Professional Documents
Culture Documents
61]
Original Article
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most prevalent gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. With 5% risk of developing CRC in life, it became
the third leading cause of cancer death in developed nations. In Nigeria, it is the most common GI cancer. However, there are limited data on
CRC in the study area (North‑Western part of Nigeria). The aim of this study was to identify the clinical, endoscopic and histological profile of
CRC seen on colonoscopy. Methodology: This was a retrospective descriptive study where colonoscopic and histological records of suspected
CRC in the study centre between January 2008 to December 2017 were evaluated. Results: Records of 135 patients were reviewed, and males
constituted 63.7%. The mean age was 46.61 ± 16.80 years, with 30–39 years as a modal group. Common presentations were diarrhoea (86.7%)
and bleeding per rectum (68.9%). Areas affected were rectosigmoid colon (63%), ascending colon (14.1%), descending colon (8.9%),
transverse colon (7.4%) and anal canal (6.7%). Histologically, adenocarcinoma was reported in 57.8%, mucinous adenocarcinoma in 8.1%
and signet ring cell adenocarcinoma in 3.7%. Tubular and villous adenomas were 3% each. Others were carcinoid tumours (1.5%), metastatic
adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, GI stromal tumour, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, angiosarcoma and
adenoid cyst carcinoma reported in 0.7% each. Conclusion: Majority of the patients with CRC were in their young age. The most common
presentations were diarrhoea, weight loss and anaemia. The most common site of affectation was in the left colon, while the most common
histological finding was adenocarcinoma.
Keywords: Adenocarcinoma, anal canal, ascending colon, colonoscopy, colorectal cancer, descending colon, mucinous adenocarcinoma,
rectosigmoid colon, signet ring adenocarcinoma, transverse colon, tubular adenoma, villous adenoma
How to cite this article: Musa Y, Mohammed MF, Muhammad NO, Yusuf I,
DOI: Abdulrahim AO, Samaila AA, et al. Clinical, endoscopic and histological
10.4103/npmj.npmj_288_20 profile of colorectal cancers seen on colonoscopy in Kano, North-Western
Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2021;28:22-6.
cancer had 2.7 and 2.1 for the two sexes.[2,3] CRC has a global Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital is an institution in Kano city,
incidence of 19.7 for both sexes with 23.6 and 16.3 for males North‑Western Nigeria. It is equipped with an endoscopy
and females, respectively.[2,3,5] suite since 1992 and manned by gastroenterologists from the
Department of Internal Medicine. The unit receives requests
CRC, though previously reported mainly amongst the middle
from Jigawa, Katsina, Bauchi, Yobe, Borno and Zamfara states.
aged and elderly worldwide,[1,6,7,9,11,13,16‑21] is now increasingly
The unit has also a colonoscopy suite which is equipped with an
reported amongst younger individuals even before the age of
Olympus adjustable procedure couch, Pentax EPK‑1000 video
20.[22‑25] Similarly, CRC has been postulated to be seen one or
colonoscope, Olympus Optera CV‑170 video system with
two decades earlier in Africans compared to Caucasians.[26]
ADVAN AMM215WTD Monitor, TE‑NE Compact Trolley
CRC has a variety of modifiable and non‑modifiable risk factors. assembly and CF‑H170 colonoscope. The common agents used
The non‑modifiable factors are ethnicity, hereditary cancer for bowel preparation are oral and rectal Bisacodyl (Dulcolax)
syndromes, family history of CRC, male gender, advancing as well as castor oil and 20% diluted oral mannitol. Boston
age, long stature, history of adenomatous polyps, history of Bowel Preparation Score is the most common guide used for
inflammatory bowel disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, previous assessing the adequacy of bowel preparation.
CRC, cystic fibrosis, abdominal radiation during childhood
The endoscopy register was reviewed, and all the patients
and cholecystectomy amongst others.[5,6,11,12,16,17,21,22,27] On the
with suspected CRC between January 2008 and December
other hand, modifiable risk factors include obesity, physical
2017 were isolated and their relevant data such as sex, age
inactivity, consumption of excessive red meat, fat and
and symptomatology or indication for the procedure as well
processed food, excessive calcium intake excessive alcohol
as endoscopic findings were noted accordingly. The biopsies
intake, low fibre intake, low Vitamin D, reduced fruits and
taken were followed up at the Histopathology Department of
vegetable intake, cigarette smoking, low socio‑economic
the same institution where previous histology registers were
status and some gut microbiota. However, high fibre diet,
checked for confirmation of histological diagnosis.
fruits, vegetables and non‑steroidal anti‑inflammatory agents
are said to be protective.[5,6,11,12,16,17,21,22,27] Variables were recorded on Microsoft Excel sheet version 2016
and transferred into computer‑based Statistical Program for
Early‑onset CRC is asymptomatic in >80% of cases, but
the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 20.0 (SPSS Inc.,
non‑specific symptoms such as malaise, weight loss, lassitude,
Chicago IL, USA) for analysis. Qualitative variables were
abdominal pain, change in bowel habits and haematochezia
summarised using mean and standard deviations and their
are less common. Similarly, late‑onset CRC (LOCRC) may be
differences determined using the t‑test. Quantitative variables
asymptomatic or identified during routine screening exercise
were grouped into proportions, median, interquartile range
on colonoscopy. However, advanced LOCRC (Stage III or IV)
and percentages and their associations determined using the
may present with distant metastasis and/or complications,[22,25]
X2 test. A confidence interval of 95% was used, and P < 0.05
features of obstruction, perforation, bleeding, abdominal
was considered statistically significant.
pain, asthenia, anaemia, altered bowel habit feeling of mass
per abdominal, bowel perforation and other constitutional
features.[11,12,22,26] Results
After thorough evaluation of the register, 135 patients
CRC prevention involves screening and lifestyle and dietary
fulfilled the colonoscopic finding of CRC with male
changes, exercise, weight reduction and removal of polyps
preponderance (63.7%). The mean age of the participants was
during screening. Drugs such as aspirin, bisphosphonates,
46.61 ± 16.03 years, with a range of 15–80 years. The modal
statins and hormones have been shown to have some protective
age was 30 years while the modal age group is 30–39 years.
effect.
Overall young and middle‑aged participants seem to have
Screening methods include faecal occult blood testing, equal frequency of occurrence amongst the study participants.
faecal immune‑histochemical test and faecal DNA, flexible Similarly, the most common presenting symptom was loose
sigmoidoscopy, computed tomography colonography, stool, followed by weight loss, anaemia and rectal bleeding.
double‑contrast barium enema and colonoscopy.[5,12,16] The detail distribution of age and clinical presentations is
The aim of this study is to evaluate retrospectively the clinical shown in Table 1.
profile of patients found with colonic tumour on endoscopy, Rectosigmoid colon was the most common area of affectation,
various sites of affectation and histology of such lesions. followed by ascending colon. Conversely, anal canal was
the least affected. Anal canal, rectosigmoid and right colon
Methodology affectations were commonly seen amongst the young, middle
aged and elderly, respectively. Similarly, colonic polyps were
This is a retrospective descriptive study of CRCs diagnosed
found to be more associated with rectosigmoid tumours.
over 10 years during endoscopy from January 2008 to
December 2017 in the Endoscopy Unit and Histopathology The most common CRC seen on histology was adenocarcinoma,
Department, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. followed by mucinous adenocarcinoma. Mucinous, signet ring
adenocarcinoma and villous adenoma were more common studies.[7,20,28‑30] Presence of CRC was found to be commoner
amongst the young (45.5%, 80% and 75%, respectively), among younger individuals in our study, a finding somehow
while adenocarcinoma was more common in the middle different from commonly reported figures.[7,14,19,20,31] However,
aged (46.2%). Table 2 shows the various tumour sites and these figures are in keeping with recently reported ones.[1,28]
histological subtypes identified.
Other histological lesions identified were metastatic
adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell
carcinoma, GI stromal tumour, inflammatory myofibroblastic
tumour, angiosarcoma and adenoid cyst carcinoma.
Figures 1‑4 show the original pictures of the colonoscopic and
histologic findings of some of the patients.
Discussion
In this 10‑year review, CRC was more prevalent amongst males
with a M: F ratio of 1.75:1, a finding similar to many previous
colorectal carcinoma among Nigerians: A 30-year review. Niger J Clin 23. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester RG, Barzi A, et al.
Pract 2011;14:432-5. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:177-93.
14. Yusuf I, Atanda AT, Umar AB, Imam MI, Mohammed AZ, Ochicha O, 24. Vuik FE, Nieuwenburg SA, Bardou M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Dinis-
et al. Cancer in Kano, Northwestern Nigeria : A 10 Year update of the Ribeiro M, Bento MJ, et al. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in
Kano cancer registry. Ann Trop Pathol 2018;8:87. young adults in Europe over the last 25 years. Gut 2019;68:1820-6.
15. Ebughe GA, Ugbem TI, Ushie DE. Cancer in cross river state. J Adv 25. Campos FG, Figueiredo MN, Monteiro M, Nahas SC, Cecconello I.
Med Med Res 2019;30:1-8. Incidence of colorectal cancer in young patients. Rev Col Bras Cir
16. Kolligs FT. Diagnostics and epidemiology of colorectal cancer. Visc 2017;44:208-15.
Med 2016;32:158-64. 26. Irabor D, Adedeji OA. Colorectal cancer in Nigeria: 40 years on.
17. Team ACS medical and Editorial Content. American Cancer Society. A review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2009;18:110-5.
Colorectal Cancer Causes, Risk Factors, and Prevention. Team ACS 27. Sierra MS, Forman D. International Agency for Research on Cancer.
medical and Editorial Content; 2018. p. 1-21. Available from: http:// Etiology of colorectal cancer (C18 – 20) in Central and South America.
www. cancer.org/cancer/colon-rectal-cancer. [Last accessed on 2020 Jan Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016. Available
05]. from: http://www-ep.iarc.fr/CSU_ resources. [Last accessed on 2020
18. Khiari H, Hsairi M. Colorectal cancer incidence and clinicopathological Feb 01].
features in Northern Tunisia 2007-2009. Color Cancer 2019;6:131-41. 28. Irabor DO, Arowolo A, Afolabi AA. Colon and rectal cancer in Ibadan,
19. Khougali HS, Albashir AA, Daffaalla HN, Salih M. Demographic and Nigeria: an update. Colorectal Dis 2010;12:e43-9.
clinicopathological patterns of colorectal cancer at the national cancer 29. Saber T, Bedran K, Ghandour F, El Khoury M, Bou Khalil R, Farhat S.
institute, Sudan. Saudi J Med Med Sci 2019;7:146-50. Results from a retrospective analysis of colonoscopies for Inflammatory
20. Golfam F, Golfam P, Neghabi Z. Frequency of all types of colorectal bowel disease and colorectal cancer in a Lebanese tertiary care centre.
tumors in the patients referred to selected hospitals in Tehran. Iran Red BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2017;4:e000167.
Crescent Med J 2013;15:473-6. 30. Graham A, Adeloye D, Grant L, Theodoratou E, Campbell H. Estimating
21. Wong MC, Ding H, Wang J, Chan PS, Huang J. Prevalence and risk the incidence of colorectal cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic
factors of colorectal cancer in Asia. Intest Res 2019;17:317-29. analysis. J Glob Health [Internet]. 2012;2(2). [About 14 p.]. Available
22. Mikaeel RR, Price TJ, Smith E, Drew PA, Uylaki W, Horsnel M, et al. from: http:// www.jogh.org. [Last Citeded on 2019 Dec 23].
Colorectal cancer in Australian young adults. Mathews J Cancer Sci 31. Irabor DO. Ethnic differences in colon and rectal cancer incidence in
2019;4:1-18. Nigeria: A case of dietary determinants? Ann Niger Med 2012;6:71‑4.