the predictability of learner
difficulty,
- Major theoretical contribution to s tudies into interlanguage
- Combination with Error Analys is as a practical clas s room res earch
tool for te achers to adjus t their teaching to the s tate of knowledge of
the ir le arners (Bas ed on J ames , 1980, pp. iii–iv).
- Contribution to the theory and practice of trans lation, to L2 writing, to
the unde rs tanding and des cription of particular languages , to
language typology, as well as to the s tudy of language univers als