1

Republic of the Philippines

CAVITE STATE UNIVERSITY
Don Severino de las Alas Campus
Indang, Cavite

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Department of Civil Engineering

CADD LABORATORY
Class Number: ____________________ Date Performed: ______________
(Section/Student No./Given No.)

Date Submitted: ________________ Score:

Working Drawing

2-STOREY RESIDENTIAL HOUSE

Objectives:

This activity aims to express the individual creativity and craftsmanship

of students by allowing them to conceptualize and draw a design for a two-

storey residential house. It aims to enhance students’ capability in producing

scaled drawings in AutoCADD such as Architectural drawing, structural and

electrical drawings. This exercise shall enhance their designing skills with major

considerations on strength, utility and beauty of a simple residential house.

Instructions:

 Students shall conceptualize a design for a residential house and

such design should be functional and of aesthetic value.

 The lot area is 966sqm. With setback in all sides.

 2

 Proper design considerations must be applied and all standard

dimensions must be complied in their individual designs.

 Drawings shall be properly labeled and with dimensions and drawn

using a scale of 1:100m.

 Student will use proper layers in each items/drawing and proper line

weight must be applied

 Final design shall be presented in PDF, paper size must be 20x30 in

AutoCADD and landscape layout, complete with the prescribed title

block changing the plate number, title and date. All writings should

be in architectural lettering.

 These working drawing must have the following

o Architectural drawings

 Site development plan

 Perspective

 Table of contents

 Floor plans

 Elevations
 3

 Sections

 Reflected ceiling plan

 Schedule of doors and windows

 Schedule of finishes

 Other details if needed

o Structural drawings

 Foundation plan

 Floor framing plan

 Roof framing plan

o Plumbing drawings

o Electrical

 The output shall be graded according to the following rubric:

CONTENTS (60%) EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFACTORY POOR UNSATISFACTORY

CRITERIA (20) (18-19) (16-17) (14-15) (13 and below)
FLOOR PLANS Design exceeds Design meets Design slightly Design is barely Design is not capable
30% desired objectives desired objectives meets desired capable of of achieving desired
having all the having all the objectives having achieving desired objectives.
criteria set in the criteria set in the most of the objectives and not Unacceptable
design problem design problem criteria set in the meeting the presentation or no
met. visual met. design problem criteria set in the floor plan present in
communication Visual met. Visual design problem. the plate.
skills are above communication communication Poor visual
average. skills are average skills are average. communication
to above average. skills.
ELEVATON AND Work is 100% Work is consistent Work is slightly Work is Work is totally
SECTION consistent with with floor plans inconsistent with inconsistent with inconsistent with floor
20% floor plans and and properly floor plans but floor plans and plans and improperly
properly arranged. properly improperly arranged.
arranged. arranged. arranged.
OTHER DETAILS Work is 100% Work is consistent Work is slightly Work is Work is totally
10% consistent with with floor plans inconsistent with inconsistent with inconsistent with floor
floor plans and and properly floor plans but floor plans and plans and improperly
properly arranged. properly improperly arranged.
arranged. arranged. arranged.
PRESENTATION EXCELLENT GOOD SATISFACTORY POOR UNSATISFACTORY
(40%)
CRITERIA (10) (9) (8) (7) (6 and below)
CRAFTSMANSHIP Paper is clean, Paper is spotless Paper has few Paper has Paper is a mess with
10% free of smudges, and clear of smudges, some smudges, lots of smudges,
wrinkles, folds, blemishes, paper wrinkles, little wrinkles, folds, wrinkles, folds, lots of
erasing marks or is not wrinkled or evidence of messy erasing heavy erasing marks
tears on edges. folded and no erasing and an marks and an and have tears in
evidence of edge or two may edge or two may several places.
erasing or tears be torn due to be torn due to
on edges. removal of removal of
drafting tape. drafting tape.
LAYOUT Layout is 100% Shows good Shows good Shows poor Shows poor layout.
10% good. Borders are layout. Borders layout. Some layout. Most All borders are
even on all sides. are even on all borders are borders are uneven.
sides. uneven. uneven.
COMPLETENESS Work is complete Work is complete Work has Work has little Unacceptable
10% with excellent with good visual acceptable visual visual impact and presentation or no
visual impact. All impact. All items impact and 1 2 or more elevations are
elevation is elevations are present in the plate.
 4

items are labeled are labeled and missing. 1-3 items missing. 4 or No labels and
and dimensioned. dimensioned. are unlabeled and more items are dimensions shown.
without unlabeled and
dimension/s. without
dimension/s.
TITLE BLOCK Correct format Work has 1 error Work has 2-3 Work has 4 or No title block
10% used, correct on format/ errors on format/ more errors on included on the plate.
information information information format/
placement, placement/spellin placement/spellin information
correct spelling, g and has good g and has placement/spellin
correct use architectural architecturally g and has poor
of lettering lettering. acceptable architectural
techniques, lettering. lettering.
and excellent
architectural
lettering.
TOTAL SCORE

Submission:

Complete set of drawing – May 31, 2021 until 6PM