The capacity of an ecosystem to adapt to a disturbance and how swiftly it recovers is known as

ecological resilience. For me, there are two main methods to evaluate this type of resilience. One is by
looking at how long it takes for an ecosystem to go back to its stable state after a disturbance, and the
other is by looking at how efficiently a system can embrace these changes while preserving its function
and composition.

In our place, human activities such as pesticide use, the introduction of exotic plants, and
pollution are examples of disturbances and disruptions that may thwart the resilience of the ecosystem.
If the ecosystem is not resilient enough, that is, if it is vulnerable, the benefits that humans obtain from
the ecosystem may be lost. Further, these disturbances can have a significant impact on the ecosystem,
forcing it to cross a threshold with a different set of processes and structures. Thus, the resilience of an
ecosystem is acknowledged to be important to human society as well as the various organisms living in
it.

Overall, resilience is mostly a beneficial trait, especially when it comes to a system's capacity to
function amidst disruption. Species have thrived and survived for thousands of years because of this
resilience, and man-made events and behaviors should continue to encourage and promote it rather
than suppress it or worsen its adverse effects among various organisms to maintain harmony and
balance within the environment.