Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4, 2006
Girish H. Subramanian*
and Abdullah C. Iyigungor
School of Business, E355 Olmsted Building
Penn State Harrisburg, 777 W. Harrisburg Pike
Middletown, PA, 17057, USA
E-mail: ghs2@psu.edu
Fax: (717) 948–6456
*Corresponding author
1 Introduction
The term ‘Supply Chain Management (SCM)’ arose in the late 1980s and came into
widespread use in the 1990s. Prior to that time, businesses used terms such as ‘logistics’
and ‘operations management’ instead of SCM (Hugos, 2003). Lambert et al. (1998)
simply define supply chain as the alignment of firms that bring products or services to
market. According to Swaminathan and Tayur (2003), a supply chain “is a set of entities
involved in the design of new products and services, procuring raw materials,
transforming them into semi-finished and finished products, and delivering them to the
end customer”.
IT can provide the following functions to improve SCM (Russell and Taylor, III,
2003; Handfield and Nichols, 1999): centralised coordination of information flows,
integration of transportation, the ability to locate and track the movement of every item in
the supply chain, consolidation of purchasing from all suppliers, intercompany and
intracompany information access and information sharing, data interchange, data
acquisition at the point of origin and point of sale, instantaneous updating of inventory
levels in real time, and improvements in supplier-customer relationships.
In this paper, we use three case studies (Wal-Mart, Amazon.com and UPS) to see the
use of IT in SCM. Wal-Mart continuously seeks for a way to reduce its inventory by
improving the cycle times and increasing the flow of information within its supply chains
in order to further reduce its prices. On the other hand, Amazon strives to improve its
SCM so that it can pass along the related savings to its customers in the form of lower
prices. Supply chain technologies provide Amazon the ability to minimise human
intervention, communication with its supply chain members in real time, and proper
shipment of products to consumers on time. In the third case, UPS utilises its innovative
supply chain technologies to provide third-party logistics (3PL) solutions in the most
efficient way for its customer companies.
We review the SCM and use of IT in SCM. We present the research methodology
and our case study approach. Then, we discuss SCM and use of IT in SCM at
Wal-Mart, Amazon, and UPS. We analyse the cases and compare them. Finally, we
conclude the paper.
A supply chain encompasses all activities associated with the flow and transformation of
goods and services from the raw materials stage to the end user, as well as the associated
information flows. Fundamentally, it consists of all the assets, information, and processes
that provide ‘supply’ (Russell and Taylor, III, 2003). Ellram et al. (2004) define SCM as
the management of information, processes, goods and funds from the earliest supplier to
the ultimate customer, including disposal. Tracey et al. (2004) describe SCM as a
philosophy that views a business as an interrelated entity with many parts that seeks to
integrate all aspects of the chain’s resources to provide superior value to customers.
Bagchi and Larsen (2003) specify that by realising the synergy that exist among
functions such as transportation, procurement, inventory control, distribution, and
customer service, many companies have extended the concept further upstream and
downstream to include entities outside the company including vendors and their vendors
and customers and their customers. As stated in McLaughlin et al. (2003) companies are
372 G.H. Subramanian and A.C. Iyigungor
aggressively pursuing initiatives to better manage their supply chains. Hadley (2004)
clarifies that the goal of supply chain planning is to create plans that minimise total
supply chain costs while maintaining desired customer service levels. Yu et al. (2001)
state that uncertainties are caused by delayed deliveries, machine breakdowns, order
fluctuations, etc. and therefore, can propagate through the supply chain in the form of
amplification of ordering variability.
Giannakis and Croom (2004) expands SCM with a conceptual framework. Their
analysis clarifies that the supply chain field uses a summary of three strategic dimensions
relating to the physical structure of supply chains which they name ‘synthesis’
dimension, human interaction and relations within the supply chain which is ‘synergy’
dimension, and the coordination and control of operations processes across the supply
chain which is ‘synchronisation’ dimension.
Today, much of the current interest in SCM is focused on the capabilities of
information technology to link and coordinate the chain members in the entire supply
chain. Several technologies are used in the supply chain. Croson and Donohue (2003)
suggest that Point-of-Sale (POS) data leads to a reduction in the bullwhip effect when
suppliers have no prior knowledge of the demand distribution.
The basic relationship among supply chain members is the Business-to-Business
(B2B) type relationship. According to Gibson and Edwards (2004), the most significant
enabler of improved SCM is B2B e-commerce. They also state that e-businesses can offer
significant improvements by removing gaps in communication and maintaining a focused
view of the service received by the final customer. E-procurement is a part of B2B
commerce which is conducted on the internet. In e-procurement, buyers make purchases
directly from suppliers through their websites using software packages or through
e-marketplaces (Russell and Taylor, III, 2003). E-commerce provides firms with a new
platform of business network which is referred as e-marketplaces. This network is
composed of business networks that interact with each other via the internet. Russell and
Taylor III (2003) define e-marketplaces as websites where companies and suppliers
conduct B2B activities. Kandampully (2003) sees e-marketplaces as an organisational
information system that allows the participating buyers and sellers to exchange
information about prices and product offerings. Delfmann et al. (2002) state that
e-commerce for suppliers become visible through e-marketplaces, where a fraction of
their products are procured from their customers.
Angulo et al. (2004) studied the impacts of information delay and accuracy among
supply chain members. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) has the ability to interface
with all processes including the manufacturing of system requirements within the
firm (Nah, 2004). EDI is a computer-to-computer exchange of business documents
in a standard format that has been established by the American National Standards
Institute (ANSI) and the International Standards Organization (ISO) (Russell and
Taylor, III, 2003). The essence of EDI is the ability to transfer data among computers
from different companies.
3 Research methodology
Due to the fact that the area of supply chain management and use of information
technologies is applied in nature, a case study approach is employed to conduct the
research. An analysis of three case studies of companies which have significant
Information systems in supply chain management 373
contributions to the use of information systems in supply chain is presented. The three
companies are Wal-Mart, Amazon.com, and UPS. Wal-Mart is a retailer, Amazon is an
e-retailer, and UPS is a logistics and transportation service provider.
Case study techniques, such as obtaining historical data, examining documentation,
and archival sources provide insight into the use of information systems by these
three organisations. A systematic method of scanning websites, annual reports,
publications, texts, and journal articles is used to obtain information about these three
organisations. The information is sorted into similar and different SCMs and the use of
information technologies in SCM. We suggest that integrated information systems using
telecommunications, data warehouses, e-commerce, and automated input devices are the
basis for the effective use of IT in supply chain management. Through these case studies,
we would like to study the use of these information technologies such as satellite
systems, barcodes, web-based EDI, RFID, data warehousing, and e-commerce in these
organisations and to arrive at a comparison of the use of these technologies.
Barcoding devices enable efficient picking, receiving and proper inventory control of
the appropriate goods, easy order packing and physical counting of the inventories. The
handheld devices guide an employee with regard to the location of a particular product
from a particular bin or shelf in the centre. The hand-held device also enables the
packaging department to get reliable information about the products to be packed. It
displays all information about the storage, packaging and shipping of a particular product
therefore saving time on unnecessary paperwork.1
Gilligan (2004) claims that RFID will probably supplant barcodes for much of the
work of gathering logistics information. Wal-Mart is going to replace barcodes with
RFID tags for major suppliers. Wal-Mart considers this technology as a key to reducing
inventory and distribution expenses further. According to Woollacott (2004), Wal-Mart
has been working on RFID since the 1990s. Wal-Mart has been trying to collaborate with
its suppliers through RFID by making the technology easier for suppliers to adopt.
Sullivan (2004) states that collaboration is critical for speed, efficiency, and innovation.
Additional supply chain visibility through RFID will help reduce out-of-stock items and
to lower inventory levels. RFID can provide better solutions to align product distribution
with actual shelf-specific demand, reduce safety stock inventory, inventory obsolescence,
material handling costs, and stock-outs (Kinsella, 2003).
According to Foote and Krishnamurthi (2001), Wal-Mart’s initial database systems
were capable of reporting only averages and summaries of their operations before it
realised that relying on averages does not always represent specific store, time and
market information.
Today, NCR’s Teradata software, a data handling system, which is a core component
used in Wal-Mart’s data warehouse is believed to be one of the biggest data warehouse
systems in the retailing industry. This system provides substantial parallel computing and
data storage infrastructure (Foote and Krishnamurthi, 2001).
Wal-Mart initially started with a 700 GB of data to manage its point-of-sale.
However, that 700 GB of data is ridiculously low compared to the 460 terabytes of
data that is used today for storing data from buyers and 10 000 suppliers in terms of
inventory, forecasts, markdowns, demographics, returns, and market baskets. This
tremendous amount of data stored on the company mainframes allows Wal-Mart to study
shopping patterns of consumers that includes a diverse collection of goods (Foote and
Krishnamurthi, 2001). This data warehousing is also the foundation of ‘Retail Link’
extranet system that Wal-Mart’s suppliers use to study inventory and sales information.
Wal-Mart’s strategy to share data with its vendor partners has been implemented
through a tool named ‘Retail Link’. This tool links all Wal-Mart’s important data with
vendor partners and carriers. It integrates the company’s EDI networks with an extranet
that is built and operated by Wal-Mart. This system lets buyers and over 10 000 suppliers
to utilise data on sales and inventory levels in every store (Janoff, 2000).
The use of extranet, as in Retail Link, can substantially decrease EDI costs and it
better allows for data synchronisation and collaboration. However, companies are looking
to move some or all of their EDI transactions to the internet. Bednarz (2004a) states that,
Wal-Mart requires the use of internet EDI software that adheres to Applicability
Statement 2 (AS2).
376 G.H. Subramanian and A.C. Iyigungor
Wal-Mart is expanding via its website, Walmart.com. The site is in the top ten
dotcom retailers in terms of number of visitors. Wal-Mart’s e-commerce site was
launched in 1996 and has a password-protected service from Verified by Visa
(Sullivan, 2004).
website personalisation. Consumers benefit from the data warehouse through the
Amazon.com shopping experience, with features such as product recommendations and
personalised storefronts. About 800 Amazon.com employees from every department in
the company tap into the Oracle data warehouse. Employees submit over 4000 queries
daily, and growth rates are substantial.4–5
Amazon’s database system is updated six times per day. Also, the flexibility of the
Oracle database has made Amazon’s business growth and changes much less painful than
before. Oracle database’s ability to support rapid growth, change and handle increasingly
complex query requirements is helpful for Amazon.4–5
Amazon’s SCM strategy seeks to optimise cycle times and costs. In order to do this
Amazon chose to outsource its supply chain logistics software to Manugistics Group Inc.
Amazon.com uses two products from the Manugistics NetWorks e-business suite:
NetWorks Strategy and NetWorks Transport. The former system was used to plan the
flow of goods through Amazon’s transportation and facility network in the USA and
Europe. This e-business suite is used to design an optimal global network by identifying
desirable locations worldwide for new distribution centres. The software is also used to
determine what quantity of each item should be kept on hand.2–5
Wheatley (2000) states that the Manugistics’ NetWorks provides Amazon the ability
to set optimal inventory levels and decide appropriate product mix and storage capacity
across the network. The solution will even suggest season pre-builds and optimal lane
volumes to maximise customer service during the holiday season and other peak periods.
By providing greater inventory visibility, NetWorks additionally will enable Amazon to
consolidate individual shipments across all shipping operations.
Database and e-business software vendor Excelon Corp. was selected to rebuild
Amazon’s B2B supply chain. Amazon utilises a private exchange that links the company
to its suppliers for toys, CDs, electronics, and all other products other than books.
Excelon’s B2B Integration Server links up supplier’s systems and a B2B Portal Server to
build a product catalogue for use with wireless devices. The system will let Amazon.com
and its suppliers communicate in real-time on orders and shipments. In addition,
Amazon’s largest suppliers will be able to manage their own inventories via connections
to Amazon’s back-office applications.4–5
Amazon opened its virtual doors in 1995 with a mission to use internet and transform
book buying into the fastest, easiest, and most enjoyable shopping experience possible.
Amazon is one of the largest online retailers, offering almost every product in
many categories.
Amazon’s website is the essential supply chain link between consumers and the
company. According to Post and Anderson (2003), Amazon uses the Secure Netscape
Commerce Server to handle online sales. Customers can conveniently enter their credit
card information online using any computer network that supports the Secure Sockets
Layer specification. Amazon’s inventory system is run on separate computers and is not
directly connected to its website. Consumers can easily access a range of information
including special discounts, online tracking, product availability, estimated delivery
time, setup help, troubleshooting, recommendations, warranty and rebate information,
comparisons to other products, chat areas, etc.
Amazon also creates websites and shares its e-commerce technology in exchange for
percentage of sales. Amazon offers this web services for consumers and other businesses
in the form of online auctions and third party vendors. Amazon has several types of
partners that need access to its systems for various reasons. Greenfield (2004) classifies
Information systems in supply chain management 379
these types of partners as: large partners that need efficiency, outside developers that
want to create new solutions and applications, third party vendors that want to list their
products, and website operators that want to merchandise Amazon products through
separate marketing programmes. Therefore, Amazon provides web services to these
parties through a set of Application Program Interfaces (APIs). Web services also support
a wide range of XML-based protocols for data transfer, and Simple Object Access
Protocol to access the site’s functionality.
state-of-the-art operating system and IT that UPS has been utilising are critical for their
customers to monitor data and events. Customers of UPS-SCS can access data whenever
they need it and the information is available to them 24/7.9
technology such as package sequencing and data overflow. UPS is putting RFID tags to
its trucks to monitor the arrival and departure of its trucks to eliminate the need for
drivers to sign in and out. Moreover, RFID labels replace barcoding in select distribution
centres (Bednarz, 2004b).
7 Analysis of cases
Wal-Mart and Amazon have established critical and timely strategies in their supply
chains through huge investments in IT. While Wal-Mart and Amazon are offering
their products to consumers, UPS-SCS offers logistics solutions for both B2B and
B2C transactions. Table 1 provides a comparison of the SCM strategies used by these
three organisations.
Supply chain
criteria Wal-Mart Amazon UPS
Distribution Critical; expands Large distribution centres Multi-client distribution centres and a
centres around these centres that are highly automated. sophisticated IT system to deliver
Centres equidistant among SCM solutions to customers.
major population centres Customers can use UPS’s distribution
network and get instant presence in
domestic and global markets.
Inventory Fast; competes on Critical; major investment in Optimal inventory management for
management speed IT for optimally managing clients focusing mostly on
inventory; communicating transportation and in-process
information to suppliers inventory
for JIT.
Management Suppliers have to Due to being a e-retailer, Service provider to suppliers and
of suppliers be very efficient Amazon provides quick e-retailers like Amazon
and optimal; high information to suppliers and
pressure on suppliers e-merchants to fulfil orders.
to conform Amazon also can ship from
its warehouses.
SCM service No Helps other e-merchants Yes; major SCM service provider.
provider have a presence on Provides IT, distribution and logistics
amazon.com systems and services for clients.
Wal-Mart shares real-time information from its many retail stores directly with its
major suppliers through state-of-the-art supply chain technologies. Wal-Mart’s ability to
manage its inventory and reduce transportation costs is the reason why the company is
successful in the retail industry. Wal-Mart competes on speed and price. It has pioneered
some supply chain applications such as ‘cross docking’, and barcode scanning and
point-of-sale applications. Wal-Mart utilises its own private satellite network, the world’s
largest retailer database system, barcode scanning technology, RFID, web-based EDI,
and e-commerce to make its supply chain efficient.
Amazon also competes on speed and price. Cost reduction is the primary reason for
Amazon to initiate supply chain improvements. Amazon’s supply chain efficiency is
based on its operations philosophy, which are JIT and TQM. Competition is fierce in the
Information systems in supply chain management 383
e-retailing industry thus Amazon is utilising one of the largest data warehouses, a supply
chain technology from Manugistic Group Inc., and a B2B integration software from
Excelon. Amazon’s website is its critical link with its customers.
UPS provides solutions to companies so they can better manage their supply chains.
UPS has the largest DB2 database in the world. UPS also has its own satellite to increase
data transfer speeds and provide package visibility. UPS also provides package tracking,
expense management, reverse logistics, and several transportation tools through its
website. It also utilises RFID technology in some of its distribution centres.
8 Conclusion
Acknowledgement
References
Amazon.com, Inc. (2004) Amazon.com (Annual Report), Seattle, Washington: Ernst and Young.
Angulo, A., Nachtmann, H. and Waller, M.A. (2004) ‘Supply chain information sharing in a vendor
managed inventory partnership’, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp.102–121.
Anonymous (2004a) ‘Continue making investments in supply chain technology (logistics
management)’, Executive Quote and Information Services: EQUIS.
Anonymous (2004b) ‘Logistics today’s: 10 best supply chains of 2004’, Logistic Today, Vol. 45,
No. 12, pp.17–23.
Bacheldor, B. (2004) ‘From scratch: Amazon keeps supply chain close to home’, Information
Week, Vol. 23, No. 979, pp.40–41.
Bagchi, P.K. and Larsen, T.S. (2003) ‘Integration of information technology and organizations in a
supply chain’, International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.89–98.
Bednarz, A. (2004a) ‘Internet EDI: blending old and new’, Network World, 21, No. 8, pp.29–30.
Bednarz, A. (2004b) ‘RFID joins wireless lineup at UPS’, Network World, Vol. 21, No. 38, p.8.
Information systems in supply chain management 385
Croson, R. and Donohue, K. (2003) ‘Impact of POS data sharing on supply chain management: an
experimental study’, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.1–12.
Delfmann, W., Albers, S. and Gehring, M. (2002) ‘The impact of electronic commerce on logistics
service providers’, International Journal of Physical and Logistics Management, Vol. 32,
Nos. 3–4, pp.203–223.
Elbert, B. (n.d.) ‘Making your idea happen – creating a viable satellite application’,
Application Technology Strategy, http://www.applicationstrategy.com/Making%20Your
%20Idea%20Happen.htm (retrieved 24 March 2005).
Ellram, L.M., Tate, W.L. and Billington, C. (2004) ‘Understanding and managing the services
supply chain’, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp.17–33.
Eskew, M. (2004) ‘The art (and science) of delivery’, Chief Executive, Vol. 3, No. 201, p.16.
Fishman, C. (2003) ‘The Wal-Mart you don’t know’, Fast Company, Vol. 77, No. 1, pp.68–78.
Foote, P.S. and Krishnamurthi, M. (2001) ‘Forecasting using data warehousing model: Wal-Mart’s
experience’, The Journal of Business Forecasting Methods and Systems, Fall, Vol. 20, No. 3,
pp.13–18.
Giannakis, M. and Croom, S.R. (2004) ‘Toward the development of a supply chain management
paradigm: a conceptual framework’, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 40, No. 2,
pp.27–37.
Gibson, P.R. and Edwards, J. (2004) ‘The strategic importance of e-commerce in modern supply
chains’, Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp.59–76.
Gilligan, E. (2004) ‘Ready for battle?’, Journal of Commerce, Vol. 15, p.1.
Grean, M. and Shaw, M.J. (n.d.) Supply-Chain Integration through Information Sharing: Channel
Partnership between Wal-Mart and Procter and Gamble, http://citebm.business.uiuc.edu/IT
_cases/Graen-Shaw-PG.pdf (retrieved 26 March 2005).
Greenfield, D. (2004) ‘Amazon: website to web services’, Network Magazine, Vol. 19, No. 10,
p.58.
Hadley, S. (2004) ‘Making the supply chain management business case’, Strategic Finance,
Vol. 85, No. 10, pp.28–34.
Handfield, R.B. and Nichols, E.L. (1999) Introduction to Supply Chain Management, New Jersey:
Upper Saddle River.
Hugos, M. (2003) Essentials of Supply Chain Management, New Jersey: Hoboken.
Janoff, B. (2000) ‘High-tech knowledge’, Progressive Grocer, Vol. 79, No. 12, pp.45–48.
Kandampully, J. (2003) B2B relationships and networks in the internet age’, Management
Decision, Vol. 41, Nos. 5–6, pp.443–452.
Kinsella, B. (2003) ‘The Wal-Mart factor’, Industrial Engineer, Vol. 35, No. 11, pp.32–36.
Lambert, D.M., Stock, J.R. and Ellram, L.M. (1998) Fundamentals of Logistics Management,
Boston, MA.
McLaughlin, J., Motwani, J., Madan, M.S. and Gunasekaran, A. (2003) ‘Using information
technology to improve downstream supply chain operations: a case study’, Business Process
Management Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.69–83.
Maloney, D. (2000) ‘E-conveyors’, Modern Materials Handling, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp.49–53.
Nah, F. (2004) ‘Supply chain and enterprise systems management and solutions’, Information
Resources Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp.1–3.
Post, G.V. and Anderson, D.L. (2003) Management Information Systems: Solving Business
Problems with Information Technology, 3rd ed., New York, NY.
Russell, R. and Taylor, III, B. (2003) Operations Management, 4th ed., New Jersey: Upper Saddle
River.
Sullivan, L. (2004) ‘E-commerce: promise fulfilled’, InformationWeek, Vol. 10, No. 13, pp.70–73.
386 G.H. Subramanian and A.C. Iyigungor
Swaminathan, J.M. and Tayur, S.R. (2003) ‘Models for supply chains in e-business’, Management
Science, Vol. 49, No. 10, p.1387.
Taylor, D.A. (n.d.) A Manager’s Guide – Chapter 1, http://www.businessintelligence.com/ex/asp/
id.4/page.1/xe/biextractdetail.htm (retrieved 29 March 2005).
Tracey, M., Fite, R.W. and Sutton, M.J. (2004) ‘An explanatory model and measurement
instrument: a guide to supply chain management research and applications’, Mid-American
Journal of Business, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.53–82.
Wheatley, B. (2000) ‘Amazon.com sees supply chain as crucial to its future’, Global Logistics and
Supply Chain Strategies, September, http://www.supplychainbrain.com/archives/9.00.Amazon
.htm?adcode=5 (retrieved 29 March 2005).
Woollacott, E. (2004) ‘Will RFID make the grade?’, Computer Trade Shopper, Sutton,
3 November, p.32.
Yu, Z., Yan, H. and Cheng, T.C.E. (2001) ‘Benefits of information sharing with supply chain
partnership’, Industrial Management and Data, Vol. 102, Nos. 3–4, pp.114–120.
Notes
1 Managing the Supply Chain (n.d.) Retrieved 21 March 2005, from Center for Management
Research Website: http://icmr.icfai.org/casestudies/Managing%20supply%20chain.html.
2 Amazon.com Company Overview (n.d.) Retrieved 28 March 2005, from Value Line
Investment Survey Website: http://www.valueline.com.
3 Amazon.com, Inc. Company Overview (n.d.) Retrieved 28 March 2005, from
http://www.hoovers.com.
4 Amazon.com’s Rapidly Growing 10TB Data Warehouse Pays for Itself in Six Months
(n.d.) Retrieved 29 March 2005, http://www.oracle.com/pls/cis/Profiles.print_html?p_profile
_id=3165.
5 Amazon’s IT Agenda (n.d.) Retrieved 30 March 2005, from Information Week Website:
http://www.informationweek.com/811/pramazon.htm.
6 Linux Infrastructure (n.d.) Retrieved 28 March 2005, from the Computer Weekly Website:
http://www.computerweekly.com/Article127751.htm.
7 Design and Planning (n.d.) Retrieved 7 March 2005, from UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Website: http://www.ups-scs.com/logistics/designconsulting.html.
8 Distribution (n.d.) Retrieved 7 March 2005, from UPS Supply Chain Solutions Website:
http://www.ups-scs.com/logistics/distribution.html.
9 Supplier management (n.d.) Retrieved 7 March 2005, from UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Website: http://www.ups-scs.com/logistics/supplier.html.
10 Flex Global View (n.d.) Retrieved 8 March 2005, from UPS Supply Chain Solutions Website:
http://www.ups-scs.com/tools/fgv/index.html.
11 Online! Service Parts (n.d.) Retrieved 7 March 2005, from UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Website: https://online.spl.ups-scs.com/splus3site/index.html.
12 UPS E-Commerce Solutions (n.d.) Retrieved 11 March 2005, from UPS E-Commerce
Website: http://www.ec.ups.com/ecommerce/solutions/c1.html.
13 UPS Logistics Technologies (n.d.) Retrieved 14 March 2005, from UPS Logistics
Technologies Website: http://www.upslogisticstech.com/.
14 Roadnet Transportation Suite (n.d.) Retrieved 14 March 2005, from UPS Logistics
Technologies Website: http://www.upslogisticstech.com/pages/products/rts/.
15 UPS Sonic Air Same Day Service (n.d.) Retrieved 6 March 2005, from UPS Supply Chain
Solutions Website: http://www.sonicair.ups.com/ups/.