You are on page 1of 3

PERSPECTIVES

ANTHROPOLOGY
What was the function of early Asian pottery,
On the Invention of Pottery which predates the invention of agriculture
by about 10,000 years?

Gideon Shelach

O
n page 1696 of this issue, human bones and identification
1 2 3 4
Wu et al. (1) report the of plant starch and animal pro-
latest of a series of excit- teins extracted from potshards
ing discoveries made over the and grinding stones.
past 20 years that have pushed One of the issues most rel-
back the earliest evidence for the evant to understanding socio-
invention of pottery by more than economic change—not only in
10,000 years. Like their findings at prehistoric societies but also in
the Xianrendong Cave (1), most 5 6 7 8 historic and even modern soci-
of the earliest pottery has been eties—is the context of techno-
discovered in south China (the logical innovations, or more spe-

Downloaded from https://www.science.org at National Cheng Kung University on September 21, 2021
Yangzi River basin and areas south cifically, the ways in which tech-
of it), but evidence for early pot- nologies are invented, developed,
tery is also known from the Yel- and adopted by society. The prov-
low River basin, and indeed from 10 mm erb “necessity is the mother of
a much larger area of East Asia all invention” not only assumes
that includes Japan and the Amur a direct functional explanation,
9 10
River basin (2–4). The early dat- but also assumes that conditions
ing of East Asian ceramics refutes of stress (caused by external
the idea that the beginning of pot- forces, such as climate change,
tery production was associated or by internal social tension)
with the transition to agriculture. force people to change their
What was the societal context for old ways of doing things. Such
its invention? assumptions are embedded in the
Documenting the invention 30 mm idea that the scarcity of resources
and development of one of human- during the LGM forced people to
Socioeconomic changes before the invention of agriculture. Artifacts from
kind’s most fundamental technolo- Locality 1 of the Longwangchan site (the Yellow River basin) dated to ~25,000 develop better ways of collecting
gies captures the imagination and calendar years before present (8): 1 to 4, microblade cores; 5 to 7, microlithic and processing food (1, 6, 9).
is of great scientific importance. tools; 8, shell; 9, shovel; 10, grinding slab (quern). These and other technolo- However, the archaeologi-
However, understanding the socio- gies invented during the Last Glacial Maximum point to a time of socioeconomic cal data suggest that grinding
economic reasons for the devel- development long before the invention of agriculture. Wu et al. contribute to this stones only started to be widely

PHOTO CREDIT: WANG XIAOQING/INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY, CHINESE ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES


opment of pottery and the ways field by reporting pottery remains dated to ~20,000 years ago. used toward the end of the last
in which this new technology glacial age, ~13,000 years ago;
evolved and affected human adaptation and It has long been suggested that broaden- ceramic production on a larger scale may
social norms is no less interesting or impor- ing the spectrum of the human diet—includ- have commenced even later. It is thus likely
tant. Research advances that address these ing the consumption of foods that are hard to that these technologies initially had a much
issues have not been as dramatic. process and digest, of which cereals (rice and more limited set of functions, and that their
The period around the Last Glacial Maxi- millet in China) are but one type—eventually full socioeconomic potential remained dor-
mum (LGM), about 25,000 to 19,000 years led to the cultivation of wild plants and finally mant until ecological and social conditions
ago, saw the advent of a new technological to their domestication (10). This remains provided opportunities for the realization of
array that, in addition to pottery, included in a viable hypothesis about the initiation of this potential.
many parts of China the production of small a long-term process that resulted in one of This more complex trajectory allows
flake tools (or microliths) and grinding slab humankind’s most dramatic revolutions: the for the possibility that the new technologies
stones (5–8) (see the figure). It is widely held transition to food production, domestication were initially developed for a different func-
(6, 9) that the artifacts produced by these new of plants and animals, adoption of a sedentary tion from that which they ultimately served
technologies enabled exploitation of a wider way of life, and ultimately, the development with greater economic and/or social effect.
range of plants and animals and more effi- of more complex societies. For example, contrary to the assumption that
cient extraction of their nutritional elements However, the validity of this hypothesis grinding stones were important because they
through grinding and intensive cooking. The should not be assumed. Rather, it should facilitated the consumption of wild cere-
technological advances during the LGM pre- be tested using systematic research meth- als, preliminary analysis of plant remains
date agriculture by at least 10,000 years. ods and scientific tools. For example, the extracted from early slab querns and use-
diet of ancient human populations and the marks found on the querns suggest that the
Department of East Asian Studies, Hebrew University, Jeru- foods processed by prehistoric tools can querns were used to process acorns or even
salem 91905, Israel. E-mail: msshe@huji.ac.il be studied through chemical analysis of nonfood materials such as pigments (6, 11).

1644 29 JUNE 2012 VOL 336 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org


Published by AAAS
PERSPECTIVES

Similar trajectories for the development of Research endeavors such as those led by sition to agriculture, signifies a fundamental
grinding technologies are known from the Wu et al. are fundamental for a better under- difference in the socioeconomic development
Levant as well. Thus, technological change standing of socioeconomic change during the of the two regions.
should not be conceived of as the conse- LGM and the developments that led to the
quence of one-off innovations, but rather as a emergence of sedentary agricultural societ- References
1. X. Wu et al., Science 336, 1696 (2012).
long-term process that involves not only tech- ies. However, anthropological perspectives on 2. E. Boaretto et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 9595
nological improvements but also the adapta- the context of pottery invention should help (2009).
tion and change of economic habits and nego- to broaden scientific attention from discovery 3. Hebeisheng, Acta Archaeol. Sin. Kaogu Xuabao 3, 361
tiations over cultural norms. and dating to the functions of early pottery (2010).
4. V. Y. Kuzmin, Antiquity 80, 362 (2006).
It is possible that pottery and other early and its social context. Research of this kind 5. T. Chung, J. East Asian Archaeol. 2, 37 (2000).
technologies were invented independently in could elucidate the development of human 6. R. G. Elston et al., Quat. Int. 242, 401 (2011).
different places. However, the fact that early societies in East Asia, as well as opening up 7. B. D. Madsen, R. G. Elston, in Late Quaternary Climate
Change and Human Adaptation in Arid China, D. B.
pottery is widely distributed in East Asia new perspectives on the evolution of human Madsen, F. H. Chen, X. Gao, Eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam,
among different societies in many different societies and the origins of social complex- 2007), pp. 69–82.
environments, but not found among preag- ity in general. More general issues awaiting 8. J.-F. Zhang et al., J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 1537 (2011).
9. O. Bar-Yosef, Curr. Anthropol. 52, S175 (2011).
ricultural societies elsewhere, suggests that serious consideration include, for example,
10. M. C. Stiner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 6993 (2001).
it spread in East Asia through intersocietal whether the fact that in East Asia pottery 11. L. Liu et al., J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 2630 (2010).
interactions, perhaps along with other ideas predates agriculture by some 10 millennia,

Downloaded from https://www.science.org at National Cheng Kung University on September 21, 2021
and technologies. whereas in the Levant it postdates the tran- 10.1126/science.1224119

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Protein synthesis that does not initiate with

A New Start for Protein Synthesis methionine is used by the mammalian immune
system to process antigen.

Thomas E. Dever

R
ecent technical advances have led to the ribosome decodes the mRNA in blocks of methionine initiation pathway, CUG-leucine
the accumulation of vast amounts three consecutive nucleotides, or codons, that can also be used to initiate protein synthesis.
of DNA sequences, highlighting the each specify an amino acid. But, how does When decoding an mRNA, ribosomes
importance of understanding how the infor- the ribosome know where to start reading on rely on transfer RNA (tRNA) molecules,
mation in DNA is translated into amino acids the mRNA? To ensure faithful translation, each of which is covalently attached to a
and proteins. To decipher this information, and thereby yield a functional protein, cells specific amino acid at one end, while three
the cell first transcribes a “coding” segment restrict translation initiation to AUG codons nucleotides in the so-called anticodon loop
of DNA into messenger RNA (mRNA). Next, that specify the amino acid methionine (Met). at the other end pairs with a codon on the
In mammals and other eukaryotic cells, trans- mRNA. Cells express two types of methio-
lation typically initiates at the AUG codon nyl-tRNA: elongator tRNAeMet decodes AUG
Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Development, Eunice closest to the beginning of the mRNA. But codons within reading frames, whereas ini-
Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development, National Institutes of Health, on page 1719 of this issue, Starck et al. (1) tiator tRNAiMet is used exclusively to initiate
Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. E-mail: tdever@nih.gov show that in addition to the canonical AUG- translation. The eukaryotic translation ini-
CREDIT: C. BICKEL/SCIENCE

How to begin? In the canonical initiation pathway (A), eIF2 delivers Met-tRNAiMet tion elongation factor eEF1A delivers Leu-tRNALeu-CAG to decode CUG codons.
to the ribosome. Base-pairing between tRNAiMet and the mRNA directs protein Starck et al. show (B) that Leu-tRNALeu-CAG can also direct protein synthesis to
synthesis to start at an AUG codon. During translation elongation, the transla- start at a CUG codon.

www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 336 29 JUNE 2012 1645


Published by AAAS
On the Invention of Pottery
Gideon Shelach

Science, 336 (6089),

View the article online


https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1224119

Downloaded from https://www.science.org at National Cheng Kung University on September 21, 2021
Permissions
https://www.science.org/help/reprints-and-permissions

Use of think article is subject to the Terms of service

Science (ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1200 New York Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
Copyright © 2012, American Association for the Advancement of Science

You might also like