Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wedekind
Assoc. Professor. Mem. ASME Theoretical Model of the
B. T. Beck
Graduate Student. Mixture-Vapor Transition Point
Oakland University.
Rochester, Mich. Oscillations Associated With
Two-Phase Evaporating Flow
Instabilities
A horizontal tube evaporator in which complete vaporization takes place can be divid-
ed into three distinct regions—a subcooled, a two-phase, and a superheat region. The
mixture-vapor transition point corresponds to the liquid film dry out point, and when en-
trainment is negligible, it represents the boundary between the two-phase and superheat
regions. Experimental evidence indicates that during what is conventionally accepted as
steady flow conditions, the motion of the mixture-vapor transition point is of an oscilla-
tory nature. Furthermore, not only are the oscillations random, but their statistical
characteristics can be represented by a modified Rayleigh distribution. This paper pre-
sents the formulation of a theoretical model which incorporates various deterministic
mechanisms, while at the same time includes the existence of a random phenomenon.
The model has the capability of predicting the influence of evaporator heat flux and
inlet flow quality on the statistical characteristics of the transition point oscillations.
Perhaps, the most significant potential of the proposed model is that it represents a first
step toward the formulation of some of the fundamental mechanisms associated with
two-phase evaporating flow instabilities on a statistical basis; a basis which appears to
be consistent with many of the experimental observations currently available.
'Mt)
yielding
pAt(h' -h)
dt 4 r-b-rt^w'V
dt 1 r 1 '" , ,. 1 ,' 1 -" dct„0
- dxA8)
Vx (
= ( / / - / ( ) (1 -x^nitlz, !),._„ (3)
Perturbation Analysis. The foregoing expression can be evaluated by integrating by
Void Fraction Perturbations. The foregoing model is extended parts; yielding after rearrangement
to include the oscillatory phenomenon by expressing the local 1
void fraction, a(z,t), in terms of a nonoscillatory and a perturba- -> {1 - (X;«,-)- J tt0(,V0)rf.Vtl} (9)
(1 - a { )
tion void fraction; thus
a(z,t) = a„{z, I) + ax{z, t) (4) Now, for a uniform heat flux, /„, the nonoscillatory flow quali-
where aQ(z,t) represents the local void fraction distribution if ty, xo, can be expressed in terms of the axial position in the evap-
orator, z. as follows:
there were no oscillations in the transition point, and a\(z,t) rep-
resents the local void fraction perturbations directly associated v 0 (z) = .*,. + (10)
l
with the random oscillations. mtii(h' -h) '*
Within the two-phase region, a spatial mean void fraction, a(t), Because of the way in which the mean position of the transition
can be approximated by point and the flow quality are defined, Xo = 1 when z = >), there-
1 ..; 1 ..»<» fore equation (10) can be used to yield
a (I) = cy„ •,(z,t)dz + ~-rr; \ ai(z,t)dz
>1 PA
(5) U-.v,) = i."; t.tOi'-h) -'? (11)
where r\(t) is the actual position of the transition point, and ij its
Using equations (10) and (11), and making a change of variables
mean position. In general, both could be functions of time, since,
from axial position in the evaporator to the corresponding flow
as was encountered in reference [5], the oscillations can be super-
quality, the nonoscillatory mean void fraction, do, from equation
imposed upon the mean transition point motion for both steady
(5) can be expressed as
and transient flow conditions. However, this paper is primarily
1 .l.ii
concerned with the mechanisms associated with the transition
^ = (1 _ r ) ' ^nU'oHvj, (12)
point oscillations. Therefore, what are conventionally accepted as
steady-state conditions are assumed to exist; the evaporator inlet The foregoing expression represents a means for calculating the
flow rate, mtj, inlet quality, xf, and evaporator heat flux, fQ, are nonoscillatory mean void fraction in conjunction with the avail-
assumed to be constant. Under these conditions, the mean transi- ability of a relationship between void fraction and flow quality
tion point position, fj, will be invariant with time, however, be- such as those suggested by Levy [6] and Fujie [7], These relation-
cause of the random process involved, its instantaneous position, ships are shown [5] to be in reasonable agreement with Hufsch-
rj(t), will be time dependent. midt's [8] experimental data for Refrigerant-12 flowing in hori-
Therefore, the mean nonoscillatory void fraction, do, is as- zontal tubes over a wide range of flow qualities.
sumed to be invariant with time and is the same quantity de- The combination of equations (9) and (12) yields the following
scribed in reference [5], However, because of its assumed relation- relationship between the nonoscillatory mean void fraction and
ship to the transition point oscillations, the mean void fraction the corresponding mean flow quality:
perturbation, ai(t), will be time dependent.
Flow Quality Perturbations. Considering the void fraction to
be a function of flow quality, the concept of a flow quality pertur-
bation would be consistent with the foregoing; thus It should be noted here that because of the way in which it is de-
fined, do ^ oto(xo).
x(z,l) =x„(z,l) +.v,(2,/) (6)
Relationship Between Mean Void Fraction Perturbations and
where x0(z,t) represents the local flow quality distribution if there Mean Flow Quality Perturbations. A relationship between the
were no oscillations in the transition point, and Xi(z,t) represents mean void fraction perturbation and mean flow quality perturba-
the local flow quality perturbations directly associated with the tion, ai(t) and ijrtj, respectively, can be obtained by assuming
random oscillations. that they are related in a manner similar to the way in which the
Since the flow quality and void fraction are directly related to nonoscillatory mean void fraction, do, is related to the nonoscilla-
each other, and since the mean void fraction, «, has already been tory mean flow quality, x 0 ; a concept consistent with perturba-
defined as a spatial mean, the mean flow quality, x, should be tion theory. This idea can be expressed analytically by utilizing
defined in a manner that is consistent with both interrelation- equation [13]; thus
ships. (1-a,'
Such a definition for mean flow quality could be of the form: a At) ^ *,(/) = -xAt) (14)
3.Vn ( 1-*,)
/ x0(a0)dn{l Fig. 2 graphically depicts the various relationships between void
W) = x„ ,(/) = fraction and flow quality that are presented in this section.
(1
Relationship Between Transition Point Oscillations and Mean
1
—, f xi(a,t)da (7) Flow Quality Perturbations. A relationship between the transi-
(1 -at) tion point oscillations and the mean flow quality perturbations is
where on is the inlet void fraction corresponding to the inlet flow developed by introducing the void fraction perturbation into the
where
( 1 / 2 ) (Try! (26)
and:
4<V
(4-; (27)
2
The transition point oscillations under consideration have been shown
[2] to have an assymetrical distribution. Physically, the transition point
does not oscillate as far downstream of its mean as it does upstream. It is
of interest to note that the contribution of the integral term in equation
(22) attempts to make the mean flow quality perturbations more symmet-
X, 0.4 0.6 ric than that of the transition point; although for the data presently under
Flow Quality, x
consideration, this effect appears to be negligible. It is possible, however,
that these effects cannot be neglected if the average heat flux in the do-
Fig. 2 Void fraction versus How quality relationships main of the transition point oscillations is high enough.
C o m p a r i s o n of T h e o r e t i c a l P r e d i c t i o n s With
Experimental Observations
The complexity of the phenomenon under consideration has
o o ^
0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 made it necessary to make a large number of approximating sim-
Transformed Mean How Qualify Perturbation, t, + 51. plifications in an effort to formulate a theoretical model which
Fig. 3 C o m p a r i s o n of s t a t i s t i c a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s w i t h t h o s e p r e d i c t e d by a
has any analytical usefulness. Therefore, the success of the result-
Rayleigh distribution ing model must be judged ultimately by its ability to predict the
outcome of the phenomenon, and to provide insight into the ef-
fects of various physical parameters associated with the phenom-
enon.
Effects of Evaporator Heat Flux on Transition Point Oscil-
Total Number of Data Pomts=6,000 lations. In the previous section, it was demonstrated that the
25 Experimental Tests mean flow quality perturbations are relatively invariant with
p=96psia i x , =0.00775 evaporator heat flux. Therefore, the theoretical model developed
7 = 0.000280 £=0.0148 earlier predicts that the amplitude of the transition point oscilla-
tions are inversely proportional to the evaporator heat flux. This
is expressed statistically in terms of the standard deviation by
Measured Data
Transtormation Constant, £
equation (24); thus
Standard Deviation, OL (1 - ) int>,.(/,'-/,)
5 0.2 *1 r t ;
RayleK^h Distribution (29)
(T^V) Tr
The ability of this model to predict the influence of evaporator
0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050
Transformed Mean Flow Quality Perturbation, £ + x.
heat flux on the transition point oscillations is demonstrated in
Fig. 5, where the predictions made by the foregoing model are
Fig. 4 Comparison of cumulative statistical characteristics with those of
compared to experimental data. In the theoretical curve present-
a Rayleigh distribution
ed, the mean flow quality perturbation statistics are based upon
the average statistics of all of the accumulated experimental
An important, implication of the ability of the transformed
data. The agreement which exists between the analytical and ex-
Rayleigh distribution to predict the statistical behavior of the
perimental results seems to speak for itself; especially when con-
mean flow quality perturbation, is that only one statistical pa-
sideration is given to the indirect experimental uncertainties
rameter, crin), is needed to specify the distribution. Unbiased es-
which are possible; not uncertainties in measuring the transition
timates of this parameter can be determined from experimental
point statistics, but in measuring parameters such as inlet flow
measurements of the mixture-vapor transition point oscillations
quality, heat flux, flowrate, etc., used in the model.
during steady state conditions. Only two such measurements are
Furthermore, it should be noted that the experimental statisti-
needed, the mean value, i), and the standard deviation of the
cal characteristics necessary to analytically predict the random
transition point about its mean, a„.
characteristics of the mean flow quality perturbations for the
With the foregoing density function, the distribution function
for the mean flow quality perturbation can be expressed as:
2
= 1 - exp (t + -V,) (28)
Using the experimental data [2] on the transition point oscilla-
tions, it was possible, by using equation (23), to obtain approxi-
mately 15,000 values for the mean flow quality perturbation,
Xt(t). for 25 different tests. These tests involved the same evapora-
tor geometry, the same refrigerant and mass flow rate, but were
for a variety of evaporator heat fluxes and inlet flow qualities.
The evaporator geometry consisted of five 6 ft long, 0.292 inch II)
glass tubes arranged in a serpentine configuration. Refrigerant-12
was used at a flowrate of 1.8 lb„,/min. Inlet flow qualities and
heat fluxes ranged from 0-30 percent, and 3200-9100 Btu/hr-ft, 2
respectively.
Consistent with the theoretical model, all of this experimental
data were assumed to come from the same random sample.
Heat Flux, f q , Btu/hr-fr
Therefore, such statistical parameters and characteristics as its
standard deviation, frequency of occurrence, and cumulative fre- Fig. 5 Influence of heat flux on transition point oscillations
Saturated Refrigerant - 12
Fujie's Void Fraction Mode! [7]
Estimated Experimental
Uncertainty Bands
Inlet Flow Quality, x, Fig. 7 Influence of inlet flow quality on transition point oscillations
Fig. 6 Influence of inlet flow quality on liquid fraction ratio
/
ERRATA