It takes a courageous gallery to search the world for examples
of a single painting and exhibit them next to their own version so that everyone can see its weaknesses. Although I suspect this was not the intention at all.
In the 19th century, Guido Reni's Saint Sebastian at Dulwich
was one of the most famous paintings in Britain. By 1900, its authenticity was doubted and it vanished into the storerooms. Only recently has scholarly fashion turned back. It is now on permanent view in a dramatic position, and this little exhibit brings together versions of the same subject by Reni from museums including Madrid's Prado and Rome's Capitoline.
Unfortunately, the comparison shows that Dulwich owns the
weakest example of the composition in which a young man stands tied to a tree, an arrow piercing his naked flank. In the Prado picture you sense the artist striving to imagine a living body from the inside. The Dulwich artist does not seem to think about anatomy with the same intelligence. The supposed proof that overrides such flaws and makes this perhaps the very first of Reni's Sebastians is a mark of drawing that shows him reconsidering the position of the saint's loincloth. I think it is a lot to hang on a glimpse of pubic hair. An own goal, then - but Dulwich is to be praised for demonstrating that the unjustly ridiculed Reni could be as powerful as Caravaggio. His saints dreamily looking upward have more than rosaries in their febrile thoughts.