Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract— A novel and sensitive detection system is absorption/emission flame spectrometric techniques, the
introduced based on atomic emission significant advantages of this AESE system include: I) more
spectroelectrochemistry (AESE) inside flame for rapid sensitive emission during applying the electrical potential in
determination of alkali and some alkaline earth metal ions a cool flame such as H2-air; II) more improved detection
in the tested samples of rain and drinking water. In this limit and wider linear dynamic range, and III) the cheapness
design, the triangular-shaped (inverted Y) three-electrode of this method.
system consists of two stainless steel rods as the working Keywords— Atomic Emission, Spectroelectrochemistry,
and counter electrodes, and a brass rod as the pseudo- Alkali Metal, Earth Metal.
reference electrode inside the H2-air flame. The inter-
electrode distance was set to 2.0 mm using two micrometers, I. INTRODUCTION
connected to the counter and reference electrodes. The Accurate measurement of cations like Li +, Na+, and K+ is
atomic emission of metal species such as alkali and alkaline highly essential in various real environments such as
earth ions was selected as the detection system during environmental, industrial, clinical, and biological samples
applying a fixed DC potential to the electrode system. In this [1,6]. According to the literature, different analytical
system, the analyte was introduced into the flame as the methods such as atomic absorption/emission spectrometry
electrolyte via formation of aerosols using a sonicator (AAS/AES) [7,8] inductively coupled plasma (ICP) [9],
through the flow of N2 as a carrier gas. The mixture of H2 molecular/atomic fluorescence spectrometry (MFE/AFS)
and air was introduced into the flame by a capillary hole [10], ion-exchange chromatography [11] as well as
along the working electrode. To analyze each metal ion, electrochemical techniques like potentiometry using ion-
parameters such as type and quantity of supporting selective electrodes [12, 13], voltammetry [14] and electro
electrolyte, kind of electrodes, inter-electrode distance, analysis [15] [16] have been reported. However, these
applied potential, and the flow rates of H2, air, N2-were analytical techniques in spite of their advantages such as
optimized using the one-at-a-time method. According to the considerable sensitivity [17], occasionally suffer from
figures of merit under the optimized condition, this system problems including low improved detection limit, narrow
has linear dynamic ranges of 0.3-8.0, 0.26-9.6, 0.65-8.0, linear range and/or chemical/optical interferences [17, 18].
64.0-192.0, 80.0-400.0, and 160.0-800.0 µg mL-1 for Li+, For instance,AAS, for detection and determination of alkali
Na+, K+, Cs+, Ca2+, and Ba2+, respectively. Regarding 90% metals, does not have enough sensitivity [17]. Besides the
of maximum response (t90), the response time was estimated problems such as self-absorption, this technique is
to be 7.0 s. The reliability of the sensor was also evaluated sometimes limited due to the necessity of background
via determination of sodium and potassium in different correction during measuring the absorbance intensity [17].
wastewater samples. Compared to the flame photometry, no Moreover, scientific skills, such as precise control of
significant interfering effect was observed during spiking at temperature, are needed during operation of the AES for the
least 200-fold excess of some foreign species such as alkali determination purposes. Furthermore, at the best conditions
and alkaline earth metal ions to their standard solutions. An of linear ranges during direct and general determination of
appropriate correlation was evaluated during the atomic species inside the flame is often in the range of µg
comparison between the results of this method and those mL-1 levels [17].
estimated using inductively coupled plasma revealing the In the ICP analysis, regardless of its acceptable detection
reliability and acceptance of this process. The validity of limit (at ng mL-1 levels) and possibility for simultaneous
this method has also been evaluated via estimation of the detection purposes, some challenges have limited its
recovery percentages. Compared to the atomic applications including high cost of the pure argon,
Fig. 2: Diagrams of emission vs. different voltages during analyses of various cationic species
Fig. 3: The effect of applied potential on the emission intensity of atomic emission spectroscopy
Fig. 4: Diagrams of emission vs. different flow rates of H2 during individual analyses of various species
Fig. 5: Diagrams of emission vs. different flow rates of air during individual analyses of various metal ions
Fig. 6: The effect of various acidic species (0.45 M) as the source of H o on the sensitivity of Na+ (3.0 µg mL-1)
Fig. 7: Calibration curves for different metal ions using HCl (0.45 M) as a hydrogen radical generator.
Table.1: Optimized parameters during analysis of Li, Na, K, Cs, Ca and Ba by AESE.
Flow rate
Applied potential Wavelength
Species (mL min-1, ±S, n=3)
(V, ±S, n=3) (nm) [30]
Air H2
Li -100.0 ± 1.0 142±1 683±1 670.8±0.1
Na -90.0 ± 1.0 25±1 560±1 589.0±0.1
K -50.0 ± 1.0 101±1 560±1 766.0±0.1
Cs -90.0 ± 1.0 4±1 560±1 852.1±0.1
Ca -100.0 ± 1.0 313±1 683±1 422.7±0.1
Ba -160.0 ± 1.0 V 419±1 560±1 553.6±0.1
Table.2: Figures of merit during analysis of alkali ions by the atomic emission spectroelectrochemistry.
Linear dynamic range Correlation coefficient Detection limit
Metal ions -1
(µg mL ) (R, ±S, n=3) (µg mL-1 , ±S, n=3)
+
Li 0.30- 8.0 0.984±0.002 0.070±0.008
Na+ 0.26- 9.6 0.990±0.003 0.090±0.005
+
K 0.65-8.0 0.997±0.003 0.040±0.002
Cs+ 65.0- 192.0 0.989±0.002 40.0±0.1
Ca2+ 80.0-400.0 0.993±0.005 60.0±0.2
2+ 160.0- 800.0 0.996±0.004 70.0±0.2
Ba
Table.4: Comparison between some figures of merit between present study and previously reported methods for
alkali ions detection.
Analytical method Detectio An Dynamic range R
n limit alyzed eference
(µg mL- sample
1
)
Atomic emission using low- 0.013 μg Dri 0.4–2140 μg L−1 [
power capacitively coupled plasma L −1
nking water (0.4×10 -3
-2140×10 -3
μg 27]
microtorch and microspectrometer (1.3×10- mL−1)
(Li) 5
μg mL ) −1
3.2 ng L-
1 Po 25-250 ng L-1
[
Ion chromatography(Na) wer plant (25×10-6-250×10-6μg
(3.2×10- 28]
samples mL−1)
6
μg mL−1)
Flow-injection system with 9.6×10−6 Co 1.0×10−5 to 1.0×10−1mol [
−1
tubular ion-selective electrodes (K) mol L conut water L−1 29]
(0.375 samples (0.391-3909.83 μg mL−1)
μg mL−1)
5.6×10−6 1.0×10−5 to 1.0×10−1mol
−1 Co −1
Flow-injection system with mol L L [
conut water
tubular ion-selective electrodes (Ca) (0.2244μ (40.078×10 −2
- 29]
samples
g mL−1) 40.078×102μg mL−1)
-
0.06×10
3
, 0.2×10-
3
,0.3×10-3,0.8×10-
3 ---- [
ICP-OES ,0.03×10-3 for Li, -------
- 30]
Na, K, Ca, Ba
respectively (μg
mL−1)
(0.02-5 Li),(0.02-5
--------- ---- [
Atomic Absorption Na),(0.03-2.0 K),(0.04-5Cs),(0.01-
-- 30]
3Ca),(0.02-50Ba)μg mL−1
0.07 for
Li,0.09 for
Dri 0.30- 8.0 for Li, 0.26- 9.6
Na,0.04 for --
nking water for Na, 0.65-8.0 for K, 65.0- 192.0
Present study K,40.0 for ---
and rain for Cs, 80.0-400.0 for Ca, 160.0-
Cs,60.0 for
water 800.0 for Ba (µg mL-1)
Ca,70.0 for Ba
(µg mL-1)